Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. 90 years ago...

90 years ago...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
game-devquestionloungelearning
45 Posts 9 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    KaRl
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    (and a few days :-O) was assassinated the only man who could have stopped the great tragedy of WW1, and because of that: Jean Jaurés[^]. "How can we give the beautiful name of humanity to this chaos of hostile and wounded nations, to this pile of bloody scraps? The sublime effort of the international proletariat is to reconcile all peoples through universal social justice. Then and only then will there be a humanity that considers its superior unity within the living diversity of free and friendly nations. As democracy and reason develop within peoples and individuals, the need to have recourse to violence diminishes. Let universal suffrage affirm itself; let a vigorous secular education open spirits to new ideas and develop the habit of reflection; let the proletariat organize and group itself according to a law ever more fair and generous; let all this happen and the great transformation that will liberate mankind from oligarchic property will be accomplished without the violence that, 110 years ago, bloodied the democratic and bourgeois revolution"[^]


    Собой остаться дольше...

    D B C 3 Replies Last reply
    0
    • K KaRl

      (and a few days :-O) was assassinated the only man who could have stopped the great tragedy of WW1, and because of that: Jean Jaurés[^]. "How can we give the beautiful name of humanity to this chaos of hostile and wounded nations, to this pile of bloody scraps? The sublime effort of the international proletariat is to reconcile all peoples through universal social justice. Then and only then will there be a humanity that considers its superior unity within the living diversity of free and friendly nations. As democracy and reason develop within peoples and individuals, the need to have recourse to violence diminishes. Let universal suffrage affirm itself; let a vigorous secular education open spirits to new ideas and develop the habit of reflection; let the proletariat organize and group itself according to a law ever more fair and generous; let all this happen and the great transformation that will liberate mankind from oligarchic property will be accomplished without the violence that, 110 years ago, bloodied the democratic and bourgeois revolution"[^]


      Собой остаться дольше...

      D Offline
      D Offline
      DRHuff
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      He was assassinated one day before the mobilizations began. How could he have stopped the war? Dave

      K 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • K KaRl

        (and a few days :-O) was assassinated the only man who could have stopped the great tragedy of WW1, and because of that: Jean Jaurés[^]. "How can we give the beautiful name of humanity to this chaos of hostile and wounded nations, to this pile of bloody scraps? The sublime effort of the international proletariat is to reconcile all peoples through universal social justice. Then and only then will there be a humanity that considers its superior unity within the living diversity of free and friendly nations. As democracy and reason develop within peoples and individuals, the need to have recourse to violence diminishes. Let universal suffrage affirm itself; let a vigorous secular education open spirits to new ideas and develop the habit of reflection; let the proletariat organize and group itself according to a law ever more fair and generous; let all this happen and the great transformation that will liberate mankind from oligarchic property will be accomplished without the violence that, 110 years ago, bloodied the democratic and bourgeois revolution"[^]


        Собой остаться дольше...

        B Offline
        B Offline
        Brit
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        I was going to say the same thing as DRHuff, but with the added comment: how would Jean Jaures (assassinated on July 31, 1914) have prevented Germany from declaring war on Russia (August 1, 1914) and France (August 3, 1914)? How would he have stopped Germany's invasion of Belgium (August 4, 1914), which drew Britain into the war? ----------------------------------------------------- Bush To Iraqi Militants: 'Please Stop Bringing It On' - The Onion "Moore's prominent presence in the news brings to light some serious questions, such as 'Can't he at least try to look presentable?'" - The Onion

        K 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • D DRHuff

          He was assassinated one day before the mobilizations began. How could he have stopped the war? Dave

          K Offline
          K Offline
          KaRl
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          By uniting the French and German proletariat in a trans-national general strike against the War, the worst fear of both governments (July 25: Jean Jaurès holds a meeting in Brussels with antiwar Socialists from Germany, Austria, England and Belgium - I've found only the french version of his speech: http://www.philagora.net/france/jaures1.htm[^] - Google's translation is approximate[^]) And the more I study the problem, the more I believe that WW1 was also a solution for the european wealthy classes (french, german, russian) to avoid to solve the social problems caused by the Industrial Revolution, and then use nationalism as a fake.


          Собой остаться дольше...

          S 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • B Brit

            I was going to say the same thing as DRHuff, but with the added comment: how would Jean Jaures (assassinated on July 31, 1914) have prevented Germany from declaring war on Russia (August 1, 1914) and France (August 3, 1914)? How would he have stopped Germany's invasion of Belgium (August 4, 1914), which drew Britain into the war? ----------------------------------------------------- Bush To Iraqi Militants: 'Please Stop Bringing It On' - The Onion "Moore's prominent presence in the news brings to light some serious questions, such as 'Can't he at least try to look presentable?'" - The Onion

            K Offline
            K Offline
            KaRl
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            See above. He was the only one with enough charisma to unite french and german socialists. After his dead, both parties betrayed their ideals, and the french socialists entered in the "Union Sacrée"[^] (August 4) when the German socialists voted the war credits (also on August 4). Would both parties opposed the war would have been the story quiet different. WW1 was an industrial war and a war of mass : it would have been impossible without the participation of the working classes.


            Собой остаться дольше...

            B 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • K KaRl

              By uniting the French and German proletariat in a trans-national general strike against the War, the worst fear of both governments (July 25: Jean Jaurès holds a meeting in Brussels with antiwar Socialists from Germany, Austria, England and Belgium - I've found only the french version of his speech: http://www.philagora.net/france/jaures1.htm[^] - Google's translation is approximate[^]) And the more I study the problem, the more I believe that WW1 was also a solution for the european wealthy classes (french, german, russian) to avoid to solve the social problems caused by the Industrial Revolution, and then use nationalism as a fake.


              Собой остаться дольше...

              S Offline
              S Offline
              Stan Shannon
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              KaЯl wrote: the more I study the problem, the more I believe that WW1 was also a solution for the european wealthy classes (french, german, russian) to avoid to solve the social problems caused by the Industrial Revolution, and then use nationalism as a fake. Only socialism, in absorbing all classes in the common ownership of the means of labor, can resolve this antagonism and make of every nation, finally reconciled with each other, a parcel of humanity. If WWI did stop that crap it was well worth it. "We have staked the whole of all our political institutions upon the capacity of mankind for self-government, upon the capacity of each and all of us to govern ourselves, to control ourselves, to sustain ourselves according to the Ten Commandments of God." James Madison, "Father of the U.S. Constitution"

              K 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S Stan Shannon

                KaЯl wrote: the more I study the problem, the more I believe that WW1 was also a solution for the european wealthy classes (french, german, russian) to avoid to solve the social problems caused by the Industrial Revolution, and then use nationalism as a fake. Only socialism, in absorbing all classes in the common ownership of the means of labor, can resolve this antagonism and make of every nation, finally reconciled with each other, a parcel of humanity. If WWI did stop that crap it was well worth it. "We have staked the whole of all our political institutions upon the capacity of mankind for self-government, upon the capacity of each and all of us to govern ourselves, to control ourselves, to sustain ourselves according to the Ten Commandments of God." James Madison, "Father of the U.S. Constitution"

                K Offline
                K Offline
                KaRl
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                - Without WW1, no October Revolution. - A parcel of humanity, it's perhaps what you're lacking of...


                Собой остаться дольше...

                C S 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • K KaRl

                  - Without WW1, no October Revolution. - A parcel of humanity, it's perhaps what you're lacking of...


                  Собой остаться дольше...

                  C Offline
                  C Offline
                  Chris Losinger
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  9 million soldiers killed? no big deal! nearly that many civillians dead? c'est la vie! poison gas? hah! as long as there's an abstract ideal to champion, bring on the death! Software | Cleek

                  S T 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • K KaRl

                    - Without WW1, no October Revolution. - A parcel of humanity, it's perhaps what you're lacking of...


                    Собой остаться дольше...

                    S Offline
                    S Offline
                    Stan Shannon
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    KaЯl wrote: - Without WW1, no October Revolution. With all of Europe becoming one big socialist utopia, the October Revolution would have just been a few years early and much more massive. KaЯl wrote: - A parcel of humanity, it's perhaps what you're lacking of... Just out of curiosity, about how much of humanity do you think will have to be sacrificed before the Marxist finally comprehend just how monsterously stupid they actually are? "We have staked the whole of all our political institutions upon the capacity of mankind for self-government, upon the capacity of each and all of us to govern ourselves, to control ourselves, to sustain ourselves according to the Ten Commandments of God." James Madison, "Father of the U.S. Constitution"

                    P K 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • C Chris Losinger

                      9 million soldiers killed? no big deal! nearly that many civillians dead? c'est la vie! poison gas? hah! as long as there's an abstract ideal to champion, bring on the death! Software | Cleek

                      S Offline
                      S Offline
                      Stan Shannon
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      Chris Losinger wrote: 9 million soldiers killed? no big deal! nearly that many civillians dead? c'est la vie! poison gas? hah! as long as there's an abstract ideal to champion, bring on the death! And, of course, 400 years of European Imperialism finally and inevitably crashing in upon itself had nothing to do with WWI. It was all because the Industrialist and the Capitalist didn't want to lose control. Suuuurrrrreee... Revisionism 101. "We have staked the whole of all our political institutions upon the capacity of mankind for self-government, upon the capacity of each and all of us to govern ourselves, to control ourselves, to sustain ourselves according to the Ten Commandments of God." James Madison, "Father of the U.S. Constitution"

                      C K 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • S Stan Shannon

                        Chris Losinger wrote: 9 million soldiers killed? no big deal! nearly that many civillians dead? c'est la vie! poison gas? hah! as long as there's an abstract ideal to champion, bring on the death! And, of course, 400 years of European Imperialism finally and inevitably crashing in upon itself had nothing to do with WWI. It was all because the Industrialist and the Capitalist didn't want to lose control. Suuuurrrrreee... Revisionism 101. "We have staked the whole of all our political institutions upon the capacity of mankind for self-government, upon the capacity of each and all of us to govern ourselves, to control ourselves, to sustain ourselves according to the Ten Commandments of God." James Madison, "Father of the U.S. Constitution"

                        C Offline
                        C Offline
                        Chris Losinger
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        Stan Shannon wrote: Suuuurrrrreee sorry Stan, i wasn't talking about any of that, and you know it. Software | Cleek

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • S Stan Shannon

                          KaЯl wrote: - Without WW1, no October Revolution. With all of Europe becoming one big socialist utopia, the October Revolution would have just been a few years early and much more massive. KaЯl wrote: - A parcel of humanity, it's perhaps what you're lacking of... Just out of curiosity, about how much of humanity do you think will have to be sacrificed before the Marxist finally comprehend just how monsterously stupid they actually are? "We have staked the whole of all our political institutions upon the capacity of mankind for self-government, upon the capacity of each and all of us to govern ourselves, to control ourselves, to sustain ourselves according to the Ten Commandments of God." James Madison, "Father of the U.S. Constitution"

                          P Offline
                          P Offline
                          palbano
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          Stan Shannon wrote: Just out of curiosity, about how much of humanity do you think will have to be sacrificed before the Marxist finally comprehend just how monsterously stupid they actually are? So… just start a war and kill them all because according to you the outcome of a compassionate humanity is certain failure? Or perhaps I missed your point entirely.

                          Hate is not a family value.

                          -pete

                          S T 2 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • K KaRl

                            (and a few days :-O) was assassinated the only man who could have stopped the great tragedy of WW1, and because of that: Jean Jaurés[^]. "How can we give the beautiful name of humanity to this chaos of hostile and wounded nations, to this pile of bloody scraps? The sublime effort of the international proletariat is to reconcile all peoples through universal social justice. Then and only then will there be a humanity that considers its superior unity within the living diversity of free and friendly nations. As democracy and reason develop within peoples and individuals, the need to have recourse to violence diminishes. Let universal suffrage affirm itself; let a vigorous secular education open spirits to new ideas and develop the habit of reflection; let the proletariat organize and group itself according to a law ever more fair and generous; let all this happen and the great transformation that will liberate mankind from oligarchic property will be accomplished without the violence that, 110 years ago, bloodied the democratic and bourgeois revolution"[^]


                            Собой остаться дольше...

                            C Offline
                            C Offline
                            Callixte
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            I don't know about the historical reality of this statement, but it surely has a mythical reality: he was the embodiement of socialist hope, he died ("Pourquoi ont ils tué Jaurès" as Jacques Brel sang) and the war broke out, it lasted four years and millions died. Note: by "socialist", I mean what was meant at this time and it has nothing to do with the Soviet Union. Callixte.[^]

                            K 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • S Stan Shannon

                              Chris Losinger wrote: 9 million soldiers killed? no big deal! nearly that many civillians dead? c'est la vie! poison gas? hah! as long as there's an abstract ideal to champion, bring on the death! And, of course, 400 years of European Imperialism finally and inevitably crashing in upon itself had nothing to do with WWI. It was all because the Industrialist and the Capitalist didn't want to lose control. Suuuurrrrreee... Revisionism 101. "We have staked the whole of all our political institutions upon the capacity of mankind for self-government, upon the capacity of each and all of us to govern ourselves, to control ourselves, to sustain ourselves according to the Ten Commandments of God." James Madison, "Father of the U.S. Constitution"

                              K Offline
                              K Offline
                              KaRl
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #14

                              Why do you limit european will of conquest to 400 years only? European powers dealt with many crisises before the assassination of Sarajevo. Many of these crisises were much more serious than this one, as the balkan wars or the morrocan disputes between France and Germany (Algesiras, Agadir). Nonetheless, this one led to a world war, not because it was inevitable, but because this time no government had the will to save the Peace. At the end of 1914 should have been elections in France which should have led to the first victory of the Socialists and the application of their programs, the first point being the creation of the income tax. In Germany, the SPD was stronger and stronger, and asked vehemently for the change of the very unfair electoral law of Prussia. In Russia, the power of the Tsar was contested for decades, and a military success would have been a good way to hide the social uneasiness. I don't say the social question was the only reason of WW1, but I believe it can't be ignored. Revisionism would be to pretend that only europeans were imperialist.


                              Собой остаться дольше...

                              C 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • C Callixte

                                I don't know about the historical reality of this statement, but it surely has a mythical reality: he was the embodiement of socialist hope, he died ("Pourquoi ont ils tué Jaurès" as Jacques Brel sang) and the war broke out, it lasted four years and millions died. Note: by "socialist", I mean what was meant at this time and it has nothing to do with the Soviet Union. Callixte.[^]

                                K Offline
                                K Offline
                                KaRl
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #15

                                You're right, the Myth overshadowes the historical facts. Callixte wrote: I mean what was meant at this time and it has nothing to do with the Soviet Union If you try to explain that to some of our right wing fellow CPians, all my wishes and good luck!


                                Собой остаться дольше...

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • K KaRl

                                  Why do you limit european will of conquest to 400 years only? European powers dealt with many crisises before the assassination of Sarajevo. Many of these crisises were much more serious than this one, as the balkan wars or the morrocan disputes between France and Germany (Algesiras, Agadir). Nonetheless, this one led to a world war, not because it was inevitable, but because this time no government had the will to save the Peace. At the end of 1914 should have been elections in France which should have led to the first victory of the Socialists and the application of their programs, the first point being the creation of the income tax. In Germany, the SPD was stronger and stronger, and asked vehemently for the change of the very unfair electoral law of Prussia. In Russia, the power of the Tsar was contested for decades, and a military success would have been a good way to hide the social uneasiness. I don't say the social question was the only reason of WW1, but I believe it can't be ignored. Revisionism would be to pretend that only europeans were imperialist.


                                  Собой остаться дольше...

                                  C Offline
                                  C Offline
                                  Callixte
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #16

                                  > Revisionism would be to pretend that only europeans were imperialist. So true. Just look at the first Cuban Revolution circa 1895 and the role of the US at this time. Jose Marti[^] (Cuban leader who died in 1895) denounced US imperialism in Latin America in his speeches. Callixte.[^]

                                  A 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • S Stan Shannon

                                    KaЯl wrote: - Without WW1, no October Revolution. With all of Europe becoming one big socialist utopia, the October Revolution would have just been a few years early and much more massive. KaЯl wrote: - A parcel of humanity, it's perhaps what you're lacking of... Just out of curiosity, about how much of humanity do you think will have to be sacrificed before the Marxist finally comprehend just how monsterously stupid they actually are? "We have staked the whole of all our political institutions upon the capacity of mankind for self-government, upon the capacity of each and all of us to govern ourselves, to control ourselves, to sustain ourselves according to the Ten Commandments of God." James Madison, "Father of the U.S. Constitution"

                                    K Offline
                                    K Offline
                                    KaRl
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #17

                                    Stan Shannon wrote: the October Revolution would have just been a few years early and much more massive. without WW1, I'm not sure October Revolution would have followed the February Revolution. As I'm sure the tsarist regim was doomed, I'm not sure a democratic revolution would have mandatory failed. Stan Shannon wrote: how much of humanity do you think will have to be sacrificed before the Marxist finally comprehend just how monsterously stupid they actually are? I don't know, I never have been and will never be Marxist, so find one and ask him/her.


                                    Собой остаться дольше...

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • P palbano

                                      Stan Shannon wrote: Just out of curiosity, about how much of humanity do you think will have to be sacrificed before the Marxist finally comprehend just how monsterously stupid they actually are? So… just start a war and kill them all because according to you the outcome of a compassionate humanity is certain failure? Or perhaps I missed your point entirely.

                                      Hate is not a family value.

                                      -pete

                                      S Offline
                                      S Offline
                                      Stan Shannon
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #18

                                      palbano wrote: Or perhaps I missed your point entirely. The road to hell is paved with good intentions... "We have staked the whole of all our political institutions upon the capacity of mankind for self-government, upon the capacity of each and all of us to govern ourselves, to control ourselves, to sustain ourselves according to the Ten Commandments of God." James Madison, "Father of the U.S. Constitution"

                                      P 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • S Stan Shannon

                                        palbano wrote: Or perhaps I missed your point entirely. The road to hell is paved with good intentions... "We have staked the whole of all our political institutions upon the capacity of mankind for self-government, upon the capacity of each and all of us to govern ourselves, to control ourselves, to sustain ourselves according to the Ten Commandments of God." James Madison, "Father of the U.S. Constitution"

                                        P Offline
                                        P Offline
                                        palbano
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #19

                                        Stan Shannon wrote: palbano wrote: Or perhaps I missed your point entirely. The road to hell is paved with good intentions... Obtuse replies to questions promote apathy, but then.... who cares :confused:

                                        "No matter where you go, there your are." - Buckaroo Banzai

                                        -pete

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • C Chris Losinger

                                          9 million soldiers killed? no big deal! nearly that many civillians dead? c'est la vie! poison gas? hah! as long as there's an abstract ideal to champion, bring on the death! Software | Cleek

                                          T Offline
                                          T Offline
                                          Tomaz Stih 0
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #20

                                          It would be worth if it stopped socialism. But unfortunately it didn't. (according to the black book: 80 mio. dead by socialistm and you can add victims of national socialism to this). No socialist has moral ground to talk about humanity. Tomaz

                                          C K 2 Replies Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups