Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. General Programming
  3. C / C++ / MFC
  4. Ugly cast

Ugly cast

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved C / C++ / MFC
question
21 Posts 7 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • T toxcct

    oh :wtf: you should ;P because there is no protection on your i member, and so anybody can modify it ... you agree so that there is no interrest ;)


    TOXCCT >>> GEII power

    _ Offline
    _ Offline
    _Magnus_
    wrote on last edited by
    #11

    I dont really see the point with the protected keyword. Maybe someone inherits from the class and then it can be modified, either it is publicly modifiable or not, i dont see the point with have it "maybemodifable". /Magnus


    - I don't necessarily agree with everything I say

    T T G 3 Replies Last reply
    0
    • _ _Magnus_

      I dont really see the point with the protected keyword. Maybe someone inherits from the class and then it can be modified, either it is publicly modifiable or not, i dont see the point with have it "maybemodifable". /Magnus


      - I don't necessarily agree with everything I say

      T Offline
      T Offline
      toxcct
      wrote on last edited by
      #12

      no, a protected member is only modifiable by the derived classes objects (and of course objects from the class itself), and occasionately by friends functions too, but in any case by the outside.


      TOXCCT >>> GEII power

      _ 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • T toxcct

        no, a protected member is only modifiable by the derived classes objects (and of course objects from the class itself), and occasionately by friends functions too, but in any case by the outside.


        TOXCCT >>> GEII power

        _ Offline
        _ Offline
        _Magnus_
        wrote on last edited by
        #13

        Yes i know how it works i just dont see the point with the protected keyword. /Magnus


        - I don't necessarily agree with everything I say

        T 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • _ _Magnus_

          Yes i know how it works i just dont see the point with the protected keyword. /Magnus


          - I don't necessarily agree with everything I say

          T Offline
          T Offline
          toxcct
          wrote on last edited by
          #14

          _Magnus_ wrote: i dont see the point sorry, my english is poor sometimes :-D what do you mean with this ?


          TOXCCT >>> GEII power

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • _ _Magnus_

            class A { public: A() : i(0) { } int i; }; class B : public A { public: void Inc() { i++; } }; A *pa = new A; B *pb = (B *)pa; pb->Inc(); The pointer is not a type B, but class B has no own data and if i run it it works. Is this valid? What happens when i do that? /Magnus


            - I don't necessarily agree with everything I say

            N Offline
            N Offline
            Navin
            wrote on last edited by
            #15

            IT may work for your particular sutiation... but the proper way of casting in this sense is with dynamic_cast:A *pa = new A; B *pb = dynamic_cast<B *>(pa);
            pb will either contain a valid pointer to a B object, or will be NULL if it can't be casted safely. Sometimes I feel like I'm a USB printer in a parallel universe.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • _ _Magnus_

              class A { public: A() : i(0) { } int i; }; class B : public A { public: void Inc() { i++; } }; A *pa = new A; B *pb = (B *)pa; pb->Inc(); The pointer is not a type B, but class B has no own data and if i run it it works. Is this valid? What happens when i do that? /Magnus


              - I don't necessarily agree with everything I say

              P Offline
              P Offline
              Paul Ranson
              wrote on last edited by
              #16

              It works by accident. It's why you should never use the old style C cast. This compiles,

              B * pb = (B*)0;
              pb->Inc () ;

              but goes bang. Paul

              T 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • P Paul Ranson

                It works by accident. It's why you should never use the old style C cast. This compiles,

                B * pb = (B*)0;
                pb->Inc () ;

                but goes bang. Paul

                T Offline
                T Offline
                Tim Smith
                wrote on last edited by
                #17

                Hmm B * pc = reinterpret_cast < B *> (0); This compiles too, so does that mean you should never use it either? Tim Smith I'm going to patent thought. I have yet to see any prior art.

                P 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • T toxcct

                  why do we protect data members ?


                  TOXCCT >>> GEII power

                  T Offline
                  T Offline
                  Tim Smith
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #18

                  I am not saying you shouldn't, I am saying you don't have to. This isn't a black/white issue. It isn't about always doing it or never doing it. It is about doing it when it is appropriate. Tim Smith I'm going to patent thought. I have yet to see any prior art.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • _ _Magnus_

                    I dont really see the point with the protected keyword. Maybe someone inherits from the class and then it can be modified, either it is publicly modifiable or not, i dont see the point with have it "maybemodifable". /Magnus


                    - I don't necessarily agree with everything I say

                    T Offline
                    T Offline
                    Tim Smith
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #19

                    The protected keyword is for people who trust others to properly augment the implementation of a class in a derived class. In the last three or four weeks I have wasted endless amounts of time because VCL (Borland's MFC) made far too many things private. I couldn't fix the bugs in their code without completely replacing their classes. If they had made their stuff protected and trusted me, I would have saved a lot of time. I hardly ever use the private keyword because I trust the programmers not to screw up the implantation. If they do screw things up, I beat them up and then make them fix it. I would rather them do that than have to reimplement my classes in their own stuff creating two implementations of the same theme. Tim Smith I'm going to patent thought. I have yet to see any prior art.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • T Tim Smith

                      Hmm B * pc = reinterpret_cast < B *> (0); This compiles too, so does that mean you should never use it either? Tim Smith I'm going to patent thought. I have yet to see any prior art.

                      P Offline
                      P Offline
                      Paul Ranson
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #20

                      reinterpret_cast stands out like a sore thumb whereas the C style one doesn't. In either case you can blow your foot off by demanding the compilation of something absurd, like the original poster. Paul

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • _ _Magnus_

                        I dont really see the point with the protected keyword. Maybe someone inherits from the class and then it can be modified, either it is publicly modifiable or not, i dont see the point with have it "maybemodifable". /Magnus


                        - I don't necessarily agree with everything I say

                        G Offline
                        G Offline
                        Gary R Wheeler
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #21

                        The protected keyword lets you differentiate between accesses of the value by users of the class from accesses by derived classes. Ordinary users of the class may not access a member marked protected. A derived class, which supplements or modifies the behavior of the base class, is granted privileged access.


                        Software Zen: delete this;

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups