Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Weird and The Wonderful
  4. It's Primes as far as the eye can see!

It's Primes as far as the eye can see!

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Weird and The Wonderful
question
44 Posts 12 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • N newton saber

    All odd numbers are prime, right? Let me check. Yep, all odd numbers are prime. Makes it a lot easier to count by the primes. Also, are there more odd numbers or even numbers? I know the answer, but it's a puzzle for you.

    P Offline
    P Offline
    PIEBALDconsult
    wrote on last edited by
    #9

    newton.saber wrote:

    All odd numbers are prime, right?

    No, primes aren't just any odd number.

    N 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Z ZurdoDev

      OriginalGriff wrote:

      call me old fashioned, but in my day, 9, 15 and 21 were divisible by 3

      Ya, but that's also back when Pluto was a planet. We live in a very different place now. This user submitted this in QA, got closed, and resubmitted it in QA. I told him to post as a tip but apparently he didn't realize some explanation should be added. Or, the important part, THAT IT SHOULD WORK! :laugh:

      There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.

      D Offline
      D Offline
      DaveAuld
      wrote on last edited by
      #10

      RyanDev wrote:

      but that's also back when Pluto was a planet

      There was a thing on the telly recently that stated it had been voted back in as a planet.

      Dave Find Me On:Web|Facebook|Twitter|LinkedIn Folding Stats: Team CodeProject

      Z P N 3 Replies Last reply
      0
      • D DaveAuld

        RyanDev wrote:

        but that's also back when Pluto was a planet

        There was a thing on the telly recently that stated it had been voted back in as a planet.

        Dave Find Me On:Web|Facebook|Twitter|LinkedIn Folding Stats: Team CodeProject

        Z Offline
        Z Offline
        ZurdoDev
        wrote on last edited by
        #11

        True fans never gave up hope. :thumbsup::thumbsup:

        There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

          This is the whole of a would-be Tip submitted today:

          public class Class1
          {
          static void Main(string[] args)
          {
          Console.WriteLine("Enter a Number");
          int num = int.Parse(Console.ReadLine());
          for (int i = 1; i <=num ; i++)
          {
          if(i==2)
          Console.WriteLine(2);

                      if (i % 2 != 0)
                      {
                          Console.WriteLine(i);
                      }
                  }
          
               }
          }
          

          No text, no explanation - the author (I can only assume he works for Mindfire, it's about their level) clearly felt that it spoke for itself. And boy, does it ever! This, ladies-n-gentlemen, is a Prime Number generator according to the author. So...I tried it... According to this code, the prime numbers under 26 are:

          1
          2
          3
          5
          7
          9
          11
          13
          15
          17
          19
          21
          23
          25

          Now, call me old fashioned, but in my day, 9, 15 and 21 were divisible by 3, and both 15 and 25 were divisible by 5... So which is wrong? The Code? Or the Laws of Mathematics? Only the author can tell... :laugh:

          Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...

          P Offline
          P Offline
          PIEBALDconsult
          wrote on last edited by
          #12

          At least he used the % operator rather than implementing his own function.

          OriginalGriffO I 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • P PIEBALDconsult

            At least he used the % operator rather than implementing his own function.

            OriginalGriffO Online
            OriginalGriffO Online
            OriginalGriff
            wrote on last edited by
            #13

            I suspect luck was involved.

            Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...

            "I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
            "Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • P PIEBALDconsult

              At least he used the % operator rather than implementing his own function.

              I Offline
              I Offline
              Ian Shlasko
              wrote on last edited by
              #14

              Yeah, it could have been worse...

              public static bool SeeIfNumberIsOdd(int i)
              {
              for (int n = i; n > 0; n--)
              {
              if (n==1)
              return true;
              else if (n==2)
              return false;
              }
              return true;
              }

              That felt dirty to write... Ok, I probably could have made it a LITTLE worse... Maybe O(n^2), but that might be gratuitous.

              Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
              Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels)

              P 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • I Ian Shlasko

                Yeah, it could have been worse...

                public static bool SeeIfNumberIsOdd(int i)
                {
                for (int n = i; n > 0; n--)
                {
                if (n==1)
                return true;
                else if (n==2)
                return false;
                }
                return true;
                }

                That felt dirty to write... Ok, I probably could have made it a LITTLE worse... Maybe O(n^2), but that might be gratuitous.

                Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
                Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels)

                P Offline
                P Offline
                PIEBALDconsult
                wrote on last edited by
                #15

                See the mod function in here: http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/ArticleVersion.aspx?aid=830657[^]

                I 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • P PIEBALDconsult

                  See the mod function in here: http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/ArticleVersion.aspx?aid=830657[^]

                  I Offline
                  I Offline
                  Ian Shlasko
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #16

                  Bah, I can do better than that!

                  //TODO: Remove all comments before publishing. Real programmers don't need comments!
                  public function SuperMod(int n, int o) // o is a great variable, because it looks like a zero
                  {
                  int p = o; //Shorter variable names make the code run faster!
                  loopy: //Labels make me feel young again!
                  while (p < n) p += o;
                  if (p < n) goto loopy; //Just in case the compiler makes a mistake
                  int answer = p - n;
                  return answer;
                  }

                  Ok, I think that's about as bad as I can make it, and though I didn't test it at all (Honestly, I think the compiler would come to life and slit my throat for even trying to execute this monstrosity), that should technically give the right answer... Unless 'o' is negative or zero, but validating parameters is so 20th century...

                  Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
                  Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels)

                  P B 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • I Ian Shlasko

                    Bah, I can do better than that!

                    //TODO: Remove all comments before publishing. Real programmers don't need comments!
                    public function SuperMod(int n, int o) // o is a great variable, because it looks like a zero
                    {
                    int p = o; //Shorter variable names make the code run faster!
                    loopy: //Labels make me feel young again!
                    while (p < n) p += o;
                    if (p < n) goto loopy; //Just in case the compiler makes a mistake
                    int answer = p - n;
                    return answer;
                    }

                    Ok, I think that's about as bad as I can make it, and though I didn't test it at all (Honestly, I think the compiler would come to life and slit my throat for even trying to execute this monstrosity), that should technically give the right answer... Unless 'o' is negative or zero, but validating parameters is so 20th century...

                    Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
                    Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels)

                    P Offline
                    P Offline
                    PIEBALDconsult
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #17

                    Ian Shlasko wrote:

                    give the right an answer

                    FTFY

                    I 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • P PIEBALDconsult

                      newton.saber wrote:

                      All odd numbers are prime, right?

                      No, primes aren't just any odd number.

                      N Offline
                      N Offline
                      newton saber
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #18

                      PIEBALDconsult wrote:

                      No, primes aren't just any odd number.

                      Of course they are. It's ridiculous to think that they aren't.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

                        newton.saber wrote:

                        it's a puzzle for you.

                        Not really: there are an infinite quantity of each. The way we define "more", "less", and "equal" for infinite quantities is as follows. For two collections A and B (say A are the even numbers and B are the odd numbers) we say that If you can associate every item in A with a unique item in B, and vice versa, then A and B are the same size. If you can associate every item in A with a unique item in B, but not vice versa, then B is bigger than A. If you can associate every item in B with a unique item in A, but not vice versa, then A is bigger than B. In this case you can associate every even number n with the odd number n+1, and you can associate every odd number m with the even number m−1 (assuming 0 is even) so therefore there are just as many odd numbers as even numbers.

                        Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...

                        N Offline
                        N Offline
                        newton saber
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #19

                        This is terribly incorrect, because I stopped counting on an odd number, so there are more odd numbers than even. Thank you for your input. :D

                        P 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

                          This is the whole of a would-be Tip submitted today:

                          public class Class1
                          {
                          static void Main(string[] args)
                          {
                          Console.WriteLine("Enter a Number");
                          int num = int.Parse(Console.ReadLine());
                          for (int i = 1; i <=num ; i++)
                          {
                          if(i==2)
                          Console.WriteLine(2);

                                      if (i % 2 != 0)
                                      {
                                          Console.WriteLine(i);
                                      }
                                  }
                          
                               }
                          }
                          

                          No text, no explanation - the author (I can only assume he works for Mindfire, it's about their level) clearly felt that it spoke for itself. And boy, does it ever! This, ladies-n-gentlemen, is a Prime Number generator according to the author. So...I tried it... According to this code, the prime numbers under 26 are:

                          1
                          2
                          3
                          5
                          7
                          9
                          11
                          13
                          15
                          17
                          19
                          21
                          23
                          25

                          Now, call me old fashioned, but in my day, 9, 15 and 21 were divisible by 3, and both 15 and 25 were divisible by 5... So which is wrong? The Code? Or the Laws of Mathematics? Only the author can tell... :laugh:

                          Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...

                          P Offline
                          P Offline
                          PIEBALDconsult
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #20

                          http://www.codeproject.com/Lounge.aspx?msg=85311#xx85311xx[^] http://www.codeproject.com/search.aspx?q=prime+number+error&categoryid=f1_1159_[^]

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

                            This is the whole of a would-be Tip submitted today:

                            public class Class1
                            {
                            static void Main(string[] args)
                            {
                            Console.WriteLine("Enter a Number");
                            int num = int.Parse(Console.ReadLine());
                            for (int i = 1; i <=num ; i++)
                            {
                            if(i==2)
                            Console.WriteLine(2);

                                        if (i % 2 != 0)
                                        {
                                            Console.WriteLine(i);
                                        }
                                    }
                            
                                 }
                            }
                            

                            No text, no explanation - the author (I can only assume he works for Mindfire, it's about their level) clearly felt that it spoke for itself. And boy, does it ever! This, ladies-n-gentlemen, is a Prime Number generator according to the author. So...I tried it... According to this code, the prime numbers under 26 are:

                            1
                            2
                            3
                            5
                            7
                            9
                            11
                            13
                            15
                            17
                            19
                            21
                            23
                            25

                            Now, call me old fashioned, but in my day, 9, 15 and 21 were divisible by 3, and both 15 and 25 were divisible by 5... So which is wrong? The Code? Or the Laws of Mathematics? Only the author can tell... :laugh:

                            Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...

                            P Offline
                            P Offline
                            PhilLenoir
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #21

                            That's odd!

                            Life is like a s**t sandwich; the more bread you have, the less s**t you eat.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • D DaveAuld

                              RyanDev wrote:

                              but that's also back when Pluto was a planet

                              There was a thing on the telly recently that stated it had been voted back in as a planet.

                              Dave Find Me On:Web|Facebook|Twitter|LinkedIn Folding Stats: Team CodeProject

                              P Offline
                              P Offline
                              PhilLenoir
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #22

                              That's democracy for you!

                              Life is like a s**t sandwich; the more bread you have, the less s**t you eat.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • P PIEBALDconsult

                                Ian Shlasko wrote:

                                give the right an answer

                                FTFY

                                I Offline
                                I Offline
                                Ian Shlasko
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #23

                                Heh, yeah, you're right... It needs to be n+o-p... But hey, what's the point of testing when you're trying to write the worst code possible? (Still haven't tested... I was going to, but the compiler pulled a knife on me and said some very non-KSS things would happen if I tried)

                                Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
                                Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels)

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • I Ian Shlasko

                                  Bah, I can do better than that!

                                  //TODO: Remove all comments before publishing. Real programmers don't need comments!
                                  public function SuperMod(int n, int o) // o is a great variable, because it looks like a zero
                                  {
                                  int p = o; //Shorter variable names make the code run faster!
                                  loopy: //Labels make me feel young again!
                                  while (p < n) p += o;
                                  if (p < n) goto loopy; //Just in case the compiler makes a mistake
                                  int answer = p - n;
                                  return answer;
                                  }

                                  Ok, I think that's about as bad as I can make it, and though I didn't test it at all (Honestly, I think the compiler would come to life and slit my throat for even trying to execute this monstrosity), that should technically give the right answer... Unless 'o' is negative or zero, but validating parameters is so 20th century...

                                  Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
                                  Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels)

                                  B Offline
                                  B Offline
                                  Bert Mitton
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #24

                                  Cut and pasted ! :laugh:

                                  I 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • B Bert Mitton

                                    Cut and pasted ! :laugh:

                                    I Offline
                                    I Offline
                                    Ian Shlasko
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #25

                                    Ok, but if you're gonna use that code, make sure to either fix the bug, or... uh... only test with (4,2).

                                    Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
                                    Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels)

                                    B 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • N newton saber

                                      This is terribly incorrect, because I stopped counting on an odd number, so there are more odd numbers than even. Thank you for your input. :D

                                      P Offline
                                      P Offline
                                      PIEBALDconsult
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #26

                                      You might get a more accurate result if you start at infinity and count backward.

                                      N 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • P PIEBALDconsult

                                        You might get a more accurate result if you start at infinity and count backward.

                                        N Offline
                                        N Offline
                                        newton saber
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #27

                                        PIEBALDconsult wrote:

                                        You might get a more accurate result if you start at infinity and count backward

                                        Great idea. I'm working on this now. :D

                                        OriginalGriffO 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • D DaveAuld

                                          RyanDev wrote:

                                          but that's also back when Pluto was a planet

                                          There was a thing on the telly recently that stated it had been voted back in as a planet.

                                          Dave Find Me On:Web|Facebook|Twitter|LinkedIn Folding Stats: Team CodeProject

                                          N Offline
                                          N Offline
                                          newton saber
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #28

                                          DaveAuld wrote:

                                          it had been voted back in as a planet

                                          That is such a coincidence because I've just been voted in as a planet too. Very cool. I hope to be voted in as a Sun one day so I can go by the name Apollo. It's such a cool name. Plus then all you people will have to rotate around me and I'll be the center of your Universe. Yes, the sun is the center of the Universe. I pre-emptively struck on your future humor that I didn't know that the sun was the center of a solar system. Wham!

                                          D 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups