GPT-4 falls short of Turing threshold
-
Tech Xplore[^]:
One question has relentlessly followed ChatGPT in its trajectory to superstar status in the field of artificial intelligence: Has it met the Turing test of generating output indistinguishable from human response?
Or that's what it wants us to think
-
Tech Xplore[^]:
One question has relentlessly followed ChatGPT in its trajectory to superstar status in the field of artificial intelligence: Has it met the Turing test of generating output indistinguishable from human response?
Or that's what it wants us to think
Article wrote:
Has it met the Turing test of generating output indistinguishable from human response?
Depending on which human response, it might even get better marks :rolleyes: :-D :sigh:
M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
-
Article wrote:
Has it met the Turing test of generating output indistinguishable from human response?
Depending on which human response, it might even get better marks :rolleyes: :-D :sigh:
M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
:thumbsup: indeed ... lately I've seen research papers about Theory of Mind for LLMs (for example [https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.01660\](https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.01660) - this one dates from 4 Sep 2023), but I am not sure if this supersedes the Turing test. Intuitively, I would say yes ...