Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. We know who the traitor is...

We know who the traitor is...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
htmlcsscomannouncementlearning
22 Posts 12 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J Jim A Johnson

    Karl Rove outed Valerie Plame: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8525978/site/newsweek/[^] ... even more good stuff here: http://www.rawstory.org/[^] Of course, most intelligent Americans knew this already, it just took a few years for the wheels of justice to grind this far. Just as we also knew that the trumped-up "war on terror" would result in more terrorism, not less: http://www.canoe.ca/NewsStand/LondonFreePress/News/2005/07/10/1124818-sun.html[^] I'm not even gonna mention WMDs... well, I guess I just did.

    D Offline
    D Offline
    Diego Moita
    wrote on last edited by
    #2

    I suspect he will be "accountable" just in the same way Rumsfeld was in the Abu Ghraib case: find some Joe Smith to blame.

    M M 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • D Diego Moita

      I suspect he will be "accountable" just in the same way Rumsfeld was in the Abu Ghraib case: find some Joe Smith to blame.

      M Offline
      M Offline
      Marc Clifton
      wrote on last edited by
      #3

      Diego Moita wrote: find some Joe Smith to blame Joe Smith? You mean, the park's handyman, where I live? Who'd have guessed? :rolleyes: yes, his name really is Joe Smith! Marc My website
      Latest Articles: Object Comparer String Helpers

      D 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Marc Clifton

        Diego Moita wrote: find some Joe Smith to blame Joe Smith? You mean, the park's handyman, where I live? Who'd have guessed? :rolleyes: yes, his name really is Joe Smith! Marc My website
        Latest Articles: Object Comparer String Helpers

        D Offline
        D Offline
        Diego Moita
        wrote on last edited by
        #4

        Gee! You're implicating me too! Get me outta that mess! I didn't know anything!:((

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • D Diego Moita

          I suspect he will be "accountable" just in the same way Rumsfeld was in the Abu Ghraib case: find some Joe Smith to blame.

          M Offline
          M Offline
          Mike Gaskey
          wrote on last edited by
          #5

          Diego Moita wrote: just in the same way Rumsfeld was in the Abu Ghraib case Wasn't he given a medal? Mike "liberals were driven crazy by Bush." Me To: Dixie Sluts, M. Moore, the Boss, Bon Jovi, Clooney, Penn, Babs, Soros, Redford, Gore, Daschle - "bye bye" Me "I voted for W." Me "There you go again." RR "Flushed the Johns" Me

          D 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • J Jim A Johnson

            Karl Rove outed Valerie Plame: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8525978/site/newsweek/[^] ... even more good stuff here: http://www.rawstory.org/[^] Of course, most intelligent Americans knew this already, it just took a few years for the wheels of justice to grind this far. Just as we also knew that the trumped-up "war on terror" would result in more terrorism, not less: http://www.canoe.ca/NewsStand/LondonFreePress/News/2005/07/10/1124818-sun.html[^] I'm not even gonna mention WMDs... well, I guess I just did.

            P Offline
            P Offline
            Pete Madden
            wrote on last edited by
            #6

            Jim, Forget the WMD's ... the one's who vouched on that are now seen as clowns all over the world ... Politics is not an easy profession and hence quite well paid too ... but the perks are what really count in that occupation ... the power etc. ... everyone does a little for themselves and their families ... the trick is to COVER it up so that the whole country is not ridiculed ... that is where the WMD's boomeranged and will be ridiculed in history books FOREVER ... Now what Clinton did was not good either but atleast there were no unnecessary deaths of 20 year olds in a FAKE war in Iraq. Getting to the War on Terror in Iraq ... how do we measure success out there? ... I mean what is it that we want ? ...

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • J Jim A Johnson

              Karl Rove outed Valerie Plame: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8525978/site/newsweek/[^] ... even more good stuff here: http://www.rawstory.org/[^] Of course, most intelligent Americans knew this already, it just took a few years for the wheels of justice to grind this far. Just as we also knew that the trumped-up "war on terror" would result in more terrorism, not less: http://www.canoe.ca/NewsStand/LondonFreePress/News/2005/07/10/1124818-sun.html[^] I'm not even gonna mention WMDs... well, I guess I just did.

              C Offline
              C Offline
              Chris Losinger
              wrote on last edited by
              #7

              it'll be a treat to see just how finely all those self-proclaimed patriots can parse the applicable laws and how delicately they can finesse the ethical issues as they try to defend Karl and his boss - and they will. to double the fun, every time they open their mouths, apply The Hillary Test: would they parse, mince, duck and weave as carefully to prove the accused's innocence if Hillary Clinton was accused of outing a CIA agent who was working on national security matters, just to try to discredit the agent's husband ? of course we all know the answer, but it'll be a delight to see them prove it over and over again. dance, my pretties. dance! Cleek | Image Toolkits | Thumbnail maker

              A E M J 4 Replies Last reply
              0
              • M Mike Gaskey

                Diego Moita wrote: just in the same way Rumsfeld was in the Abu Ghraib case Wasn't he given a medal? Mike "liberals were driven crazy by Bush." Me To: Dixie Sluts, M. Moore, the Boss, Bon Jovi, Clooney, Penn, Babs, Soros, Redford, Gore, Daschle - "bye bye" Me "I voted for W." Me "There you go again." RR "Flushed the Johns" Me

                D Offline
                D Offline
                Diego Moita
                wrote on last edited by
                #8

                I gotta admit man. You have style. :omg:

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • C Chris Losinger

                  it'll be a treat to see just how finely all those self-proclaimed patriots can parse the applicable laws and how delicately they can finesse the ethical issues as they try to defend Karl and his boss - and they will. to double the fun, every time they open their mouths, apply The Hillary Test: would they parse, mince, duck and weave as carefully to prove the accused's innocence if Hillary Clinton was accused of outing a CIA agent who was working on national security matters, just to try to discredit the agent's husband ? of course we all know the answer, but it'll be a delight to see them prove it over and over again. dance, my pretties. dance! Cleek | Image Toolkits | Thumbnail maker

                  A Offline
                  A Offline
                  Alvaro Mendez
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #9

                  Here's a response you can predict from at least one CP regular: (can you guess who?) Rove is a right-wing capitalist like me. He's no Marxist. This means that it doesn't matter how dirty, corrupt, unethical, or sinister he is. He's got my full support. The left is simply trying to bring him down because he's a conservative. :sigh: Alvaro


                  Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is. -- GWB, 1999.

                  A C S 3 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • A Alvaro Mendez

                    Here's a response you can predict from at least one CP regular: (can you guess who?) Rove is a right-wing capitalist like me. He's no Marxist. This means that it doesn't matter how dirty, corrupt, unethical, or sinister he is. He's got my full support. The left is simply trying to bring him down because he's a conservative. :sigh: Alvaro


                    Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is. -- GWB, 1999.

                    A Offline
                    A Offline
                    Anna Jayne Metcalfe
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #10

                    It isn't difficult, is it? :rolleyes: Anna :rose: Riverblade Ltd - Software Consultancy Services Anna's Place | Tears and Laughter "Be yourself - not what others think you should be" - Marcia Graesch "Anna's just a sexy-looking lesbian tart" - A friend, trying to wind me up. It didn't work.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • A Alvaro Mendez

                      Here's a response you can predict from at least one CP regular: (can you guess who?) Rove is a right-wing capitalist like me. He's no Marxist. This means that it doesn't matter how dirty, corrupt, unethical, or sinister he is. He's got my full support. The left is simply trying to bring him down because he's a conservative. :sigh: Alvaro


                      Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is. -- GWB, 1999.

                      C Offline
                      C Offline
                      Chris Losinger
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #11

                      gee... i wonder who that could be... a perfect example - Party before Country. Cleek | Image Toolkits | Thumbnail maker

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • C Chris Losinger

                        it'll be a treat to see just how finely all those self-proclaimed patriots can parse the applicable laws and how delicately they can finesse the ethical issues as they try to defend Karl and his boss - and they will. to double the fun, every time they open their mouths, apply The Hillary Test: would they parse, mince, duck and weave as carefully to prove the accused's innocence if Hillary Clinton was accused of outing a CIA agent who was working on national security matters, just to try to discredit the agent's husband ? of course we all know the answer, but it'll be a delight to see them prove it over and over again. dance, my pretties. dance! Cleek | Image Toolkits | Thumbnail maker

                        E Offline
                        E Offline
                        El Corazon
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #12

                        Chris Losinger wrote: dance, my pretties. dance! I've already started seeing a few articles and quotes here and there (though nothing from the white house) although avoiding the issue of the crime, commending him for not "lying" in his past statements. Karl Rove always said "I never revealed her 'name' to the press." As his statements now show, when he revealed her to the press, he referred to her as "the wife of ..." therefore he never said her "name." That dance is awfully familiar and suprisingly similar to the side they make fun of. _________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)

                        M 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • E El Corazon

                          Chris Losinger wrote: dance, my pretties. dance! I've already started seeing a few articles and quotes here and there (though nothing from the white house) although avoiding the issue of the crime, commending him for not "lying" in his past statements. Karl Rove always said "I never revealed her 'name' to the press." As his statements now show, when he revealed her to the press, he referred to her as "the wife of ..." therefore he never said her "name." That dance is awfully familiar and suprisingly similar to the side they make fun of. _________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)

                          M Offline
                          M Offline
                          Mike Gaskey
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #13

                          Jeffry J. Brickley wrote: "I never revealed her 'name' to the press." If he had (or did) that would be illegal. Otherwise it is a debate of intent of the law versus the actual law. But fear not, once we can properly define, "IS" we'll get on to the weightier things. Mike "liberals were driven crazy by Bush." Me To: Dixie Sluts, M. Moore, the Boss, Bon Jovi, Clooney, Penn, Babs, Soros, Redford, Gore, Daschle - "bye bye" Me "I voted for W." Me "There you go again." RR "Flushed the Johns" Me

                          C R 2 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • C Chris Losinger

                            it'll be a treat to see just how finely all those self-proclaimed patriots can parse the applicable laws and how delicately they can finesse the ethical issues as they try to defend Karl and his boss - and they will. to double the fun, every time they open their mouths, apply The Hillary Test: would they parse, mince, duck and weave as carefully to prove the accused's innocence if Hillary Clinton was accused of outing a CIA agent who was working on national security matters, just to try to discredit the agent's husband ? of course we all know the answer, but it'll be a delight to see them prove it over and over again. dance, my pretties. dance! Cleek | Image Toolkits | Thumbnail maker

                            M Offline
                            M Offline
                            Mike Gaskey
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #14

                            Chris Losinger wrote: The Hillary Test: would they parse, mince, duck and weave as carefully to prove the accused's innocence if Hillary Clinton was accused of outing a CIA agent who was working on national security matters, just to try to discredit the agent's husband ? There is only one set of rules and both side use the same set. But you knew that. Mike "liberals were driven crazy by Bush." Me To: Dixie Sluts, M. Moore, the Boss, Bon Jovi, Clooney, Penn, Babs, Soros, Redford, Gore, Daschle - "bye bye" Me "I voted for W." Me "There you go again." RR "Flushed the Johns" Me

                            C 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • M Mike Gaskey

                              Chris Losinger wrote: The Hillary Test: would they parse, mince, duck and weave as carefully to prove the accused's innocence if Hillary Clinton was accused of outing a CIA agent who was working on national security matters, just to try to discredit the agent's husband ? There is only one set of rules and both side use the same set. But you knew that. Mike "liberals were driven crazy by Bush." Me To: Dixie Sluts, M. Moore, the Boss, Bon Jovi, Clooney, Penn, Babs, Soros, Redford, Gore, Daschle - "bye bye" Me "I voted for W." Me "There you go again." RR "Flushed the Johns" Me

                              C Offline
                              C Offline
                              Chris Losinger
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #15

                              what, no defense of Rove? come on man, don't let me down. Mike Gaskey wrote: There is only one set of rules and both side use the same set. But you knew that. i'll bookmark this one, too. :) Cleek | Image Toolkits | Thumbnail maker

                              M 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • M Mike Gaskey

                                Jeffry J. Brickley wrote: "I never revealed her 'name' to the press." If he had (or did) that would be illegal. Otherwise it is a debate of intent of the law versus the actual law. But fear not, once we can properly define, "IS" we'll get on to the weightier things. Mike "liberals were driven crazy by Bush." Me To: Dixie Sluts, M. Moore, the Boss, Bon Jovi, Clooney, Penn, Babs, Soros, Redford, Gore, Daschle - "bye bye" Me "I voted for W." Me "There you go again." RR "Flushed the Johns" Me

                                C Offline
                                C Offline
                                Chris Losinger
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #16

                                Mike Gaskey wrote: Otherwise it is a debate of intent of the law versus the actual law ah... that's the stuff. Mike Gaskey wrote: But fear not, once we can properly define, "IS" we'll get on to the weightier things even better! you get my 5. Cleek | Image Toolkits | Thumbnail maker

                                M 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • C Chris Losinger

                                  it'll be a treat to see just how finely all those self-proclaimed patriots can parse the applicable laws and how delicately they can finesse the ethical issues as they try to defend Karl and his boss - and they will. to double the fun, every time they open their mouths, apply The Hillary Test: would they parse, mince, duck and weave as carefully to prove the accused's innocence if Hillary Clinton was accused of outing a CIA agent who was working on national security matters, just to try to discredit the agent's husband ? of course we all know the answer, but it'll be a delight to see them prove it over and over again. dance, my pretties. dance! Cleek | Image Toolkits | Thumbnail maker

                                  J Offline
                                  J Offline
                                  Jason Henderson
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #17

                                  Democrats give other Democrats the benefit of the doubt and give no such leeway to Republicans. Republicans give other Republicans the benefit of the doubt and give no such leeway to Democrats. Why don't we all try to let the investigation finish before jumping to conclusions for once.

                                  "Live long and prosper." - Spock

                                  Jason Henderson
                                  blog

                                  C 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • C Chris Losinger

                                    Mike Gaskey wrote: Otherwise it is a debate of intent of the law versus the actual law ah... that's the stuff. Mike Gaskey wrote: But fear not, once we can properly define, "IS" we'll get on to the weightier things even better! you get my 5. Cleek | Image Toolkits | Thumbnail maker

                                    M Offline
                                    M Offline
                                    Mike Gaskey
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #18

                                    Chris Losinger wrote: ah... that's the stuff. Chris Losinger wrote: even better! I aim to please. Mike "liberals were driven crazy by Bush." Me To: Dixie Sluts, M. Moore, the Boss, Bon Jovi, Clooney, Penn, Babs, Soros, Redford, Gore, Daschle - "bye bye" Me "I voted for W." Me "There you go again." RR "Flushed the Johns" Me

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • C Chris Losinger

                                      what, no defense of Rove? come on man, don't let me down. Mike Gaskey wrote: There is only one set of rules and both side use the same set. But you knew that. i'll bookmark this one, too. :) Cleek | Image Toolkits | Thumbnail maker

                                      M Offline
                                      M Offline
                                      Mike Gaskey
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #19

                                      Chris Losinger wrote: i'll bookmark this one, too. Someone needs to develop a good, "bookmark manager". Reckon? Mike "liberals were driven crazy by Bush." Me To: Dixie Sluts, M. Moore, the Boss, Bon Jovi, Clooney, Penn, Babs, Soros, Redford, Gore, Daschle - "bye bye" Me "I voted for W." Me "There you go again." RR "Flushed the Johns" Me

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • J Jason Henderson

                                        Democrats give other Democrats the benefit of the doubt and give no such leeway to Republicans. Republicans give other Republicans the benefit of the doubt and give no such leeway to Democrats. Why don't we all try to let the investigation finish before jumping to conclusions for once.

                                        "Live long and prosper." - Spock

                                        Jason Henderson
                                        blog

                                        C Offline
                                        C Offline
                                        Chris Losinger
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #20

                                        Jason Henderson wrote: Why don't we all try to let the investigation finish before jumping to conclusions for once. yeah, let's start with this one. :laugh: the WH is already knee-deep in its own public lies on this one. nobody needs to wait for the investigation to finish to have fun with that. sure, i'll wait for the verdict before deciding that Rove is guilty of any crime. but with what we publically know, he's already failed the ethical test. and so has McClellan. and, unless W is a complete idiot, we can assume he's known about all of this for years - and Rove still works there. Cleek | Image Toolkits | Thumbnail maker

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • M Mike Gaskey

                                          Jeffry J. Brickley wrote: "I never revealed her 'name' to the press." If he had (or did) that would be illegal. Otherwise it is a debate of intent of the law versus the actual law. But fear not, once we can properly define, "IS" we'll get on to the weightier things. Mike "liberals were driven crazy by Bush." Me To: Dixie Sluts, M. Moore, the Boss, Bon Jovi, Clooney, Penn, Babs, Soros, Redford, Gore, Daschle - "bye bye" Me "I voted for W." Me "There you go again." RR "Flushed the Johns" Me

                                          R Offline
                                          R Offline
                                          Rob Graham
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #21

                                          Saying that a person's wife is something may not technically be 'giving her name', but it's much too close for comfort. The intent of the law would seem to be to protect the identity of clandestine agents. Identifying someone by a unique relationship is as much revealing 'identity' as spelling out their name. If Rove did this, then he should pay the price. That said, I favor waiting for the special prosecutor to actually file specific charges (should he determine that a crime was indeed committed) rather than reacting to yet another media frenzy. Absolute faith corrupts as absolutely as absolute power Eric Hoffer The opposite of the religious fanatic is not the fanatical atheist but the gentle cynic who cares not whether there is a god or not. Eric Hoffer

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups