Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
CODE PROJECT For Those Who Code
  • Home
  • Articles
  • FAQ
Community
  1. Home
  2. General Programming
  3. C / C++ / MFC
  4. Can VC++ launch MS Dos window then issues Dos commands? [modified]

Can VC++ launch MS Dos window then issues Dos commands? [modified]

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved C / C++ / MFC
c++helpquestion
23 Posts 3 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A ATC

    It is the same, I did try system("pause"); It is pause but the previous MS DOS Window still disappear! So it shows an empty MS DOS Window ... but it stay there until I press a key!

    S Offline
    S Offline
    Stephen Hewitt
    wrote on last edited by
    #13

    Can you describe your application a little. For example, is it a console application or a Win32 application?

    Steve

    A 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • S Stephen Hewitt

      Can you describe your application a little. For example, is it a console application or a Win32 application?

      Steve

      A Offline
      A Offline
      ATC
      wrote on last edited by
      #14

      It is a WIN32 MFC application

      S 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • A ATC

        It is a WIN32 MFC application

        S Offline
        S Offline
        Stephen Hewitt
        wrote on last edited by
        #15

        Try this: // DOSCommands.cpp : Defines the entry point for the application. //   #include "stdafx.h" #include <process.h> #include <conio.h>   int APIENTRY WinMain(HINSTANCE hInstance, HINSTANCE hPrevInstance, LPSTR lpCmdLine, int nCmdShow) { AllocConsole(); system("dir"); system("tree"); getch(); FreeConsole();   return 0; }

        Steve

        A 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • S Stephen Hewitt

          Try this: // DOSCommands.cpp : Defines the entry point for the application. //   #include "stdafx.h" #include <process.h> #include <conio.h>   int APIENTRY WinMain(HINSTANCE hInstance, HINSTANCE hPrevInstance, LPSTR lpCmdLine, int nCmdShow) { AllocConsole(); system("dir"); system("tree"); getch(); FreeConsole();   return 0; }

          Steve

          A Offline
          A Offline
          ATC
          wrote on last edited by
          #16

          Once again you save my day, it works perfectly! Many thanks, I am really really appreciate it! :):-D:rolleyes:

          S 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • A ATC

            Once again you save my day, it works perfectly! Many thanks, I am really really appreciate it! :):-D:rolleyes:

            S Offline
            S Offline
            Stephen Hewitt
            wrote on last edited by
            #17

            Glad I could help.

            Steve

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • A ATC

              I try ShellExecute(this->m_hWnd,"dir/k", "","","", SW_SHOW ); it does not work! Can you give a typical DOS command? Thanks

              S Offline
              S Offline
              Sam Hobbs
              wrote on last edited by
              #18

              Please stop saying DOS! First, did you search for previous answers? It is nearly certain that this question has been asked and answered many times before. When I said command shell, I meant command-interpreter. Look at the documentation of the system function. It is useful because it describes how the filename of the "command-interpreter file" is determined. For NT type versions of Windows, the command-interpreter file is Cmd.exe. For 95 versions of Windows, the command-interpreter file is Command.com. Those names might change for future version so it is better to get the filename from the environment. You need to execute the command-interpreter and pass the options and command on the command line. Note that this will create a new window for the command; if that is not what you need, then I am sorry for misleading you.

              S 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S Sam Hobbs

                Please stop saying DOS! First, did you search for previous answers? It is nearly certain that this question has been asked and answered many times before. When I said command shell, I meant command-interpreter. Look at the documentation of the system function. It is useful because it describes how the filename of the "command-interpreter file" is determined. For NT type versions of Windows, the command-interpreter file is Cmd.exe. For 95 versions of Windows, the command-interpreter file is Command.com. Those names might change for future version so it is better to get the filename from the environment. You need to execute the command-interpreter and pass the options and command on the command line. Note that this will create a new window for the command; if that is not what you need, then I am sorry for misleading you.

                S Offline
                S Offline
                Stephen Hewitt
                wrote on last edited by
                #19

                While you're correct you seem to be being a little pedantic; I think we both know what he meant by the question.

                Steve

                S 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • S Stephen Hewitt

                  While you're correct you seem to be being a little pedantic; I think we both know what he meant by the question.

                  Steve

                  S Offline
                  S Offline
                  Sam Hobbs
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #20

                  I did not know what was meant by the initial question and the answer could have depended on the difference. People trying to help often waste their time answering a misunderstood question. People asking questions should try to be clear. In this situation, this person is not trying. It is now not important for this question, but this person will likely waste people's time in the future. My guess is that this person is not using the best solution for their fundamental problem. They probably think that this solution is the easiest, but then they will need to enhance it some more and the final solution is likely to be more work than if they considered all their requirements initially and asked for solutions for all the requirements.

                  S 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • S Sam Hobbs

                    I did not know what was meant by the initial question and the answer could have depended on the difference. People trying to help often waste their time answering a misunderstood question. People asking questions should try to be clear. In this situation, this person is not trying. It is now not important for this question, but this person will likely waste people's time in the future. My guess is that this person is not using the best solution for their fundamental problem. They probably think that this solution is the easiest, but then they will need to enhance it some more and the final solution is likely to be more work than if they considered all their requirements initially and asked for solutions for all the requirements.

                    S Offline
                    S Offline
                    Stephen Hewitt
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #21

                    I understood what he meant. Sometimes people do be vague and it annoyes me, but in this instance I didn't have any problems.

                    Steve

                    S 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • S Stephen Hewitt

                      I understood what he meant. Sometimes people do be vague and it annoyes me, but in this instance I didn't have any problems.

                      Steve

                      S Offline
                      S Offline
                      Sam Hobbs
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #22

                      I have not been very active in CodeProject, but in the CodeGuru forums I was the first to hit 10,000 posts and about 99% of them were efforts to help others. So I have seen quite a few vague questions and such. People often spend less time asking a question than we spend answering them. In this situation, my guess is that there are better answers if the person were to take the time to be clear about requirements.

                      S 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • S Sam Hobbs

                        I have not been very active in CodeProject, but in the CodeGuru forums I was the first to hit 10,000 posts and about 99% of them were efforts to help others. So I have seen quite a few vague questions and such. People often spend less time asking a question than we spend answering them. In this situation, my guess is that there are better answers if the person were to take the time to be clear about requirements.

                        S Offline
                        S Offline
                        Stephen Hewitt
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #23

                        I can't argue with you there.

                        Steve

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups