QA blooper

[Sascha Lefevre]

public int val2
{
    get
    {
        return val2;
    }
    set
    {
        val2 = 10;
    }
}

:rolleyes:

If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson

[Kyle Moyer]

Maybe there was a requirement to not use const?

[phil o]

I'm surprised this code compiles, as there is a circular reference in the getter.

You always obtain more by being rather polite and armed than polite only.

[Sascha Lefevre]

No, the requirement was to create a public get/set property named Value2 for a private field named value2 and to use that property to set value2 to a value of 10 - but from outside the containing class..

If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson

[Sascha Lefevre]

Yep, the compiler will let you run into a SO-exception without turning a hair :laugh:

If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson

[F ES Sitecore]

Alas it does, I've lost many an hour to it :D

[Sentenryu]

there's one in the setter too.

[Nathan Minier]

I strongly suspect that nugget of joy was written by someone who typically writes in JavaScript. Or maybe a cat walking across the keyboard. Any other answer would be insane...

[Brisingr Aerowing]

Or someone who has no idea what he is doing and is playing games in class and not paying attention to the professor.

What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question? The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism. Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???