OK, enough is enough.
-
Who is the person that rabid liberals fear most? Not conservatives - they are easily beaten. The answer is an intelligent liberal that isn't tied body and soul to the extreme liberal platform. I am assuming that people here are intelligent enough to parse the salient points of my posts before they go all spasmodic and begin throwing hissy fits. If that assumption is wrong - then please tell me. Be honest. I have said this for months - I am a social liberal that is a hawk when it comes to combatting terrorism. I think that the opinion I hold that most offends self-righteous liberal bastards is my "You must be a Saddam supporter" position. For some reason, the tiny little control computers that slowly grind away inside of the brains of many knee-jerk liberals force their hosts to discount anything I say just because the observations I make (which are patently obvious to any neutral appraiser) force their brittle belief systems against a jagged wall. It is true - I believe that: 1) Anyone who thinks the Iraqis were better off under Saddam is a Saddam supporter 2) Anyone who thinks the Iraqis are better off without Saddam should give democracy a chance before crowing about how badly the US is doing over there 3) People who wish to highlight US failures in Iraq (real or propagandized) have a hidden agenda Other points to note: A) If you aren't self-righteous then you aren't self-righteous liberal bastard! B) If you aren't a bastard, then you aren't a self-righteous liberal bastard! C) Don't be an asshole and assume I am talking about you without realizing that you need to first consciously decide to apply my labels to yourself.
I'm going to live forever or die trying
Rangers Lead The WayDid someone pee in your porridge? Rob Manderson Colin Davies wrote: I'm sure Americans could use more of it, and thus reduce the world supply faster. This of course would be good, because the faster we run out globally, the less chance of pollution there will be. (Talking about the price of petrol) The Soapbox, March 5 2004
-
Did someone pee in your porridge? Rob Manderson Colin Davies wrote: I'm sure Americans could use more of it, and thus reduce the world supply faster. This of course would be good, because the faster we run out globally, the less chance of pollution there will be. (Talking about the price of petrol) The Soapbox, March 5 2004
Rob Manderson wrote: Did someone pee in your porridge? He likes it, apparently.
-
Who is the person that rabid liberals fear most? Not conservatives - they are easily beaten. The answer is an intelligent liberal that isn't tied body and soul to the extreme liberal platform. I am assuming that people here are intelligent enough to parse the salient points of my posts before they go all spasmodic and begin throwing hissy fits. If that assumption is wrong - then please tell me. Be honest. I have said this for months - I am a social liberal that is a hawk when it comes to combatting terrorism. I think that the opinion I hold that most offends self-righteous liberal bastards is my "You must be a Saddam supporter" position. For some reason, the tiny little control computers that slowly grind away inside of the brains of many knee-jerk liberals force their hosts to discount anything I say just because the observations I make (which are patently obvious to any neutral appraiser) force their brittle belief systems against a jagged wall. It is true - I believe that: 1) Anyone who thinks the Iraqis were better off under Saddam is a Saddam supporter 2) Anyone who thinks the Iraqis are better off without Saddam should give democracy a chance before crowing about how badly the US is doing over there 3) People who wish to highlight US failures in Iraq (real or propagandized) have a hidden agenda Other points to note: A) If you aren't self-righteous then you aren't self-righteous liberal bastard! B) If you aren't a bastard, then you aren't a self-righteous liberal bastard! C) Don't be an asshole and assume I am talking about you without realizing that you need to first consciously decide to apply my labels to yourself.
I'm going to live forever or die trying
Rangers Lead The WayYou are determined to save the world but don't do anything about it. Slow down and actually do something. Me ? I do some counselling now and then and have helped a few people back from the edge of taking their lives, helped some others accept themselves and start making thier lives work. So tell us, what difference do you make to the world other than attacking others to make yourself feel better? The tigress is here :-D
-
Who is the person that rabid liberals fear most? Not conservatives - they are easily beaten. The answer is an intelligent liberal that isn't tied body and soul to the extreme liberal platform. I am assuming that people here are intelligent enough to parse the salient points of my posts before they go all spasmodic and begin throwing hissy fits. If that assumption is wrong - then please tell me. Be honest. I have said this for months - I am a social liberal that is a hawk when it comes to combatting terrorism. I think that the opinion I hold that most offends self-righteous liberal bastards is my "You must be a Saddam supporter" position. For some reason, the tiny little control computers that slowly grind away inside of the brains of many knee-jerk liberals force their hosts to discount anything I say just because the observations I make (which are patently obvious to any neutral appraiser) force their brittle belief systems against a jagged wall. It is true - I believe that: 1) Anyone who thinks the Iraqis were better off under Saddam is a Saddam supporter 2) Anyone who thinks the Iraqis are better off without Saddam should give democracy a chance before crowing about how badly the US is doing over there 3) People who wish to highlight US failures in Iraq (real or propagandized) have a hidden agenda Other points to note: A) If you aren't self-righteous then you aren't self-righteous liberal bastard! B) If you aren't a bastard, then you aren't a self-righteous liberal bastard! C) Don't be an asshole and assume I am talking about you without realizing that you need to first consciously decide to apply my labels to yourself.
