Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. Buzzword Bingo
  4. "Let's make that a Version 2 feature...."

"Let's make that a Version 2 feature...."

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Buzzword Bingo
7 Posts 6 Posters 5 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Mnaught
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Typically said after I have looked down the road and proposed a feature that I think is really critical but is seen as time consuming, which it usually isn't. "Let's make that a version 2 feature" = "I think that's a waste of time, or I don't understand it so I'm not going to buy in to it." Um, and I just deployed version 3.5.1, so if you are going to shrug off my suggestions and try to make it look like you are in any way release-planning, at least act like you are planning an actual release. :mad:

    S N R D 4 Replies Last reply
    0
    • M Mnaught

      Typically said after I have looked down the road and proposed a feature that I think is really critical but is seen as time consuming, which it usually isn't. "Let's make that a version 2 feature" = "I think that's a waste of time, or I don't understand it so I'm not going to buy in to it." Um, and I just deployed version 3.5.1, so if you are going to shrug off my suggestions and try to make it look like you are in any way release-planning, at least act like you are planning an actual release. :mad:

      S Offline
      S Offline
      Super Lloyd
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Alright, let's make it a version 4 feature then! ;P

      All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar DirectX for WinRT/C# since 2013! Taking over the world since 1371!

      M 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • S Super Lloyd

        Alright, let's make it a version 4 feature then! ;P

        All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar DirectX for WinRT/C# since 2013! Taking over the world since 1371!

        M Offline
        M Offline
        Mnaught
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Now we're cooking. 4 it is.

        C 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M Mnaught

          Now we're cooking. 4 it is.

          C Offline
          C Offline
          CBadger
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Do not jump the gun hey! It is version 3.5.11 :-\

          »»» Loading Signature ««« · · · Please Wait · · ·    :badger:   :badger:   :badger:

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M Mnaught

            Typically said after I have looked down the road and proposed a feature that I think is really critical but is seen as time consuming, which it usually isn't. "Let's make that a version 2 feature" = "I think that's a waste of time, or I don't understand it so I'm not going to buy in to it." Um, and I just deployed version 3.5.1, so if you are going to shrug off my suggestions and try to make it look like you are in any way release-planning, at least act like you are planning an actual release. :mad:

            N Offline
            N Offline
            nanik88
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            how to make

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M Mnaught

              Typically said after I have looked down the road and proposed a feature that I think is really critical but is seen as time consuming, which it usually isn't. "Let's make that a version 2 feature" = "I think that's a waste of time, or I don't understand it so I'm not going to buy in to it." Um, and I just deployed version 3.5.1, so if you are going to shrug off my suggestions and try to make it look like you are in any way release-planning, at least act like you are planning an actual release. :mad:

              R Offline
              R Offline
              RickZeeland
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Fork it on GitHub !

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • M Mnaught

                Typically said after I have looked down the road and proposed a feature that I think is really critical but is seen as time consuming, which it usually isn't. "Let's make that a version 2 feature" = "I think that's a waste of time, or I don't understand it so I'm not going to buy in to it." Um, and I just deployed version 3.5.1, so if you are going to shrug off my suggestions and try to make it look like you are in any way release-planning, at least act like you are planning an actual release. :mad:

                D Offline
                D Offline
                Dr Walt Fair PE
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                It really meand, there's a problem, but we can kick the can on down the road untill another group decides to fix it.

                CQ de W5ALT

                Walt Fair, Jr., P. E. Comport Computing Specializing in Technical Engineering Software

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                Reply
                • Reply as topic
                Log in to reply
                • Oldest to Newest
                • Newest to Oldest
                • Most Votes


                • Login

                • Don't have an account? Register

                • Login or register to search.
                • First post
                  Last post
                0
                • Categories
                • Recent
                • Tags
                • Popular
                • World
                • Users
                • Groups