Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. I hate Netscape

I hate Netscape

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
htmlcsssecurityquestion
17 Posts 8 Posters 51 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J Jon Sagara

    I have spent the past 20 minutes trying to figure out why my table that stretches all the way across the page in IE, doesn't in Netscape. I tried everything - I tweaked my CSS, I tweaked the width parameters in the <TD>s, and everything else in between. I was about to say "FiretrUCK Netscape!!!" when I noticed that I had forgotten to put one quotation mark on the width statement of the parent table. I hate that Netscape makes me write HTML correctly. ;P FiretrUCK me. Jon Sagara "We assume you already know not to consider something like Windows as a firewall platform. Does the name "Windows" evoke images of security? Silly rabbit, Windows is for desktops." -- Unix System Administration Handbook

    P Offline
    P Offline
    Paul Watson
    wrote on last edited by
    #7

    Netscape is the devil. Microsoft may be profiteering scum bags but they don't release cess pool applications like Netscape 4.x. I would not mind so much if Netscape 4.x was consistently buggy. But oh no, it decides when and how to do it's thing, and in it's own time. Jon Sagara wrote: I hate that Netscape makes me write HTML correctly. I hate that Netscape makes me write twice as much HTML just to get a design to work. FiretrUCK Netscape! regards, Paul Watson Bluegrass Cape Town, South Africa Do you Sonork? I do! 100.9903 Stormfront "The greatest thing you will ever learn is to love, and be loved in return" - Moulin Rouge

    J 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • G George

      To be fair you should not even have to type such things, but the HTML editors are just so bad... :( Let me guess - are you using notepad for HTML stuff just like me? ;)

      J Offline
      J Offline
      Jon Sagara
      wrote on last edited by
      #8

      George wrote: Let me guess - are you using notepad for HTML stuff just like me? Sort of - I use Macromedia Homesite, which is a super-fancy Notepad. It's generally very sophisticated, but for some reason doesn't catch little errors like that. Jon Sagara "Ninety percent of baseball is mental, the other half is physical." -- Yogi Bera

      J 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • P Paul Watson

        Netscape is the devil. Microsoft may be profiteering scum bags but they don't release cess pool applications like Netscape 4.x. I would not mind so much if Netscape 4.x was consistently buggy. But oh no, it decides when and how to do it's thing, and in it's own time. Jon Sagara wrote: I hate that Netscape makes me write HTML correctly. I hate that Netscape makes me write twice as much HTML just to get a design to work. FiretrUCK Netscape! regards, Paul Watson Bluegrass Cape Town, South Africa Do you Sonork? I do! 100.9903 Stormfront "The greatest thing you will ever learn is to love, and be loved in return" - Moulin Rouge

        J Offline
        J Offline
        Jon Sagara
        wrote on last edited by
        #9

        Paul Watson wrote: Netscape is the devil. :-D That thought has crossed my mind many-o-time, but even though 6.x is SLLLLOOOOOWWWWW, it does a much better job of rendering stuff that I write for IE. Jon Sagara "Ninety percent of baseball is mental, the other half is physical." -- Yogi Bera

        P 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • J Jon Sagara

          George wrote: Let me guess - are you using notepad for HTML stuff just like me? Sort of - I use Macromedia Homesite, which is a super-fancy Notepad. It's generally very sophisticated, but for some reason doesn't catch little errors like that. Jon Sagara "Ninety percent of baseball is mental, the other half is physical." -- Yogi Bera

          J Offline
          J Offline
          Jason Jystad
          wrote on last edited by
          #10

          As a fellow HomeSite afficianado, I thought I would point out a couple of useful tidbits. One is that there are some VTOM scripts available to parse your HTML and quote all the attributes for you. I am not thrilled with these, because they are too stupid, you would have ended up with that width attribute quoted, but with two quotes on one side. Even better, though more expensive, is CSE HTML Validator. I LOVE this thing. It integrates with HomeSite, takes the place of the internal HomeSite validator for whole document validation. Give it a try, catches all kinds of things. I use it on most everything I do. It even has a spelling checker now. :) http://www.htmlvalidator.com Jason Jystad Cito Technologies www.citotech.net Sonork ID 100.9918 >-------------------------------------------------< Every program has at least one bug and can be shortened by at least one instruction -- from which, by induction, one can deduce that every program can be reduced to one instruction that doesn't work. >-------------------------------------------------<

          J 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • J Jon Sagara

            Paul Watson wrote: Netscape is the devil. :-D That thought has crossed my mind many-o-time, but even though 6.x is SLLLLOOOOOWWWWW, it does a much better job of rendering stuff that I write for IE. Jon Sagara "Ninety percent of baseball is mental, the other half is physical." -- Yogi Bera

            P Offline
            P Offline
            Paul Watson
            wrote on last edited by
            #11

            Jon Sagara wrote: but even though 6.x is SLLLLOOOOOWWWWW, it does a much better job of rendering stuff that I write for IE. Netscape 6.1 is a LOT better than 6.0 was and 6.2 is even better. But unfortuanatley it is still slower and buggier. A huge improvement over 4.x but still not good enough to make me switch to it over IE or Opera. Oh well, this is one arena where I don't mind there being a dominant player. regards, Paul Watson Bluegrass Cape Town, South Africa Do you Sonork? I do! 100.9903 Stormfront "The greatest thing you will ever learn is to love, and be loved in return" - Moulin Rouge

            J 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • P Paul Watson

              Jon Sagara wrote: but even though 6.x is SLLLLOOOOOWWWWW, it does a much better job of rendering stuff that I write for IE. Netscape 6.1 is a LOT better than 6.0 was and 6.2 is even better. But unfortuanatley it is still slower and buggier. A huge improvement over 4.x but still not good enough to make me switch to it over IE or Opera. Oh well, this is one arena where I don't mind there being a dominant player. regards, Paul Watson Bluegrass Cape Town, South Africa Do you Sonork? I do! 100.9903 Stormfront "The greatest thing you will ever learn is to love, and be loved in return" - Moulin Rouge

              J Offline
              J Offline
              Jon Sagara
              wrote on last edited by
              #12

              Paul Watson wrote: but still not good enough to make me switch to it over IE or Opera. Oh well, this is one arena where I don't mind there being a dominant player. I totally agree, but there is always some tool out there using Netscape who complains that the page looks crappy in his browser. Bad business to tell my customers, "Don't use Netscape, ya jack@$$!" (Though I really want to :-D ) Jon Sagara "Ninety percent of baseball is mental, the other half is physical." -- Yogi Bera

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • J Jason Jystad

                As a fellow HomeSite afficianado, I thought I would point out a couple of useful tidbits. One is that there are some VTOM scripts available to parse your HTML and quote all the attributes for you. I am not thrilled with these, because they are too stupid, you would have ended up with that width attribute quoted, but with two quotes on one side. Even better, though more expensive, is CSE HTML Validator. I LOVE this thing. It integrates with HomeSite, takes the place of the internal HomeSite validator for whole document validation. Give it a try, catches all kinds of things. I use it on most everything I do. It even has a spelling checker now. :) http://www.htmlvalidator.com Jason Jystad Cito Technologies www.citotech.net Sonork ID 100.9918 >-------------------------------------------------< Every program has at least one bug and can be shortened by at least one instruction -- from which, by induction, one can deduce that every program can be reduced to one instruction that doesn't work. >-------------------------------------------------<

                J Offline
                J Offline
                Jon Sagara
                wrote on last edited by
                #13

                Cool, thanks for the recommendation! Jon Sagara "Ninety percent of baseball is mental, the other half is physical." -- Yogi Bera

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • J Jon Sagara

                  I have spent the past 20 minutes trying to figure out why my table that stretches all the way across the page in IE, doesn't in Netscape. I tried everything - I tweaked my CSS, I tweaked the width parameters in the <TD>s, and everything else in between. I was about to say "FiretrUCK Netscape!!!" when I noticed that I had forgotten to put one quotation mark on the width statement of the parent table. I hate that Netscape makes me write HTML correctly. ;P FiretrUCK me. Jon Sagara "We assume you already know not to consider something like Windows as a firewall platform. Does the name "Windows" evoke images of security? Silly rabbit, Windows is for desktops." -- Unix System Administration Handbook

                  M Offline
                  M Offline
                  Melissa_N
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #14

                  Jon Sagara wrote: FiretrUCK me. Hahahaha LOL! that is too clever... did you make that up yourself? must use that in the future... :) Melissa

                  J 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • M Melissa_N

                    Jon Sagara wrote: FiretrUCK me. Hahahaha LOL! that is too clever... did you make that up yourself? must use that in the future... :) Melissa

                    J Offline
                    J Offline
                    Jon Sagara
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #15

                    Nope, I think Michael Martin coined that one. A few months ago, there was a raging debate (actually more of a whimper) about not being able to use the word F*CK in any of the forums, so several members came up with creative ways to get around the filters. :) Jon Sagara "Ninety percent of baseball is mental, the other half is physical." -- Yogi Bera

                    realJSOPR 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • J Jon Sagara

                      Nope, I think Michael Martin coined that one. A few months ago, there was a raging debate (actually more of a whimper) about not being able to use the word F*CK in any of the forums, so several members came up with creative ways to get around the filters. :) Jon Sagara "Ninety percent of baseball is mental, the other half is physical." -- Yogi Bera

                      realJSOPR Offline
                      realJSOPR Offline
                      realJSOP
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #16

                      I'm surprised nobody has tried using the colloquial spelling - "phuque" - I know, it looks kinda foo-foo, but it works. I wonder if fuque or phuck works... "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001

                      D 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • realJSOPR realJSOP

                        I'm surprised nobody has tried using the colloquial spelling - "phuque" - I know, it looks kinda foo-foo, but it works. I wonder if fuque or phuck works... "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001

                        D Offline
                        D Offline
                        Dan Lavigne
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #17

                        You hate Netscape??? I really like it Christian Hewitt Intel Corporation

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups