Frustrated with the buggy forums
-
It's just that Alvaro's faith has been shaken. Here he was, an innocent atheist, who believed in Paul Watson. Now you've changed your name. And know he's questioning if Paul Watson is your real name. So what's he to believe in now? Peace, Alvaro. Just having a bit-o-fun.
ahz wrote:
Peace, Alvaro. Just having a bit-o-fun.
:laugh: That's cool man. Alvaro
... since we've descended to name calling, I'm thinking you're about twenty pounds of troll droppings in a ten pound bag. - Vincent Reynolds
-
It's just that Alvaro's faith has been shaken. Here he was, an innocent atheist, who believed in Paul Watson. Now you've changed your name. And know he's questioning if Paul Watson is your real name. So what's he to believe in now? Peace, Alvaro. Just having a bit-o-fun.
:laugh: I'd say my name is not important.
-
John Draich wrote:
Alvaro is
Yes, just saw that :-)
John Draich wrote:
Plus I never check user-ids and quite a few people have the icon.
I saw the icon, wondered who this new site builder is, hovered the mouse over the icon, saw the id and recognized it :-) Regards, Nish
Nish’s thoughts on MFC, C++/CLI and .NET (my blog)
The Ultimate Grid - The #1 MFC grid out there!You are GEEK http://www.boingboing.net/images/geek-squad.jpg[^]
-
:laugh: I'd say my name is not important.
-
Alvaro Mendez wrote:
All I know is that if I were in charge of this site's development
Really? Had much experience running a million+ user website funded on advertisements?
-
Finally got sick of the whale-saver jokes, eh? :rolleyes:
Now taking suggestions for the next release of CPhog...
:laugh: You know it man, you know it.
-
Really. I know that wasn't me.
-
Finally got sick of the whale-saver jokes, eh? :rolleyes:
Now taking suggestions for the next release of CPhog...
Shog9 wrote:
whale-saver jokes,
:confused: Regards, Nish
Nish’s thoughts on MFC, C++/CLI and .NET (my blog)
The Ultimate Grid - The #1 MFC grid out there! -
Nishant Sivakumar wrote:
saw the id and recognized it
You are such a geek :-D
John Draich wrote:
You are such a geek
Sometimes. :) Regards, Nish
Nish’s thoughts on MFC, C++/CLI and .NET (my blog)
The Ultimate Grid - The #1 MFC grid out there! -
:laugh: Regards, Nish
Nish’s thoughts on MFC, C++/CLI and .NET (my blog)
The Ultimate Grid - The #1 MFC grid out there! -
Shog9 wrote:
whale-saver jokes,
:confused: Regards, Nish
Nish’s thoughts on MFC, C++/CLI and .NET (my blog)
The Ultimate Grid - The #1 MFC grid out there!PaulWatson.com Try it.
-
John Draich wrote:
You are such a geek
Sometimes. :) Regards, Nish
Nish’s thoughts on MFC, C++/CLI and .NET (my blog)
The Ultimate Grid - The #1 MFC grid out there!I'll ask the wife, she'll know.
-
Michael P Butler wrote:
No piece of software of any complexity can have zero bugs.
Yes it can! My pet hate is when people make the above statement, it implies that you expect your code to be buggy and already are thinking up excuses for the errors! The main reason for 'buggy' code is cost, to properly design, write and test costs time and money. I used to write software that had to run 24/7, it can be done.
"Normal is getting dressed in clothes that you buy for work and driving through traffic in a car that you are still paying for - in order to get to the job you need to pay for the clothes and the car, and the house you leave vacant all day so you can afford to live in it." - Ellen Goodman
Ted Ferenc wrote:
I used to write software that had to run 24/7, it can be done.
Just because it runs 24/7 does not mean it is also free of "bugs." You may have thoroughly tested it, but that merely shows the presence of a bug, not its absence.
"Let us be thankful for the fools. But for them the rest of us could not succeed." - Mark Twain
"There is no death, only a change of worlds." - Native American Proverb
-
Ted Ferenc wrote:
I used to write software that had to run 24/7, it can be done.
Just because it runs 24/7 does not mean it is also free of "bugs." You may have thoroughly tested it, but that merely shows the presence of a bug, not its absence.
"Let us be thankful for the fools. But for them the rest of us could not succeed." - Mark Twain
"There is no death, only a change of worlds." - Native American Proverb
DavidCrow wrote:
You may have thoroughly tested it, but that merely shows the presence of a bug, not its absence.
:confused: Regards, Nish
Nish’s thoughts on MFC, C++/CLI and .NET (my blog)
The Ultimate Grid - The #1 MFC grid out there! -
I'll ask the wife, she'll know.
John Draich wrote:
I'll ask the wife, she'll know.
:laugh: Regards, Nish
Nish’s thoughts on MFC, C++/CLI and .NET (my blog)
The Ultimate Grid - The #1 MFC grid out there! -
PaulWatson.com Try it.
John Draich wrote:
LOL. Thanks :-) Regards, Nish
Nish’s thoughts on MFC, C++/CLI and .NET (my blog)
The Ultimate Grid - The #1 MFC grid out there! -
DavidCrow wrote:
You may have thoroughly tested it, but that merely shows the presence of a bug, not its absence.
:confused: Regards, Nish
Nish’s thoughts on MFC, C++/CLI and .NET (my blog)
The Ultimate Grid - The #1 MFC grid out there!It's a study of "program correctness" by the late Professor Dijkstra.
"Let us be thankful for the fools. But for them the rest of us could not succeed." - Mark Twain
"There is no death, only a change of worlds." - Native American Proverb
-
DavidCrow wrote:
You may have thoroughly tested it, but that merely shows the presence of a bug, not its absence.
:confused: Regards, Nish
Nish’s thoughts on MFC, C++/CLI and .NET (my blog)
The Ultimate Grid - The #1 MFC grid out there!You can't prove a negative. Elementary logic. So the statement "there are no bugs in this program" for a sufficiently large program is not verifiable.
-
You can't prove a negative. Elementary logic. So the statement "there are no bugs in this program" for a sufficiently large program is not verifiable.
ahz wrote:
You can't prove a negative.
Prove that!
ahz wrote:
Elementary logic.
It most certainly isn't Are you gonna bark all, day little doggy. Or are you gonna bite. - Mr Blonde
-
I'm probably gonna get pummelled for this but... I need to get it off my chest: Am I the only who thinks that there's NO excuse for the CP forums to be buggy? This is a developer site: run by developers, for developers. You'd expect it to contain zero bugs, or at the very least for the bugs to be fixed immediately after being detected. But no. The bugs exist and they linger... and when you think they've been fixed, they come back. WTH! I know that this is a free site so I shouldn't expect much from it, and perhaps even be grateful for what I get. The old, "you get what you pay for" comes to mind. But the truth is that Chris Maunder and company aren't doing this for free. There are plenty of ads on this site that are paying to keep it running, and then some. And the ads are there because enough of us come to this site on a regular basis. In other words, if enough of us left, the site would stop receiving advertising dollars and eventually die. So indirectly, we are contributing to this site and its developers. At a minimum, we should be able to use it without running into what I consider stupid bugs... Or perhaps having bug-free forums is practically impossible, I don't know. :~ All I know is that if I were in charge of this site's development, I'd make quality a top priority. It doesn't need fancy bells and whistles, but the ones that are there, should work perfectly. And when they don't, they should be fixed immediately. There's just no excuse to keep something broken broken, especially when so many developers use it on a regular basis. I'd be so embarrassed if it was happening to my site. That's all -- just voicing my frustration. Alvaro
... since we've descended to name calling, I'm thinking you're about twenty pounds of troll droppings in a ten pound bag. - Vincent Reynolds
I agree completely. It's hard to beat the CP community though, so I'm still here. :)
Alvaro Mendez wrote:
That's all -- just voicing my frustration.
We all need to do that from time-to-time. Jeremy Falcon
