Add Control

vengaqua

I am doing this and only the last textbox is there and rest of them are not there. Please help me out friends its very urgent. Txt.ID = "SubmitBtn1" Txt.TextMode = TextBoxMode.MultiLine PlaceHolder1.Controls.Add(Txt) PlaceHolder1.Controls.Add(New LiteralControl("
")) Txt.ID = "SubmitBtn2" Txt.TextMode = TextBoxMode.MultiLine PlaceHolder1.Controls.Add(Txt) PlaceHolder1.Controls.Add(New LiteralControl("
")) Txt.ID = "SubmitBtn3" Txt.TextMode = TextBoxMode.MultiLine PlaceHolder1.Controls.Add(Txt) PlaceHolder1.Controls.Add(New LiteralControl("
")) Txt.ID = "SubmitBtn4" Txt.TextMode = TextBoxMode.MultiLine PlaceHolder1.Controls.Add(Txt)

Mohinder Singh

Marcus J Smith

You need to create a new textbox everytime you plan to add one so before the Txt.ID portion of each section call for a new textbox Txt = New Textbox.

CleaKO

"I think you'll be okay here, they have a thin candy shell. 'Surprised you didn't know that.'" - Tommy (Tommy Boy)
"Fill it up again! Fill it up again! Once it hits your lips, it's so good!" - Frank the Tank (Old School)

joon vh

I think even that won't do the trick. Shouldn't you actually declare an entirely new variable everytime? TextBox txt1 = new TextBox(); TextBox txt2 = new TextBox(); TextBox txt3 = new TextBox(); TextBox txt4 = new TextBox(); TextBox txt5 = new TextBox(); ...

public object BufferOverFlow { __get { return BufferOverFlow; } __set { BufferOverFlow = value; } }

Marcus J Smith

Once it's added no. I do this often when populating a datatable with a datarow. You use the same variable, next loop set it to new again then populate and add. -- modified at 11:43 Monday 19th March, 2007

CleaKO

"I think you'll be okay here, they have a thin candy shell. 'Surprised you didn't know that.'" - Tommy (Tommy Boy)
"Fill it up again! Fill it up again! Once it hits your lips, it's so good!" - Frank the Tank (Old School)

joon vh

I learned something today!

public object BufferOverFlow { __get { return BufferOverFlow; } __set { BufferOverFlow = value; } }

Marcus J Smith

Although it may be easier to follow in the case of the OP if different names are used that match the ID given but it isnt required.

CleaKO

"I think you'll be okay here, they have a thin candy shell. 'Surprised you didn't know that.'" - Tommy (Tommy Boy)
"Fill it up again! Fill it up again! Once it hits your lips, it's so good!" - Frank the Tank (Old School)

joon vh

I usually use this in a loop, and then I put the declaration in the loop too. Is this good practice? Or is there no performance difference. -- modified at 12:08 Monday 19th March, 2007 I threw together this code: class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { Stopwatch sw = new Stopwatch(); sw.Start(); test1(); sw.Stop(); Console.WriteLine(sw.Elapsed); sw.Reset(); sw.Start(); test2(); sw.Stop(); Console.WriteLine(sw.Elapsed); Console.Read(); } static void test1() { String testString; for (int i = 0; i < 50000000; i++) { testString = i.ToString(); } } static void test2() { for (int i = 0; i < 50000000; i++) { String testString; testString = i.ToString(); } } } pretty fun (clogs for about 17 secs on my pc)... but not really conclusive. I asked a MSIL guru about it. You probably don't care even half as much as I do, but I like these kinds of perf. things.

public object BufferOverFlow { __get { return BufferOverFlow; } __set { BufferOverFlow = value; } }

vengaqua

if i add new control at runtime suppose three buttons how can i get the click event of these three buttons.

Mohinder Singh

vengaqua

if i do this way for the button then i get three buttons but how can i have the click event of these three buttons .

Mohinder Singh

joon vh

By setting the event in code. LinkButton.Click += new System.EventHandler(method); in VS2005 Intellisense does most of the thinking for you.

public object BufferOverFlow { __get { return BufferOverFlow; } __set { BufferOverFlow = value; } }