Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Insider News
  4. A bit of perspective: Cost of a Computer Every Year Since 1970

A bit of perspective: Cost of a Computer Every Year Since 1970

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Insider News
comquestionannouncementlounge
6 Posts 5 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Daniel Pfeffer
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    [Cost of a Computer Every Year Since 1970](https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/cost-of-a-computer-every-year-since-1970/ss-AAOwPZs?ocid=msedgntp#image=1) I could argue with some of the choices, but in general - a good review of how far we've come in one working lifetime. I also note that during most of that time the computer I wanted, not necessarily the one I needed, always cost between US$ 2,500 to 3,500. :(

    Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.

    G B Richard Andrew x64R 3 Replies Last reply
    0
    • D Daniel Pfeffer

      [Cost of a Computer Every Year Since 1970](https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/cost-of-a-computer-every-year-since-1970/ss-AAOwPZs?ocid=msedgntp#image=1) I could argue with some of the choices, but in general - a good review of how far we've come in one working lifetime. I also note that during most of that time the computer I wanted, not necessarily the one I needed, always cost between US$ 2,500 to 3,500. :(

      Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.

      G Offline
      G Offline
      Gjeltema
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      How can you tell when a non-technical person is tasked with writing an article? When you see them claim that switching to 64 bit from 32 bit improves performance by 2x... > 2003 > Notable computer: Apple Power Mac G5 > Price tag: $1,999 > Inflation adjusted price: $2,968 > At the time of its release, the Power Mac G5 was the most powerful Macintosh computer. It was the first personal computer to utilize 64-bit processing, allowing users to run tasks twice as fast as was possible with 32-bit architecture, the standard at the time.

      P 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • G Gjeltema

        How can you tell when a non-technical person is tasked with writing an article? When you see them claim that switching to 64 bit from 32 bit improves performance by 2x... > 2003 > Notable computer: Apple Power Mac G5 > Price tag: $1,999 > Inflation adjusted price: $2,968 > At the time of its release, the Power Mac G5 was the most powerful Macintosh computer. It was the first personal computer to utilize 64-bit processing, allowing users to run tasks twice as fast as was possible with 32-bit architecture, the standard at the time.

        P Offline
        P Offline
        PIEBALDconsult
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Bigger mistakes in half the time.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • D Daniel Pfeffer

          [Cost of a Computer Every Year Since 1970](https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/cost-of-a-computer-every-year-since-1970/ss-AAOwPZs?ocid=msedgntp#image=1) I could argue with some of the choices, but in general - a good review of how far we've come in one working lifetime. I also note that during most of that time the computer I wanted, not necessarily the one I needed, always cost between US$ 2,500 to 3,500. :(

          Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.

          B Offline
          B Offline
          BillWoodruff
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Hi, Dan, Interesting: back in the daze when the latest ooh-shiny computer appeared, and, i fantasized about having one, the new beast was almost always 2-3k US$ more than i could afford, or justify spending. These daze, it's more peripheral devices that i fantasize about, like a very high-end monitor, like an Eizo ColorEdge, with built-in colorimetric calibration, and full coverage of Adobe RGB SRGB, and CMYK, gamuts; or, an NAS loaded with 16 tb.s of top-end storage. A motherboard with >= 4 M2 slots, and 2 tb. cards in each, and a top-end CPU, 64 gigs of ram, etc. i admit the big iPad models intrigue me, but, when i think of having one, i immediately imagine i took it outside the house, and it got broken, and i couldn't afford to fix it. And, i ain't never going back to Mac OS. But now, out-to-pasture as i am, my fantasies are much more about having a 20+ VVS star-sapphire to design a ring for, or a visit to the ruins of Gobelki-Tepi [^] :)

          «The mind is not a vessel to be filled but a fire to be kindled» Plutarch

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • D Daniel Pfeffer

            [Cost of a Computer Every Year Since 1970](https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/cost-of-a-computer-every-year-since-1970/ss-AAOwPZs?ocid=msedgntp#image=1) I could argue with some of the choices, but in general - a good review of how far we've come in one working lifetime. I also note that during most of that time the computer I wanted, not necessarily the one I needed, always cost between US$ 2,500 to 3,500. :(

            Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.

            Richard Andrew x64R Offline
            Richard Andrew x64R Offline
            Richard Andrew x64
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            I, for one, am deeply offended that the TRS-80 line of computers was not represented in this list! X|

            The difficult we do right away... ...the impossible takes slightly longer.

            D 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Richard Andrew x64R Richard Andrew x64

              I, for one, am deeply offended that the TRS-80 line of computers was not represented in this list! X|

              The difficult we do right away... ...the impossible takes slightly longer.

              D Offline
              D Offline
              Daniel Pfeffer
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              IMAO, even for its own time, the TRS-80's nickname (Trash-80) was well-earned. I remember using one to collect data from a piece of lab. equipment back in the day. It produced so much electrical interference that it interfered with the measurements being taken (!). We eventually solved the problem by using opto-isolators on the lines leading from the equipment to the TRS-80, and moving the computer far enough away that radiated interference was no longer a factor. The Commodore PET (of similar vintage, also not mentioned) benefited from having a metal case which trapped most of the RFI.

              Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              Reply
              • Reply as topic
              Log in to reply
              • Oldest to Newest
              • Newest to Oldest
              • Most Votes


              • Login

              • Don't have an account? Register

              • Login or register to search.
              • First post
                Last post
              0
              • Categories
              • Recent
              • Tags
              • Popular
              • World
              • Users
              • Groups