Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. The Surge is not Working

The Surge is not Working

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
comquestionannouncement
37 Posts 10 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    Red Stateler
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    link[^]

    Sixty-three U.S. military deaths were reported in September, the lowest monthly
    toll since July 2006, according to U.S. forces and a preliminary count by The
    Associated Press.

    I was initially skeptical of "the surge", but it appears that (as usual) the leftist, anti-American propagandists were wrong. Apparently "the surge" is having a measurable effect as the number of American casualties last month was rolled back to levels not seen for over a year (even further on a per-capita basis as there are now more soldiers). The question now is whether this trend can continue such that Iraq can become self-managed, we can get out of there and we can divert that money to more worthwhile causes like prosecuting all 3 million members of Moveon.org for treason.


    If liberals are not traitors, their only fallback argument at this point is that they're really stupid. -Ann Coulter

    L R P R J 6 Replies Last reply
    0
    • R Red Stateler

      link[^]

      Sixty-three U.S. military deaths were reported in September, the lowest monthly
      toll since July 2006, according to U.S. forces and a preliminary count by The
      Associated Press.

      I was initially skeptical of "the surge", but it appears that (as usual) the leftist, anti-American propagandists were wrong. Apparently "the surge" is having a measurable effect as the number of American casualties last month was rolled back to levels not seen for over a year (even further on a per-capita basis as there are now more soldiers). The question now is whether this trend can continue such that Iraq can become self-managed, we can get out of there and we can divert that money to more worthwhile causes like prosecuting all 3 million members of Moveon.org for treason.


      If liberals are not traitors, their only fallback argument at this point is that they're really stupid. -Ann Coulter

      L Offline
      L Offline
      Lost User
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      According to this BBC report [^], "However, our correspondent says, the political situation remains deadlocked and there are fears that when the extra troops are withdrawn the violence will escalate again.". But, is [^] a dangerous or a courageous move. However, this [^] is not a surprise.

      R 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • L Lost User

        According to this BBC report [^], "However, our correspondent says, the political situation remains deadlocked and there are fears that when the extra troops are withdrawn the violence will escalate again.". But, is [^] a dangerous or a courageous move. However, this [^] is not a surprise.

        R Offline
        R Offline
        Red Stateler
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Richard A. Abbott wrote:

        According to this BBC report [^], "However, our correspondent says, the political situation remains deadlocked and there are fears that when the extra troops are withdrawn the violence will escalate again.".

        Once it was realized that the surge was working, the left immediately turned to saying that the political process was not working. Of course, when does it ever?


        If liberals are not traitors, their only fallback argument at this point is that they're really stupid. -Ann Coulter

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • R Red Stateler

          link[^]

          Sixty-three U.S. military deaths were reported in September, the lowest monthly
          toll since July 2006, according to U.S. forces and a preliminary count by The
          Associated Press.

          I was initially skeptical of "the surge", but it appears that (as usual) the leftist, anti-American propagandists were wrong. Apparently "the surge" is having a measurable effect as the number of American casualties last month was rolled back to levels not seen for over a year (even further on a per-capita basis as there are now more soldiers). The question now is whether this trend can continue such that Iraq can become self-managed, we can get out of there and we can divert that money to more worthwhile causes like prosecuting all 3 million members of Moveon.org for treason.


          If liberals are not traitors, their only fallback argument at this point is that they're really stupid. -Ann Coulter

          R Offline
          R Offline
          Ryan Roberts
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Civilian casualties have dropped by 50% from last month[^] to 840 as well. Or 30,000 if you believe the Lancet. How much of that is a direct result of the surge or Petreaus' doctrine and whether the trend will continue I wouldn't like to say, but there does seem to be some positive news from what was increasingly looking like a unresolvable disaster.

          D 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • R Ryan Roberts

            Civilian casualties have dropped by 50% from last month[^] to 840 as well. Or 30,000 if you believe the Lancet. How much of that is a direct result of the surge or Petreaus' doctrine and whether the trend will continue I wouldn't like to say, but there does seem to be some positive news from what was increasingly looking like a unresolvable disaster.

            D Offline
            D Offline
            Diego Moita
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            But how many times did we see this pattern: a temporary big improvement followed by a slow and steady degradation. Well, let's see: 1) Sadam's sons were killed. 2) Sadam himself is captured. 3) Mukhtada Al-Sadr first insurrection is calmed. 4) Falujah is retaken from the insurgents. 5) Al-Zarqawi is killed. 6) The first elections in Iraq. etc, etc,... Al of these were hailed as a sign that "things are improving now" only to be negated by the facts later.


            Of all forms of sexual aberration, the most unnatural is abstinence.

            R R 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • D Diego Moita

              But how many times did we see this pattern: a temporary big improvement followed by a slow and steady degradation. Well, let's see: 1) Sadam's sons were killed. 2) Sadam himself is captured. 3) Mukhtada Al-Sadr first insurrection is calmed. 4) Falujah is retaken from the insurgents. 5) Al-Zarqawi is killed. 6) The first elections in Iraq. etc, etc,... Al of these were hailed as a sign that "things are improving now" only to be negated by the facts later.


              Of all forms of sexual aberration, the most unnatural is abstinence.

              R Offline
              R Offline
              Red Stateler
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              None of those yielded real results like the surge has.


              If liberals are not traitors, their only fallback argument at this point is that they're really stupid. -Ann Coulter

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • D Diego Moita

                But how many times did we see this pattern: a temporary big improvement followed by a slow and steady degradation. Well, let's see: 1) Sadam's sons were killed. 2) Sadam himself is captured. 3) Mukhtada Al-Sadr first insurrection is calmed. 4) Falujah is retaken from the insurgents. 5) Al-Zarqawi is killed. 6) The first elections in Iraq. etc, etc,... Al of these were hailed as a sign that "things are improving now" only to be negated by the facts later.


                Of all forms of sexual aberration, the most unnatural is abstinence.

                R Offline
                R Offline
                Ryan Roberts
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Possibly, but most of those were more or less symbolic events. The tribal 'awakening' that is responsible for much of the reduction in violence was also largely unexpected and not related to the increase in troop numbers - the Marine garrison in Anbar thought the Mosques were calling for a Jihad on them, not Al Qaeda in Iraq. With so much potential for chaos in such a shattered country, and it being in the interest of Iraq and Syria to foment it things could easily deteriorate again.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • R Red Stateler

                  link[^]

                  Sixty-three U.S. military deaths were reported in September, the lowest monthly
                  toll since July 2006, according to U.S. forces and a preliminary count by The
                  Associated Press.

                  I was initially skeptical of "the surge", but it appears that (as usual) the leftist, anti-American propagandists were wrong. Apparently "the surge" is having a measurable effect as the number of American casualties last month was rolled back to levels not seen for over a year (even further on a per-capita basis as there are now more soldiers). The question now is whether this trend can continue such that Iraq can become self-managed, we can get out of there and we can divert that money to more worthwhile causes like prosecuting all 3 million members of Moveon.org for treason.


                  If liberals are not traitors, their only fallback argument at this point is that they're really stupid. -Ann Coulter

                  P Offline
                  P Offline
                  Patrick Etc
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  I'd always expect a surge like this to work. The obvious solution is to fill the country with soldiers, one for every man, women, and child. Since that's not practical, success will always be less than complete, but it doesn't really need to be. I'm curious how many troops would need to be there to stop insurgent bombings completely, or at least, enough to give the country time to establish some stability. I think once they have a workable political system installed that everyone can agree to, alot of the unrest will go away [unrest from the general populace and clans, I mean, not from the bombers; they have no interest in participating in the government, it seems]. That could simply be my incredible naivete' however..


                  The early bird who catches the worm works for someone who comes in late and owns the worm farm. -- Travis McGee

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • R Red Stateler

                    link[^]

                    Sixty-three U.S. military deaths were reported in September, the lowest monthly
                    toll since July 2006, according to U.S. forces and a preliminary count by The
                    Associated Press.

                    I was initially skeptical of "the surge", but it appears that (as usual) the leftist, anti-American propagandists were wrong. Apparently "the surge" is having a measurable effect as the number of American casualties last month was rolled back to levels not seen for over a year (even further on a per-capita basis as there are now more soldiers). The question now is whether this trend can continue such that Iraq can become self-managed, we can get out of there and we can divert that money to more worthwhile causes like prosecuting all 3 million members of Moveon.org for treason.


                    If liberals are not traitors, their only fallback argument at this point is that they're really stupid. -Ann Coulter

                    R Offline
                    R Offline
                    Rob Manderson
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    Red Stateler wrote:

                    worthwhile causes like prosecuting all 3 million members of Moveon.org for treason

                    How curious that a political position not coincidental with your own is 'treason'. :wtf:

                    Rob Manderson My bloghttp://robmanderson.blogspot.com[^]

                    R 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • R Rob Manderson

                      Red Stateler wrote:

                      worthwhile causes like prosecuting all 3 million members of Moveon.org for treason

                      How curious that a political position not coincidental with your own is 'treason'. :wtf:

                      Rob Manderson My bloghttp://robmanderson.blogspot.com[^]

                      R Offline
                      R Offline
                      Red Stateler
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      Rob Manderson wrote:

                      How curious that a political position not coincidental with your own is 'treason'.

                      "Political positions" do not include providing aid and comfort to the enemy.


                      If liberals are not traitors, their only fallback argument at this point is that they're really stupid. -Ann Coulter

                      P 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • R Red Stateler

                        link[^]

                        Sixty-three U.S. military deaths were reported in September, the lowest monthly
                        toll since July 2006, according to U.S. forces and a preliminary count by The
                        Associated Press.

                        I was initially skeptical of "the surge", but it appears that (as usual) the leftist, anti-American propagandists were wrong. Apparently "the surge" is having a measurable effect as the number of American casualties last month was rolled back to levels not seen for over a year (even further on a per-capita basis as there are now more soldiers). The question now is whether this trend can continue such that Iraq can become self-managed, we can get out of there and we can divert that money to more worthwhile causes like prosecuting all 3 million members of Moveon.org for treason.


                        If liberals are not traitors, their only fallback argument at this point is that they're really stupid. -Ann Coulter

                        J Offline
                        J Offline
                        John Carson
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        Red Stateler wrote:

                        Sixty-three U.S. military deaths were reported in September, the lowest monthly toll since July 2006, according to U.S. forces and a preliminary count by TheAssociated Press.

                        The reason why you have to go back that far to get a lower figure is because in every prior month for 2007, the military casualties were higher than in 2006. Higher in January 2007 than January 2006, higher in February 2007 than February 2006, higher in March 2007 than March 2006...all the way through to August. Thus the case for progress rests on a single month in which the figures were better. One would have thought that the fiasco of the past 4 years might have taught people something about the dangers of cherry picking evidence. Alas, some peoople are just too stupid and too dishonest to mend their ways.

                        John Carson

                        R 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • J John Carson

                          Red Stateler wrote:

                          Sixty-three U.S. military deaths were reported in September, the lowest monthly toll since July 2006, according to U.S. forces and a preliminary count by TheAssociated Press.

                          The reason why you have to go back that far to get a lower figure is because in every prior month for 2007, the military casualties were higher than in 2006. Higher in January 2007 than January 2006, higher in February 2007 than February 2006, higher in March 2007 than March 2006...all the way through to August. Thus the case for progress rests on a single month in which the figures were better. One would have thought that the fiasco of the past 4 years might have taught people something about the dangers of cherry picking evidence. Alas, some peoople are just too stupid and too dishonest to mend their ways.

                          John Carson

                          R Offline
                          R Offline
                          Red Stateler
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          John Carson wrote:

                          The reason why you have to go back that far to get a lower figure is because in every prior month for 2007, the military casualties were higher than in 2006. Higher in January 2007 than January 2006, higher in February 2007 than February 2006, higher in March 2007 than March 2006...all the way through to August. Thus the case for progress rests on a single month in which the figures were better.

                          Yup. Clearly the insurgents (you know...Those guys you're rooting for) were making progress...Progress which was rolled back by the surge. The question is whether or not that progress is sustainable. Perhaps an even larger surge would push the insurgency into oblivion. Note that one criticism of Rumsfeld was that he did not initially commit enough troops to the battlefield. Maybe that mistake can be rectified.


                          If liberals are not traitors, their only fallback argument at this point is that they're really stupid. -Ann Coulter

                          J 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • R Red Stateler

                            link[^]

                            Sixty-three U.S. military deaths were reported in September, the lowest monthly
                            toll since July 2006, according to U.S. forces and a preliminary count by The
                            Associated Press.

                            I was initially skeptical of "the surge", but it appears that (as usual) the leftist, anti-American propagandists were wrong. Apparently "the surge" is having a measurable effect as the number of American casualties last month was rolled back to levels not seen for over a year (even further on a per-capita basis as there are now more soldiers). The question now is whether this trend can continue such that Iraq can become self-managed, we can get out of there and we can divert that money to more worthwhile causes like prosecuting all 3 million members of Moveon.org for treason.


                            If liberals are not traitors, their only fallback argument at this point is that they're really stupid. -Ann Coulter

                            L Offline
                            L Offline
                            Lost User
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            You are trying as hard as you can to sound like Ann Coulter aren't you.

                            R 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • R Red Stateler

                              Rob Manderson wrote:

                              How curious that a political position not coincidental with your own is 'treason'.

                              "Political positions" do not include providing aid and comfort to the enemy.


                              If liberals are not traitors, their only fallback argument at this point is that they're really stupid. -Ann Coulter

                              P Offline
                              P Offline
                              Patrick Etc
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #14

                              Red Stateler wrote:

                              "Political positions" do not include providing aid and comfort to the enemy.

                              Phew, then I guess those at MoveOn, while a bit misguided, at least aren't traitors.


                              The early bird who catches the worm works for someone who comes in late and owns the worm farm. -- Travis McGee

                              R 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • L Lost User

                                You are trying as hard as you can to sound like Ann Coulter aren't you.

                                R Offline
                                R Offline
                                Red Stateler
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #15

                                INITCOMMONCONTROLSEX wrote:

                                You are trying as hard as you can to sound like Ann Coulter aren't you.

                                You are trying as hard as you can to sound like Corky aren't you.


                                If liberals are not traitors, their only fallback argument at this point is that they're really stupid. -Ann Coulter

                                L P 2 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • P Patrick Etc

                                  Red Stateler wrote:

                                  "Political positions" do not include providing aid and comfort to the enemy.

                                  Phew, then I guess those at MoveOn, while a bit misguided, at least aren't traitors.


                                  The early bird who catches the worm works for someone who comes in late and owns the worm farm. -- Travis McGee

                                  R Offline
                                  R Offline
                                  Red Stateler
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #16

                                  Patrick Sears wrote:

                                  Phew, then I guess those at MoveOn, while a bit misguided, at least aren't traitors.

                                  Sure they are. You don't think that the enemy found "General Betray-Us" to be comforting? And the fact that they paid for it constitutes "aid".


                                  If liberals are not traitors, their only fallback argument at this point is that they're really stupid. -Ann Coulter

                                  P C V 3 Replies Last reply
                                  0
                                  • R Red Stateler

                                    INITCOMMONCONTROLSEX wrote:

                                    You are trying as hard as you can to sound like Ann Coulter aren't you.

                                    You are trying as hard as you can to sound like Corky aren't you.


                                    If liberals are not traitors, their only fallback argument at this point is that they're really stupid. -Ann Coulter

                                    L Offline
                                    L Offline
                                    Lost User
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #17

                                    Who is that? Is that another character off one of those little kid shows you watch?

                                    R 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • L Lost User

                                      Who is that? Is that another character off one of those little kid shows you watch?

                                      R Offline
                                      R Offline
                                      Red Stateler
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #18

                                      Don't you know how to use Google, Kyle? I thought you were a 1337 h4x0r!


                                      If liberals are not traitors, their only fallback argument at this point is that they're really stupid. -Ann Coulter

                                      L 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • R Red Stateler

                                        Patrick Sears wrote:

                                        Phew, then I guess those at MoveOn, while a bit misguided, at least aren't traitors.

                                        Sure they are. You don't think that the enemy found "General Betray-Us" to be comforting? And the fact that they paid for it constitutes "aid".


                                        If liberals are not traitors, their only fallback argument at this point is that they're really stupid. -Ann Coulter

                                        P Offline
                                        P Offline
                                        Patrick Etc
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #19

                                        Red Stateler wrote:

                                        You don't think that the enemy found "General Betray-Us" to be comforting? And the fact that they paid for it constitutes "aid".

                                        I'll take these statements with the humor in which they must be meant :) I had direct contact with some of the MoveOn organizers when I was in college. It left me really not wanting to interact with them at all; they had a very extreme view of the world.


                                        The early bird who catches the worm works for someone who comes in late and owns the worm farm. -- Travis McGee

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • R Red Stateler

                                          Don't you know how to use Google, Kyle? I thought you were a 1337 h4x0r!


                                          If liberals are not traitors, their only fallback argument at this point is that they're really stupid. -Ann Coulter

                                          L Offline
                                          L Offline
                                          Lost User
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #20

                                          Or could it be that I don't care enough about what you write to google it?

                                          R 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups