Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
CODE PROJECT For Those Who Code
  • Home
  • Articles
  • FAQ
Community
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. Another opinion on France as an Ally

Another opinion on France as an Ally

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
comquestion
50 Posts 9 Posters 4 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • K KaRl

    João Paulo Figueira wrote: The national soldiers would be serving whom? Europe. João Paulo Figueira wrote: Which nation would be in charge? Europe. João Paulo Figueira wrote: Serving what political and economical interests? European ones. It's possible, just a political will. We, citizen, have to convince our leaders.


    I'm sorry about our waffling on Iraq. I mean,when you're going up against a crazed dictator,you wanna have your friends by your side. I realize it took more than 2 years before you guys pitched in against Hitler,but that was different. Everyone knew he had weapons

    J Offline
    J Offline
    Joao Paulo Figueira
    wrote on last edited by
    #36

    I hope you are right. Maybe I'm already too cinical to believe...

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • K KaRl

      I don't think a country will be crazy enough to use chemical or biological weapons to attack a nuclear power. For France it has always been clear, such an attack could be considered the same as a nuclear one and would retaliate nuclearly. Iraq had these WMD in 1991, and didn't use them. Not for moral reasons, ask to the Iranians. It's too easy to create chemical and biological weapons, individuals are able to do it, and here is IMHO the greatest danger. Individuals are not sensible to the MAD theory. So, IMHO, the first objective is to eradicate terrorism. And AFAIK, when I think terrorism, I don't think to Iraq first. Doug Goulden wrote: the French government would organize opposition to the US attack on Iraq You're "booleanising". France opposes to a war as long as there no real proof of resistance. If SH had refused to destroy his missiles, France would IMHO have changed immediatly its stance. Doug Goulden wrote: I think its a sad acceptance that the world is a smaller and more dangerous place. The rest of the world was already a dangerous place, <sarcasm>welcome to the club</sarcasm> :(


      I'm sorry about our waffling on Iraq. I mean,when you're going up against a crazed dictator,you wanna have your friends by your side. I realize it took more than 2 years before you guys pitched in against Hitler,but that was different. Everyone knew he had weapons

      D Offline
      D Offline
      Doug Goulden
      wrote on last edited by
      #37

      KaЯl wrote: You're "booleanising". France opposes to a war as long as there no real proof of resistance. If SH had refused to destroy his missiles, France would IMHO have changed immediatly its stance I honestly don't think so,France hasn't addressed the idea that SH is still making more of the missles he is destroying. And I don't hear outrage about him having the drones with a 500 km range.... I can believe that you would expect your government to react that way, but I am sceptical. KaЯl wrote: Iraq had these WMD in 1991, and didn't use them. Not for moral reasons, ask to the Iranians. It's too easy to create chemical and biological weapons, individuals are able to do it, and here is IMHO the greatest danger. Individuals are not sensible to the MAD theory. So, IMHO, the first objective is to eradicate terrorism. And AFAIK, when I think terrorism, I don't think to Iraq first I completely agree that individuals aren't responsive to the idea of MAD. But SH and his family, seem almost more of a cult of personality. The Soviet Union or China although they have been the US adversaries never really showed they were in any hurry to die over their beliefs. In that respect MAD did work, they (the USSR epecially) never saw any gain in attacking. SH on the other hand destroys the things around him as a last result. Look at the oil well fires and the oil he dumped into the Persian Gulf. Look at the fact that not only did he gas the Iranians, he gassed the Kurds. IMHO its not much of a stretch to see him provide the weapons he has in limited quanities to terrorists. The Saudi's have made bargains with more radical elements to strengthen their own position with their people, SH could do the same either overtly or covertly. I really doubt that we will ever know the details about how much support SH has provided either Hamaas or Al Quada , but I do buy into the idea we should take the threat seriously. Uptight Ex-Military Republican married to a Commie Lib - How weird is that?

      K 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • K KaRl

        IMHO both :laugh:


        I'm sorry about our waffling on Iraq. I mean,when you're going up against a crazed dictator,you wanna have your friends by your side. I realize it took more than 2 years before you guys pitched in against Hitler,but that was different. Everyone knew he had weapons

        D Offline
        D Offline
        Doug Goulden
        wrote on last edited by
        #38

        Man I'm bummed I have to travel out of town tommorrow, I had a really good idea for my thread tommorrow.... Top 10 reasons to dislike the French :omg:;);P Uptight Ex-Military Republican married to a Commie Lib - How weird is that?

        K 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • D Doug Goulden

          Man I'm bummed I have to travel out of town tommorrow, I had a really good idea for my thread tommorrow.... Top 10 reasons to dislike the French :omg:;);P Uptight Ex-Military Republican married to a Commie Lib - How weird is that?

          K Offline
          K Offline
          KaRl
          wrote on last edited by
          #39

          Letterman is a pilar of american culture :)


          I'm sorry about our waffling on Iraq. I mean,when you're going up against a crazed dictator,you wanna have your friends by your side. I realize it took more than 2 years before you guys pitched in against Hitler,but that was different. Everyone knew he had weapons

          D 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • K KaRl

            Letterman is a pilar of american culture :)


            I'm sorry about our waffling on Iraq. I mean,when you're going up against a crazed dictator,you wanna have your friends by your side. I realize it took more than 2 years before you guys pitched in against Hitler,but that was different. Everyone knew he had weapons

            D Offline
            D Offline
            Doug Goulden
            wrote on last edited by
            #40

            Thats scary all by itself :laugh: I was going to solicit input but start with 1. French Poodles 2. Women with hairy armpits 3. Prissy looking berets ..... The list could get long ;) Have a nice night I have to stop pretending to work and go do some woodworking. Uptight Ex-Military Republican married to a Commie Lib - How weird is that?

            K 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • D Doug Goulden

              KaЯl wrote: You're "booleanising". France opposes to a war as long as there no real proof of resistance. If SH had refused to destroy his missiles, France would IMHO have changed immediatly its stance I honestly don't think so,France hasn't addressed the idea that SH is still making more of the missles he is destroying. And I don't hear outrage about him having the drones with a 500 km range.... I can believe that you would expect your government to react that way, but I am sceptical. KaЯl wrote: Iraq had these WMD in 1991, and didn't use them. Not for moral reasons, ask to the Iranians. It's too easy to create chemical and biological weapons, individuals are able to do it, and here is IMHO the greatest danger. Individuals are not sensible to the MAD theory. So, IMHO, the first objective is to eradicate terrorism. And AFAIK, when I think terrorism, I don't think to Iraq first I completely agree that individuals aren't responsive to the idea of MAD. But SH and his family, seem almost more of a cult of personality. The Soviet Union or China although they have been the US adversaries never really showed they were in any hurry to die over their beliefs. In that respect MAD did work, they (the USSR epecially) never saw any gain in attacking. SH on the other hand destroys the things around him as a last result. Look at the oil well fires and the oil he dumped into the Persian Gulf. Look at the fact that not only did he gas the Iranians, he gassed the Kurds. IMHO its not much of a stretch to see him provide the weapons he has in limited quanities to terrorists. The Saudi's have made bargains with more radical elements to strengthen their own position with their people, SH could do the same either overtly or covertly. I really doubt that we will ever know the details about how much support SH has provided either Hamaas or Al Quada , but I do buy into the idea we should take the threat seriously. Uptight Ex-Military Republican married to a Commie Lib - How weird is that?

              K Offline
              K Offline
              KaRl
              wrote on last edited by
              #41

              Doug Goulden wrote: SH is still making more of the missles he is destroying. And I don't hear outrage about him having the drones with a 500 km range Have you any proof for your assertions? not secret evidences, but real ones. There are several motives to explain the opposition to a war. Some are deeply pacifists, some don't believe the case is made to justify a war. There's no invasion, no attack, and SH does what the inspectors ask. Change that and the position of the majority will change. And please, don't Forget France is not alone, quiet every country thnks like us. We are here acting like a symbol, and we like that ;P And please, don't believe in the lie saying that France is trying to regain a first-place classe in the world. I know the majority of the american believe this, but frankly, nobody here talks or thinks about this. Doug Goulden wrote: MAD. But SH and his family, seem almost more of a cult of personality Look at NK, there are masters in this game. And their atrocities are similar in horror to what the Nazis made. They have WMD. They will have H bombs. But they deserve a "multilateral approach". :wtf:! If you say SH has to be removed, I totally agree, as quiet anybody here. But it's another question. For the moment, the subject is the disarmament of Iraq. And this subject is progressing now. A war could have uncalculable consequences, for everybody, we have to be sure. If we decide to remove dictators through the world, we'll have to do a lot of work. First, let's make a list, and next agree on the means. Chinese and some others will be delighted.


              I'm sorry about our waffling on Iraq. I mean,when you're going up against a crazed dictator,you wanna have your friends by your side. I realize it took more than 2 years before you guys pitched in against Hitler,but that was different. Everyone knew he had weapons

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • D Doug Goulden

                Thats scary all by itself :laugh: I was going to solicit input but start with 1. French Poodles 2. Women with hairy armpits 3. Prissy looking berets ..... The list could get long ;) Have a nice night I have to stop pretending to work and go do some woodworking. Uptight Ex-Military Republican married to a Commie Lib - How weird is that?

                K Offline
                K Offline
                KaRl
                wrote on last edited by
                #42

                Doug Goulden wrote: Have a nice night I have to stop pretending to work and go do some woodworking. Thanks, I need it :zzz: Have a nice day :)


                I'm sorry about our waffling on Iraq. I mean,when you're going up against a crazed dictator,you wanna have your friends by your side. I realize it took more than 2 years before you guys pitched in against Hitler,but that was different. Everyone knew he had weapons

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • K KaRl

                  João Paulo Figueira wrote: Reliance on foreign military help seems to be a vital need. You're right, so what about building an european army? We are big enough to protect ourselves, without having to ask to the US to play the big brother! I thought it was the way followed by Portugal, after the buy of 3 A400M. BTW, do you see any threat of invasion? Which country could invade you?


                  I'm sorry about our waffling on Iraq. I mean,when you're going up against a crazed dictator,you wanna have your friends by your side. I realize it took more than 2 years before you guys pitched in against Hitler,but that was different. Everyone knew he had weapons

                  J Offline
                  J Offline
                  jan larsen
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #43

                  Kaßl wrote: You're right, so what about building an european army? Isn't that what the Western Union is all about?, I don't know much about the military cooperation in EU, because Denmark is currently not taking part in that. "After all it's just text at the end of the day. - Colin Davies "For example, when a VB programmer comes to my house, they may say 'does your pool need cleaning, sir ?' " - Christian Graus

                  K 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • J jan larsen

                    Kaßl wrote: You're right, so what about building an european army? Isn't that what the Western Union is all about?, I don't know much about the military cooperation in EU, because Denmark is currently not taking part in that. "After all it's just text at the end of the day. - Colin Davies "For example, when a VB programmer comes to my house, they may say 'does your pool need cleaning, sir ?' " - Christian Graus

                    K Offline
                    K Offline
                    KaRl
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #44

                    The problem is some european countries see the creation of an european army as a weakening of the NATO, and fear they would loose the protection of the US umbrella.


                    Angels banished from heaven have no choice but to become demons Cowboy Bebop

                    J 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • K KaRl

                      The problem is some european countries see the creation of an european army as a weakening of the NATO, and fear they would loose the protection of the US umbrella.


                      Angels banished from heaven have no choice but to become demons Cowboy Bebop

                      J Offline
                      J Offline
                      jan larsen
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #45

                      As I see it: France and UK have enough firepower to fight of any known potential enemy, and combined with the troops and weapons delivered by minor states like Sweden and Denmark, there is really no reason to fear loss of security. US is currently showing that they have other interests than their NATO partners, and that they are willing to pursue their goals even if it would destroy UN and/or NATO. I think we should consider those facts, and immediately start to work on an alternative. "After all it's just text at the end of the day. - Colin Davies "For example, when a VB programmer comes to my house, they may say 'does your pool need cleaning, sir ?' " - Christian Graus

                      K 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • J jan larsen

                        As I see it: France and UK have enough firepower to fight of any known potential enemy, and combined with the troops and weapons delivered by minor states like Sweden and Denmark, there is really no reason to fear loss of security. US is currently showing that they have other interests than their NATO partners, and that they are willing to pursue their goals even if it would destroy UN and/or NATO. I think we should consider those facts, and immediately start to work on an alternative. "After all it's just text at the end of the day. - Colin Davies "For example, when a VB programmer comes to my house, they may say 'does your pool need cleaning, sir ?' " - Christian Graus

                        K Offline
                        K Offline
                        KaRl
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #46

                        I totally agree with your vision, but I'm not the one to be convinced :) What's the opinion in Denmark about the current crisis? What's the position of your government?


                        Angels banished from heaven have no choice but to become demons Cowboy Bebop

                        J 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • K KaRl

                          I totally agree with your vision, but I'm not the one to be convinced :) What's the opinion in Denmark about the current crisis? What's the position of your government?


                          Angels banished from heaven have no choice but to become demons Cowboy Bebop

                          J Offline
                          J Offline
                          jan larsen
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #47

                          The public opinion is against a war not sanctioned by UN, I haven't seen any polls, but I suspect more than half to be against such a war. But our prime minister hasn't promised not to join US, UK, Spain and Portugal if they attack, and we have allready send a frigate and a submarine to a district where Danish warships certainly not belong. "After all it's just text at the end of the day. - Colin Davies "For example, when a VB programmer comes to my house, they may say 'does your pool need cleaning, sir ?' " - Christian Graus

                          K 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • J jan larsen

                            The public opinion is against a war not sanctioned by UN, I haven't seen any polls, but I suspect more than half to be against such a war. But our prime minister hasn't promised not to join US, UK, Spain and Portugal if they attack, and we have allready send a frigate and a submarine to a district where Danish warships certainly not belong. "After all it's just text at the end of the day. - Colin Davies "For example, when a VB programmer comes to my house, they may say 'does your pool need cleaning, sir ?' " - Christian Graus

                            K Offline
                            K Offline
                            KaRl
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #48

                            Thanks for all these explanations :) Denmark signed the "letter of the 8" with Britain, Spain, Italy, Portugal, Hungary, the Czech Republic and Poland, didn't it? What's your opinion on it?


                            Angels banished from heaven have no choice but to become demons Cowboy Bebop

                            J 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • K KaRl

                              Thanks for all these explanations :) Denmark signed the "letter of the 8" with Britain, Spain, Italy, Portugal, Hungary, the Czech Republic and Poland, didn't it? What's your opinion on it?


                              Angels banished from heaven have no choice but to become demons Cowboy Bebop

                              J Offline
                              J Offline
                              jan larsen
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #49

                              I think it was spitting in the eye of the EU, and what makes it worse, is that our current government consists of the two parties that are most pro EU :wtf: I can assure you, that it wasn't very popular, and the government has tried to stay low ever since, and they have been very vague in their comments. "After all it's just text at the end of the day. - Colin Davies "For example, when a VB programmer comes to my house, they may say 'does your pool need cleaning, sir ?' " - Christian Graus

                              K 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • J jan larsen

                                I think it was spitting in the eye of the EU, and what makes it worse, is that our current government consists of the two parties that are most pro EU :wtf: I can assure you, that it wasn't very popular, and the government has tried to stay low ever since, and they have been very vague in their comments. "After all it's just text at the end of the day. - Colin Davies "For example, when a VB programmer comes to my house, they may say 'does your pool need cleaning, sir ?' " - Christian Graus

                                K Offline
                                K Offline
                                KaRl
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #50

                                Thx again. It's a pleasure to see other people in Europe than French or German may believe in an European dream :)


                                Angels banished from heaven have no choice but to become demons Cowboy Bebop

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                Reply
                                • Reply as topic
                                Log in to reply
                                • Oldest to Newest
                                • Newest to Oldest
                                • Most Votes


                                • Login

                                • Don't have an account? Register

                                • Login or register to search.
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                0
                                • Categories
                                • Recent
                                • Tags
                                • Popular
                                • World
                                • Users
                                • Groups