Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Insider News
  4. The worst version of Windows ever released

The worst version of Windows ever released

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Insider News
htmlcomquestionannouncement
9 Posts 8 Posters 18 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    Kent Sharkey
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Computerworld[^]:

    Windows Me was unstable, unloved and unusable. But was it really the worst OS Microsoft ever produced – worse even than Windows 8?

    An abbreviated list

    F N Sander RosselS K J 5 Replies Last reply
    0
    • K Kent Sharkey

      Computerworld[^]:

      Windows Me was unstable, unloved and unusable. But was it really the worst OS Microsoft ever produced – worse even than Windows 8?

      An abbreviated list

      F Offline
      F Offline
      FIorian Schneidereit
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      I think it's a little unfair to claim Vista was worse than ME. The whole article is more polemic than the result of deep technical understanding. He might be right that UAC was annoying in Vista, but what's annoying compared to a laughable user protection like in DOS-based Windows (yes, Windows ME)? Sure, its system requirements were high, but most of the driver and performance issues were gone with Service Pack 1 and 2. And Windows 8? It was a mistake from the UI perspective, but underneath it was really stable and had a relatively low memory footprint (sometimes even better than Windows 7). In this regards, it was better than some Windows 10 release of today that is half-baked and overloaded with a ton of bullshit-features and semi-annual upgrades no one asked for. So - sorry. Windows ME is really the worst. Just because it's DOS-based makes it worse than any of the worst NT-releases :D

      realJSOPR 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • K Kent Sharkey

        Computerworld[^]:

        Windows Me was unstable, unloved and unusable. But was it really the worst OS Microsoft ever produced – worse even than Windows 8?

        An abbreviated list

        N Offline
        N Offline
        Nelek
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Can it be that some of the people involved in Windows ME is now working in the windows Updates department? :rolleyes: :-D

        M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

        K 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • K Kent Sharkey

          Computerworld[^]:

          Windows Me was unstable, unloved and unusable. But was it really the worst OS Microsoft ever produced – worse even than Windows 8?

          An abbreviated list

          Sander RosselS Offline
          Sander RosselS Offline
          Sander Rossel
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          I've used Windows Me for a couple of years and never had any troubles :D Of course, back then I only played games. I also remember having a Final Fantasy VII themed computer with custom cursors and a screen saver with sound (playing the Costa Del Sol track from the game) :laugh: I loved XP though, so I never went back. To me, Vista was the absolute worst. It didn't work with some hardware I had, among which a 7.1 dolby surround set by Creative. That thing cost me months of income and it didn't work after a few months because I got a Vista computer. I also couldn't play some games anymore. Went back to XP really fast! At least Windows 8 worked. I used Windows 8 on a work computer, but skipped it for my private computer in favor of Windows 7. I've never had any troubles with Windows 10, which seems about as good as Windows 7 and XP.

          Best, Sander sanderrossel.com Migrating Applications to the Cloud with Azure arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript Object-Oriented Programming in C# Succinctly

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F FIorian Schneidereit

            I think it's a little unfair to claim Vista was worse than ME. The whole article is more polemic than the result of deep technical understanding. He might be right that UAC was annoying in Vista, but what's annoying compared to a laughable user protection like in DOS-based Windows (yes, Windows ME)? Sure, its system requirements were high, but most of the driver and performance issues were gone with Service Pack 1 and 2. And Windows 8? It was a mistake from the UI perspective, but underneath it was really stable and had a relatively low memory footprint (sometimes even better than Windows 7). In this regards, it was better than some Windows 10 release of today that is half-baked and overloaded with a ton of bullshit-features and semi-annual upgrades no one asked for. So - sorry. Windows ME is really the worst. Just because it's DOS-based makes it worse than any of the worst NT-releases :D

            realJSOPR Offline
            realJSOPR Offline
            realJSOP
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Technically, all versions of Windows are dos-based.

            ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
            -----
            You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
            -----
            When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013

            D 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • realJSOPR realJSOP

              Technically, all versions of Windows are dos-based.

              ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
              -----
              You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
              -----
              When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013

              D Offline
              D Offline
              Daniel Pfeffer
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Wrong. The NT line (NT 3.1, NT 3.51, NT 4.0, 2000, XP, …) were rewritten from the ground up. They used the VM86 capabilities of the 80386 (or above) processors to provide DOS windows in separate memory address spaces.

              Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • N Nelek

                Can it be that some of the people involved in Windows ME is now working in the windows Updates department? :rolleyes: :-D

                M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

                K Offline
                K Offline
                Kent Sharkey
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                :omg: You might be on to something there!

                TTFN - Kent

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • K Kent Sharkey

                  Computerworld[^]:

                  Windows Me was unstable, unloved and unusable. But was it really the worst OS Microsoft ever produced – worse even than Windows 8?

                  An abbreviated list

                  K Offline
                  K Offline
                  kmoorevs
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  IMHO, Windows ME was the worst. My first laptop came with it. It use to crash so frequently using Visual Studio that I got used to saving work every minute or so. It didn't take long for me to get a copy of 2000 which I stuck with for almost a decade, completely skipping XP. As for Vista, I never had too many problems with it, but it was quickly replaced with 7 which was one of the best.

                  "Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • K Kent Sharkey

                    Computerworld[^]:

                    Windows Me was unstable, unloved and unusable. But was it really the worst OS Microsoft ever produced – worse even than Windows 8?

                    An abbreviated list

                    J Offline
                    J Offline
                    Joe Woodbury
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    IMHO, Window Me was the worse, especially if upgraded to it or installed on a system not designed for it. (One of my daughters had Vista on her laptop and it ran perfectly fine.)

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    Reply
                    • Reply as topic
                    Log in to reply
                    • Oldest to Newest
                    • Newest to Oldest
                    • Most Votes


                    • Login

                    • Don't have an account? Register

                    • Login or register to search.
                    • First post
                      Last post
                    0
                    • Categories
                    • Recent
                    • Tags
                    • Popular
                    • World
                    • Users
                    • Groups