Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. Michael Parenti's Opinion on War in Iraq

Michael Parenti's Opinion on War in Iraq

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
9 Posts 6 Posters 3 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    Robert Buldoc
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    I just found out Michael Parenti has published an article on US war with Iraq. http://www.michaelparenti.org/IRAQGeorge2.htm[^] I hope this article enlighten those who haven't learned way to analyze what they are being fed. PS. I learned about Michael Parenti in my Academic Writting class, and now I am a big fan of him!

    R S 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • R Robert Buldoc

      I just found out Michael Parenti has published an article on US war with Iraq. http://www.michaelparenti.org/IRAQGeorge2.htm[^] I hope this article enlighten those who haven't learned way to analyze what they are being fed. PS. I learned about Michael Parenti in my Academic Writting class, and now I am a big fan of him!

      R Offline
      R Offline
      ROK_RShadow
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      You have said that people need to be enlighten ( I don't know if that is a word. but I think I know what you mean) and able to analyze what they are being fed. I read the article from Michael Parenti, and I believe it to be bias to war opposition. Yes, there are some wrong reasons for going to war with Iraq. Oil being one of them. No doubt that higher up officials looked at oil as a benefit to going to war. But it is not a single reason. Nor do I believe it to be the ultimate reason. No matter how much our country may or may not want oil, I don't think we are willing to sacrafice our soldiers lives for it. Robert have you ever served in a Military Unit? Have you ever served your country? It seems that you are painting a picture of war hungry americans that are determined on taking over a country for its oil, and killing anything that gets in our way. This is not true. We are going out of our way (more so than most countries would) to protect non combatant lives. In Post war Iraq in fact the United States has plans to slowly release the control over the country back to its people. Just like we did in Afganistan. We will hold contracts on oil in Iraq after the war. Most likely.. who wouldn't? The French who are opposed to the war and think it is wrong, are allready complaining because they will not have any oil contracts in Iraq. It seems to me the French are more interested in the Oil than America. -------------------------------------------------------- IMHO: C# a poor attempt at bringing C++ to the VB masses --------------------------------------------------------

      A D 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • R ROK_RShadow

        You have said that people need to be enlighten ( I don't know if that is a word. but I think I know what you mean) and able to analyze what they are being fed. I read the article from Michael Parenti, and I believe it to be bias to war opposition. Yes, there are some wrong reasons for going to war with Iraq. Oil being one of them. No doubt that higher up officials looked at oil as a benefit to going to war. But it is not a single reason. Nor do I believe it to be the ultimate reason. No matter how much our country may or may not want oil, I don't think we are willing to sacrafice our soldiers lives for it. Robert have you ever served in a Military Unit? Have you ever served your country? It seems that you are painting a picture of war hungry americans that are determined on taking over a country for its oil, and killing anything that gets in our way. This is not true. We are going out of our way (more so than most countries would) to protect non combatant lives. In Post war Iraq in fact the United States has plans to slowly release the control over the country back to its people. Just like we did in Afganistan. We will hold contracts on oil in Iraq after the war. Most likely.. who wouldn't? The French who are opposed to the war and think it is wrong, are allready complaining because they will not have any oil contracts in Iraq. It seems to me the French are more interested in the Oil than America. -------------------------------------------------------- IMHO: C# a poor attempt at bringing C++ to the VB masses --------------------------------------------------------

        A Offline
        A Offline
        Anthony_Yio
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Germany also in against the US attack but Germany is not within the concession with Baghdad oil supply. No matter what the reason was. WAR is always not a good resolution. And that is why we have UN. remember? Peace no war

        J 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • R ROK_RShadow

          You have said that people need to be enlighten ( I don't know if that is a word. but I think I know what you mean) and able to analyze what they are being fed. I read the article from Michael Parenti, and I believe it to be bias to war opposition. Yes, there are some wrong reasons for going to war with Iraq. Oil being one of them. No doubt that higher up officials looked at oil as a benefit to going to war. But it is not a single reason. Nor do I believe it to be the ultimate reason. No matter how much our country may or may not want oil, I don't think we are willing to sacrafice our soldiers lives for it. Robert have you ever served in a Military Unit? Have you ever served your country? It seems that you are painting a picture of war hungry americans that are determined on taking over a country for its oil, and killing anything that gets in our way. This is not true. We are going out of our way (more so than most countries would) to protect non combatant lives. In Post war Iraq in fact the United States has plans to slowly release the control over the country back to its people. Just like we did in Afganistan. We will hold contracts on oil in Iraq after the war. Most likely.. who wouldn't? The French who are opposed to the war and think it is wrong, are allready complaining because they will not have any oil contracts in Iraq. It seems to me the French are more interested in the Oil than America. -------------------------------------------------------- IMHO: C# a poor attempt at bringing C++ to the VB masses --------------------------------------------------------

          D Offline
          D Offline
          DODO
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Well,I think what you are saying is 1.Angel America is paying billions of dolars and the lives of many soldiers to save the Iraqi people from sadam -as they are saving the good sharon from the palastinians by paying him billions and giving him weapons to defend him self againest thoses monesters children with rocks- same point of view of course 2.America in its current situation dont need oil :-D 3.It is not of israeli interest to get rid of the arabs and muslims one country by another any way I like the way you express your opinion as you dont think any other opinion is antiamerican :) La ILah Ila allah Mohamed Rasoul Allah

          J 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • R Robert Buldoc

            I just found out Michael Parenti has published an article on US war with Iraq. http://www.michaelparenti.org/IRAQGeorge2.htm[^] I hope this article enlighten those who haven't learned way to analyze what they are being fed. PS. I learned about Michael Parenti in my Academic Writting class, and now I am a big fan of him!

            S Offline
            S Offline
            Stan Shannon
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            The objective is not just power for its own sake but power to insure plutocratic control of the planet, power to privatize and deregulate the economies of every nation in the world, to hoist upon the backs of peoples everywhere—including the people of North America ---the blessings of an untrammeled "free market" corporate capitalism. Sounds like a plan to me. The struggle is between those who believe that the land, labor, capital, technology, and markets of the world should be dedicated to maximizing capital accumulation for the few, and those who believe that these things should be used for the communal benefit and socio-economic development of the many. So it's still all about Capitalism vs. Marxism. I thought so. I believe I will take capitalism, thank you very much all the same. "My job is to protect America" George W. Bush.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • A Anthony_Yio

              Germany also in against the US attack but Germany is not within the concession with Baghdad oil supply. No matter what the reason was. WAR is always not a good resolution. And that is why we have UN. remember? Peace no war

              J Offline
              J Offline
              Jason Henderson
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Anthony_Yio wrote: WAR is always not a good resolution Let's rephrase this so it will make more sense. WAR is NOT ALWAYS a good resolutions. But sometimes it is.

              Jason Henderson
              "You must be the change you wish to see in the world." - Gandhi

              articles profile

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • D DODO

                Well,I think what you are saying is 1.Angel America is paying billions of dolars and the lives of many soldiers to save the Iraqi people from sadam -as they are saving the good sharon from the palastinians by paying him billions and giving him weapons to defend him self againest thoses monesters children with rocks- same point of view of course 2.America in its current situation dont need oil :-D 3.It is not of israeli interest to get rid of the arabs and muslims one country by another any way I like the way you express your opinion as you dont think any other opinion is antiamerican :) La ILah Ila allah Mohamed Rasoul Allah

                J Offline
                J Offline
                Jason Henderson
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Samer12 wrote: any way I like the way you express your opinion as you dont think any other opinion is antiamerican You guys are so blinded by your hatred for Israel its not even funny.

                Jason Henderson
                "You must be the change you wish to see in the world." - Gandhi

                articles profile

                D 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • J Jason Henderson

                  Samer12 wrote: any way I like the way you express your opinion as you dont think any other opinion is antiamerican You guys are so blinded by your hatred for Israel its not even funny.

                  Jason Henderson
                  "You must be the change you wish to see in the world." - Gandhi

                  articles profile

                  D Offline
                  D Offline
                  DODO
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  You guys are so blinded by your hatred for Israel its not even funny I must admit that I hate Israel:mad: ,what is the problem in that? do you like/support those terrorists you seem like a nice guy,so I will tell you the truth no arab in the universe will say he likes Israel this is a very serious matter to all of us La ILah Ila allah Mohamed Rasoul Allah

                  J 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • D DODO

                    You guys are so blinded by your hatred for Israel its not even funny I must admit that I hate Israel:mad: ,what is the problem in that? do you like/support those terrorists you seem like a nice guy,so I will tell you the truth no arab in the universe will say he likes Israel this is a very serious matter to all of us La ILah Ila allah Mohamed Rasoul Allah

                    J Offline
                    J Offline
                    Jason Henderson
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    Samer12 wrote: I must admit that I hate Israel ,what is the problem in that? What's the problem? How can you ever expect to live in peace? Yes, I dislike the terrorists, but if they stopped terrorizing, I wouldn't. Why do you hate Israel so much? Don't anser that. I will start an entirely new thread here in the soapbox and you can answer it there.

                    Jason Henderson
                    "You must be the change you wish to see in the world." - Gandhi

                    articles profile

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    Reply
                    • Reply as topic
                    Log in to reply
                    • Oldest to Newest
                    • Newest to Oldest
                    • Most Votes


                    • Login

                    • Don't have an account? Register

                    • Login or register to search.
                    • First post
                      Last post
                    0
                    • Categories
                    • Recent
                    • Tags
                    • Popular
                    • World
                    • Users
                    • Groups