Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Insider News
  4. DeepMind's co-founder suggested testing an AI chatbot's ability to turn $100,000 into $1 million to measure human-like intelligence

DeepMind's co-founder suggested testing an AI chatbot's ability to turn $100,000 into $1 million to measure human-like intelligence

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Insider News
comtestingbeta-testingquestion
2 Posts 2 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    Kent Sharkey
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Insider[^]:

    DeepMind's co-founder believes the Turing test is an outdated method to test AI intelligence.

    Seeing as how most humans couldn't turn $100k into $1MM, I don't think it's accurate

    Other direction? Easy enough.

    N 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • K Kent Sharkey

      Insider[^]:

      DeepMind's co-founder believes the Turing test is an outdated method to test AI intelligence.

      Seeing as how most humans couldn't turn $100k into $1MM, I don't think it's accurate

      Other direction? Easy enough.

      N Offline
      N Offline
      Nelek
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Kent Sharkey wrote:

      Seeing as how most humans couldn't turn $100k into $1MM, I don't think it's accurate

      :thumbsup::thumbsup: On the other hand... how many humans would pass the turing test?

      M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      Reply
      • Reply as topic
      Log in to reply
      • Oldest to Newest
      • Newest to Oldest
      • Most Votes


      • Login

      • Don't have an account? Register

      • Login or register to search.
      • First post
        Last post
      0
      • Categories
      • Recent
      • Tags
      • Popular
      • World
      • Users
      • Groups