Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Insider News
  4. Understability of code should be the default priority

Understability of code should be the default priority

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Insider News
htmlcomperformancehelpquestion
9 Posts 8 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    Kent Sharkey
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Matt Lacey[^]:

    All things being equal, so not when performance is an issue, and in addition to any existing coding conventions, the understandability of code is the most important thing.

    Understand?

    D N K L 4 Replies Last reply
    0
    • K Kent Sharkey

      Matt Lacey[^]:

      All things being equal, so not when performance is an issue, and in addition to any existing coding conventions, the understandability of code is the most important thing.

      Understand?

      D Offline
      D Offline
      David ONeil
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Two words: Job security through spaghetti code.

      Our Forgotten Astronomy | Object Oriented Programming with C++ | Wordle solver

      L 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • K Kent Sharkey

        Matt Lacey[^]:

        All things being equal, so not when performance is an issue, and in addition to any existing coding conventions, the understandability of code is the most important thing.

        Understand?

        N Offline
        N Offline
        Nelek
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Is he a coder or a politician?

        M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • K Kent Sharkey

          Matt Lacey[^]:

          All things being equal, so not when performance is an issue, and in addition to any existing coding conventions, the understandability of code is the most important thing.

          Understand?

          K Offline
          K Offline
          Kaladin
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Understood by whom?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • D David ONeil

            Two words: Job security through spaghetti code.

            Our Forgotten Astronomy | Object Oriented Programming with C++ | Wordle solver

            L Offline
            L Offline
            Lost User
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            David O'Neil wrote:

            Job security through spaghetti code

            That's five words, unless my counting is really off.

            T D 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • L Lost User

              David O'Neil wrote:

              Job security through spaghetti code

              That's five words, unless my counting is really off.

              T Offline
              T Offline
              trønderen
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              "This sentence has sofa six words". In my student days, "self-referencing sentences" were sort of a craze. The above is one of the basic examples. What has the sofa got to do in there? Well, if it was removed, the statement would no longer be true; the sentence would not refer to itself. (Another popular one: "This sentence does not refer to itself" - is that a self-referencing sentence? Is the statement true?)

              P 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • L Lost User

                David O'Neil wrote:

                Job security through spaghetti code

                That's five words, unless my counting is really off.

                D Offline
                D Offline
                David ONeil
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                People who would use spaghetti code for job security would count 'five' as 'two.'

                Our Forgotten Astronomy | Object Oriented Programming with C++ | Wordle solver

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • T trønderen

                  "This sentence has sofa six words". In my student days, "self-referencing sentences" were sort of a craze. The above is one of the basic examples. What has the sofa got to do in there? Well, if it was removed, the statement would no longer be true; the sentence would not refer to itself. (Another popular one: "This sentence does not refer to itself" - is that a self-referencing sentence? Is the statement true?)

                  P Offline
                  P Offline
                  Peter_in_2780
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  A classic from Scott Kim, quoted by Douglas Hofstadter: This sentence no verb.

                  Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • K Kent Sharkey

                    Matt Lacey[^]:

                    All things being equal, so not when performance is an issue, and in addition to any existing coding conventions, the understandability of code is the most important thing.

                    Understand?

                    L Offline
                    L Offline
                    lukeer
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    Does "understability" mean that it bends and changes at its own whim? And I'm in charge of fixing the wobbly thing with more bolts? And that's securing my job? Meh.

                    Ciao, luker

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    Reply
                    • Reply as topic
                    Log in to reply
                    • Oldest to Newest
                    • Newest to Oldest
                    • Most Votes


                    • Login

                    • Don't have an account? Register

                    • Login or register to search.
                    • First post
                      Last post
                    0
                    • Categories
                    • Recent
                    • Tags
                    • Popular
                    • World
                    • Users
                    • Groups