Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Insider News
  4. Where programming languages are headed in 2020

Where programming languages are headed in 2020

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Insider News
com
8 Posts 5 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    Kent Sharkey
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    O'Reilly[^]:

    Experts discuss what's in store for popular and growing programming languages.

    To the compiler! (or interpreter as the case may be)

    M A 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • K Kent Sharkey

      O'Reilly[^]:

      Experts discuss what's in store for popular and growing programming languages.

      To the compiler! (or interpreter as the case may be)

      M Offline
      M Offline
      Marc Clifton
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Not a criticism to you and your posting this, Kent -- I am far less concerned with where languages are headed than I am concerned with where programmers are headed. Having worked in this field for 30+ years, I can confidently say, "not in the right direction." Finding programmers who actually care about the quality of their work (and *know* what quality even means so as to care about it) is a downward spiral. :sigh:

      Latest Articles:
      Abusing Extension Methods, Null Continuation, and Null Coalescence Operators

      K 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Marc Clifton

        Not a criticism to you and your posting this, Kent -- I am far less concerned with where languages are headed than I am concerned with where programmers are headed. Having worked in this field for 30+ years, I can confidently say, "not in the right direction." Finding programmers who actually care about the quality of their work (and *know* what quality even means so as to care about it) is a downward spiral. :sigh:

        Latest Articles:
        Abusing Extension Methods, Null Continuation, and Null Coalescence Operators

        K Offline
        K Offline
        Kent Sharkey
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Agreed. I'm a little worried about the possible answers to the next question though: Why do you think this direction is happening? Is it the over-reliance on frameworks? (especially by JS devs) Or IDEs? Move towards busy-work (SOLID, "repository all the stuff", "clean code" etc.) Just those dang kids on the lawn? Something else?

        TTFN - Kent

        M 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • K Kent Sharkey

          Agreed. I'm a little worried about the possible answers to the next question though: Why do you think this direction is happening? Is it the over-reliance on frameworks? (especially by JS devs) Or IDEs? Move towards busy-work (SOLID, "repository all the stuff", "clean code" etc.) Just those dang kids on the lawn? Something else?

          TTFN - Kent

          M Offline
          M Offline
          Mark_Wallace
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Lack of good teachers.

          I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

          N 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M Mark_Wallace

            Lack of good teachers.

            I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

            N Offline
            N Offline
            Nelek
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            And lack of pride about doing things the best one can in many youngsters (it takes energy and time to do it)

            M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • K Kent Sharkey

              O'Reilly[^]:

              Experts discuss what's in store for popular and growing programming languages.

              To the compiler! (or interpreter as the case may be)

              A Offline
              A Offline
              AReady
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              I see this happening frequently in articles from O'Reilly (I read their programming newsletter) Is C# really so irrelevant in the industry? Or there is no significant innovotation to report? I don't think so...

              K 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • A AReady

                I see this happening frequently in articles from O'Reilly (I read their programming newsletter) Is C# really so irrelevant in the industry? Or there is no significant innovotation to report? I don't think so...

                K Offline
                K Offline
                Kent Sharkey
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                No, you're right - I think it's O'Reilly. They seem to have a blind-spot for some reason. Maybe Bill/Satya said something nasty about their animal covers, or it's a holdover from their old Unix/Linux days.

                TTFN - Kent

                A 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • K Kent Sharkey

                  No, you're right - I think it's O'Reilly. They seem to have a blind-spot for some reason. Maybe Bill/Satya said something nasty about their animal covers, or it's a holdover from their old Unix/Linux days.

                  TTFN - Kent

                  A Offline
                  A Offline
                  AReady
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  Here we go again O'Reilly :-D

                  View post on imgur.com

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  Reply
                  • Reply as topic
                  Log in to reply
                  • Oldest to Newest
                  • Newest to Oldest
                  • Most Votes


                  • Login

                  • Don't have an account? Register

                  • Login or register to search.
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  0
                  • Categories
                  • Recent
                  • Tags
                  • Popular
                  • World
                  • Users
                  • Groups