Russians poised to brutalize Iraqi people
-
Eco Jones wrote: 1. No source noted. Sorry. I thought you lived in a place with electricty......[^] Eco Jones wrote: 2. Unneccessary use of the word 'rape' which really kind of devalues the actual crime of rape. According to every dictionary - including this one, [^] (see verb 2) what Russia and France are prepared to do to the newly freed Iraqis is rape. Eco Jones wrote: 3. Idiotic, biased, unspecific conjecture. This is your opinion and you are welcome to it. The sad thing is that there are probably idiots reading this who voted your post a 5.
Terry O'Nolley wrote: Sorry. I thought you lived in a place with electricty.... There are plenty of simple and obvious reasons for providing a source to back up your argument. The following comment by Paul Martin (soon to be Prime Minister of Canada): "I find it really very difficult to fathom" also sums up my view of your post and it's relationship to that article. Terry O'Nolley wrote: The sad thing is that there are probably idiots reading this who voted your post a 5. On the other hand, they might have voted 1.
« eikonoklastes »
-
Terry O'Nolley wrote: Sorry. I thought you lived in a place with electricty.... There are plenty of simple and obvious reasons for providing a source to back up your argument. The following comment by Paul Martin (soon to be Prime Minister of Canada): "I find it really very difficult to fathom" also sums up my view of your post and it's relationship to that article. Terry O'Nolley wrote: The sad thing is that there are probably idiots reading this who voted your post a 5. On the other hand, they might have voted 1.
« eikonoklastes »
Tsk tsk, don't confuse Nelly O'Trolly with logic :laugh: The tigress is here :-D
-
Tsk tsk, don't confuse Nelly O'Trolly with logic :laugh: The tigress is here :-D
Trollslayer wrote: don't confuse Nelly O'Trolly with logic I think it took maybe 3 Nelly posts to work that out. Trollslayer wrote: Nelly O'Trolly :laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh: Rob Manderson http://www.mindprobes.net **Paul Watson wrote:**What sense would you most dislike loosing? Ian Darling replied. Telepathy Then I'd no longer be able to find out everyones dirty little secrets The Lounge, December 4 2003
-
Sure the Russians sided with Saddam Hussein in the war. But since they aren't going to be profitting off of the demise of their buddy with rebuilding contracts they have hinted that they may force the new Iraqi govt. to pay off Saddam's debts. I'll bet France will also attempt to rape the free Iraq. So sad............
-
Eco Jones wrote: 1. No source noted. Sorry. I thought you lived in a place with electricty......[^] Eco Jones wrote: 2. Unneccessary use of the word 'rape' which really kind of devalues the actual crime of rape. According to every dictionary - including this one, [^] (see verb 2) what Russia and France are prepared to do to the newly freed Iraqis is rape. Eco Jones wrote: 3. Idiotic, biased, unspecific conjecture. This is your opinion and you are welcome to it. The sad thing is that there are probably idiots reading this who voted your post a 5.
Hey, not all of us watch CNN religiously like you do. Just because you bow to it's warming light, doesn't mean we're all hunched near our own TV sets, anxiously waiting for them to tell us the latest 'facts' every hour of the day. Terry O`Nolley wrote: This is your opinion and you are welcome to it. What you wrote (concerning France): Idiotic - opinion, sure Biased - fact Unspecific - fact Conjecture - fact And something tells me you don't know anyone who's actually been raped, or you might have a slightly different outlook on the words you use to describe world economics. X| Eco
-
Sure the Russians sided with Saddam Hussein in the war. But since they aren't going to be profitting off of the demise of their buddy with rebuilding contracts they have hinted that they may force the new Iraqi govt. to pay off Saddam's debts. I'll bet France will also attempt to rape the free Iraq. So sad............
-
Tsk tsk, don't confuse Nelly O'Trolly with logic :laugh: The tigress is here :-D
I had to vote your poast a 5! It has been so long since I saw a person stoop to making up silly sounding names for someone. Brought me back to 4th grade and that is 5-worthy! How old are you anyways?
-
Hey, not all of us watch CNN religiously like you do. Just because you bow to it's warming light, doesn't mean we're all hunched near our own TV sets, anxiously waiting for them to tell us the latest 'facts' every hour of the day. Terry O`Nolley wrote: This is your opinion and you are welcome to it. What you wrote (concerning France): Idiotic - opinion, sure Biased - fact Unspecific - fact Conjecture - fact And something tells me you don't know anyone who's actually been raped, or you might have a slightly different outlook on the words you use to describe world economics. X| Eco
Eco Jones wrote: And something tells me you don't know anyone who's actually been raped, or you might have a slightly different outlook on the words you use to describe world economics. There is more than one definition of the word rape. Don't even try to censor me with your pathetic attempt to garner the support of victims groups. Nice try goofball.
-
a debt is a debt. Rape is when you force sexual intercourse on someone. Just to clear things up a but.
Flirt harder, I'm a coder.
mlog || Agile Programming | doxygenpeterchen wrote: a debt is a debt. The debt was from Saddam's Baathist govt. which no longer exists. Attempting to transfer the debtto the newly freed Iraqi people is sickening.
-
Eco Jones wrote: And something tells me you don't know anyone who's actually been raped, or you might have a slightly different outlook on the words you use to describe world economics. There is more than one definition of the word rape. Don't even try to censor me with your pathetic attempt to garner the support of victims groups. Nice try goofball.
Hey, you call me a goofball - and yet you use the most emotionally laden and manipulative language possible to describe the most inane things, for the sole purpose of hiding your poor writing and research skills, and almost total lack of logic. If I were trying to censor you I would just downvote the post - and this is much more fun. :-D Eco
-
Tsk tsk, don't confuse Nelly O'Trolly with logic :laugh: The tigress is here :-D
Something for the kids: Nelly to logic is like water to oil. ;) -- 20 eyes in my head, they're all the same![^]
-
peterchen wrote: a debt is a debt. The debt was from Saddam's Baathist govt. which no longer exists. Attempting to transfer the debtto the newly freed Iraqi people is sickening.
But there is a legally acceptable follower, who, by customs, is to take over the debt. Terry O`Nolley wrote: Attempting to transfer the debtto the newly freed Iraqi people a) it's the same people as before. They have not changed (yet), just their government chaos generator. Is this so hard to get? b) The debt is not transfered to the iraqui people, but to the new government. If the new government transfers this to the "newly freed Iraqui people", well, tough luck, If the US wants to subside only it's own companies with tax payers money, fine. If the european creditors agree to forget about the debt, fine. But asking for both is sick.
Flirt harder, I'm a coder.
mlog || Agile Programming | doxygen