Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Artificial Intelligence
  3. AI Assisted Coding
  4. I signed up for Anthropic's Claude model - might go with Kagi's Claude next. Some observations

I signed up for Anthropic's Claude model - might go with Kagi's Claude next. Some observations

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved AI Assisted Coding
mcpquestionvisual-studiotestinghelp
3 Posts 2 Posters 150 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • code-witchC Offline
    code-witchC Offline
    code-witch
    wrote last edited by code-witch
    #1

    The machine is not a liar, it's a bullshitter. The intent is different, but the result is often the same.
    There's a notes section anthropic has which it will use to seed all your prompts i guess. Mine says "the right question is more important than the right answer. don't be afraid to say I don't know. "
    Not sure how effective it is in practice.

    It's not great at imperative development, but it's a set monster. Give it a functional problem vs an imperative one, and it will absolutely go to town on it.

    I used it for research, because I don't have a math background, and I was exploring some new frontiers in Chomsky type 3 discrete deterministic finite automata, a subject I know a lot about fundamentally, but I am taxed when it comes to expanding the algorithms, because my grasp of them isn't always complete, especially in the extents, and the math fails me. Well. Claude was able to explore some techniques with me from "The Dragon Book" (not its actual title but if you know what this is you know what this is) and implement them with little to no guidance from me, which allowed me to learn the things I didn't understand, and come to a whole new class of understandings about the way FSMs work, which furthered my research goals.

    It's not a substitute for knowledge. You have to know enough about the subject to know if it's bullshitting you. Claude would have led me down counterproductive rabbit holes a lot more often than it did if I wasn't vigilant and aware enough of the subject matter to say "hey, wait a minute! what's that about?!" Even with knowledge i ended up being glad i saved work in progress copies of my code before making major changes it suggested.

    And unit test unit test unit test. The thing doesn't like handling edge cases. So you better test for them especially. Also, I've tried getting it to write unit tests for me and in the end it's questionable whether that saved me any time. It wrote a bunch of bad tests, and i had to review all of them anyway.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • pkfoxP Offline
      pkfoxP Offline
      pkfox
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      Hi HTCW, I recently used ChatGP to help me to convert/rewrite an MVC site to Blazor Server and I must say it was very helpful but as you say you have to watch what it gives you carefully - if you tell it exactly what you don't want it actually will improve its offerings - nice to see old names appearing here

      code-witchC 1 Reply Last reply
      3
      • pkfoxP pkfox

        Hi HTCW, I recently used ChatGP to help me to convert/rewrite an MVC site to Blazor Server and I must say it was very helpful but as you say you have to watch what it gives you carefully - if you tell it exactly what you don't want it actually will improve its offerings - nice to see old names appearing here

        code-witchC Offline
        code-witchC Offline
        code-witch
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        @pkfox Good to see you!

        I don't trust ChatGPT's model, but then the last one i tried was 4. Everyone I talked to about it said try Claude Sonnet 4 so I did, and in some ways it really impressed me. Of course immediately after it would do something pants-on-head stupid. XD

        1 Reply Last reply
        1
        Reply
        • Reply as topic
        Log in to reply
        • Oldest to Newest
        • Newest to Oldest
        • Most Votes


        • Login

        • Don't have an account? Register

        • Login or register to search.
        • First post
          Last post
        0
        • Categories
        • Recent
        • Tags
        • Popular
        • World
        • Users
        • Groups