Your heartbeat as a password - smart or stupid?
-
N_tro_P wrote:
Nope, you are right understanding how an EKG works is not relavant to a person claiming first that "SOUND" is not unique, then double backed to claim NOISE, which then he claimed was noise of sound which has NOTHING to do with an EKG.
Which is still all correct, also according to the article.
N_tro_P wrote:
Then he stuck with this notion of NOISE to claim a person's noise is not unique WHICH IS EXACTLY WHAT THE FLIPPING SCIENCE SHOWED HE IS WRONG ABOUT, but hey, yeah it is me that has the problem.
You should look up what a static key would be.
N_tro_P wrote:
Seriously, you just sound like a bumbling idiot now and the fact that you have used CP email services to message me to troll is against their policy.
CP's log will show it was a reaction to your direct-mail, so you are the one who took that initiative.
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^][](X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett)
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
CP's log will show it was a reaction to your direct-mail,
I never sent you any emails, you sent me one. I think you are mixing up your notifications etc.
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
Which is still all correct, also according to the article.
Its funny cause you keep claiming that and still haven't figured out that this science has been going around far longer than this crappy article.
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
You should look up what a static key would be.
And you should look up dynamic keys.
Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet. The interesting thing about software is it can not reproduce, until it can.
-
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
CP's log will show it was a reaction to your direct-mail,
I never sent you any emails, you sent me one. I think you are mixing up your notifications etc.
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
Which is still all correct, also according to the article.
Its funny cause you keep claiming that and still haven't figured out that this science has been going around far longer than this crappy article.
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
You should look up what a static key would be.
And you should look up dynamic keys.
Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet. The interesting thing about software is it can not reproduce, until it can.
N_tro_P wrote:
I never sent you any emails, you sent me one. I think you are mixing up your notifications etc.
I'm not; it says so in the mail you sent from the board. If you want, you can look up the exact text, as I posted it here :laugh:
N_tro_P wrote:
And you should look up dynamic keys.
No, I should get some sleep :)
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^][](X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett)
-
N_tro_P wrote:
I never sent you any emails, you sent me one. I think you are mixing up your notifications etc.
I'm not; it says so in the mail you sent from the board. If you want, you can look up the exact text, as I posted it here :laugh:
N_tro_P wrote:
And you should look up dynamic keys.
No, I should get some sleep :)
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^][](X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett)
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
I'm not; it says so in the mail you sent from the board. If you want, you can look up the exact text, as I posted it here :laugh:
You are full of shit because I neve sent your troll as a flipping email. YOU SENT ONE TO ME! (from your other trolling thread) Piss off troll.
Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet. The interesting thing about software is it can not reproduce, until it can.
-
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
I'm not; it says so in the mail you sent from the board. If you want, you can look up the exact text, as I posted it here :laugh:
You are full of shit because I neve sent your troll as a flipping email. YOU SENT ONE TO ME! (from your other trolling thread) Piss off troll.
Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet. The interesting thing about software is it can not reproduce, until it can.
N_tro_P wrote:
You are full of sh*t because I neve sent your troll as a flipping email. YOU SENT ONE TO ME! (from your other trolling thread)
I merely replied to your thread.
N_tro_P wrote:
Piss off troll.
I'm just defending my name :) You're the idiot that cannot let go. I'm going to keep responding, just to see how for you're going with this.
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^][](X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett)
-
N_tro_P wrote:
You are full of sh*t because I neve sent your troll as a flipping email. YOU SENT ONE TO ME! (from your other trolling thread)
I merely replied to your thread.
N_tro_P wrote:
Piss off troll.
I'm just defending my name :) You're the idiot that cannot let go. I'm going to keep responding, just to see how for you're going with this.
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^][](X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett)
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
I merely replied to your thread.
You sent an email using the CP services which are not meant to be used for trolling.
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
I'm going to keep responding, just to see how for you're going with this.
Fine with me.
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
You're the idiot that cannot let go.
I actually know what I am talking about. It is you that keeps making up the most silly claims and it is quite obvious has not read anything else on the topic other than the single article and now are here trying to claim you are some SME. Yeah, I think it is obvious who the idiot who can't let it go is. :suss:
Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet. The interesting thing about software is it can not reproduce, until it can.
-
N_tro_P wrote:
You are full of sh*t because I neve sent your troll as a flipping email. YOU SENT ONE TO ME! (from your other trolling thread)
I merely replied to your thread.
N_tro_P wrote:
Piss off troll.
I'm just defending my name :) You're the idiot that cannot let go. I'm going to keep responding, just to see how for you're going with this.
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^][](X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett)
BTW, I doubt you have
Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet. The interesting thing about software is it can not reproduce, until it can.
-
N_tro_P wrote:
You are full of sh*t because I neve sent your troll as a flipping email. YOU SENT ONE TO ME! (from your other trolling thread)
I merely replied to your thread.
N_tro_P wrote:
Piss off troll.
I'm just defending my name :) You're the idiot that cannot let go. I'm going to keep responding, just to see how for you're going with this.
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^][](X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett)
half
Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet. The interesting thing about software is it can not reproduce, until it can.
-
N_tro_P wrote:
You are full of sh*t because I neve sent your troll as a flipping email. YOU SENT ONE TO ME! (from your other trolling thread)
I merely replied to your thread.
N_tro_P wrote:
Piss off troll.
I'm just defending my name :) You're the idiot that cannot let go. I'm going to keep responding, just to see how for you're going with this.
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^][](X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett)
the
Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet. The interesting thing about software is it can not reproduce, until it can.
-
N_tro_P wrote:
You are full of sh*t because I neve sent your troll as a flipping email. YOU SENT ONE TO ME! (from your other trolling thread)
I merely replied to your thread.
N_tro_P wrote:
Piss off troll.
I'm just defending my name :) You're the idiot that cannot let go. I'm going to keep responding, just to see how for you're going with this.
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^][](X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett)
trolling
Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet. The interesting thing about software is it can not reproduce, until it can.
-
N_tro_P wrote:
I never sent you any emails, you sent me one. I think you are mixing up your notifications etc.
I'm not; it says so in the mail you sent from the board. If you want, you can look up the exact text, as I posted it here :laugh:
N_tro_P wrote:
And you should look up dynamic keys.
No, I should get some sleep :)
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^][](X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett)
capability
Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet. The interesting thing about software is it can not reproduce, until it can.
-
N_tro_P wrote:
I never sent you any emails, you sent me one. I think you are mixing up your notifications etc.
I'm not; it says so in the mail you sent from the board. If you want, you can look up the exact text, as I posted it here :laugh:
N_tro_P wrote:
And you should look up dynamic keys.
No, I should get some sleep :)
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^][](X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett)
that
Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet. The interesting thing about software is it can not reproduce, until it can.
-
N_tro_P wrote:
how an EKG works
How it works is not relevant for the application as described.
N_tro_P wrote:
nor can he even read a crappy article correctly.
And you are still having trouble with that one sentence :) :cool:
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^][](X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett)
you
Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet. The interesting thing about software is it can not reproduce, until it can.
-
N_tro_P wrote:
how an EKG works
How it works is not relevant for the application as described.
N_tro_P wrote:
nor can he even read a crappy article correctly.
And you are still having trouble with that one sentence :) :cool:
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^][](X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett)
claim
Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet. The interesting thing about software is it can not reproduce, until it can.
-
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
I merely replied to your thread.
You sent an email using the CP services which are not meant to be used for trolling.
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
I'm going to keep responding, just to see how for you're going with this.
Fine with me.
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
You're the idiot that cannot let go.
I actually know what I am talking about. It is you that keeps making up the most silly claims and it is quite obvious has not read anything else on the topic other than the single article and now are here trying to claim you are some SME. Yeah, I think it is obvious who the idiot who can't let it go is. :suss:
Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet. The interesting thing about software is it can not reproduce, until it can.