I'm going to live forever or die trying
Rangers Lead The WayAs long as you will use systematically violence, insults and disrespect in your posts, you will be considered by many as a trolling buffoon. You can't attack people and then hope they will listen to you. Hatred can't be a valid communication mode.
Dansez sur moi, dansez sur moi, Le soir de mes funerailles Que la vie soit feu d'artifice Et la mort un feu de paille Claude Nougaro (1929-2004)
-
As long as you will use systematically violence, insults and disrespect in your posts, you will be considered by many as a trolling buffoon. You can't attack people and then hope they will listen to you. Hatred can't be a valid communication mode.
Dansez sur moi, dansez sur moi, Le soir de mes funerailles Que la vie soit feu d'artifice Et la mort un feu de paille Claude Nougaro (1929-2004)
Well said and a 5. Elaine :rose: The tigress is here :-D
-
I suspect that many of your posts would be far more acceptable if your style was less obnoxious and abrasive. I happen to agree with much of what you have to say, but because of your style I'm inclined to think of you as more of a particularly low and virulent asshole than a rational observer of world events. Mind you, there's nothing wrong with being an asshole, so long as you're good at it. We all take turns at it here, though John Simmons is probably the universally acknowledged master... he is held in high regard because of his mastery of style. You could learn much from a study of his contributions. Terry O`Nolley wrote: 3) People who wish to highlight US failures in Iraq (real or propagandized) have a hidden agenda Of course they do - what's new about that? Liberals want a nanny state, worldwide, and they will seize any opportunity to undermine respect for the existing regime. Old news, so why harp on it? Terry O`Nolley wrote: A) If you aren't self-righteous then you aren't self-righteous liberal bastard I don't see any shortage of self-righteous Conservatives. Even Jerry Falwell still has a following, though most have trouble remembering how to tie shoes. Terry O`Nolley wrote: B) If you aren't a bastard, then you aren't a self-righteous liberal bastard! Are the children of Liberals the only ones who can't recall the names of their fathers? Terry O`Nolley wrote: C) Don't be an asshole and assume I am talking about you without realizing that you need to first consciously decide to apply my labels to yourself. I'd never do that. You're obviously taking to Chris and Karl. And you're obviously trolling for a response from our poor, retarded, Liberal friends. That's just plain cruel, and beneath you. They can't help the fact that their minds were canalized at a young age in ways that no thinking person would condone. Be nice, Terry - shame on you for picking on defenseless critters like that!;P Will Build Nuclear Missile For Food - No Target Too Small
Roger Wright wrote: You're obviously taking to Chris and Karl Don't forget the aptly named LunaticFringe Mike "liberals are being driven crazy by the fact that Bush is so popular with Americans, and thus by the realization that anyone to the left of center is utterly marginal." JAMES TRAUB NY Times Loyal member of the vast right wing conspiracy Me "Kerry is a girl's name." Conan O'Brian "I've spoken to many world leaders - they all look at me and say, you've got to win. I just can't tell you who they are." J.F.Kerry
-
Who is the person that rabid liberals fear most? Not conservatives - they are easily beaten. The answer is an intelligent liberal that isn't tied body and soul to the extreme liberal platform. I am assuming that people here are intelligent enough to parse the salient points of my posts before they go all spasmodic and begin throwing hissy fits. If that assumption is wrong - then please tell me. Be honest. I have said this for months - I am a social liberal that is a hawk when it comes to combatting terrorism. I think that the opinion I hold that most offends self-righteous liberal bastards is my "You must be a Saddam supporter" position. For some reason, the tiny little control computers that slowly grind away inside of the brains of many knee-jerk liberals force their hosts to discount anything I say just because the observations I make (which are patently obvious to any neutral appraiser) force their brittle belief systems against a jagged wall. It is true - I believe that: 1) Anyone who thinks the Iraqis were better off under Saddam is a Saddam supporter 2) Anyone who thinks the Iraqis are better off without Saddam should give democracy a chance before crowing about how badly the US is doing over there 3) People who wish to highlight US failures in Iraq (real or propagandized) have a hidden agenda Other points to note: A) If you aren't self-righteous then you aren't self-righteous liberal bastard! B) If you aren't a bastard, then you aren't a self-righteous liberal bastard! C) Don't be an asshole and assume I am talking about you without realizing that you need to first consciously decide to apply my labels to yourself.
I'm going to live forever or die trying
Rangers Lead The WayTerry O`Nolley wrote: Who is the person that rabid liberals fear most? Not conservatives - they are easily beaten. The answer is an intelligent liberal that isn't tied body and soul to the extreme liberal platform. You are apparently referring to yourself. Your image of yourself is not widely shared. Terry O`Nolley wrote: I think that the opinion I hold that most offends self-righteous liberal bastards is my "You must be a Saddam supporter" position. That is certainly offensive but is symptomatic of a broader problem which is: 1. An inability to accept that people of goodwill might disagree with you. 2. A reluctance to honestly engage with other people's views, preferring instead to defame them by attributing to them a distorted caricature of their true opinions. John Carson "I wish to propose for the reader's favourable consideration a doctrine which may, I fear, appear wildly paradoxical and subversive. The doctrine in question is this: that it is undesirable to believe a proposition when there is no ground whatever for supposing it true." - Bertrand Russell
-
As long as you will use systematically violence, insults and disrespect in your posts, you will be considered by many as a trolling buffoon. You can't attack people and then hope they will listen to you. Hatred can't be a valid communication mode.
Dansez sur moi, dansez sur moi, Le soir de mes funerailles Que la vie soit feu d'artifice Et la mort un feu de paille Claude Nougaro (1929-2004)
KaЯl wrote: Hatred can't be a valid communication mode. Wrong. This is the method in vogue by the Democrat Party. Mike "liberals are being driven crazy by the fact that Bush is so popular with Americans, and thus by the realization that anyone to the left of center is utterly marginal." JAMES TRAUB NY Times Loyal member of the vast right wing conspiracy Me "Kerry is a girl's name." Conan O'Brian "I've spoken to many world leaders - they all look at me and say, you've got to win. I just can't tell you who they are." J.F.Kerry
-
KaЯl wrote: Hatred can't be a valid communication mode. Wrong. This is the method in vogue by the Democrat Party. Mike "liberals are being driven crazy by the fact that Bush is so popular with Americans, and thus by the realization that anyone to the left of center is utterly marginal." JAMES TRAUB NY Times Loyal member of the vast right wing conspiracy Me "Kerry is a girl's name." Conan O'Brian "I've spoken to many world leaders - they all look at me and say, you've got to win. I just can't tell you who they are." J.F.Kerry
Mike Gaskey wrote: Wrong. This is the method in vogue by the Democrat Party. :laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh: Yeah, and you'd know, right, Mr. Gaskey? Christ, Nelly O'Trolley is a rank amateur compared to you, when it comes to hate-filled, unbalanced screeds.
-
Roger Wright wrote: You're obviously taking to Chris and Karl Don't forget the aptly named LunaticFringe Mike "liberals are being driven crazy by the fact that Bush is so popular with Americans, and thus by the realization that anyone to the left of center is utterly marginal." JAMES TRAUB NY Times Loyal member of the vast right wing conspiracy Me "Kerry is a girl's name." Conan O'Brian "I've spoken to many world leaders - they all look at me and say, you've got to win. I just can't tell you who they are." J.F.Kerry
-
1 because I think all you guys are beating a dead horse. Give it a rest already, you are not going to convince the opposition, and they are not going to convince you. I can't believe this, but I miss the cricket posts. :rolleyes:
"if you vote me down, I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine" - Michael P. Butler. Support Bone It's a weird Life
Nick Seng wrote: I can't believe this, but I miss the cricket posts I am sure it can be arranged :-)
-
Nick Seng wrote: I can't believe this, but I miss the cricket posts I am sure it can be arranged :-)
-
Who is the person that rabid liberals fear most? Not conservatives - they are easily beaten. The answer is an intelligent liberal that isn't tied body and soul to the extreme liberal platform. I am assuming that people here are intelligent enough to parse the salient points of my posts before they go all spasmodic and begin throwing hissy fits. If that assumption is wrong - then please tell me. Be honest. I have said this for months - I am a social liberal that is a hawk when it comes to combatting terrorism. I think that the opinion I hold that most offends self-righteous liberal bastards is my "You must be a Saddam supporter" position. For some reason, the tiny little control computers that slowly grind away inside of the brains of many knee-jerk liberals force their hosts to discount anything I say just because the observations I make (which are patently obvious to any neutral appraiser) force their brittle belief systems against a jagged wall. It is true - I believe that: 1) Anyone who thinks the Iraqis were better off under Saddam is a Saddam supporter 2) Anyone who thinks the Iraqis are better off without Saddam should give democracy a chance before crowing about how badly the US is doing over there 3) People who wish to highlight US failures in Iraq (real or propagandized) have a hidden agenda Other points to note: A) If you aren't self-righteous then you aren't self-righteous liberal bastard! B) If you aren't a bastard, then you aren't a self-righteous liberal bastard! C) Don't be an asshole and assume I am talking about you without realizing that you need to first consciously decide to apply my labels to yourself.
I'm going to live forever or die trying
Rangers Lead The WayI make my judgements on facts as I see them and ignore ideology. The fact is that regardless of the horrible things that occurred on 9/11, and other terrorist attacks, the Bush administration has been using it as an excuse to push its own agenda. Yes people are better off without Saddam. But only just I would say. The way that Bush got from A to B was by using lies and disception. Is that the kind of person that you want in office? I would say the worse problem is that Bush is using it as a means to enrich himself and his cronies. The deficits have hit all time highs. There is high unemployment because he has put business interests over American interests. BTW where is Osama bin Laden, has this war on terror stopped them from bombing Madrid?
My neighbours think I am crazy - but they don't know that I have a trampoline. All they see my head bobbing up and down over the fence every five seconds
-
I make my judgements on facts as I see them and ignore ideology. The fact is that regardless of the horrible things that occurred on 9/11, and other terrorist attacks, the Bush administration has been using it as an excuse to push its own agenda. Yes people are better off without Saddam. But only just I would say. The way that Bush got from A to B was by using lies and disception. Is that the kind of person that you want in office? I would say the worse problem is that Bush is using it as a means to enrich himself and his cronies. The deficits have hit all time highs. There is high unemployment because he has put business interests over American interests. BTW where is Osama bin Laden, has this war on terror stopped them from bombing Madrid?
My neighbours think I am crazy - but they don't know that I have a trampoline. All they see my head bobbing up and down over the fence every five seconds
5. Now you are what I'd consider a rational person :)
-
I suspect that many of your posts would be far more acceptable if your style was less obnoxious and abrasive. I happen to agree with much of what you have to say, but because of your style I'm inclined to think of you as more of a particularly low and virulent asshole than a rational observer of world events. Mind you, there's nothing wrong with being an asshole, so long as you're good at it. We all take turns at it here, though John Simmons is probably the universally acknowledged master... he is held in high regard because of his mastery of style. You could learn much from a study of his contributions. Terry O`Nolley wrote: 3) People who wish to highlight US failures in Iraq (real or propagandized) have a hidden agenda Of course they do - what's new about that? Liberals want a nanny state, worldwide, and they will seize any opportunity to undermine respect for the existing regime. Old news, so why harp on it? Terry O`Nolley wrote: A) If you aren't self-righteous then you aren't self-righteous liberal bastard I don't see any shortage of self-righteous Conservatives. Even Jerry Falwell still has a following, though most have trouble remembering how to tie shoes. Terry O`Nolley wrote: B) If you aren't a bastard, then you aren't a self-righteous liberal bastard! Are the children of Liberals the only ones who can't recall the names of their fathers? Terry O`Nolley wrote: C) Don't be an asshole and assume I am talking about you without realizing that you need to first consciously decide to apply my labels to yourself. I'd never do that. You're obviously taking to Chris and Karl. And you're obviously trolling for a response from our poor, retarded, Liberal friends. That's just plain cruel, and beneath you. They can't help the fact that their minds were canalized at a young age in ways that no thinking person would condone. Be nice, Terry - shame on you for picking on defenseless critters like that!;P Will Build Nuclear Missile For Food - No Target Too Small
Roger Wright wrote: Mind you, there's nothing wrong with being an asshole, so long as you're good at it. He is a Big Fat Troll and wishes to be treated like one, imo. :) Later, JoeSox "All our dreams can come true, if we have the courage to pursue them." -- Walt Disney joeswammi.com ↔ humanaiproject.org ↔ joeswammi.com/sinfest
-
I make my judgements on facts as I see them and ignore ideology. The fact is that regardless of the horrible things that occurred on 9/11, and other terrorist attacks, the Bush administration has been using it as an excuse to push its own agenda. Yes people are better off without Saddam. But only just I would say. The way that Bush got from A to B was by using lies and disception. Is that the kind of person that you want in office? I would say the worse problem is that Bush is using it as a means to enrich himself and his cronies. The deficits have hit all time highs. There is high unemployment because he has put business interests over American interests. BTW where is Osama bin Laden, has this war on terror stopped them from bombing Madrid?
My neighbours think I am crazy - but they don't know that I have a trampoline. All they see my head bobbing up and down over the fence every five seconds
I wish I had the self control to be able to put into words how I feel as well as you have, but I do get overly-emotive regarding some of the xenophopic and near-racist comments and commentaries I've seen here regarding nations unwilling to beg scraps from the table of the Bush administration (see, there I go AGAIN!). I know that America, and it's people, are not fairly represented in the commentaries I refer to and wherever you're from I'd like to say thank you for bringing me back some perspective.
-
KaЯl wrote: Hatred can't be a valid communication mode. Wrong. This is the method in vogue by the Democrat Party. Mike "liberals are being driven crazy by the fact that Bush is so popular with Americans, and thus by the realization that anyone to the left of center is utterly marginal." JAMES TRAUB NY Times Loyal member of the vast right wing conspiracy Me "Kerry is a girl's name." Conan O'Brian "I've spoken to many world leaders - they all look at me and say, you've got to win. I just can't tell you who they are." J.F.Kerry
It seems to be the method you just used... The tigress is here :-D
-
I make my judgements on facts as I see them and ignore ideology. The fact is that regardless of the horrible things that occurred on 9/11, and other terrorist attacks, the Bush administration has been using it as an excuse to push its own agenda. Yes people are better off without Saddam. But only just I would say. The way that Bush got from A to B was by using lies and disception. Is that the kind of person that you want in office? I would say the worse problem is that Bush is using it as a means to enrich himself and his cronies. The deficits have hit all time highs. There is high unemployment because he has put business interests over American interests. BTW where is Osama bin Laden, has this war on terror stopped them from bombing Madrid?
My neighbours think I am crazy - but they don't know that I have a trampoline. All they see my head bobbing up and down over the fence every five seconds
One thing that concerns me is many people in the US seem to think that Iraq was behind the attack on WTC. Is my perception correct and if so, what balance would you put on government and media as causes ? Elaine :rose: The tigress is here :-D
-
I make my judgements on facts as I see them and ignore ideology. The fact is that regardless of the horrible things that occurred on 9/11, and other terrorist attacks, the Bush administration has been using it as an excuse to push its own agenda. Yes people are better off without Saddam. But only just I would say. The way that Bush got from A to B was by using lies and disception. Is that the kind of person that you want in office? I would say the worse problem is that Bush is using it as a means to enrich himself and his cronies. The deficits have hit all time highs. There is high unemployment because he has put business interests over American interests. BTW where is Osama bin Laden, has this war on terror stopped them from bombing Madrid?
My neighbours think I am crazy - but they don't know that I have a trampoline. All they see my head bobbing up and down over the fence every five seconds
"After a misspent youth playing video games and composing dirty limericks" Misspent ? The tigress is here :-D
-
Mike Gaskey wrote: Wrong. This is the method in vogue by the Democrat Party. :laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh: Yeah, and you'd know, right, Mr. Gaskey? Christ, Nelly O'Trolley is a rank amateur compared to you, when it comes to hate-filled, unbalanced screeds.
LunaticFringe wrote: Christ, Nelly O'Trolley is a rank amateur compared to you, when it comes to hate-filled, unbalanced screeds. Yet, a few posts above you call him a "bigoted racist asshole". Seems kinda "hate-filled" to me. We must respect the other fellow's religion, but only in the sense and to the extent that we respect his theory that his wife is beautiful and his children smart. ~ H.L. Mencken