Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. Secretary say memos were forgery

Secretary say memos were forgery

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
comannouncement
14 Posts 8 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    Jeff Bogan
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    But she also says: "These are not real," and that "the information in here was correct, but it was picked up from the real ones." While forgeries, they are also reproductions of the real memos that were most likely destroyed. usatoday[^]

    L M S C 4 Replies Last reply
    0
    • J Jeff Bogan

      But she also says: "These are not real," and that "the information in here was correct, but it was picked up from the real ones." While forgeries, they are also reproductions of the real memos that were most likely destroyed. usatoday[^]

      L Offline
      L Offline
      Lost User
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Hey, I used to have $1,000,000 cash but it was "most likely" destroyed. If I whip up a copy on Word will you accept it as legitimate? I didn't think so... :doh: "Reality is what refuses to go away when I stop believing in it." Philip K. Dick

      J 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • J Jeff Bogan

        But she also says: "These are not real," and that "the information in here was correct, but it was picked up from the real ones." While forgeries, they are also reproductions of the real memos that were most likely destroyed. usatoday[^]

        M Offline
        M Offline
        Marc Clifton
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Jeff Bogan wrote: While forgeries, they are also reproductions of the real memoes that were most likely destroyed. That would never hold up in court. It's completely unsubstantiated. Isn't that called "heresay"? Marc MyXaml Advanced Unit Testing

        A J 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • M Marc Clifton

          Jeff Bogan wrote: While forgeries, they are also reproductions of the real memoes that were most likely destroyed. That would never hold up in court. It's completely unsubstantiated. Isn't that called "heresay"? Marc MyXaml Advanced Unit Testing

          A Offline
          A Offline
          Adam Wimsatt
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Marc Clifton wrote: Isn't that called "heresay"? Lunacy is probably a better fit.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M Marc Clifton

            Jeff Bogan wrote: While forgeries, they are also reproductions of the real memoes that were most likely destroyed. That would never hold up in court. It's completely unsubstantiated. Isn't that called "heresay"? Marc MyXaml Advanced Unit Testing

            J Offline
            J Offline
            Jeff Bogan
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Do you mean hearsay? And it's not - she is report on memos that she directly typed.

            M 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • J Jeff Bogan

              Do you mean hearsay? And it's not - she is report on memos that she directly typed.

              M Offline
              M Offline
              Marc Clifton
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Yes, and ah, thanks for the correction. Marc MyXaml Advanced Unit Testing

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • L Lost User

                Hey, I used to have $1,000,000 cash but it was "most likely" destroyed. If I whip up a copy on Word will you accept it as legitimate? I didn't think so... :doh: "Reality is what refuses to go away when I stop believing in it." Philip K. Dick

                J Offline
                J Offline
                Jeff Bogan
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                AWOL Ad[^]

                L S 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • J Jeff Bogan

                  AWOL Ad[^]

                  L Offline
                  L Offline
                  Lost User
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  :zzz: "Reality is what refuses to go away when I stop believing in it." Philip K. Dick

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • J Jeff Bogan

                    AWOL Ad[^]

                    S Offline
                    S Offline
                    Stan Shannon
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    John Kerry burned peoples homes and cut their arms and legs off and shot their little doggies in Vietnam and than met with the North Vietnamese and caused U.S. prisoners to be tortured. :rolleyes: God almighty, get past it. "Benedict Arnold was a war hero too."

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • J Jeff Bogan

                      But she also says: "These are not real," and that "the information in here was correct, but it was picked up from the real ones." While forgeries, they are also reproductions of the real memos that were most likely destroyed. usatoday[^]

                      S Offline
                      S Offline
                      scadaguy
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      What I can't figure out is why someone would bother to reproduce and destory the originals. It's seems like useless effort for absolutely zero benefit.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • J Jeff Bogan

                        But she also says: "These are not real," and that "the information in here was correct, but it was picked up from the real ones." While forgeries, they are also reproductions of the real memos that were most likely destroyed. usatoday[^]

                        C Offline
                        C Offline
                        Chris Losinger
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        http://www.scrappleface.com/MT/archives/001837.html[^]

                        Former CIA Boss Tenet Calls CBS Memos 'Slam Dunk' (2004-09-15) -- Former CIA director George Tenet today defended CBS news reporter Dan Rather for his use of potentially inauthentic documents to prove that then-Lt. George W. Bush sought special treatment to evade service in the Air National Guard in the early 1970s. "Those memos are a slam-dunk," said Mr. Tenet, gesturing broadly, "Dan Rather did the due diligence of seeking document experts who agreed with his predetermined opinion. What more can you ask?" The Clinton-appointed former CIA director, said Mr. Rather shouldn't worry about losing his job over 'memogate'. "Dan Rather asks the tough questions and does his homework, or gets someone to do it," Mr. Tenet said. "If I were still at the Agency, I'd take a look at his resume, even if he typed it up in Microsoft Word."

