Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. Lieberman pulls ahead

Lieberman pulls ahead

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
comannouncement
26 Posts 9 Posters 3 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D David Wulff

    You totally missed the point there Stan. Do you not find it slightly disturbing that a political party is putting such material on your televisions to get you to vote for them? How different is this from the propoganda in Germany in the 1930s?


    Ðavid Wulff Die Freiheit spielt auf allen Geigen (video)
      10 PRINT 'HELLO MAINTAINER: GOTO HELL

    S Offline
    S Offline
    Stan Shannon
    wrote on last edited by
    #21

    I didn't miss any point. The BBC is actively campaigning for the democrats, they are useing scare tactics to influence the election. Just as mike said, the commerical is entirely accurate even if sensationalistic. Recent history clearly indicates that addressing terrorism the way the democratic party wants will, in fact, make us vulnerable to terrorists attacks. The republicans have a much more realistic set of solutions for dealing with Islamic terrorism. And there is nothing wrong with making those differences obvious to the voters. Comparing it to Nazi Germany is, ironically, much closer to a fascist like political tactic than the commercial itself is. EDIT - and, btw, my point was if I have a choice of being scared of terrorists or republicans - I pick the terrorists. -- modified at 7:14 Sunday 22nd October, 2006

    Thank God for disproportional force.

    D 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • S Stan Shannon

      I didn't miss any point. The BBC is actively campaigning for the democrats, they are useing scare tactics to influence the election. Just as mike said, the commerical is entirely accurate even if sensationalistic. Recent history clearly indicates that addressing terrorism the way the democratic party wants will, in fact, make us vulnerable to terrorists attacks. The republicans have a much more realistic set of solutions for dealing with Islamic terrorism. And there is nothing wrong with making those differences obvious to the voters. Comparing it to Nazi Germany is, ironically, much closer to a fascist like political tactic than the commercial itself is. EDIT - and, btw, my point was if I have a choice of being scared of terrorists or republicans - I pick the terrorists. -- modified at 7:14 Sunday 22nd October, 2006

      Thank God for disproportional force.

      D Offline
      D Offline
      David Wulff
      wrote on last edited by
      #22

      Stan Shannon wrote:

      sensationalistic

      That is the whole point, surely? I cannot believe you are happy to sit back and let that sort of scaremongerng decide your country's government. P.S. The BBC did not produce that commercial, and the commentator is from an American network.


      Ðavid Wulff Die Freiheit spielt auf allen Geigen (video)
        10 PRINT 'HELLO MAINTAINER: GOTO HELL

      S 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • D David Wulff

        Mike Gaskey wrote:

        that makes it a factual presentation versus propaganda, no

        That was not my question. The point was, getting people to vote for you by implying, strongly, that they will be murdered if they don't is less than 100% truthfull.


        Ðavid Wulff Die Freiheit spielt auf allen Geigen (video)
          10 PRINT 'HELLO MAINTAINER: GOTO HELL

        M Offline
        M Offline
        Mike Gaskey
        wrote on last edited by
        #23

        David Wulff wrote:

        The point was, getting people to vote for you by implying, strongly, that they will be murdered if they don't is less than 100% truthfull.

        Here is the real deal as far as am concerned: From Veitnam through the current date liberal and Democrat led policies have made us a nation under fire and a nation that is suceptable to attack. The liberal media, call it the network news and teh New York Times, caused us to tuck our tails and run from Veitnam when we were winning the war. This effort was led by the likes of Walter Cronkite and a host of others who played up the TET Offensive making it look to the population as a huge battle that we had lost. Point in fact we had won but that was not reported, only the battle carnage was. That earned us a reputation as a paper tiger. Skip down history lane and you'll find the weakest US President this nation has ever seen. A cowardly wimp with a loud mouth named Jimmy Carter. Carter permitted a band of radicals to invade soverign US territory (Iran consulate) and hold it for 444 days along with our diplomatic contingent. We should have retaliated immediately but did not, further enhancing our paper tiger image. Skip down history lane and you find President Bush #1 who correctly liberated an invaded Kuwait but bowed to world pressure and left the invading dictator in place. That earned us a reputation as being afraid to go for the kill but did so while insensing radical muslims even more because we had men on supposedly sacred ground. Continue skipping and you find President Clinton who despised the military and intelligience services, weakening one and virtually dismantling the other - preparing the way for 9-11. This 9-11 preparation was enhanced when we turned tail (Blackhawk down), and ignored other attacks(Kobar, Cole, 1st World Trade center Bombing) then refusing to take control of Bin Laden when offered the opportunity. Couple all of that with a western Europe that is capable of little other than talking with a lot of that talk being anti-US venom and a US Democrat party that thinks the European way is a-okay and yes I am afraid of Democrats being elected.

        Mike Dear NYT - the fact is, the founding fathers hung traitors. Vincent Reynolds: My opposition is as enlightened as your support, jackass. dennisd45: My view of the world is slightly more nuanced dennisd45 (the NAMBLA supporter) wrot

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • D David Wulff

          Stan Shannon wrote:

          sensationalistic

          That is the whole point, surely? I cannot believe you are happy to sit back and let that sort of scaremongerng decide your country's government. P.S. The BBC did not produce that commercial, and the commentator is from an American network.


          Ðavid Wulff Die Freiheit spielt auf allen Geigen (video)
            10 PRINT 'HELLO MAINTAINER: GOTO HELL

          S Offline
          S Offline
          Stan Shannon
          wrote on last edited by
          #24

          David Wulff wrote:

          That is the whole point, surely? I cannot believe you are happy to sit back and let that sort of scaremongerng decide your country's government

          I am absolutely happy with whatever it takes to defeat the set of principles currently referred to as 'liberalism'. I really don't care if we have to pull western civilization down around our ears to kill it, liberalism has to die. The absolute worst thing that can happen to human civilization is to allow this vile monstrosity of a moral/social/political agenda to continue to exist.

          Thank God for disproportional force.

          J 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • S Stan Shannon

            David Wulff wrote:

            That is the whole point, surely? I cannot believe you are happy to sit back and let that sort of scaremongerng decide your country's government

            I am absolutely happy with whatever it takes to defeat the set of principles currently referred to as 'liberalism'. I really don't care if we have to pull western civilization down around our ears to kill it, liberalism has to die. The absolute worst thing that can happen to human civilization is to allow this vile monstrosity of a moral/social/political agenda to continue to exist.

            Thank God for disproportional force.

            J Offline
            J Offline
            John Carson
            wrote on last edited by
            #25

            Stan Shannon wrote:

            I am absolutely happy with whatever it takes to defeat the set of principles currently referred to as 'liberalism'. I really don't care if we have to pull western civilization down around our ears to kill it, liberalism has to die. The absolute worst thing that can happen to human civilization is to allow this vile monstrosity of a moral/social/political agenda to continue to exist.

            So I guess you will be signing up with Al Quaeda in the near future.

            John Carson "All Mr. Bush and his party can do at this point is demonize their opposition. And my guess is that the public won’t go for it, that Americans are fed up with leadership that has nothing to hope for but fear itself." Paul Krugman

            S 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • J John Carson

              Stan Shannon wrote:

              I am absolutely happy with whatever it takes to defeat the set of principles currently referred to as 'liberalism'. I really don't care if we have to pull western civilization down around our ears to kill it, liberalism has to die. The absolute worst thing that can happen to human civilization is to allow this vile monstrosity of a moral/social/political agenda to continue to exist.

              So I guess you will be signing up with Al Quaeda in the near future.

              John Carson "All Mr. Bush and his party can do at this point is demonize their opposition. And my guess is that the public won’t go for it, that Americans are fed up with leadership that has nothing to hope for but fear itself." Paul Krugman

              S Offline
              S Offline
              Stan Shannon
              wrote on last edited by
              #26

              John Carson wrote:

              So I guess you will be signing up with Al Quaeda in the near future.

              One things for sure, if I did, that would sure as hell be one way to get the left to finally want to take them seriously.

              Thank God for disproportional force.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              Reply
              • Reply as topic
              Log in to reply
              • Oldest to Newest
              • Newest to Oldest
              • Most Votes


              • Login

              • Don't have an account? Register

              • Login or register to search.
              • First post
                Last post
              0
              • Categories
              • Recent
              • Tags
              • Popular
              • World
              • Users
              • Groups