Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. News from the FAA

News from the FAA

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
questionsecuritydebuggingperformancehelp
1 Posts 1 Posters 9 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    Roger Wright
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Subject: New FAA Regulations

    New FAA Regulations

    WASHINGTON, D.C.-
    The FAA is set to unleash a firestorm of criticism early next week when
    it issues a directive to airlines calling for "close, hands-on
    inspection" of all women with large breasts who are checking in for flights.
    The agency had considered this step for some time, as is quite easy to
    conceal large amounts of C-4 inside a brassiere, but after last month's
    incident when a terrorist concealed explosives inside his shoes, the FAA
    feels it has no choice but to proceed.
    Tests have shown that a 42D bra can easily contain sufficient explosives
    to fatally damage a 747. And many bras, especially the very popular
    Wonderbra, have wire harnesses built in which can easily be adapted to a
    detonation mechanism.
    "The problem is not the size of the mammaries! , per se, but to determine
    if what is inside them is indeed, the real thing, so to speak. Breasts
    have a certain feel, a certain consistency of texture, which is far
    different from C-4, and about the only way you can determine if the real
    thing, as it were, is to subject them to a vigorous pat-down and
    squeeze," an agency spokesman said yesterday.
    Critics, especially National Organization of Women (NOW), have been
    quick to voice their opposition. "It's profiling, it's sexist, and it's
    discriminatory," NOW's legal counsel reported. "And besides, it's not
    the chest measurement, it's the CUP size that counts. Everyone knows a
    32D is far more dangerous than a 38AA."
    NOW is going to write to Atty General Ashcroft to demand that he
    personally take a hands-on approach to developing standards for these
    inspections. "As women, NOW recognizes the need for enhanced securit! y,
    but come, on, this is a dangerous jiggling of our Constitutional rights."
    NOW has stated that they will advise all their members to refuse to be
    patted down and squeezed, rather they will suggest that their members
    remove their blouses and bras at the check-in gate to prove that they
    are not concealing any contraband. When told of this, the FAA spokesman
    responded, "YEEECCCHHH! Have you ever seen these NOW ladies?"
    Aside from increased airline safety, another positive from this new
    directive is an expecting quintupling of the number of applicants of for
    the position of security screeners at airports. Indeed, demand for
    applications is so high that the government is considering lowering the
    starting salary. Said Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta,
    "Obviously,

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes


    • Login

    • Don't have an account? Register

    • Login or register to search.
    • First post
      Last post
    0
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • World
    • Users
    • Groups