Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. General Programming
  3. C / C++ / MFC
  4. SetUnhandledExceptionFilter() difference Windows 2K and XP

SetUnhandledExceptionFilter() difference Windows 2K and XP

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved C / C++ / MFC
debuggingvisual-studiodata-structurestutorialquestion
1 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    StHubi
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Hallo, I have been working for a long time with Windows 2000 with SP4 as my operating system. Now I have moved to Windows XP with SP2. Unfortunately that had a nasty side effect I cannot yet understand: When I do run a debug version of my application outside the debugger and an exception occurs, Windows 2000 notifed me about it and I could choose "Retry" to debug the application. The IDE came up and I got every information about the stack and its variables. Under Windows XP the "Retry" button was replaced by "Debug", but when I use it the IDE comes up and I do not get any useful stack information, just Assembler code that is not very useful for me. Finally I found out that this behaviour is connected to the SetUnhandledExceptionFilter() function. Without it even Windows XP will show me the stack information. But I really need my custom exception filter, so I cannot leave the application without it forever. Does anyone know how to get the full stack information under Windows XP? Thanks, StHubi ---------- "Have no fear, the saint is here!" -- modified at 3:35 Tuesday 29th November, 2005

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes


    • Login

    • Don't have an account? Register

    • Login or register to search.
    • First post
      Last post
    0
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • World
    • Users
    • Groups