Help Cross-Platform application
-
I wanted to have some simple projects for Cross-Platform application development its good if in QT library. Do any one has idea about the cross -platform development wich is more suitable and realiable, I feel QT is good one Vikas Amin Embin Technology Bombay vikas.amin@embin.com
-
I wanted to have some simple projects for Cross-Platform application development its good if in QT library. Do any one has idea about the cross -platform development wich is more suitable and realiable, I feel QT is good one Vikas Amin Embin Technology Bombay vikas.amin@embin.com
vikas amin wrote:
I wanted to have some simple projects for Cross-Platform application development its good if in QT library.
What type of project are you making ?... if it gui based project you can use wxWidgets[^]!
"Opinions are neither right nor wrong. I cannot change your opinion. I can, however, change what influences your opinion." - David Crow
cheers, Alok Gupta VC Forum Q&A :- I/ IV
-
vikas amin wrote:
I wanted to have some simple projects for Cross-Platform application development its good if in QT library.
What type of project are you making ?... if it gui based project you can use wxWidgets[^]!
"Opinions are neither right nor wrong. I cannot change your opinion. I can, however, change what influences your opinion." - David Crow
cheers, Alok Gupta VC Forum Q&A :- I/ IV
Hi alok I have gone down the link u said , wxWdiget is a good library . I had got some news that few good s/w companies like SAS have choosen QT to develope cross-platfrom application. I have to develope application for embeded device, have to use sockets, serial port,database,GUI , My concern is that perfomance of the application as it was stated that QT.4 is better then MFC ? Do u have any idea about this let me know thank u :cool: Vikas Amin Embin Technology Bombay vikas.amin@embin.com
-
Hi alok I have gone down the link u said , wxWdiget is a good library . I had got some news that few good s/w companies like SAS have choosen QT to develope cross-platfrom application. I have to develope application for embeded device, have to use sockets, serial port,database,GUI , My concern is that perfomance of the application as it was stated that QT.4 is better then MFC ? Do u have any idea about this let me know thank u :cool: Vikas Amin Embin Technology Bombay vikas.amin@embin.com
vikas amin wrote:
as it was stated that QT.4 is better then MFC ?
Now and then we hear that this library is Better then MFC, that library is better then MFC... that might be true.. As they providing Cross Platform application development.. that MFC doesn't support.. So if you targeting cross development.. MFC is not suitable for that so there are no issues of Performance etc. Or If you want to compare WxWidgets and QT ? Better ask Priyank Bolia.(Author of that article, which I referred in previous post).. he surly help you!.. or wait for other people to respond to your query
"Opinions are neither right nor wrong. I cannot change your opinion. I can, however, change what influences your opinion." - David Crow
cheers, Alok Gupta VC Forum Q&A :- I/ IV
-
Hi alok I have gone down the link u said , wxWdiget is a good library . I had got some news that few good s/w companies like SAS have choosen QT to develope cross-platfrom application. I have to develope application for embeded device, have to use sockets, serial port,database,GUI , My concern is that perfomance of the application as it was stated that QT.4 is better then MFC ? Do u have any idea about this let me know thank u :cool: Vikas Amin Embin Technology Bombay vikas.amin@embin.com
First of all wxWidgets is not MFC, nor it resembles to MFC. It had many ways of programming, like Message Maps as used in MFC for windows people and connect calls as used in Linux. wxWidgets is much better design than MFC, its very easy to use (like all event handler have a void return type, as compared to MFC where each function has its own way of defination). It is supported on WinCE also and support all the sockets, serial port,database,GUI. It use true native controls as compared to QT interpolation (simulation), so its fast. Its free, whereas QT is commercial. The support for wxWidgets is nice, as lots of open source application used wxWidgets rather than Qt (~3300$ per developer). Qt is copyright, you can't change the API for your personal modification, or bug fixes. QT and wxWidgets on wxWidgets site http://wiki.wxwidgets.org/wiki.pl?WxWidgets_Compared_To_Other_Toolkits QT and wxWidgets on Qt site: http://lists.trolltech.com/qt-interest/1999-05/thread00027-0.html http://www.priyank.in/
-
First of all wxWidgets is not MFC, nor it resembles to MFC. It had many ways of programming, like Message Maps as used in MFC for windows people and connect calls as used in Linux. wxWidgets is much better design than MFC, its very easy to use (like all event handler have a void return type, as compared to MFC where each function has its own way of defination). It is supported on WinCE also and support all the sockets, serial port,database,GUI. It use true native controls as compared to QT interpolation (simulation), so its fast. Its free, whereas QT is commercial. The support for wxWidgets is nice, as lots of open source application used wxWidgets rather than Qt (~3300$ per developer). Qt is copyright, you can't change the API for your personal modification, or bug fixes. QT and wxWidgets on wxWidgets site http://wiki.wxwidgets.org/wiki.pl?WxWidgets_Compared_To_Other_Toolkits QT and wxWidgets on Qt site: http://lists.trolltech.com/qt-interest/1999-05/thread00027-0.html http://www.priyank.in/
I just want to add that starting with wxWidgets is much easier now for VC++.NET 2003 developers, as there is a installer from upcase that install and compiles the wxWidgets automatically and installs the help file integration with Visual Studio. Also there is a class wizard also availble written by myself for wxWidgets on Visual Studio.NET http://wxforum.shadonet.com/viewforum.php?f=10&sid=e0451a062a958683f3503a473a85d9f3 http://www.priyank.in/
-
vikas amin wrote:
as it was stated that QT.4 is better then MFC ?
Now and then we hear that this library is Better then MFC, that library is better then MFC... that might be true.. As they providing Cross Platform application development.. that MFC doesn't support.. So if you targeting cross development.. MFC is not suitable for that so there are no issues of Performance etc. Or If you want to compare WxWidgets and QT ? Better ask Priyank Bolia.(Author of that article, which I referred in previous post).. he surly help you!.. or wait for other people to respond to your query
"Opinions are neither right nor wrong. I cannot change your opinion. I can, however, change what influences your opinion." - David Crow
cheers, Alok Gupta VC Forum Q&A :- I/ IV
Thank you Alok i have ask few of my friends woking on Linux to test the QT free verson ,might be i get the Linux feed back from them & as far as windows is concern i will test it thanks again Vikas Amin Embin Technology Bombay vikas.amin@embin.com
-
Thank you Alok i have ask few of my friends woking on Linux to test the QT free verson ,might be i get the Linux feed back from them & as far as windows is concern i will test it thanks again Vikas Amin Embin Technology Bombay vikas.amin@embin.com
vikas amin wrote:
Thank you Alok
I believe Suitable candidate for above Thanks is Priyank :)
"Opinions are neither right nor wrong. I cannot change your opinion. I can, however, change what influences your opinion." - David Crow
cheers, Alok Gupta VC Forum Q&A :- I/ IV
-
I just want to add that starting with wxWidgets is much easier now for VC++.NET 2003 developers, as there is a installer from upcase that install and compiles the wxWidgets automatically and installs the help file integration with Visual Studio. Also there is a class wizard also availble written by myself for wxWidgets on Visual Studio.NET http://wxforum.shadonet.com/viewforum.php?f=10&sid=e0451a062a958683f3503a473a85d9f3 http://www.priyank.in/
I have gone throught the websites given by u fist of all thanks for it, It obiviously a matter that QT is not free but if i consifer Quality the topmost in my application so dont matter to pay some money , if i am geting a stabe and more relaible components . Yet will have to do some study for comparison between QT and wxWidget . Get back to u with proper feedbacks. Thank u :cool: Vikas Amin Embin Technology Bombay vikas.amin@embin.com