Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. Crime is Bush's fault

Crime is Bush's fault

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
comquestionannouncement
91 Posts 12 Posters 3 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L Lost User

    espeir wrote:

    Technically your neighbors have to live next to you, so I would argue with that point

    I am struggling to comprehend the logic behind this statement. Living next door to someone who grows canabis makes you a victim? What the fuck? Are you serious?

    Truth is the subjection of reality to an individuals perception

    R Offline
    R Offline
    Red Stateler
    wrote on last edited by
    #14

    fat_boy wrote:

    Living next door to someone who grows canabis makes you a victim? What the f***? Are you serious?

    More specifically, living next door to YOU growing cannibis. :-D


    "I curse economic prosperity as it puts an end to much-needed poverty, famine and pestilence." -dennisd45 "I fully support Communists in key positions of our government. I believe that they contribute positively to the liberal ideal." -dennisd45 "Liberals do not exist. You invented them to facilitate your strawman arguments." -dennisd45 "The Communist Manifest was written 150 years ago. It has been rigorously tested and is accepted by left"

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • L Lost User

      espeir wrote:

      a criminal is someone who breaks the law

      Not always. It is illegal to drive at 100 mph in the UK. To break this law is not a criminal act.

      Truth is the subjection of reality to an individuals perception

      R Offline
      R Offline
      Red Stateler
      wrote on last edited by
      #15

      I would think that fits the definition of a criminal[^] act, though not a serious one...unless you're driving through a school zone while hopped up on your wacky weed.


      "I curse economic prosperity as it puts an end to much-needed poverty, famine and pestilence." -dennisd45 "I fully support Communists in key positions of our government. I believe that they contribute positively to the liberal ideal." -dennisd45 "Liberals do not exist. You invented them to facilitate your strawman arguments." -dennisd45 "The Communist Manifest was written 150 years ago. It has been rigorously tested and is accepted by left"

      L 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • L Lost User

        Score: 1.0 (3 votes). wrote:

        No, a criminal is someone who is willing to harm others to get what he wants

        No, you are wrong: Lets say I grow canabis in my garden. It is a criminal act, it hurts no one else, and I considder it a risk worth taking because a) the punishment is not that bad, b) I really like to smoke a j or two. Crime does not have to have a victim.

        Truth is the subjection of reality to an individuals perception

        A Offline
        A Offline
        Allah On Acid
        wrote on last edited by
        #16

        I thought you were referring to theft

        A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity. - Sigmund Freud

        L 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • R Red Stateler

          I would think that fits the definition of a criminal[^] act, though not a serious one...unless you're driving through a school zone while hopped up on your wacky weed.


          "I curse economic prosperity as it puts an end to much-needed poverty, famine and pestilence." -dennisd45 "I fully support Communists in key positions of our government. I believe that they contribute positively to the liberal ideal." -dennisd45 "Liberals do not exist. You invented them to facilitate your strawman arguments." -dennisd45 "The Communist Manifest was written 150 years ago. It has been rigorously tested and is accepted by left"

          L Offline
          L Offline
          Lost User
          wrote on last edited by
          #17

          espeir wrote:

          I would think

          Your thoughts are of little import, motoring offences are NOT criminal offences.

          Truth is the subjection of reality to an individuals perception

          R X 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • L Lost User

            espeir wrote:

            I would think

            Your thoughts are of little import, motoring offences are NOT criminal offences.

            Truth is the subjection of reality to an individuals perception

            R Offline
            R Offline
            Red Stateler
            wrote on last edited by
            #18

            Then what would you consider it? A snafu?


            "I curse economic prosperity as it puts an end to much-needed poverty, famine and pestilence." -dennisd45 "I fully support Communists in key positions of our government. I believe that they contribute positively to the liberal ideal." -dennisd45 "Liberals do not exist. You invented them to facilitate your strawman arguments." -dennisd45 "The Communist Manifest was written 150 years ago. It has been rigorously tested and is accepted by left"

            L 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • A Allah On Acid

              I thought you were referring to theft

              A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity. - Sigmund Freud

              L Offline
              L Offline
              Lost User
              wrote on last edited by
              #19

              Doesnt matter, a criminal is still someone whoose risk vs. reward balance is squewed. Lets say you were starving hungry, like close to death hungry, and you passed an orchard full of trees. There is no wall or fence and there are apples lying on the ground. It is a criminal act to steal an apple, yet I will bet almost every person alive on this earth will commit that criminal act in that situation.

