Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. General Programming
  3. C / C++ / MFC
  4. DSA

DSA

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved C / C++ / MFC
data-structures
13 Posts 6 Posters 51 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Z ZAID razvi

    Code Segment (I) : int dequeue() { if (isFull(f)){ printf("Queue Underflow! Nothing to Dequeue"); } int dqd =f->data; f = f->next; return dqd; } Code Segment (II) : int dequeue(){ int val=-1; struct Node *ptr=f; if(f==NULL){ printf("Empty\n"); } else{ f=f->next; val=ptr->data; free(ptr); return val; } } In Code I, DeQueue operation is being carried out directly using front pointer. In Code II, The same is happening but this time another Node pointer is created to store the front pointer. So, What's is the Difference in these two methods!

    CPalliniC Offline
    CPalliniC Offline
    CPallini
    wrote on last edited by
    #2

    Well... The second one releases memory (while the first one does NOT relaase memory). Moreover, in the first one, the

    if (isFull(f)){

    line looks suspicious.

    "In testa che avete, Signor di Ceprano?" -- Rigoletto

    In testa che avete, signor di Ceprano?

    Z 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • CPalliniC CPallini

      Well... The second one releases memory (while the first one does NOT relaase memory). Moreover, in the first one, the

      if (isFull(f)){

      line looks suspicious.

      "In testa che avete, Signor di Ceprano?" -- Rigoletto

      Z Offline
      Z Offline
      ZAID razvi
      wrote on last edited by
      #3

      Sir, first code doesn't actually need to free something as it is not creating a node to perform operation rather doing the same thing using the front pointer directly. And yes I have wrote a function 'isFull' already

      CPalliniC 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Z ZAID razvi

        Sir, first code doesn't actually need to free something as it is not creating a node to perform operation rather doing the same thing using the front pointer directly. And yes I have wrote a function 'isFull' already

        CPalliniC Offline
        CPalliniC Offline
        CPallini
        wrote on last edited by
        #4

        Quote:

        first code doesn't actually need to free something as it is not creating a node

        Neither the second one is. So the second code wrongly releases memory.

        Quote:

        And yes I have wrote a function 'isFull' already

        But you should check for not-empty condition, with is NOT quite the same of is-full, is it?

        "In testa che avete, Signor di Ceprano?" -- Rigoletto

        In testa che avete, signor di Ceprano?

        Z 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • CPalliniC CPallini

          Quote:

          first code doesn't actually need to free something as it is not creating a node

          Neither the second one is. So the second code wrongly releases memory.

          Quote:

          And yes I have wrote a function 'isFull' already

          But you should check for not-empty condition, with is NOT quite the same of is-full, is it?

          "In testa che avete, Signor di Ceprano?" -- Rigoletto

          Z Offline
          Z Offline
          ZAID razvi
          wrote on last edited by
          #5

          How is that possible sir! Second code is written by a renowned youtuber 'code_with_harry'. Okk, for your better understanding i'm pasting full source code here: #include #include struct Node *f = NULL; struct Node *r = NULL; struct Node{ int data; struct Node *next; }; void traversal(struct Node *f){ struct Node *ptr=f; printf("------------\n"); while(ptr!=NULL){ printf("%d ",ptr->data); ptr=ptr->next; } printf("\n------------\n"); } int isEmpty(struct Node *f){ if (f == NULL){ return 1; } return 0; } int isFull(struct Node *f){ struct Node *n = (struct Node *)malloc(sizeof(struct Node)); if (n == NULL){ return 1; } return 0; } struct Node *enqueue(int val){ if (isFull(f)){ printf("Queue Overflow! Can't Enqueue %d\n", val); return f; } else{ struct Node *n = (struct Node *)malloc(sizeof(struct Node)); n->data = val; n->next = NULL; if (isEmpty(f)){ f = r = n; } r->next = n; r = n; return f; } } // int dequeue(){ // if (isFull(f)){ // printf("Queue Underflow! Nothing to Dequeue"); // } // int dqd = f->data; // f = f->next; // return dqd; // } int dequeue(){ int val=-1; struct Node *ptr=f; if (f==NULL){ printf("Empty\n"); } else{ f=f->next; val=ptr->data; free(ptr); return val; } } int main(){ enqueue(11); enqueue(22); enqueue(33); enqueue(44); traversal(f); dequeue(); dequeue(); traversal(f); return 0; }

          Richard DeemingR L D CPalliniC 4 Replies Last reply
          0
          • Z ZAID razvi

            How is that possible sir! Second code is written by a renowned youtuber 'code_with_harry'. Okk, for your better understanding i'm pasting full source code here: #include #include struct Node *f = NULL; struct Node *r = NULL; struct Node{ int data; struct Node *next; }; void traversal(struct Node *f){ struct Node *ptr=f; printf("------------\n"); while(ptr!=NULL){ printf("%d ",ptr->data); ptr=ptr->next; } printf("\n------------\n"); } int isEmpty(struct Node *f){ if (f == NULL){ return 1; } return 0; } int isFull(struct Node *f){ struct Node *n = (struct Node *)malloc(sizeof(struct Node)); if (n == NULL){ return 1; } return 0; } struct Node *enqueue(int val){ if (isFull(f)){ printf("Queue Overflow! Can't Enqueue %d\n", val); return f; } else{ struct Node *n = (struct Node *)malloc(sizeof(struct Node)); n->data = val; n->next = NULL; if (isEmpty(f)){ f = r = n; } r->next = n; r = n; return f; } } // int dequeue(){ // if (isFull(f)){ // printf("Queue Underflow! Nothing to Dequeue"); // } // int dqd = f->data; // f = f->next; // return dqd; // } int dequeue(){ int val=-1; struct Node *ptr=f; if (f==NULL){ printf("Empty\n"); } else{ f=f->next; val=ptr->data; free(ptr); return val; } } int main(){ enqueue(11); enqueue(22); enqueue(33); enqueue(44); traversal(f); dequeue(); dequeue(); traversal(f); return 0; }

            Richard DeemingR Offline
            Richard DeemingR Offline
            Richard Deeming
            wrote on last edited by
            #6

            ZAID razvi wrote:

            Second code is written by a renowned youtuber

            At least 90% of YouTube coding tutorial videos aren't worth the paper they're printed on. And how do you know that this Harry is "renowned"? Is this something that other well-known, competent, and respected developers have said? Or is it an adjective he's applied to himself? Either way, if the code doesn't work, there are two options: either you've made a mistake in copying it, or he made a mistake in writing it.


            "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

            "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined" - Homer

            Z A 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • Richard DeemingR Richard Deeming

              ZAID razvi wrote:

              Second code is written by a renowned youtuber

              At least 90% of YouTube coding tutorial videos aren't worth the paper they're printed on. And how do you know that this Harry is "renowned"? Is this something that other well-known, competent, and respected developers have said? Or is it an adjective he's applied to himself? Either way, if the code doesn't work, there are two options: either you've made a mistake in copying it, or he made a mistake in writing it.


              "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

              Z Offline
              Z Offline
              ZAID razvi
              wrote on last edited by
              #7

              Okay sir! Got your point, please calm down 😊

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Z ZAID razvi

                How is that possible sir! Second code is written by a renowned youtuber 'code_with_harry'. Okk, for your better understanding i'm pasting full source code here: #include #include struct Node *f = NULL; struct Node *r = NULL; struct Node{ int data; struct Node *next; }; void traversal(struct Node *f){ struct Node *ptr=f; printf("------------\n"); while(ptr!=NULL){ printf("%d ",ptr->data); ptr=ptr->next; } printf("\n------------\n"); } int isEmpty(struct Node *f){ if (f == NULL){ return 1; } return 0; } int isFull(struct Node *f){ struct Node *n = (struct Node *)malloc(sizeof(struct Node)); if (n == NULL){ return 1; } return 0; } struct Node *enqueue(int val){ if (isFull(f)){ printf("Queue Overflow! Can't Enqueue %d\n", val); return f; } else{ struct Node *n = (struct Node *)malloc(sizeof(struct Node)); n->data = val; n->next = NULL; if (isEmpty(f)){ f = r = n; } r->next = n; r = n; return f; } } // int dequeue(){ // if (isFull(f)){ // printf("Queue Underflow! Nothing to Dequeue"); // } // int dqd = f->data; // f = f->next; // return dqd; // } int dequeue(){ int val=-1; struct Node *ptr=f; if (f==NULL){ printf("Empty\n"); } else{ f=f->next; val=ptr->data; free(ptr); return val; } } int main(){ enqueue(11); enqueue(22); enqueue(33); enqueue(44); traversal(f); dequeue(); dequeue(); traversal(f); return 0; }

                L Offline
                L Offline
                Lost User
                wrote on last edited by
                #8

                ZAID razvi wrote:

                written by a renowned youtuber 'code_with_harry'.

                Believe that and you will believe anything. And if that is an example of his output I would say he is renowned for writing poor code.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • Z ZAID razvi

                  How is that possible sir! Second code is written by a renowned youtuber 'code_with_harry'. Okk, for your better understanding i'm pasting full source code here: #include #include struct Node *f = NULL; struct Node *r = NULL; struct Node{ int data; struct Node *next; }; void traversal(struct Node *f){ struct Node *ptr=f; printf("------------\n"); while(ptr!=NULL){ printf("%d ",ptr->data); ptr=ptr->next; } printf("\n------------\n"); } int isEmpty(struct Node *f){ if (f == NULL){ return 1; } return 0; } int isFull(struct Node *f){ struct Node *n = (struct Node *)malloc(sizeof(struct Node)); if (n == NULL){ return 1; } return 0; } struct Node *enqueue(int val){ if (isFull(f)){ printf("Queue Overflow! Can't Enqueue %d\n", val); return f; } else{ struct Node *n = (struct Node *)malloc(sizeof(struct Node)); n->data = val; n->next = NULL; if (isEmpty(f)){ f = r = n; } r->next = n; r = n; return f; } } // int dequeue(){ // if (isFull(f)){ // printf("Queue Underflow! Nothing to Dequeue"); // } // int dqd = f->data; // f = f->next; // return dqd; // } int dequeue(){ int val=-1; struct Node *ptr=f; if (f==NULL){ printf("Empty\n"); } else{ f=f->next; val=ptr->data; free(ptr); return val; } } int main(){ enqueue(11); enqueue(22); enqueue(33); enqueue(44); traversal(f); dequeue(); dequeue(); traversal(f); return 0; }

                  D Offline
                  D Offline
                  Dave Kreskowiak
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #9

                  Harry is "renowned"? Prolific YouTube creator, maybe, but not renowned. A 125 video series on "How to become a job ready programmer in 3 months"? BWAHAHAHAHA! That's bullshit, and everybody in this field knows it. He's got a shit-ton of self-promotion marketing, but that doesn't mean he can teach.

                  Asking questions is a skill CodeProject Forum Guidelines Google: C# How to debug code Seriously, go read these articles.
                  Dave Kreskowiak

                  Richard DeemingR 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • Richard DeemingR Richard Deeming

                    ZAID razvi wrote:

                    Second code is written by a renowned youtuber

                    At least 90% of YouTube coding tutorial videos aren't worth the paper they're printed on. And how do you know that this Harry is "renowned"? Is this something that other well-known, competent, and respected developers have said? Or is it an adjective he's applied to himself? Either way, if the code doesn't work, there are two options: either you've made a mistake in copying it, or he made a mistake in writing it.


                    "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

                    A Offline
                    A Offline
                    Andre Oosthuizen
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #10

                    Quote:

                    ouTube coding tutorial videos aren't worth the paper they're printed on.

                    Or the screen they are presented on.

                    Quote:

                    either you've made a mistake in copying it, or he made a mistake in writing it

                    Indeed, back to the drawing board.

                    Richard DeemingR 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • A Andre Oosthuizen

                      Quote:

                      ouTube coding tutorial videos aren't worth the paper they're printed on.

                      Or the screen they are presented on.

                      Quote:

                      either you've made a mistake in copying it, or he made a mistake in writing it

                      Indeed, back to the drawing board.

                      Richard DeemingR Offline
                      Richard DeemingR Offline
                      Richard Deeming
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #11

                      Andre Oosthuizen wrote:

                      Or the screen they are presented on.

                      That's the point - the screen they're presented on is worth much more than the paper they're (not) printed on. :-D


                      "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

                      "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined" - Homer

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • D Dave Kreskowiak

                        Harry is "renowned"? Prolific YouTube creator, maybe, but not renowned. A 125 video series on "How to become a job ready programmer in 3 months"? BWAHAHAHAHA! That's bullshit, and everybody in this field knows it. He's got a shit-ton of self-promotion marketing, but that doesn't mean he can teach.

                        Asking questions is a skill CodeProject Forum Guidelines Google: C# How to debug code Seriously, go read these articles.
                        Dave Kreskowiak

                        Richard DeemingR Offline
                        Richard DeemingR Offline
                        Richard Deeming
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #12

                        Dave Kreskowiak wrote:

                        that doesn't mean he can teach

                        Or even write code, from the sounds of it. :laugh:


                        "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

                        "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined" - Homer

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • Z ZAID razvi

                          How is that possible sir! Second code is written by a renowned youtuber 'code_with_harry'. Okk, for your better understanding i'm pasting full source code here: #include #include struct Node *f = NULL; struct Node *r = NULL; struct Node{ int data; struct Node *next; }; void traversal(struct Node *f){ struct Node *ptr=f; printf("------------\n"); while(ptr!=NULL){ printf("%d ",ptr->data); ptr=ptr->next; } printf("\n------------\n"); } int isEmpty(struct Node *f){ if (f == NULL){ return 1; } return 0; } int isFull(struct Node *f){ struct Node *n = (struct Node *)malloc(sizeof(struct Node)); if (n == NULL){ return 1; } return 0; } struct Node *enqueue(int val){ if (isFull(f)){ printf("Queue Overflow! Can't Enqueue %d\n", val); return f; } else{ struct Node *n = (struct Node *)malloc(sizeof(struct Node)); n->data = val; n->next = NULL; if (isEmpty(f)){ f = r = n; } r->next = n; r = n; return f; } } // int dequeue(){ // if (isFull(f)){ // printf("Queue Underflow! Nothing to Dequeue"); // } // int dqd = f->data; // f = f->next; // return dqd; // } int dequeue(){ int val=-1; struct Node *ptr=f; if (f==NULL){ printf("Empty\n"); } else{ f=f->next; val=ptr->data; free(ptr); return val; } } int main(){ enqueue(11); enqueue(22); enqueue(33); enqueue(44); traversal(f); dequeue(); dequeue(); traversal(f); return 0; }

                          CPalliniC Offline
                          CPalliniC Offline
                          CPallini
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #13

                          Quote:

                          How is that possible sir! Second code is written by a renowned youtuber 'code_with_harry'.

                          I know. But here is renowed expert CPallini :-D. If you run Harry's code using Valgrind, then you get (something similar to)

                          ==3144== LEAK SUMMARY:
                          ==3144== definitely lost: 64 bytes in 4 blocks
                          ==3144== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
                          ==3144== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
                          ==3144== still reachable: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
                          ==3144== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
                          ==3144==
                          ==3144== For lists of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -s
                          ==3144== ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)

                          On the other hand, if you run the following, alternative code

                          #include
                          #include

                          struct Node
                          {
                          int val;
                          struct Node * next;
                          };

                          void traversal(const struct Node * p)
                          {
                          printf("------------\n");
                          while (p)
                          {
                          printf("%d ",p->val);
                          p = p->next;
                          }
                          printf("\n------------\n");
                          }

                          // isEmpty is not strictly needed
                          // isFull is meaning-less

                          struct Node * enqueue(struct Node *p, int val)
                          {

                          struct Node * prev = NULL;
                          while (p)
                          {
                          prev = p;
                          p = p->next;
                          }
                          p = malloc(sizeof(struct Node ));
                          if ( p )
                          {
                          p->val = val;
                          p->next = NULL;
                          if ( prev )
                          prev->next = p;
                          }
                          return p;
                          }

                          int dequeue(struct Node ** pp)
                          {
                          int val = -1;
                          struct Node * p = *pp;
                          if ( p )
                          {
                          val = p->val;
                          *pp = p->next;
                          free(p);
                          }
                          return val;
                          }

                          int main()
                          {
                          struct Node * ph = enqueue(NULL, 11);
                          enqueue(ph, 22);
                          enqueue(ph, 33);
                          enqueue(ph, 44);
                          traversal(ph);
                          dequeue(&ph);
                          dequeue(&ph);
                          traversal(ph);
                          dequeue(&ph);
                          dequeue(&ph);
                          return 0;
                          }

                          then Valgrind is somewhat happier:

                          ==3153== HEAP SUMMARY:
                          ==3153== in use at exit: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
                          ==3153== total heap usage: 5 allocs, 5 frees, 1,088 bytes allocated
                          ==3153==
                          ==3153== All heap blocks were freed -- no leaks are possible
                          ==3153==
                          ==3153== For lists of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -s
                          ==3153== ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)

                          "In testa che avete, Signor di Ceprano?" -- Rigoletto

                          In testa che avete, signor di Ceprano?

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • World
                          • Users
                          • Groups