When I'm right...I'm right
-
Feminism was a ruse. It began nobly enough, seeking to gain the right to vote for women (led mostly by ugly women unable to marry men to vote for them). Even up until the 60's it was reasonable enough. But then the basis fell apart as "feminism" basically became a dual front for man-hating and leftist policies. In a matter of a couple years, they went from condemning pr0n as exploitative of women to endorsing it (as well as prostitution) for providing women with sexual power. Then it went from there to a basis in "reproductive rights" (with Roe vs. Wade coming out in the same time period) and a wholesale adoption of depravity spawned, which led to the necessary adoption of the concept of personal liberty and, ultimately, an inexorable tie to liberalism. Feminism no longer has any interests in the advancement of women (e.g. Condoleeza Rice is condemned by feminists) and is basically a mouthpiece of the left. Given that there is a very clear Islamoleftist alignment, you can rest easy that we won't have any anti-Muslim protests by feminist groups in San Francisco.
-
Bassam Abdul-Baki wrote:
Red Stateler wrote: Condoleeza Rice is basically a mouthpiece of the left These two statements are clearly incompatible.
That is because you modified his statement to take it out of context ...
If you decide to become a software engineer, you are signing up to have a 1/2" piece of silicon tell you exactly how stupid you really are for 8 hours a day, 5 days a week Zac
-
Personally, I find his thoughts on rape to be more disturbing (though, they are held by several other Muslim clerics as well). The idea that these clerics want to destroy western civilization (which, ironically, living in it and enjoying the benefits they claim are evil) doesn't surprise me any more than seeing Hillary Clinton try to act nice on national television.
If you decide to become a software engineer, you are signing up to have a 1/2" piece of silicon tell you exactly how stupid you really are for 8 hours a day, 5 days a week Zac
Zac Howland wrote:
Personally, I find his thoughts on rape to be more disturbing (though, they are held by several other Muslim clerics as well). The idea that these clerics want to destroy western civilization (which, ironically, living in it and enjoying the benefits they claim are evil) doesn't surprise me any more than seeing Hillary Clinton try to act nice on national television.
Aw, give Adnan a break. He's probably got low blood sugar as a result of Ramadan. Or something. He just likes to provoke, I'm sure. That's why I take all the digs I can at him. I mean, I don't even think he's physically capable of holding down a woman!
-
Zac Howland wrote:
Personally, I find his thoughts on rape to be more disturbing (though, they are held by several other Muslim clerics as well). The idea that these clerics want to destroy western civilization (which, ironically, living in it and enjoying the benefits they claim are evil) doesn't surprise me any more than seeing Hillary Clinton try to act nice on national television.
Aw, give Adnan a break. He's probably got low blood sugar as a result of Ramadan. Or something. He just likes to provoke, I'm sure. That's why I take all the digs I can at him. I mean, I don't even think he's physically capable of holding down a woman!
The Apocalyptic Teacup wrote:
Aw, give Adnan a break. He's probably got low blood sugar as a result of Ramadan.
Or high testosterone from lack of sex, maybe?
The Apocalyptic Teacup wrote:
I mean, I don't even think he's physically capable of holding down a woman!
Perhaps, but some of those who listen to him are quite capable and he is basically encouraging them to rape girls who don't stay locked away somewhere.
If you decide to become a software engineer, you are signing up to have a 1/2" piece of silicon tell you exactly how stupid you really are for 8 hours a day, 5 days a week Zac
-
The Apocalyptic Teacup wrote:
Aw, give Adnan a break. He's probably got low blood sugar as a result of Ramadan.
Or high testosterone from lack of sex, maybe?
The Apocalyptic Teacup wrote:
I mean, I don't even think he's physically capable of holding down a woman!
Perhaps, but some of those who listen to him are quite capable and he is basically encouraging them to rape girls who don't stay locked away somewhere.
If you decide to become a software engineer, you are signing up to have a 1/2" piece of silicon tell you exactly how stupid you really are for 8 hours a day, 5 days a week Zac
Zac Howland wrote:
Or high testosterone from lack of sex, maybe?
Oh, both.
Zac Howland wrote:
Perhaps, but some of those who listen to him are quite capable and he is basically encouraging them to rape girls who don't stay locked away somewhere.
You mean Adnan or the cleric in the news? I was referring to Adnan.
-
Parenthesis encapsulate a related side thought, but its contents shouldn't be considered as part of the sentence structure. So this... "Feminism no longer has any interests in the advancement of women (e.g. Condoleeza Rice is condemned by feminists) and is basically a mouthpiece of the left." Should be read as this... "Feminism no longer has any interests in the advancement of women and is basically a mouthpiece of the left."
-
Parenthesis encapsulate a related side thought, but its contents shouldn't be considered as part of the sentence structure. So this... "Feminism no longer has any interests in the advancement of women (e.g. Condoleeza Rice is condemned by feminists) and is basically a mouthpiece of the left." Should be read as this... "Feminism no longer has any interests in the advancement of women and is basically a mouthpiece of the left."
Red Stateler wrote:
Parenthesis encapsulate a related side thought, but its contents shouldn't be considered as part of the sentence structure. So this... "Feminism no longer has any interests in the advancement of women (e.g. Condoleeza Rice is condemned by feminists) and is basically a mouthpiece of the left." Should be read as this... "Feminism no longer has any interests in the advancement of women and is basically a mouthpiece of the left."
Why, you done got ye'self some of that high-brow learnin' stuff, ha'nt ye, boy?
-
Zac Howland wrote:
Or high testosterone from lack of sex, maybe?
Oh, both.
Zac Howland wrote:
Perhaps, but some of those who listen to him are quite capable and he is basically encouraging them to rape girls who don't stay locked away somewhere.
You mean Adnan or the cleric in the news? I was referring to Adnan.
The Apocalyptic Teacup wrote:
You mean Adnan or the cleric in the news? I was referring to Adnan.
I was actually referring to the cleric in the news (Hilaly I think is his name?), but the same goes for any cleric that pushes the idea that if a girl is raped it was her fault for not being completely covered and locked away like a "piece of meat".
If you decide to become a software engineer, you are signing up to have a 1/2" piece of silicon tell you exactly how stupid you really are for 8 hours a day, 5 days a week Zac
-
More on the IslamoLeftist alliance (this is the cat/meat cleric below)... link[^]
Hilaly attended prayers at the Lakemba Mosque on Friday but did not give the
sermon. Surrounded by dozens of supporters as he left the mosque, Hilaly said he
would not resign."After we clean the world of the White House first," he said when asked directly by
reporters when he would stand down.:laugh::laugh::laugh:
Hilaly attended prayers at the Lakemba Mosque on Friday but did not give thesermon. Surrounded by dozens of supporters as he left the mosque, Hilaly said hewould not resign. "After we clean the world of the White House first," he said when asked directly byreporters when he would stand down. I could be wrong and usually IS... BUT WHY CANNOT WE ALL GET ALONG without killing each other? Punch In The Nose OK if you don't break it.. Really! Life is to short and I'm close to the end of mine..
-
Parenthesis encapsulate a related side thought, but its contents shouldn't be considered as part of the sentence structure. So this... "Feminism no longer has any interests in the advancement of women (e.g. Condoleeza Rice is condemned by feminists) and is basically a mouthpiece of the left." Should be read as this... "Feminism no longer has any interests in the advancement of women and is basically a mouthpiece of the left."
-
Feminism was a ruse. It began nobly enough, seeking to gain the right to vote for women (led mostly by ugly women unable to marry men to vote for them). Even up until the 60's it was reasonable enough. But then the basis fell apart as "feminism" basically became a dual front for man-hating and leftist policies. In a matter of a couple years, they went from condemning pr0n as exploitative of women to endorsing it (as well as prostitution) for providing women with sexual power. Then it went from there to a basis in "reproductive rights" (with Roe vs. Wade coming out in the same time period) and a wholesale adoption of depravity spawned, which led to the necessary adoption of the concept of personal liberty and, ultimately, an inexorable tie to liberalism. Feminism no longer has any interests in the advancement of women (e.g. Condoleeza Rice is condemned by feminists) and is basically a mouthpiece of the left. Given that there is a very clear Islamoleftist alignment, you can rest easy that we won't have any anti-Muslim protests by feminist groups in San Francisco.