              Truth is the subjection of reality to an individuals perception

              R A 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • R Red Stateler

                Vincent Reynolds wrote:

                Increasing police presence would be a deterrent because it always has been. Crime increases in an area, the police increase visibility in that area, crime goes down. It's not a solution I agree with, but it certainly does work. I happen to think possession of firearms by law-abiding citizens educated in their use is also an effective deterrent to violent crime.

                Wait...You're the one who's concerned about a police state. Oh yeah...Now that the Democrats want to make it a political issue it's ok (*cough*hive mind*cough*).

                Vincent Reynolds wrote:

                So you're discarding the patently ridiculous assertion that governmental policy is partly responsible for an increase in violent crime, and replacing it with the logically sound assertion that the cause of an increase in violent crime in the last few years is due to hippies...

                Actually violent crime has remained fairly steadily low since the mid-90's, even including the cited increase, which fluxuates from year-to-year. Historically, there is a single point at which crime skyrocketted and that was the late 60's. Once Republicans took control of the government, crime declined to current levels.


                "I curse economic prosperity as it puts an end to much-needed poverty, famine and pestilence." -dennisd45 "I fully support Communists in key positions of our government. I believe that they contribute positively to the liberal ideal." -dennisd45 "Liberals do not exist. You invented them to facilitate your strawman arguments." -dennisd45 "The Communist Manifest was written 150 years ago. It has been rigorously tested and is accepted by left"

                V Offline
                V Offline
                Vincent Reynolds
                wrote on last edited by
                #20

                espeir wrote:

                You're the one who's concerned about a police state.

                What part of "it's not a solution I agree with" didn't you understand?

                espeir wrote:

                Democrats want to make it a political issue

                espeir wrote:

                Once Republicans took control of the government, crime declined to current levels.

                :laugh: I imagine when someone asks you for the time, you tell them instead how the tyrannical oligarchy at the International Bureau of Weights and Measures is part of a leftist plot to subvert time and assume control of the world's clocks, and only by putting it to a community vote is there hope for true Jeffersonian time to prevail.

                R 7 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • L Lost User

                  Doesnt matter, a criminal is still someone whoose risk vs. reward balance is squewed. Lets say you were starving hungry, like close to death hungry, and you passed an orchard full of trees. There is no wall or fence and there are apples lying on the ground. It is a criminal act to steal an apple, yet I will bet almost every person alive on this earth will commit that criminal act in that situation.

                  Truth is the subjection of reality to an individuals perception

                  R Offline
                  R Offline
                  Red Stateler
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #21

                  fat_boy wrote:

                  Lets say you were starving hungry, like close to death hungry, and you passed an orchard full of trees. There is no wall or fence and there are apples lying on the ground.

                  I think that your risk vs. reward balance would be skewed if you didn't commit a crime in that situation.


                  "I curse economic prosperity as it puts an end to much-needed poverty, famine and pestilence." -dennisd45 "I fully support Communists in key positions of our government. I believe that they contribute positively to the liberal ideal." -dennisd45 "Liberals do not exist. You invented them to facilitate your strawman arguments." -dennisd45 "The Communist Manifest was written 150 years ago. It has been rigorously tested and is accepted by left"

                  L 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • L Lost User

                    Doesnt matter, a criminal is still someone whoose risk vs. reward balance is squewed. Lets say you were starving hungry, like close to death hungry, and you passed an orchard full of trees. There is no wall or fence and there are apples lying on the ground. It is a criminal act to steal an apple, yet I will bet almost every person alive on this earth will commit that criminal act in that situation.

                    Truth is the subjection of reality to an individuals perception

                    A Offline
                    A Offline
                    Allah On Acid
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #22

                    Of course, but in a well-fed country like America or England, people mostly dont steal food. Like after hurricane Katrina, the people who stayed looted electronics and alchohol.

                    A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity. - Sigmund Freud

                    L 7 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • V Vincent Reynolds

                      espeir wrote:

                      You're the one who's concerned about a police state.

                      What part of "it's not a solution I agree with" didn't you understand?

                      espeir wrote:

                      Democrats want to make it a political issue

                      espeir wrote:

                      Once Republicans took control of the government, crime declined to current levels.

                      :laugh: I imagine when someone asks you for the time, you tell them instead how the tyrannical oligarchy at the International Bureau of Weights and Measures is part of a leftist plot to subvert time and assume control of the world's clocks, and only by putting it to a community vote is there hope for true Jeffersonian time to prevail.

                      R Offline
                      R Offline
                      Red Stateler
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #23

                      Vincent Reynolds wrote:

                      What part of "it's not a solution I agree with" didn't you understand?

                      I missed that part. But I find it odd it would not be a solution you agree with despite believing it works. I guess supporting a higher murder rate (like terrorism) is a justifiable expense in order to ensure that the government doesn't take away your weed garden.

                      Vincent Reynolds wrote:

                      I imagine when someone asks you for the time, you tell them instead how the tyrannical oligarchy at the International Bureau of Weights and Measures is part of a leftist plot to subvert time and assume control of the world's clocks, and only by putting it to a community vote is there hope for true Jeffersonian time to prevail.

                      I'll leave out the obvious irony with regards to Ben Franklin. :)


                      "I curse economic prosperity as it puts an end to much-needed poverty, famine and pestilence." -dennisd45 "I fully support Communists in key positions of our government. I believe that they contribute positively to the liberal ideal." -dennisd45 "Liberals do not exist. You invented them to facilitate your strawman arguments." -dennisd45 "The Communist Manifest was written 150 years ago. It has been rigorously tested and is accepted by left"

                      V 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • R Red Stateler

                        fat_boy wrote:

                        Lets say you were starving hungry, like close to death hungry, and you passed an orchard full of trees. There is no wall or fence and there are apples lying on the ground.

                        I think that your risk vs. reward balance would be skewed if you didn't commit a crime in that situation.


                        "I curse economic prosperity as it puts an end to much-needed poverty, famine and pestilence." -dennisd45 "I fully support Communists in key positions of our government. I believe that they contribute positively to the liberal ideal." -dennisd45 "Liberals do not exist. You invented them to facilitate your strawman arguments." -dennisd45 "The Communist Manifest was written 150 years ago. It has been rigorously tested and is accepted by left"

                        L Offline
                        L Offline
                        Lost User
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #24

                        Exactly, from the worst criminal to the holiest saint, it is just a matter or risk vs. reward.

                        Truth is the subjection of reality to an individuals perception

                        R 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • R Red Stateler

                          link[^] As is always the case, the mainstream media has adopted the Democratic pre-election platform:

                          The slaying of the 20-year-old mother -- on a narrow street behind a police
                          station in Boston's poor Roxbury district last month -- is one of the shocking
                          examples of a rise in the murder rate across the United States that is raising
                          questions about whether police are fighting terrorism at the expense of
                          crime.

                          It goes on to further blame Bush for fewer cops on the street...as if that's the federal government's role. But beyond the obvious political slant of this article, when did the presence of police become the deterrent for crime? Why would police be a deterrent, but the possession of firearms by law-abiding citizens cause crime (as also suggested)? If you ask me, crime is simply the result of bad people. Poverty does not necessarily breed crime, as there are numerous honest poor people. Guns don't breed crime as there are numerous guns held by law abiding people. The presence of police only deters crime when the criminal-to-be fears their immediate presence (and will commit a crime when the opportunity arises). Interestingly enough, if you look at American murder statistics, there's a pivot points in the late 1960's. Before then murder rates were consistently very low and afterwards they were high. I'm sure it's more than coincidence that this point in US history marked the rapid increase in divorce, abortion and moral permisiveness.


                          "I curse economic prosperity as it puts an end to much-needed poverty, famine and pestilence." -dennisd45 "I fully support Communists in key positions of our government. I believe that they contribute positively to the liberal ideal." -dennisd45 "Liberals do not exist. You invented them to facilitate your strawman arguments." -dennisd45 "The Communist Manifest was written 150 years ago. It has been rigorously tested and is accepted by left"

                          7 Offline
                          7 Offline
                          73Zeppelin
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #25

                          Crime rates are correlated with: 1. Socio-economic inequality (ie: income inequality) 2. Population density 3. breakdown of the traditional family. Availability of weapons has little if nothing to do with crime rates. Weapons are the tools of crime, not the instigators.

                          R 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • A Allah On Acid

                            Of course, but in a well-fed country like America or England, people mostly dont steal food. Like after hurricane Katrina, the people who stayed looted electronics and alchohol.

                            A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity. - Sigmund Freud

                            L Offline
                            L Offline
                            Lost User
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #26

                            Score: 1.0 (3 votes). wrote:

                            Of course, but in a well-fed country like America or England, people mostly dont steal food. Like after hurricane Katrina, the people who stayed looted electronics and alchohol.

                            Why do you aregue in such a limited way? I merely used apples and hunger as an example. That people stole electronics and alcohol after atrina prooves nothing more thasn that they werent hungry or thirsty. They still weighed the risk vs. reward of stlealing the stuff, and decided the risk was worth it.

                            Truth is the subjection of reality to an individuals perception

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • L Lost User

                              Exactly, from the worst criminal to the holiest saint, it is just a matter or risk vs. reward.

                              Truth is the subjection of reality to an individuals perception

                              R Offline
                              R Offline
                              Red Stateler
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #27

                              No, it's a matter of breaking the law, which is a social construct. The fact that risk and reward must be weighted does not make an act criminal, otherwise smoking would be inherently illegal. It's a matter of whether or not someone decides to disregard the law.


                              "I curse economic prosperity as it puts an end to much-needed poverty, famine and pestilence." -dennisd45 "I fully support Communists in key positions of our government. I believe that they contribute positively to the liberal ideal." -dennisd45 "Liberals do not exist. You invented them to facilitate your strawman arguments." -dennisd45 "The Communist Manifest was written 150 years ago. It has been rigorously tested and is accepted by left"

                              L 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • V Vincent Reynolds

                                espeir wrote:

                                If you ask me...

                                Or, apparently, even if we don't...

                                espeir wrote:

                                Why would police be a deterrent, but the possession of firearms by law-abiding citizens cause crime (as also suggested)?

                                Increasing police presence would be a deterrent because it always has been. Crime increases in an area, the police increase visibility in that area, crime goes down. It's not a solution I agree with, but it certainly does work. I happen to think possession of firearms by law-abiding citizens educated in their use is also an effective deterrent to violent crime.

                                espeir wrote:

                                I'm sure it's more than coincidence that this point in US history marked the rapid increase in divorce, abortion and moral permisiveness.

                                So you're discarding the patently ridiculous assertion that governmental policy is partly responsible for an increase in violent crime, and replacing it with the logically sound assertion that the cause of an increase in violent crime in the last few years is due to hippies... You can't argue with logic like that.

                                7 Offline
                                7 Offline
                                73Zeppelin
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #28

                                Vincent Reynolds wrote:

                                Increasing police presence would be a deterrent because it always has been. Crime increases in an area, the police increase visibility in that area, crime goes down. It's not a solution I agree with, but it certainly does work.

                                I disagree. I think increased police presence serves to do one (or both) of two things: 1. Drive crime more underground 2. Move crime elsewhere (as in relocation) Crime rates drop because there is less reporting of crime and the crimes are committed in another place. Overall, I do not think there is a correlation between level of police presence and decreasing overall crime rate.

                                V 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • R Red Stateler

                                  No, it's a matter of breaking the law, which is a social construct. The fact that risk and reward must be weighted does not make an act criminal, otherwise smoking would be inherently illegal. It's a matter of whether or not someone decides to disregard the law.


                                  "I curse economic prosperity as it puts an end to much-needed poverty, famine and pestilence." -dennisd45 "I fully support Communists in key positions of our government. I believe that they contribute positively to the liberal ideal." -dennisd45 "Liberals do not exist. You invented them to facilitate your strawman arguments." -dennisd45 "The Communist Manifest was written 150 years ago. It has been rigorously tested and is accepted by left"

                                  L Offline
                                  L Offline
                                  Lost User
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #29

                                  espeir wrote:

                                  The fact that risk and reward must be weighted does not make an act criminal,

                                  I didnt state that it did so there is no point arguing it.

                                  Truth is the subjection of reality to an individuals perception

                                  R 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • A Allah On Acid

                                    Of course, but in a well-fed country like America or England, people mostly dont steal food. Like after hurricane Katrina, the people who stayed looted electronics and alchohol.

                                    A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity. - Sigmund Freud

                                    7 Offline
                                    7 Offline
                                    73Zeppelin
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #30

                                    Score: 1.0 (3 votes). wrote:

                                    Of course, but in a well-fed country like America or England, people mostly dont steal food. Like after hurricane Katrina, the people who stayed looted electronics and alchohol.

                                    You need to get out more. Try travelling a little bit around the world and see what you discover. From the sounds of things you will be unpleasantly surprised.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • 7 73Zeppelin

                                      Crime rates are correlated with: 1. Socio-economic inequality (ie: income inequality) 2. Population density 3. breakdown of the traditional family. Availability of weapons has little if nothing to do with crime rates. Weapons are the tools of crime, not the instigators.

                                      R Offline
                                      R Offline
                                      Red Stateler
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #31

                                      thealj wrote:

                                      1. Socio-economic inequality (ie: income inequality) 2. Population density 3. breakdown of the traditional family.

                                      I think I would agree with that in the order specified.


                                      "I curse economic prosperity as it puts an end to much-needed poverty, famine and pestilence." -dennisd45 "I fully support Communists in key positions of our government. I believe that they contribute positively to the liberal ideal." -dennisd45 "Liberals do not exist. You invented them to facilitate your strawman arguments." -dennisd45 "The Communist Manifest was written 150 years ago. It has been rigorously tested and is accepted by left"

                                      7 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • L Lost User

                                        espeir wrote:

                                        The fact that risk and reward must be weighted does not make an act criminal,

                                        I didnt state that it did so there is no point arguing it.

                                        Truth is the subjection of reality to an individuals perception

                                        R Offline
                                        R Offline
                                        Red Stateler
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #32

                                        fat_boy wrote:

                                        I didnt state that it did so there is no point arguing it.

                                        fat_boy wrote:

                                        A criminal is a person who will take a higher than average risk to get what he wants.

                                        :confused:


                                        "I curse economic prosperity as it puts an end to much-needed poverty, famine and pestilence." -dennisd45 "I fully support Communists in key positions of our government. I believe that they contribute positively to the liberal ideal." -dennisd45 "Liberals do not exist. You invented them to facilitate your strawman arguments." -dennisd45 "The Communist Manifest was written 150 years ago. It has been rigorously tested and is accepted by left"

                                        L 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • R Red Stateler

                                          fat_boy wrote:

                                          I didnt state that it did so there is no point arguing it.

                                          fat_boy wrote:

                                          A criminal is a person who will take a higher than average risk to get what he wants.

                                          :confused:


                                          "I curse economic prosperity as it puts an end to much-needed poverty, famine and pestilence." -dennisd45 "I fully support Communists in key positions of our government. I believe that they contribute positively to the liberal ideal." -dennisd45 "Liberals do not exist. You invented them to facilitate your strawman arguments." -dennisd45 "The Communist Manifest was written 150 years ago. It has been rigorously tested and is accepted by left"

                                          L Offline
                                          L Offline
                                          Lost User
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #33

                                          I stated: 'A criminal is a person who will take a higher than average risk to get what he wants.' You satated: 'The fact that risk and reward must be weighted does not make an act criminal' Defining criminal does not define crime.

                                          Truth is the subjection of reality to an individuals perception

                                          R 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups