Ann Is A Mean Angry Woman
-
Brit wrote:
Gee, Stan, I thought you I remember you agreeing with evolution.
I do.
Brit wrote:
Ann seems to think that you believe it only because you are morally bankrupt.
However, I don't fault those who take issue with the theory. I do agree with those like Coulter that the theory of evolution is used by the left as yet another means of beating Christianity into submission rather than as a means of understanding the universe. "The theory of evolution prooves that your religion is untrue so you must let the state teach your children the TRUTH!" Besides, the left want's to teach only those aspects of evolutin that support their anti-religious agenda. They would never teach those aspects of evolution that don't support their agenda. For example, if evolution is true, than it stands to reason that non-Africans should be somewhat evolutionarily advanced different in many ways than Africans, as we are the result of 50 to 100 thousands years of separate evolution adapting to more hostile and challanging enviroments. There are studies which suggest some slight average differences in intellectual abilities between the two groups which could be explained by evolution theory. Yet, the left would never entertain such a heretical assault on one of its own core moral principles - it would just be all racist to even suggest it. So much for science. EDIT - I took out the "advanced" term because it implies that evolution is purposefully directional. The rest of my comment stands. "You get that which you tolerate" -- modified at 20:12 Wednesday 7th June, 2006
Stan Shannon wrote:
I do agree with those like Coulter that the theory of evolution is used by the left as yet another means of beating Christianity into submission rather than as a means of understanding the universe.
BTW, in case I need to reiterate, you think that evolution is misused by the Left, but Ann thinks that evolution is entirely false, obviously false, and the only people who could possibly believe it are people trying to deny the existence of God. So, no, you don't agree with Ann. Ann thinks your a self-delusional God-hating idiot based purely on your acceptance of evolution. Don't worry, lots of us are used to being unfairly slandered by hard-right conservatives who ignorantly claim to know exactly why we believe what we believe. ----------------------------------------------------- Empires Of Steel[^]
-
Stan Shannon wrote:
as we are the result of 50 to 100 thousands years of separate evolution adapting to more hostile and challanging enviroments
It's the opposite. The tigress is here :-D
Opposite of what? "You get that which you tolerate"
-
Stan Shannon wrote:
I do agree with those like Coulter that the theory of evolution is used by the left as yet another means of beating Christianity into submission rather than as a means of understanding the universe.
BTW, in case I need to reiterate, you think that evolution is misused by the Left, but Ann thinks that evolution is entirely false, obviously false, and the only people who could possibly believe it are people trying to deny the existence of God. So, no, you don't agree with Ann. Ann thinks your a self-delusional God-hating idiot based purely on your acceptance of evolution. Don't worry, lots of us are used to being unfairly slandered by hard-right conservatives who ignorantly claim to know exactly why we believe what we believe. ----------------------------------------------------- Empires Of Steel[^]
Brit wrote:
Don't worry, lots of us are used to being unfairly slandered by hard-right conservatives who ignorantly claim to know exactly why we believe what we believe.
Well, as I am so accustomed to far worse behavior from those on the left, Ann's mild scolding is hardly noticeable. Maybe you shouldn't be so sensitive. But, again, she is absolutly correct that the only reason the issue of evolution is so important to the left is precisely because it so easily helps them promote an anti-Chrisitan message with the full blessing of the state. "You get that which you tolerate"