After Iraq, what next?

[JoeSox]

WTF:wtf::wtf::wtf: weird, must be IE ;P :laugh::laugh: that was wierd Later,
JoeSox
www.joeswammi.com
USN Veteran 94-98[^]

[Chris Maunder]

Sign out and try it yourself :) cheers, Chris Maunder

[realJSOP]

France - they'll give up if we even look at them cross-eyed. ------- signature starts "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001 Please review the Legal Disclaimer in my bio. ------- signature ends

[Rob Graham]

In the case of France, depeliatory cream is would be the WMD of choice.:) Genius may have its limitations, but stupidity is not thus handicapped. - Elbert Hubbard

[Anonymous]

Hah! You bases Amuricuns only let your iraki kilink peeple vot on dis websit!!! All abowt oil, codeprojek wants iraki peeples oil! Aljazeera is the lite!!!!!!1!!!!!!!!!1

[Rob Graham]

Oh Damn, now I'm in real trouble. I'm thinking just like you... Genius may have its limitations, but stupidity is not thus handicapped. - Elbert Hubbard

[Ed Gadziemski]

You said "anonymity". heh-heh heh-heh

[Anonymous]

Why you 9/11 murdering little rat bastard! When my tanks roll into Baghdad you going to be the first Iraqi to stop dancing! Then we going to take all your bleeding oil and colonise the whole of the Gulf with our liberating force of peace, justice and American freedom! We are saving the frikin world here you ignorant pissant, go join the French and those freeking anoying South Africans who think they know a damned shit!

[Chris Maunder]

lol. I can still see you Paul :D cheers, Chris Maunder

[John M Drescher]

Lebanon, West Bank, Syria, North Korea.

[Paul Watson]

Damn. That was fun. I couldn't vote but I sure could rant from both sides. :-D

Paul Watson
Bluegrass
Cape Town, South Africa

Macbeth muttered: I am in blood / Stepped in so far, that should I wade no more, / Returning were as tedious as go o'er DavidW wrote: You are totally mad. Nice.

[John M Drescher]

Just Kidding. After 911 any nation that supports terrorist attacks against the US or its allies will be under close watch. John

[Le centriste]

[sarcasm] aaaaaaaaaaaaaah the truth comes out! [/sarcasm]

[Chris Losinger]

John M. Drescher wrote: Just Kidding. actually, GWB did give a little out-of-the-blue speech about his big plans for the Israel issue a week ago. so, you may be right about the West Bank. -c

---

Image tools: ThumbNailer, Bobber, TIFFAssembler

[Jeremy Falcon]

:rolleyes: Jeremy Falcon "so be it, threaten no more, to secure peace is to prepare for war" - Metallica

[Kant]

Anonymous wrote: Liberate Saudi Arabia? Pakistan? Tibet? Cypress? Northern Ireland? Regime change in US (2004 Elections) ;) Don't :beer: and drive.

[Le centriste]

Will you liberate it from its dictator Jacques Chirac and make it a free country?;P

[Doug Goulden]

Thats a Clinton kinda difference Uptight Ex-Military Republican married to a Commie Lib - How weird is that?

[Anonymous]

I thought you were picking on the syntax. Never mind.:)

[JoeSox]

Chris Losinger wrote: your self-contradiction intrigues me. This whole thread is becoming intriguing:~ which I think is largely due to the stupid original post. lets' break this down: "After Iraq, what next? Liberate Saudi Arabia? Pakistan? Tibet? Cypress? Northern Ireland?" - original post I reply with: "Liberate CPians from dumb Anonymous posts" I later state: "I didn't mean to be so mean but, come on "what's next"? This is just ignorance."Anonymous replies to this statement: "What's next - What next = 's That the difference among ignorance and knowledge. You will have to talk to my lawyer about this. I do not know his address I know he said http://www.codeproject.com/script/comments/forums.asp?msg=456879&forumid=2605#xx456879xx[^] :wtf:is he trying to say here? I think he is trying to argue that I miss-interpreted his "What next" into "What's next":wtf::wtf: Later,
JoeSox
www.joeswammi.com
USN Veteran 94-98[^]