cutoss! Limbaugh
-
mystro_AKA_kokie wrote: Even for an ordinary person, 3 failed marraiges is a strecth Sure. Not simply because they are of better character necessarily though. Kids, insecurity of being alone, "devil you know is better than the one you don't", actually still love, convenience, etc. mystro_AKA_kokie wrote: TV gives you a very very distored representation No doubt about it. Prescription drugs are HUGE business, it's how I make my money(pharmecuetical software). BW The Biggest Loser
"People look so snooty, take pills make them moody
Automatic bazootie, zero to tutti frutti"
-Hollywood Freaksbrianwelsch wrote: Not simply because they are of better character necessarily though. Kids, insecurity of being alone, "devil you know is better than the one you don't", actually still love, convenience, etc. Yeah well tell that to our friend Rush:), he doesn't seem so considerate. Last i heard he said anyone who breaks the law(refering to drug addicts) should be sent to the big house. I am sitting in my flame proof buncker, so don't even bother. by the way, perl stinks.
-
brianwelsch wrote: So you have an issue with people who suck at being married? Not really. It does however matter when we're talking about Limbaugh and what he constantly proposes. Even for an ordinary person, 3 failed marraiges is a strecth. You have to remember this is a guy who was abusing drugs while advocating strong sentences for drug abusers. The only difference between him and your average coke-head is that Limbaugh has access to a doctor who can prescribe it to him even when the doctor may be aware he's abusing it. I am making that accusation based on working for a major prescription drug benefit provider, and i know what the reality of drug abuse is in America. TV gives you a very very distored representation, the majority of America's drug abusers are suburbanites living in nice neigborhoods and don't have any dope dealers on the corner. I am sitting in my flame proof buncker, so don't even bother. by the way, perl stinks.
mystro_AKA_kokie wrote: You have to remember this is a guy who was abusing drugs while advocating strong sentences for drug abusers. This really has nothing to do with marriage and divorce. Besides, his comment on drug abusers was made in '95, long before the drug abuse allegations.
"Live long and prosper." - Spock
Jason Henderson
blog -
mystro_AKA_kokie wrote: You have to remember this is a guy who was abusing drugs while advocating strong sentences for drug abusers. This really has nothing to do with marriage and divorce. Besides, his comment on drug abusers was made in '95, long before the drug abuse allegations.
"Live long and prosper." - Spock
Jason Henderson
blogJason Henderson wrote: drug abuse allegations
"I need to tell you today that part of what you have heard and read is correct. I am addicted to prescription pain medication."
and
"Immediately following this broadcast, I am checking myself into a treatment center for the next 30 days to once and for all break the hold this highly addictive medication has on me"
his own words. he abused drugs, he admitted it. Software | Cleek
-
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=514&e=8&u=/ap/20040611/ap_on_en_ot/people_limbaugh_divorce[^] 2 Badly thougth-out marriages? maybe,but a third? I think we're talking major character flaw here. I am sitting in my flame proof buncker, so don't even bother. by the way, perl stinks.
SHouldn't he be thankful to all the hippies, gays, and "find-yourself-don't-give-a-shit-about old-family-values" treehuggers that a divorce is now socially acceptable?
we are here to help each other get through this thing, whatever it is Vonnegut jr.
sighist || Agile Programming | doxygen -
brianwelsch wrote: So you have an issue with people who suck at being married? Not really. It does however matter when we're talking about Limbaugh and what he constantly proposes. Even for an ordinary person, 3 failed marraiges is a strecth. You have to remember this is a guy who was abusing drugs while advocating strong sentences for drug abusers. The only difference between him and your average coke-head is that Limbaugh has access to a doctor who can prescribe it to him even when the doctor may be aware he's abusing it. I am making that accusation based on working for a major prescription drug benefit provider, and i know what the reality of drug abuse is in America. TV gives you a very very distored representation, the majority of America's drug abusers are suburbanites living in nice neigborhoods and don't have any dope dealers on the corner. I am sitting in my flame proof buncker, so don't even bother. by the way, perl stinks.
mystro_AKA_kokie wrote: You have to remember this is a guy who was abusing drugs while advocating strong sentences for drug abusers. I've never abused drugs, but from a similar line I would say that would make him expertly qualified to advocate such a thing. mystro_AKA_kokie wrote: I am making that accusation based on working for a major prescription drug benefit provider, and i know what the reality of drug abuse is in America. Ah, of course, every human being is exactly the same, except you, right? No? This next bit isn't directed just at you: Who is Limbaugh anyway? From the frequency he gets mentioned here he sounds like a politician so if so how about we tear apart his politicial views and leave his private life private. Hold the same standards to yourself or shut the fuck up.
David Wulff The Royal Woofle Museum
Putting the laughter back into slaughter
-
mystro_AKA_kokie wrote: You have to remember this is a guy who was abusing drugs while advocating strong sentences for drug abusers. I've never abused drugs, but from a similar line I would say that would make him expertly qualified to advocate such a thing. mystro_AKA_kokie wrote: I am making that accusation based on working for a major prescription drug benefit provider, and i know what the reality of drug abuse is in America. Ah, of course, every human being is exactly the same, except you, right? No? This next bit isn't directed just at you: Who is Limbaugh anyway? From the frequency he gets mentioned here he sounds like a politician so if so how about we tear apart his politicial views and leave his private life private. Hold the same standards to yourself or shut the fuck up.
David Wulff The Royal Woofle Museum
Putting the laughter back into slaughter
David Wulff wrote: how about we tear apart his politicial views and leave his private life private. That is becuase his political views are intricately tied to things that would be considered personal. If he hadn't had such a tatared marriage record he would probably be advocating making divorces illegal. That is the type of person he is, that is why it's relevant to mention his private life when tearing down his political views.I could have easily talked about him being bald and fat, but i didn't. I am sitting in my flame proof buncker, so don't even bother. by the way, perl stinks.
-
David Wulff wrote: how about we tear apart his politicial views and leave his private life private. That is becuase his political views are intricately tied to things that would be considered personal. If he hadn't had such a tatared marriage record he would probably be advocating making divorces illegal. That is the type of person he is, that is why it's relevant to mention his private life when tearing down his political views.I could have easily talked about him being bald and fat, but i didn't. I am sitting in my flame proof buncker, so don't even bother. by the way, perl stinks.
I guess some people just can't see the line.
David Wulff The Royal Woofle Museum
Putting the laughter back into slaughter
-
mystro_AKA_kokie wrote: You have to remember this is a guy who was abusing drugs while advocating strong sentences for drug abusers. I've never abused drugs, but from a similar line I would say that would make him expertly qualified to advocate such a thing. mystro_AKA_kokie wrote: I am making that accusation based on working for a major prescription drug benefit provider, and i know what the reality of drug abuse is in America. Ah, of course, every human being is exactly the same, except you, right? No? This next bit isn't directed just at you: Who is Limbaugh anyway? From the frequency he gets mentioned here he sounds like a politician so if so how about we tear apart his politicial views and leave his private life private. Hold the same standards to yourself or shut the fuck up.
David Wulff The Royal Woofle Museum
Putting the laughter back into slaughter
David Wulff wrote: Who is Limbaugh anyway? he's not a politician, he's a radio personality. his show is a daily 3-hour rant against the librul, pop-culture, feminazi, blahblahblah, etc.etc.. he's a moralizer and hypocritical preacher of right-wing values. he's not shy about attacking people personally - in one famous instance, he called Bill Clinton's teenage daughter the "White House dog". Software | Cleek
-
David Wulff wrote: Who is Limbaugh anyway? he's not a politician, he's a radio personality. his show is a daily 3-hour rant against the librul, pop-culture, feminazi, blahblahblah, etc.etc.. he's a moralizer and hypocritical preacher of right-wing values. he's not shy about attacking people personally - in one famous instance, he called Bill Clinton's teenage daughter the "White House dog". Software | Cleek
So he's like that guy on the GTA Vice City radio? (VCPN I think it is called.) :cool:
David Wulff The Royal Woofle Museum
Putting the laughter back into slaughter
-
Jason Henderson wrote: drug abuse allegations
"I need to tell you today that part of what you have heard and read is correct. I am addicted to prescription pain medication."
and
"Immediately following this broadcast, I am checking myself into a treatment center for the next 30 days to once and for all break the hold this highly addictive medication has on me"
his own words. he abused drugs, he admitted it. Software | Cleek
OK, I meant the allegations of doctor shopping. I should not have said drug abuse allegations.
"Live long and prosper." - Spock
Jason Henderson
blog -
David Wulff wrote: Who is Limbaugh anyway? he's not a politician, he's a radio personality. his show is a daily 3-hour rant against the librul, pop-culture, feminazi, blahblahblah, etc.etc.. he's a moralizer and hypocritical preacher of right-wing values. he's not shy about attacking people personally - in one famous instance, he called Bill Clinton's teenage daughter the "White House dog". Software | Cleek
Be careful about the above, it isn't false, but it is taken out of context. Without that context it is easy to to see flamebait works (feminazi in particular) and not knowing how he uses it think things are much worse than they are. He is an interesting charicter. Entertaining and all that. There are few places in the US (world really as there is a shortwave broadcast too) where you can't listen to him for 3 hours a day. Spend a few weeks listening to him and you will know what he says. I think you will have a hard time finding a small town without some old man who isn't a lot like him overall. Minor differences of course in the details. He however is an excellent radio host. I'll let you decide where you stand on his politics. Its a sad situation when you have two people who agree 100% on politics.
