Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. General Programming
  3. C / C++ / MFC
  4. unions and their methods...

unions and their methods...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved C / C++ / MFC
cssgraphicsooptutorialquestion
2 Posts 2 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Z Offline
    Z Offline
    zqueezy
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    hey folks I've got a simple question: (No I'm not a newbie and I know what a union is...) is there any disadvantage (no need for inheritance) of using methods for unions... I know this is a rare case, but somehow I encountered it. I figured out I can use methods for unions and it would make it more complicated to put this union into a class (cause the access to the unions-(data-sharing)variables would be less elegant. thx in advance zqueezy some example: union matrix4x4 { // VARIABLES __m128 c[4]; // Col-Vector (SSE) float f[16]; // directly as float; col-wise vector4 col[4]; // METHODS matrix4x4(); matrix4x4 operator*(matrix4x4& factor); };

    CPalliniC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Z zqueezy

      hey folks I've got a simple question: (No I'm not a newbie and I know what a union is...) is there any disadvantage (no need for inheritance) of using methods for unions... I know this is a rare case, but somehow I encountered it. I figured out I can use methods for unions and it would make it more complicated to put this union into a class (cause the access to the unions-(data-sharing)variables would be less elegant. thx in advance zqueezy some example: union matrix4x4 { // VARIABLES __m128 c[4]; // Col-Vector (SSE) float f[16]; // directly as float; col-wise vector4 col[4]; // METHODS matrix4x4(); matrix4x4 operator*(matrix4x4& factor); };

      CPalliniC Offline
      CPalliniC Offline
      CPallini
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      zqueezy wrote:

      (No I'm not a newbie and I know what a union is...)

      hence, IMHO, there are no harms. :)

      If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.

      In testa che avete, signor di Ceprano?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      Reply
      • Reply as topic
      Log in to reply
      • Oldest to Newest
      • Newest to Oldest
      • Most Votes


      • Login

      • Don't have an account? Register

      • Login or register to search.
      • First post
        Last post
      0
      • Categories
      • Recent
      • Tags
      • Popular
      • World
      • Users
      • Groups