Visual Basic&Pentium4
-
Dear community I am working at a my project in Visual Basic 6 (Service Pack 5) and I notice this seroius problem. When I create my executable on a PIII or Athlon Processor the speed of the program is almost two faster than when I create my executable on P4. I think that the compiler isn't optimized for P4, but it's a strange fact. ( The P4 Work at 2.4 Ghz, P3 work at 1.0 Ghz and Athlon XP work at 1.6 Ghz (It is a AthlonXP2000) Somebody can help me for increasing the speed on P4?
-
Dear community I am working at a my project in Visual Basic 6 (Service Pack 5) and I notice this seroius problem. When I create my executable on a PIII or Athlon Processor the speed of the program is almost two faster than when I create my executable on P4. I think that the compiler isn't optimized for P4, but it's a strange fact. ( The P4 Work at 2.4 Ghz, P3 work at 1.0 Ghz and Athlon XP work at 1.6 Ghz (It is a AthlonXP2000) Somebody can help me for increasing the speed on P4?
Unfortunately, the compiler doesn't have any optimizations for a P4, or a P3 for that matter. There's got to be something else installed on the machine that is causing this. I've run VB6 SP5 on my machines, P3, P4 and Athlon 2600+, with no difference between the executables or their speed. Are the .EXE files generated EXACTLY the same, byte for byte? RageInTheMachine9532
-
Unfortunately, the compiler doesn't have any optimizations for a P4, or a P3 for that matter. There's got to be something else installed on the machine that is causing this. I've run VB6 SP5 on my machines, P3, P4 and Athlon 2600+, with no difference between the executables or their speed. Are the .EXE files generated EXACTLY the same, byte for byte? RageInTheMachine9532
I have done two tests: First I have made the executable on P3 and I tested it on P4. The difference on speed is about two times. Second: I have made the executable on P4 directly, but it is the same. The source code is the same, in each tests. I have used Windows2000, and WindowsXp : there are no difference. E.G.
-
I have done two tests: First I have made the executable on P3 and I tested it on P4. The difference on speed is about two times. Second: I have made the executable on P4 directly, but it is the same. The source code is the same, in each tests. I have used Windows2000, and WindowsXp : there are no difference. E.G.
Let me get this straight: You compile the program on a P3. Run it on the P3 and P4 and the performance is about twice as fast on the P4. You compile the program on a P4. Run it on the P3 and P4 and the performance is EQUAL on both machines!? :confused: and its slower than when the program was compiled on the P3? RageInTheMachine9532
-
Let me get this straight: You compile the program on a P3. Run it on the P3 and P4 and the performance is about twice as fast on the P4. You compile the program on a P4. Run it on the P3 and P4 and the performance is EQUAL on both machines!? :confused: and its slower than when the program was compiled on the P3? RageInTheMachine9532
Probably I made some mess in my word.. I tested the speed in two way: First: I compile the program on a P3(1 Ghz) and I copy it on a P4 (2.4 Ghz) also. In this way the executable is the same (Byte per Byte), but I see that the speed on P3 is faster (!!!) than the P4. Second: I compile the program on P3 and run it. I compile the program on P4 and run it. I see that the P3 is faster than P4. The P3 is faster than P4. Why? (Very strange) I didn't install any special program and I have made some tests on different P4. E.G.