Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. General Programming
  3. C / C++ / MFC
  4. Event Notification in C++

Event Notification in C++

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved C / C++ / MFC
questionc++data-structuressales
15 Posts 5 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J J Patel

    You can use the Subject, Observer pattern. HTH Jignesh

    S Offline
    S Offline
    Sam C
    wrote on last edited by
    #5

    Thanks for the respone and the URL I'll take a look at it, and thanks for helping me avoid option 3! Sam C ---- Systems Manager Hospitality Marketing Associates

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • S Sam C

      Does anyone know of a technique to "raise events" between two class objects? For example I have class A and Class B, I make a change to one of the member variables in class B, could be 20 of them, how do I notify class A of the change so it can see what has changed and act accordingly? Sort of of like Windows WinProc? Here are some simplistic ideas I have come up with 1. Create a system timer within class A and have it poll a "isDirty" variable in B and that is when it knows something is amiss. 2. Create a message queue in class A that B would send things too, and when A has a chance respond to the message. 3. Give up C++ programming and go back to Visual Basic :-) (Not that I can do what I need to do within VB) I don't prefer C because that might weigh heavily on system performance, and 2 seems more complex than it should, and I am definitely trying to avoid 3 ! So if any C++ gurus can give me a hint or point me in the right direction I would be mighty appreciative of yous. Sam C ---- Systems Manager Hospitality Marketing Associates

      T Offline
      T Offline
      Tomasz Sowinski
      wrote on last edited by
      #6

      The only way is to go with (3). Give up this C++ thing and code in VB. If you care for performance, implement time-critical things in assembly I've heard that there's a group of open source programmers working on porting VB to Linux, so you'll be able to quickly adapt your app to this wonderful OS. ;P I think now I'm going to reply to my own posts :-D To Chris Maunder - do I qualify for 'The Most Stupid Post in VC++ Forum' award? Like CP Mug with Bob? Tomasz Sowinski -- http://www.shooltz.com

      N S 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • T Tomasz Sowinski

        The only way is to go with (3). Give up this C++ thing and code in VB. If you care for performance, implement time-critical things in assembly I've heard that there's a group of open source programmers working on porting VB to Linux, so you'll be able to quickly adapt your app to this wonderful OS. ;P I think now I'm going to reply to my own posts :-D To Chris Maunder - do I qualify for 'The Most Stupid Post in VC++ Forum' award? Like CP Mug with Bob? Tomasz Sowinski -- http://www.shooltz.com

        N Offline
        N Offline
        Nemanja Trifunovic
        wrote on last edited by
        #7

        Actually, you qualify for the 'Most clever post in VC++ forum' award :( Now, let's be serious. I've read that in VC++ 7.0 we have new keywords ( _event, I think) that enables "unified event handling". Of course, it is a non-standard extension. How do you like that? :suss: I vote pro drink :beer:

        T 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • N Nemanja Trifunovic

          Actually, you qualify for the 'Most clever post in VC++ forum' award :( Now, let's be serious. I've read that in VC++ 7.0 we have new keywords ( _event, I think) that enables "unified event handling". Of course, it is a non-standard extension. How do you like that? :suss: I vote pro drink :beer:

          T Offline
          T Offline
          Tomasz Sowinski
          wrote on last edited by
          #8

          Is this keyword usable outside of .NET world? I mean, they have something called Managed C++ which introduces new keywords like __gc and others. Tomasz Sowinski -- http://www.shooltz.com

          N 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • T Tomasz Sowinski

            Is this keyword usable outside of .NET world? I mean, they have something called Managed C++ which introduces new keywords like __gc and others. Tomasz Sowinski -- http://www.shooltz.com

            N Offline
            N Offline
            Nemanja Trifunovic
            wrote on last edited by
            #9

            As far as I know, it has nothing to do with MC++. It is for the "native" code. I vote pro drink :beer:

            F 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • T Tomasz Sowinski

              The only way is to go with (3). Give up this C++ thing and code in VB. If you care for performance, implement time-critical things in assembly I've heard that there's a group of open source programmers working on porting VB to Linux, so you'll be able to quickly adapt your app to this wonderful OS. ;P I think now I'm going to reply to my own posts :-D To Chris Maunder - do I qualify for 'The Most Stupid Post in VC++ Forum' award? Like CP Mug with Bob? Tomasz Sowinski -- http://www.shooltz.com

              S Offline
              S Offline
              Sam C
              wrote on last edited by
              #10

              I knew I should've stuck with Visual Basic it rules!!! None of the complexities that are associated with C++ and chicks love it :-P Yeah right! ;-) Sam C ---- Systems Manager Hospitality Marketing Associates

              N 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • N Nemanja Trifunovic

                As far as I know, it has nothing to do with MC++. It is for the "native" code. I vote pro drink :beer:

                F Offline
                F Offline
                Fazlul Kabir
                wrote on last edited by
                #11

                I know MC++ supports __event keyword (not _event as you said) to declare events through delegates, but I'm not aware that any such keyword exists in native C++. // Fazlul


                Get RadVC today! Play RAD in VC++ http://www.capitolsoft.com

                N 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Fazlul Kabir

                  I know MC++ supports __event keyword (not _event as you said) to declare events through delegates, but I'm not aware that any such keyword exists in native C++. // Fazlul


                  Get RadVC today! Play RAD in VC++ http://www.capitolsoft.com

                  N Offline
                  N Offline
                  Nemanja Trifunovic
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #12

                  If you have VS .NET Beta 2, take a look into documentation (I found this info there). I'm pretty sure, they added this "unified" event approach to native C++. I vote pro drink :beer:

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • S Sam C

                    I knew I should've stuck with Visual Basic it rules!!! None of the complexities that are associated with C++ and chicks love it :-P Yeah right! ;-) Sam C ---- Systems Manager Hospitality Marketing Associates

                    N Offline
                    N Offline
                    Nemanja Trifunovic
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #13

                    As for complexities, I don't think VB is much simpler than C++, when you have "big" projects (I've tried both). As for chicks, I'm happily married, so this argument is also not valid for me. :cool: I vote pro drink :beer:

                    S 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • N Nemanja Trifunovic

                      As for complexities, I don't think VB is much simpler than C++, when you have "big" projects (I've tried both). As for chicks, I'm happily married, so this argument is also not valid for me. :cool: I vote pro drink :beer:

                      S Offline
                      S Offline
                      Sam C
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #14

                      Actually the comment was directed towards Tomasz, but since you replied...:-) We'll I have developed a ColorFORTH version of Internet Explorer and I'm happily divorced! Take that! :-D :-) (gg) Sam C ---- Systems Manager Hospitality Marketing Associates

                      N 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • S Sam C

                        Actually the comment was directed towards Tomasz, but since you replied...:-) We'll I have developed a ColorFORTH version of Internet Explorer and I'm happily divorced! Take that! :-D :-) (gg) Sam C ---- Systems Manager Hospitality Marketing Associates

                        N Offline
                        N Offline
                        Nemanja Trifunovic
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #15

                        I give up. VB is definitely better. :rolleyes: I vote pro drink :beer:

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups