Excecuted
-
Tomaž Štih wrote: 1) Kill him. 2) Let him there. Perhaps he'll be shooting at your soldiers the next day. 3) Send your soldiers to recover him, risking their life twice. You're kidding, right? Are those the only options you can come up with? As seen (edited), that old video is in violation of the UMCJ as well as military training doctrine. One last thought for you to ponder: A soldier's job is ultimately to save lives and prevent war. Best, Jerry
"Making money is art and working is art and good business is the best art of all."--Andy Warhol Toasty0.com
Toasty0 wrote: A soldier's job is ultimately to save lives and prevent war. Never been a soldier have you ? Thats kinda like saying that a birds ultimate job is to poop on windshields. A soldier has only ONE ultimate job - to keep alive . And if he does this then all the other so called "goals" will be achieved. Remember the words of the late great GS Patton - "Its not your job to die for your country. Its your job to make some other poor sonofabitch die for his" Richard "Under certain circumstances, profanity provides a relief denied even to prayer --Mark Twain (1835 - 1910)
-
Tomaž Štih wrote: 1) Kill him. 2) Let him there. Perhaps he'll be shooting at your soldiers the next day. 3) Send your soldiers to recover him, risking their life twice. You're kidding, right? Are those the only options you can come up with? As seen (edited), that old video is in violation of the UMCJ as well as military training doctrine. One last thought for you to ponder: A soldier's job is ultimately to save lives and prevent war. Best, Jerry
"Making money is art and working is art and good business is the best art of all."--Andy Warhol Toasty0.com
Toasty0 wrote: One last thought for you to ponder: A soldier's job is ultimately to save lives and prevent war. Not really, a soldier's jobduty is to fight the war that was unavoidable. Its the politician's duty to prevent the war, the soldiers suty to fight and win it. Uptight Ex-Military Republican married to a Commie Lib - How weird is that?
-
Toasty0 wrote: A soldier's job is ultimately to save lives and prevent war. Never been a soldier have you ? Thats kinda like saying that a birds ultimate job is to poop on windshields. A soldier has only ONE ultimate job - to keep alive . And if he does this then all the other so called "goals" will be achieved. Remember the words of the late great GS Patton - "Its not your job to die for your country. Its your job to make some other poor sonofabitch die for his" Richard "Under certain circumstances, profanity provides a relief denied even to prayer --Mark Twain (1835 - 1910)
It's interesting that you mention Patton - he was known for glorious campaigns that got a lot of his own troops killed, hence 'Blood and Gust Patton'. Their blood, his guts. That is why he was in charge of the D day diversion. Elaine :rose: The tigress is here :-D
-
All good questions but this is what soldiers are trained and paid to deal with. What happens in the video clip is illegal under international law, the Geneva Convention and American Military law. pseudonym67 My Articles[^] "They say there are strangers who threaten us, In our immigrants and infidels. They say there is strangeness too dangerous In our theaters and bookstore shelves. That those who know what's best for us Must rise and save us from ourselves." Rush
There are too many unkowns in this. Was he actually disabled or could he still have shot at the US soldiers ? Was there any other access to the space which would not have exposed the US soldiers to risk ? I am not comfortable with what happened but neither of us was there. Elaine :rose: The tigress is here :-D
-
It's interesting that you mention Patton - he was known for glorious campaigns that got a lot of his own troops killed, hence 'Blood and Gust Patton'. Their blood, his guts. That is why he was in charge of the D day diversion. Elaine :rose: The tigress is here :-D
Trollslayer wrote: It's interesting that you mention Patton - he was known for glorious campaigns that got a lot of his own troops killed, hence 'Blood and Gust Patton'. Their blood, his guts. That is why he was in charge of the D day diversion. You saw the movie. Now go read the real history. Pattons casuality rate was almost 35% below any comparable front line unit. He was a military genius - no politican - no statesman. He fell into the first vestiges of PC when the US was trying to appease the French and English during the final stages of WWII. Hell Montgomery got more people killed thru sheer stupidity than Patton ever did and Patton was always attacking. Movies are good enternainment but attributing the G. C. Scott interpertation of GS Patton to reality is like saying "Blazing Saddles" is a good representaion of the early west. Richard "Under certain circumstances, profanity provides a relief denied even to prayer --Mark Twain (1835 - 1910)
-
The following link is to a video that shows an Iraqi lying wounded on the ground being executed by American marines. It is clip taken from CNN not an Arab media station. http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article5365.htm[^] pseudonym67 My Articles[^] "They say there are strangers who threaten us, In our immigrants and infidels. They say there is strangeness too dangerous In our theaters and bookstore shelves. That those who know what's best for us Must rise and save us from ourselves." Rush
When anyone here has served at the safe end of a M16 in a shooting war, then - and only then - will anyone here be qualified to comment. ------- sig starts "I've heard some drivers saying, 'We're going too fast here...'. If you're not here to race, go the hell home - don't come here and grumble about going too fast. Why don't you tie a kerosene rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
-
I rated you 1 because 1) with my question I did not set up a strawman (I accused no one of making statements that they weren't making), 2) I think my question is reasonable. It reminds people what war means. 3) I created one possible context (scenario) to provide what is called benefit of a doubt to which (so I belive) every man is entitled. 4) You have written a radical reply but have not used your own username. [edit] And, btw, the thing with "brown people" is a straw man. Par excellence. [/edit] Tomaž
-
What exactly on the clip is illegal? I see a military situation in which an enemy soldier is wounded and then killed. What law prevents a soldier to shoot at wounded enemy soldier from the distance again? You really can't tell if he could be captured. It is not clear from the video. An investigation would answer this question but you judge as if an investigation already took place and all is already known about what was happening there. I know it is not nice, but in war, when you shoot and wound an enemy soldier you don't stop shooting because of it. And you have to separate the soldiers reaction (it feels good) from what he did, because it does not matter how he reacted to it but with what sort of military situation was he faced. And the fact is we simply can't see from the video. We can only guess. Tomaz
Just to further inflame the argument... Tomaž Štih wrote: I see a military situation in which an enemy soldier is wounded and then killed. Yes, he is wounded. He is writhing on the ground clearly in great pain and unable to do anything to defend himself, let alone perform an offensive action. I suppose they were just putting him out of his misery, like a deseased farm animal. Tomaž Štih wrote: but in war, when you shoot and wound an enemy soldier you don't stop shooting because of it. Why not? It costs the other side more to care for their wounded than it does for them to bury their dead.