-
Be careful about the above, it isn't false, but it is taken out of context. Without that context it is easy to to see flamebait works (feminazi in particular) and not knowing how he uses it think things are much worse than they are. He is an interesting charicter. Entertaining and all that. There are few places in the US (world really as there is a shortwave broadcast too) where you can't listen to him for 3 hours a day. Spend a few weeks listening to him and you will know what he says. I think you will have a hard time finding a small town without some old man who isn't a lot like him overall. Minor differences of course in the details. He however is an excellent radio host. I'll let you decide where you stand on his politics. Its a sad situation when you have two people who agree 100% on politics.
Henry miller wrote: (feminazi in particular) and not knowing how he uses it think things are much worse than they are. :laugh: i'm gonna go out on a limb here and state that there is no context where calling someone who isn't pushing for a merging of government and corporate interests based on violent and eliminationist nationalism under the hand of an absolute dictator a "*Nazi" is OK. Software | Cleek
-
Henry miller wrote: (feminazi in particular) and not knowing how he uses it think things are much worse than they are. :laugh: i'm gonna go out on a limb here and state that there is no context where calling someone who isn't pushing for a merging of government and corporate interests based on violent and eliminationist nationalism under the hand of an absolute dictator a "*Nazi" is OK. Software | Cleek
The context is a few (about 5 total) women who want to see as many abortions happen as they can. Not just allow them, but encourage them. If you can't see how anyone opposed to abortion would see that as equale to the Nazi's killing of the jews you need to open your mind.
-
The context is a few (about 5 total) women who want to see as many abortions happen as they can. Not just allow them, but encourage them. If you can't see how anyone opposed to abortion would see that as equale to the Nazi's killing of the jews you need to open your mind.
here's el Rushbo in his own words:
I prefer to call the most obnoxious feminists what they really are: feminazis. The term describes any female who is intolerant of any point of view that challenges militant feminism. I often use it to describe women who are obsessed with perpetuating a modern-day holocaust: abortion. A feminazi is a woman to whom the most important thing in life is seeing to it that as many abortions as possible are performed. Their unspoken reasoning is quite simple. Abortion is the single greatest avenue for militant women to exercise their quest for power and advance their belief that men aren’t necessary. Nothing matter but me, says the feminazi; the is an unviable tissue mass. Feminazis have adopted abortion as a kind of sacrament for their religion/politics of alienation and bitterness. --The Way Things Ought To Be, p.192-93
(my emphasis) first of all, he says he uses it to describe militant feminists. then he adds the definition you like. so, no it isn't limited to "less than 5 women". second, about this "as many abortions as possible" charge. does he offer any proof for this nonsensical claim ? real proof, not based on an out-of-context quote from someone else ? and finally: no, Nazism has nothing to do with abortions. it's a weak and transparent attempt to harness the emotional impact of the word "Nazi" for his own devices. he's a demagogue. Software | Cleek
-
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=514&e=8&u=/ap/20040611/ap_on_en_ot/people_limbaugh_divorce[^] 2 Badly thougth-out marriages? maybe,but a third? I think we're talking major character flaw here. I am sitting in my flame proof buncker, so don't even bother. by the way, perl stinks.
-
here's el Rushbo in his own words:
I prefer to call the most obnoxious feminists what they really are: feminazis. The term describes any female who is intolerant of any point of view that challenges militant feminism. I often use it to describe women who are obsessed with perpetuating a modern-day holocaust: abortion. A feminazi is a woman to whom the most important thing in life is seeing to it that as many abortions as possible are performed. Their unspoken reasoning is quite simple. Abortion is the single greatest avenue for militant women to exercise their quest for power and advance their belief that men aren’t necessary. Nothing matter but me, says the feminazi; the is an unviable tissue mass. Feminazis have adopted abortion as a kind of sacrament for their religion/politics of alienation and bitterness. --The Way Things Ought To Be, p.192-93
(my emphasis) first of all, he says he uses it to describe militant feminists. then he adds the definition you like. so, no it isn't limited to "less than 5 women". second, about this "as many abortions as possible" charge. does he offer any proof for this nonsensical claim ? real proof, not based on an out-of-context quote from someone else ? and finally: no, Nazism has nothing to do with abortions. it's a weak and transparent attempt to harness the emotional impact of the word "Nazi" for his own devices. he's a demagogue. Software | Cleek
You know, my bulls*** detector goes off full blast the minute a man tries to apply to women logic that works when you're dealing with men. His line of thinking goes like this: "If I were female, I would feel subservient to men, and abortion seems like a good way to alleviate that feeling." Of course this stems from the fact that as a man he believes that women are beneath him. This may also hint at the explanation for his trio of divorces...