AI outperforms humans in standardized tests of creative potential
-
Tech Xplore[^]:
In a recent study, 151 human participants were pitted against ChatGPT-4 in three tests designed to measure divergent thinking, which is considered to be an indicator of creative thought.
Can I borrow two standard cups of creativity for tomorrow's newsletter
I promise to return the favour next Tuesday Edit: fixed link
-
Tech Xplore[^]:
In a recent study, 151 human participants were pitted against ChatGPT-4 in three tests designed to measure divergent thinking, which is considered to be an indicator of creative thought.
Can I borrow two standard cups of creativity for tomorrow's newsletter
I promise to return the favour next Tuesday Edit: fixed link
Kent Sharkey wrote:
to measure divergent thinking, which is considered to be an indicator of creative thought.
I can think of many evil "divergent thinkers" that I guess would beat ChatGPT hands down. :~
Latest Articles:
A Lightweight Thread Safe In-Memory Keyed Generic Cache Collection Service A Dynamic Where Implementation for Entity Framework -
Tech Xplore[^]:
In a recent study, 151 human participants were pitted against ChatGPT-4 in three tests designed to measure divergent thinking, which is considered to be an indicator of creative thought.
Can I borrow two standard cups of creativity for tomorrow's newsletter
I promise to return the favour next Tuesday Edit: fixed link
Wrong link
-
Wrong link
And yet someone still upvoted it. :doh: Thank you, fixed.
TTFN - Kent
-
Tech Xplore[^]:
In a recent study, 151 human participants were pitted against ChatGPT-4 in three tests designed to measure divergent thinking, which is considered to be an indicator of creative thought.
Can I borrow two standard cups of creativity for tomorrow's newsletter
I promise to return the favour next Tuesday Edit: fixed link
From the article:
Quote:
Also, the researchers did not evaluate the appropriateness of GPT-4 responses.
So, it's all BS. Simply spewing lots of nonsense isn't a measure of creativity. Next up a math test: Researcher: What's 2 + 3 equals? GPT-4: 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 15, 36 Researcher: Very good; you are so much better at math than humans.
-
From the article:
Quote:
Also, the researchers did not evaluate the appropriateness of GPT-4 responses.
So, it's all BS. Simply spewing lots of nonsense isn't a measure of creativity. Next up a math test: Researcher: What's 2 + 3 equals? GPT-4: 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 15, 36 Researcher: Very good; you are so much better at math than humans.
Joe Woodbury wrote:
Researcher: What's 2 + 3 equals?
The pattering of a spring rain upon the leaves of a newly-sprouted crocus.
-
Joe Woodbury wrote:
Researcher: What's 2 + 3 equals?
The pattering of a spring rain upon the leaves of a newly-sprouted crocus.
Hey, no AI's allowed here.
-
Tech Xplore[^]:
In a recent study, 151 human participants were pitted against ChatGPT-4 in three tests designed to measure divergent thinking, which is considered to be an indicator of creative thought.
Can I borrow two standard cups of creativity for tomorrow's newsletter
I promise to return the favour next Tuesday Edit: fixed link
-
From the article:
Quote:
Also, the researchers did not evaluate the appropriateness of GPT-4 responses.
So, it's all BS. Simply spewing lots of nonsense isn't a measure of creativity. Next up a math test: Researcher: What's 2 + 3 equals? GPT-4: 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 15, 36 Researcher: Very good; you are so much better at math than humans.
Joe Woodbury wrote:
Researcher: Very good; you are so much better at creative math than humans.
FTFY
M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
-
Tech Xplore[^]:
In a recent study, 151 human participants were pitted against ChatGPT-4 in three tests designed to measure divergent thinking, which is considered to be an indicator of creative thought.
Can I borrow two standard cups of creativity for tomorrow's newsletter
I promise to return the favour next Tuesday Edit: fixed link
Kent Sharkey wrote:
151 human participants
Task to ChatGPT: Identify 151 human participants in this world who will outperform you in creativity.