                        Software | Cleek

                        G S 2 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • C Chris Losinger

                          http://www.scrappleface.com/MT/archives/001837.html[^]

                          Former CIA Boss Tenet Calls CBS Memos 'Slam Dunk' (2004-09-15) -- Former CIA director George Tenet today defended CBS news reporter Dan Rather for his use of potentially inauthentic documents to prove that then-Lt. George W. Bush sought special treatment to evade service in the Air National Guard in the early 1970s. "Those memos are a slam-dunk," said Mr. Tenet, gesturing broadly, "Dan Rather did the due diligence of seeking document experts who agreed with his predetermined opinion. What more can you ask?" The Clinton-appointed former CIA director, said Mr. Rather shouldn't worry about losing his job over 'memogate'. "Dan Rather asks the tough questions and does his homework, or gets someone to do it," Mr. Tenet said. "If I were still at the Agency, I'd take a look at his resume, even if he typed it up in Microsoft Word."

                          Software | Cleek

                          G Offline
                          G Offline
                          Gary Kirkham
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          Chris Losinger wrote: 'Slam Dunk' Documents traced to Texas Kinkos[^] Chris Losinger wrote: Dan Rather asks the tough questions and does his homework O' Really[^]...looks like Danny's having doubts. Gary Kirkham A working Program is one that has only unobserved bugs He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose. - Jim Elliot Me blog, You read

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • C Chris Losinger

                            http://www.scrappleface.com/MT/archives/001837.html[^]

                            Former CIA Boss Tenet Calls CBS Memos 'Slam Dunk' (2004-09-15) -- Former CIA director George Tenet today defended CBS news reporter Dan Rather for his use of potentially inauthentic documents to prove that then-Lt. George W. Bush sought special treatment to evade service in the Air National Guard in the early 1970s. "Those memos are a slam-dunk," said Mr. Tenet, gesturing broadly, "Dan Rather did the due diligence of seeking document experts who agreed with his predetermined opinion. What more can you ask?" The Clinton-appointed former CIA director, said Mr. Rather shouldn't worry about losing his job over 'memogate'. "Dan Rather asks the tough questions and does his homework, or gets someone to do it," Mr. Tenet said. "If I were still at the Agency, I'd take a look at his resume, even if he typed it up in Microsoft Word."

                            Software | Cleek

                            S Offline
                            S Offline
                            Stan Shannon
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            A slam-dunk of what? Nobody gives a shit. The only big deal here is that CBS did, in fact, screw the pooch on these documents. They are clearly forgeries. The alligations themselves are no big deal. The fact that Bush got into the National Guard based on family influence (as did about a billion or so other baby boomers) is generally accepted and yawned at. So what? The fact that he "disobeyed orders" to get a physical so he could help with some campaign in Alabama is a laughable charge. Guardsmen do that all the time. People frequently disappear for months at a time from guard units for any number of reasons. It is not considered a big deal. When I was in the Guard I knew people who never went to drill but were always involved in local/state political issues. As long as a member earns the minimum retirement points for any given year (which usually only takes two or three drills) they are in compliance with regulations. Remember that the Guard, until officially activated by the federal government, is exclusively a state ran show and serves under the authority of the Governor of that state, not the president. So, state politics are typically an important part of its orientation. All this chatter about Bush's guard service is a complete joke. Again, Kerry's premeditated betrayal of his brother's in arms is a far worse alligation than any thing Bush is accused of. The dems would be well advised to just let it drop, it is a lose-lose proposition for them. But, hey, if you guys think you are doing Kerry a favor, by all means, keep up the good work. :laugh: "Benedict Arnold was a war hero too."

                            C 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • S Stan Shannon

                              A slam-dunk of what? Nobody gives a shit. The only big deal here is that CBS did, in fact, screw the pooch on these documents. They are clearly forgeries. The alligations themselves are no big deal. The fact that Bush got into the National Guard based on family influence (as did about a billion or so other baby boomers) is generally accepted and yawned at. So what? The fact that he "disobeyed orders" to get a physical so he could help with some campaign in Alabama is a laughable charge. Guardsmen do that all the time. People frequently disappear for months at a time from guard units for any number of reasons. It is not considered a big deal. When I was in the Guard I knew people who never went to drill but were always involved in local/state political issues. As long as a member earns the minimum retirement points for any given year (which usually only takes two or three drills) they are in compliance with regulations. Remember that the Guard, until officially activated by the federal government, is exclusively a state ran show and serves under the authority of the Governor of that state, not the president. So, state politics are typically an important part of its orientation. All this chatter about Bush's guard service is a complete joke. Again, Kerry's premeditated betrayal of his brother's in arms is a far worse alligation than any thing Bush is accused of. The dems would be well advised to just let it drop, it is a lose-lose proposition for them. But, hey, if you guys think you are doing Kerry a favor, by all means, keep up the good work. :laugh: "Benedict Arnold was a war hero too."

                              C Offline
                              C Offline
                              Chris Losinger
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #14

                              Stan Shannon wrote: A slam-dunk of what? it's a joke. keep up. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A14030-2004Jun3.html[^] Stan Shannon wrote: Nobody gives a sh*t. then why are you trying to debunk it? Software | Cleek

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              Reply
                              • Reply as topic
                              Log in to reply
                              • Oldest to Newest
                              • Newest to Oldest
                              • Most Votes


                              • Login

                              • Don't have an account? Register

                              • Login or register to search.
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Tags
                              • Popular
                              • World
                              • Users
                              • Groups