Pointer to structure problem...

[Dominik Reichl]

1. The source buffer for memcpy is too small. It is just 5 characters ("Paul"+zero), but you specify 30. This will result in a memory access error. A valid value for memcpy source len would be strlen("Paul")+1. 2) Declare the Test array as array and not as pointer array. So instead of struct s_Test* Test[10]; do a struct s_Test Test[10]; 3) If you have done step 2 you don't need a dereferenced access to the name member variable any more. So the memcpy would look like: memcpy(Test[0].name,"Paul",strlen("Paul")+1); :-D -Dominik

---

_outp(0x64, 0xAD); and __asm mov al, 0xAD __asm out 0x64, al do the same... but what do they do?? ;)

[RChin]

.. and you rightly deserve an error message! The variable Test has been defined as a pointer to the structure:
struct s_Test* Test[10] Therefore the memory location for your structure has not been allocated as yet.

try:
.. .. struct s_Test Test[10]; void main() { // use the appropriate string Function. strcpy( Test[0].name, "Paul" ); return; }

---

"Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something."
Plato

[Dominik Reichl]

Meeeep. System error. Copying 30 characters from a buffer which is only 5 characters ("Paul"+zero) long. :-D :beer: -Dominik

---

_outp(0x64, 0xAD); and __asm mov al, 0xAD __asm out 0x64, al do the same... but what do they do?? ;)

[jhwurmbach]

OOOPS! :omg: But it did compile.....:-O That type of errors is the reason why I prefer std::vector and std::string.

---

My opinions may have changed, but not the fact that I am right.

[IrishSonic]

Thanks for all of those suggestions and help. I know I am being awkward but I really want to get it working using a pointer to the structure. I could do it the normal way no problem but I only want to allocate the memory as I need it. I don't want it to be a static array. Is it not possible to have a pointer to a structure with instances aswell??

[Dominik Reichl]

Sure, this is possible too:

struct s_Test
{
char name[30];
};

s_Test *Test;

void main()
{
Test = new s_Test[10];

memcpy(Test\[0\].name,"Paul",strlen("Paul")+1);

// Do something more

delete \[\]Test;
Test = NULL;
return;

}

:-D -Dominik

---

_outp(0x64, 0xAD); and __asm mov al, 0xAD __asm out 0x64, al do the same... but what do they do?? ;)

[Rage]

If you need a table, you need a table. How do you understand a pointer to a structure with instances as well ? To be able to point at something, you need that the something exist in the memory. It is therefor impossible to have a table without allocating some memory for it. ~RaGE();

[BhaskarBora]

yup Plato.. what you said is correct ! there the array is infact a array of pointers to "struct s_Test " rather then a array of "struct s_Test ". "Think big, think fast, think ahead. Ideas are no one's monopoly"

[IrishSonic]

Thanks, have it sorted and know the reason y it can't just do it like that. thanks for all ur help. grahamoj

[John M Drescher]

What you really need is a vector or list of structures but this is a little too complicated to start off with. You can look up vector or list in the help for examples if you want. I assume that you will not know how many structures you will have at compile time and that is why you want a dynamic array. You can create a large array of pointers to your structure. This will take 4 bytes per element. Then allocate your structures when you need them. Have an integer keep track of the current number of structures. Try this: struct s_Test { char name[30]; } struct s_Test* Test[10]; int nTestCount = 0; void main() { // Add a struct and initialize Test[nTestCount] = new Test; strcpy( Test[nTestCount]->name,"Paul"); nTestCount++; // Add a struct and initialize Test[nTestCount] = new Test; strcpy( Test[nTestCount]->name,"John"); nTestCount++; for(int i=0; i < nTestCount;i++) { printf("%s\n",Test[i]->name); } return; }