Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. The universe just turned 6010 years old

The universe just turned 6010 years old

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
comquestionannouncement
26 Posts 10 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J Jorgen Sigvardsson

    Demon Possessed wrote:

    http://www.americaslastdays.com/?page=science

    That is just unbelievable. How in the world do one come up with such crap, and call it science? The mind boggles.

    -- Kein Mitleid Für Die Mehrheit

    B Offline
    B Offline
    Brady Kelly
    wrote on last edited by
    #17

    It's not altogether crap. the concept is sound, just the attempts to use it, and what they attempt to prove, are crap. Ancient scholars used to use such devices to guard against forgery etc. You could call it a form of steganography.

    J R 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • B Brady Kelly

      It's not altogether crap. the concept is sound, just the attempts to use it, and what they attempt to prove, are crap. Ancient scholars used to use such devices to guard against forgery etc. You could call it a form of steganography.

      J Offline
      J Offline
      Jorgen Sigvardsson
      wrote on last edited by
      #18

      I beg your pardon? :~

      -- Kein Mitleid Für Die Mehrheit

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • J Jorgen Sigvardsson

        I just can't understand why one would want to lie about something, that can be discredited so easily, if you only took 30 seconds of your life to apply some critical thinking.

        -- Kein Mitleid Für Die Mehrheit

        J Offline
        J Offline
        James L Thomson
        wrote on last edited by
        #19

        Joergen Sigvardsson wrote:

        I just can't understand why one would want to lie about something, that can be discredited so easily, if you only took 30 seconds of your life to apply some critical thinking.

        That's 30 seconds of critical thinking more than some people will use in their lives, especially where religion is concerned. Theologists can make claims like that safely because there is little chance that their intended audience will do anything other than blindly accept.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • R Rob Graham

          Joergen Sigvardsson wrote:

          How in the world do one come up with such crap, and call it science?

          All that is required is a willingness to lie.

          D Offline
          D Offline
          Demon Possessed
          wrote on last edited by
          #20

          I don't think they are intentionally lying. In their twisted little view of reality that is the truth.

          These people do all sorts of gibberish underworld activities as long as they are with thier 'gang'. - Vasudevan Deepak Kumar

          R 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • D Demon Possessed

            I don't think they are intentionally lying. In their twisted little view of reality that is the truth.

            These people do all sorts of gibberish underworld activities as long as they are with thier 'gang'. - Vasudevan Deepak Kumar

            R Offline
            R Offline
            Rob Graham
            wrote on last edited by
            #21

            You are far too naive.

            D 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • B Brady Kelly

              It's not altogether crap. the concept is sound, just the attempts to use it, and what they attempt to prove, are crap. Ancient scholars used to use such devices to guard against forgery etc. You could call it a form of steganography.

              R Offline
              R Offline
              Rob Graham
              wrote on last edited by
              #22

              Brady Kelly wrote:

              the concept is sound, ju

              The concept is the stupidity of applying statistics for random events to something completely non-random like writing. Not sound at all, since there is no reasonable reason to presume the occurrences will be the least bit random.

              B 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • R Rob Graham

                Brady Kelly wrote:

                the concept is sound, ju

                The concept is the stupidity of applying statistics for random events to something completely non-random like writing. Not sound at all, since there is no reasonable reason to presume the occurrences will be the least bit random.

                B Offline
                B Offline
                Brady Kelly
                wrote on last edited by
                #23

                I should not have used the word sound. I was having an ecstatic epiphany[1] and hurried my sentence out. What I meant was, there is probably some evidence for deliberate, ooh what does one call it, manipulation, or composition for hidden patterns. [1] In discovering I can fool the VS2005 designer into creating instances of a user control derived from an abstract base.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • R Rob Graham

                  You are far too naive.

                  D Offline
                  D Offline
                  Demon Possessed
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #24

                  Feeling grumpy today? Maybe you just need a nap. :((

                  These people do all sorts of gibberish underworld activities as long as they are with thier 'gang'. - Vasudevan Deepak Kumar

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • J Jorgen Sigvardsson

                    Demon Possessed wrote:

                    http://www.americaslastdays.com/?page=science

                    That is just unbelievable. How in the world do one come up with such crap, and call it science? The mind boggles.

                    -- Kein Mitleid Für Die Mehrheit

                    L Offline
                    L Offline
                    led mike
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #25

                    Joergen Sigvardsson wrote:

                    That is just unbelievable.

                    What do you mean? It's true. It also proves that Bin Laden is a disciple. He attacked New York on 9-11! 9 + 11 = 20 He has devised an attack flying airliners into skyscrapers exactly one time 20 + 1 = 21 which is evenly divisible by .... YES! SEVEN 3 x 7

                    J 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • L led mike

                      Joergen Sigvardsson wrote:

                      That is just unbelievable.

                      What do you mean? It's true. It also proves that Bin Laden is a disciple. He attacked New York on 9-11! 9 + 11 = 20 He has devised an attack flying airliners into skyscrapers exactly one time 20 + 1 = 21 which is evenly divisible by .... YES! SEVEN 3 x 7

                      J Offline
                      J Offline
                      jhwurmbach
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #26

                      There it is! 3 and 7! And 37 is exactly the waist-size of my Jeans! Now it is proven by the Bible: I am OBL! :omg::wtf:


                      Let's think the unthinkable, let's do the undoable, let's prepare to grapple with the ineffable itself, and see if we may not eff it after all.
                      Douglas Adams, "Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency"

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups