President Bush
-
Chris Losinger wrote: Bush, that brave man, snuck in under the cover of darkness... So if he had gone in with a full announcment of his intentions and his plane had got shot at you wouldn't have said "What a fool for taking such a risk"?? Is there any way he could have visited Iraq that would have satisfied you (In a pine box perhaps?) If he had announced his intentions every single terrorist with a stinger missile would have been in the area and that would be just stupid - who knows - maybe a democratic president in 2012 or 2016 will try it? Dave Huff In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. (Yogi Berra)
Dave Huff wrote: So if he had gone in with a full announcment of his intentions you mean like Hillary, Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld, a whole host of other congressmen, etc. have done? ClickPic | ImgSource | CheeseWeasle
-
Dave Huff wrote: So if he had gone in with a full announcment of his intentions you mean like Hillary, Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld, a whole host of other congressmen, etc. have done? ClickPic | ImgSource | CheeseWeasle
Chris Losinger wrote: you mean like Hillary, Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld, a whole host of other congressmen, etc. have done? And which of those people are the President of the US? If any one of them gets taken out would it plunge the US into political chaos? Announcing his intention and giving everyone a schedule would have been incredibly stupid and inviting disaster. Even a Harvard and Yale educated 'moron' knows that. As it was I would be willing to bet the Secret Service was having kittens over this trip. Dave Huff In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. (Yogi Berra)
-
Chris Losinger wrote: you mean like Hillary, Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld, a whole host of other congressmen, etc. have done? And which of those people are the President of the US? If any one of them gets taken out would it plunge the US into political chaos? Announcing his intention and giving everyone a schedule would have been incredibly stupid and inviting disaster. Even a Harvard and Yale educated 'moron' knows that. As it was I would be willing to bet the Secret Service was having kittens over this trip. Dave Huff In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. (Yogi Berra)
Dave Huff wrote: If any one of them gets taken out would it plunge the US into political chaos? don't be so dramatic. there are rules that clearly describe how the government would function if someone with an RPG brought it on (to Bush). Dave Huff wrote: As it was I would be willing to bet the Secret Service was having kittens over this trip. i bet they were. such a big risk, for a such a little bit of granstanding. ClickPic | ImgSource | CheeseWeasle
-
Dave Huff wrote: If any one of them gets taken out would it plunge the US into political chaos? don't be so dramatic. there are rules that clearly describe how the government would function if someone with an RPG brought it on (to Bush). Dave Huff wrote: As it was I would be willing to bet the Secret Service was having kittens over this trip. i bet they were. such a big risk, for a such a little bit of granstanding. ClickPic | ImgSource | CheeseWeasle
Chris Losinger wrote: don't be so dramatic. there are rules that clearly describe how the government would function if someone with an RPG brought it on (to Bush). Yeah - Dick Cheney and Haliburton take over! Chris Losinger wrote: such a big risk, for a such a little bit of granstanding. I am sure that every US soldier in Iraq is thinking that very thought today. Dave Huff In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. (Yogi Berra)
-
couldn't let himself get shown-up by Hillary (or her husband), could he ? Bush, that brave man, snuck in under the cover of darkness just long enough to get some pictures taken. what an inspiration. i wonder if he dared the Iraqis to "Bring It On" while he was there, or did he wait until he was safely out of range ? ClickPic | ImgSource | CheeseWeasle
-
Mike Gaskey wrote: Suspect this will work well for the men and women in the service in Iraq. Yes, I know when Clinton visited my aircraft carrier in 96 it was great for morale. I am glad Bush did this, since appearently they are calling up inactive reserves now. Someone I know only received 2 days notice that they had to go back into the Marines!!:(:(:( I hope he doesn't get killed. Later, JoeSox When you're riding in a time machine way far into the future, don't stick your elbow out the window, or it'll turn into a fossil. --Jack Handy Deep Thoughts joeswammi.com ↔ humanaiproject.org ↔ joeswammi.com/sinfest
Are you sure it was inactive reserves or regular reserves? I cannot remember the last time they called up inactive reserves! How long has that individual been out and what is his MOS? I just find it quite interesting that they would recall the inactive reserves before using the reserves first!
-
Mike Gaskey wrote: Cheney no longer has a business relationship with Haliburton. he is still on their payroll - receiving delayed compensation to the tune of $180K/yr. Mike Gaskey wrote: Cheney walked away from millions to serve riiiight. he burned all his cash before he left for DC, and there's nothing waiting for him when he leaves office. he'll have to go live under a bridge, wearing a sack. what a sacrifice. what a generous man. if nothing else he can go work for the Carlyle Group along with Bush I, James Baker, and a whole bunch of other Bush/Reagan cronies. ClickPic | ImgSource | CheeseWeasle
Chris Losinger wrote: what a generous man that is the fucking truth. He could have turned down the chance to be VP and continued to line his pockets. 180K is peanuts for a top flight corporate executive, so big woo. Chris Losinger wrote: if nothing else he can go work for the Carlyle Group along with Bush I, James Baker, and a whole bunch of other Bush/Reagan cronies. And the problem with that is? Mike "liberals are being driven crazy by the fact that Bush is so popular with Americans, and thus by the realization that anyone to the left of center is utterly marginal." JAMES TRAUB NY Times Loyal member of the vast right wing conspiracy **"could a country (USA) letting one sixth of its population under the level of powerty be considered as civilized?"**KaЯl (France let 15,000 elderly die from summer heat)
-
Mike Gaskey wrote: To contrast, for the sake of contrast, Cheney with Clinton - Clinton ran for office as a poor man having done nothing other than serve in politics. He left office as a millionare. Cheney walked away from millions to serve. I seem to remember Cheney getting hired as CEO of Halliburton after serving as Sec Defense. He had no business experience but he served them well by getting them all sorts of defense business. Now he's in for round two of "public service". At any given instant there are considerably more assholes than mouths in the universe.
Tim Craig wrote: Now he's in for round two of "public service". at a significantly reduced salary. Mike "liberals are being driven crazy by the fact that Bush is so popular with Americans, and thus by the realization that anyone to the left of center is utterly marginal." JAMES TRAUB NY Times Loyal member of the vast right wing conspiracy **"could a country (USA) letting one sixth of its population under the level of powerty be considered as civilized?"**KaЯl (France let 15,000 elderly die from summer heat)
-
Mike Gaskey wrote: My personal belief is that without our 9-11 response to Afganistan and the follow on action in Iraq the terrorist world would have viewed us as cowardly and we would be living with daily in the streets terrorism as is the case in Israel. Huh?, where's the connection?, besides in Bush's brain that is... While Afghanistan was all about 9-11 and terrorists, Iraq is not even remotely linked to any of the two. "After all it's just text at the end of the day. - Colin Davies "For example, when a VB programmer comes to my house, they may say 'does your pool need cleaning, sir ?' " - Christian Graus
jan larsen wrote: besides in Bush's brain that is... in the minds of roughly 60% of Americans. I believe the action in Iraq was to show the Muslim world that we're willing to take on the best they have, remember we had been under attack for roughly 10 years prior to 9-11. The reason? We didn't go for the kill during the first Gulf War. Taking on Iraq ridded the world of a mindless mass murderer and the next generation of the same - witness the mass graves with more than 300,000 bodies. It also brings the battle against terrorism to the part of the world where it is fostered and keeps it away from the USA and other western nations. Watch the news over the next few years, Syria, Iran and others will be in line. The end result, democracy ultimately. Mike "liberals are being driven crazy by the fact that Bush is so popular with Americans, and thus by the realization that anyone to the left of center is utterly marginal." JAMES TRAUB NY Times Loyal member of the vast right wing conspiracy **"could a country (USA) letting one sixth of its population under the level of powerty be considered as civilized?"**KaЯl (France let 15,000 elderly die from summer heat)
-
Mike Gaskey wrote: To contrast, for the sake of contrast, Cheney with Clinton - Clinton ran for office as a poor man having done nothing other than serve in politics. He left office as a millionare. Cheney walked away from millions to serve. I seem to remember Cheney getting hired as CEO of Halliburton after serving as Sec Defense. He had no business experience but he served them well by getting them all sorts of defense business. Now he's in for round two of "public service". At any given instant there are considerably more assholes than mouths in the universe.
Tim Craig wrote: Now he's in for round two of "public service". round five, at least. he was Rummy's assistant under Nixon, he was Ford's chief of staff and he was a Rep for Wyoming. he's had more government jobs than anything else. and he'll probably end up on the board of some other huge company after his turn at VP is over. ClickPic | ImgSource | CheeseWeasle
-
Chris Losinger wrote: what a generous man that is the fucking truth. He could have turned down the chance to be VP and continued to line his pockets. 180K is peanuts for a top flight corporate executive, so big woo. Chris Losinger wrote: if nothing else he can go work for the Carlyle Group along with Bush I, James Baker, and a whole bunch of other Bush/Reagan cronies. And the problem with that is? Mike "liberals are being driven crazy by the fact that Bush is so popular with Americans, and thus by the realization that anyone to the left of center is utterly marginal." JAMES TRAUB NY Times Loyal member of the vast right wing conspiracy **"could a country (USA) letting one sixth of its population under the level of powerty be considered as civilized?"**KaЯl (France let 15,000 elderly die from summer heat)
Mike Gaskey wrote: And the problem with that is? no problem. but your "walking away from millions" is silly, when it's clear that he'll be able to have some lucrative post-govt job somewhere. ClickPic | ImgSource | CheeseWeasle
-
Mike Gaskey wrote: And the problem with that is? no problem. but your "walking away from millions" is silly, when it's clear that he'll be able to have some lucrative post-govt job somewhere. ClickPic | ImgSource | CheeseWeasle
Chris Losinger wrote: "walking away from millions" is silly It would be, I'll agree, if he were younger and healthier. Given his age and health I would say taking 1 year to campaign, 4 in office and potentially 4 more in office - it is only 50/50 that he steps into a lucrative post-VP job. Mike "liberals are being driven crazy by the fact that Bush is so popular with Americans, and thus by the realization that anyone to the left of center is utterly marginal." JAMES TRAUB NY Times Loyal member of the vast right wing conspiracy **"could a country (USA) letting one sixth of its population under the level of powerty be considered as civilized?"**KaЯl (France let 15,000 elderly die from summer heat)
-
Are you sure it was inactive reserves or regular reserves? I cannot remember the last time they called up inactive reserves! How long has that individual been out and what is his MOS? I just find it quite interesting that they would recall the inactive reserves before using the reserves first!
US Marine Jr. wrote: I just find it quite interesting that they would recall the inactive reserves before using the reserves first! I think it is a rate (job position) thing more than a "we need a body" thing. Later, JoeSox When you're riding in a time machine way far into the future, don't stick your elbow out the window, or it'll turn into a fossil. --Jack Handy Deep Thoughts joeswammi.com ↔ humanaiproject.org ↔ joeswammi.com/sinfest
-
Tim Craig wrote: Now he's in for round two of "public service". at a significantly reduced salary. Mike "liberals are being driven crazy by the fact that Bush is so popular with Americans, and thus by the realization that anyone to the left of center is utterly marginal." JAMES TRAUB NY Times Loyal member of the vast right wing conspiracy **"could a country (USA) letting one sixth of its population under the level of powerty be considered as civilized?"**KaЯl (France let 15,000 elderly die from summer heat)
-
Mike Gaskey wrote: at a significantly reduced salary. Just an investment for his next job in the private sector. At any given instant there are considerably more assholes than mouths in the universe.
my reply to Chris should suffice to explain: http://www.codeproject.com/script/comments/forums.asp?msg=678110&forumid=2605#xx678110xx[^] Mike "liberals are being driven crazy by the fact that Bush is so popular with Americans, and thus by the realization that anyone to the left of center is utterly marginal." JAMES TRAUB NY Times Loyal member of the vast right wing conspiracy **"could a country (USA) letting one sixth of its population under the level of powerty be considered as civilized?"**KaЯl (France let 15,000 elderly die from summer heat)
-
jan larsen wrote: besides in Bush's brain that is... in the minds of roughly 60% of Americans. I believe the action in Iraq was to show the Muslim world that we're willing to take on the best they have, remember we had been under attack for roughly 10 years prior to 9-11. The reason? We didn't go for the kill during the first Gulf War. Taking on Iraq ridded the world of a mindless mass murderer and the next generation of the same - witness the mass graves with more than 300,000 bodies. It also brings the battle against terrorism to the part of the world where it is fostered and keeps it away from the USA and other western nations. Watch the news over the next few years, Syria, Iran and others will be in line. The end result, democracy ultimately. Mike "liberals are being driven crazy by the fact that Bush is so popular with Americans, and thus by the realization that anyone to the left of center is utterly marginal." JAMES TRAUB NY Times Loyal member of the vast right wing conspiracy **"could a country (USA) letting one sixth of its population under the level of powerty be considered as civilized?"**KaЯl (France let 15,000 elderly die from summer heat)
Mike Gaskey wrote: believe the action in Iraq was to show the Muslim world that we're willing to take on the best they have It certainly wasn't about WMD's and freedom, before the attack they had neither, and under your occupation they still have neither. Anyway, it couldn't be about showing anything to the Muslim world, other than plain stupidity, because then the target should have been one of the real Islamic countries where Sharia is more implemented, like Saudi Arabia, then it probably would have something remotely related to 9-11. Well, I'm off to the monday morning meeting, more rants later :-D "After all it's just text at the end of the day. - Colin Davies "For example, when a VB programmer comes to my house, they may say 'does your pool need cleaning, sir ?' " - Christian Graus
