Life on mars
-
thomas_joyee wrote:
This is the first statue of human made by universe
certainly not the first. There is a non-illuminated figure in the main cavern at carlsbad caverns NM that looks like a man pissing on the trail when viewed from the back, the front looks nothng like a man, luckily, so they only need keep shadow on one side so as not to upset tourists. There are also half a dozen other very accurate natural sculptures of human anatomy (or at least parts therein) that also must remain shadowed lest they offend visitors. What was renamed the chinese hat and then had its name removed was the most PG-rated of the various parts.
_________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)
That anyone would get offended by natural rock formations. Not surprising, just that kind of slight disappointment that you try to shrug off but ends up settling between your shoulder blades anyway.
This blanket smells like ham
-
That anyone would get offended by natural rock formations. Not surprising, just that kind of slight disappointment that you try to shrug off but ends up settling between your shoulder blades anyway.
This blanket smells like ham
Andy Brummer wrote:
That anyone would get offended by natural rock formations. Not surprising, just that kind of slight disappointment that you try to shrug off but ends up settling between your shoulder blades anyway.
well, most of them take a bit of staring before you see it, but one is so graphic that it does have to keep from being lit. An employee decades ago put a light under it to light it only for certain friends, but since it is near enough to the lunch room, it is hard to illuminate it without upsettng many ladies. Hint: it has lips, but not found on the face. It is very well formed, and very obvious to anyone who has ever seen the real thing, it even has the ... sensitive spot.... I guess mother nature is a bit of an exibitionist.... The one with the guy pissing on the path, you have to be at the right angle, and it only looks like him from that angle, jeans slipping a bit and showing a bit of cheek. That one takes a bit of effort, some of the others take no such effort. Getting a near private tour of the caverns I got to see a number of the more embarassing formations. Since it was in a photography course part of it was being careful what you showed, inspect all of your images, because nature sticks in a LOT of detail you might miss. In our case it was not about embarassment, or covering up nature, but from public relations and printability. If you want national coverage of your photograph, you need to know what is there and make sure the photo is appropriate for the publication. If you are submitting pictures to another magazine, you can save the other photo too. :laugh:
_________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)
-
Andy Brummer wrote:
That anyone would get offended by natural rock formations. Not surprising, just that kind of slight disappointment that you try to shrug off but ends up settling between your shoulder blades anyway.
well, most of them take a bit of staring before you see it, but one is so graphic that it does have to keep from being lit. An employee decades ago put a light under it to light it only for certain friends, but since it is near enough to the lunch room, it is hard to illuminate it without upsettng many ladies. Hint: it has lips, but not found on the face. It is very well formed, and very obvious to anyone who has ever seen the real thing, it even has the ... sensitive spot.... I guess mother nature is a bit of an exibitionist.... The one with the guy pissing on the path, you have to be at the right angle, and it only looks like him from that angle, jeans slipping a bit and showing a bit of cheek. That one takes a bit of effort, some of the others take no such effort. Getting a near private tour of the caverns I got to see a number of the more embarassing formations. Since it was in a photography course part of it was being careful what you showed, inspect all of your images, because nature sticks in a LOT of detail you might miss. In our case it was not about embarassment, or covering up nature, but from public relations and printability. If you want national coverage of your photograph, you need to know what is there and make sure the photo is appropriate for the publication. If you are submitting pictures to another magazine, you can save the other photo too. :laugh:
_________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)
El Corazon wrote:
It is very well formed, and very obvious to anyone who has ever seen the real thing, it even has the ... sensitive spot.... I guess mother nature is a bit of an exibitionist....
There's a flower in the Dominican republic that looks just like that too. I was describing it to a friend of mine in college and my brother's girlfriend overheard me. She asked what that was. :omg: :wtf: :^) :doh: I guess that's what you get when you are raised by a divorced baptist minister. :)
El Corazon wrote:
you need to know what is there and make sure the photo is appropriate for the publication.
It's all natural rock formations. :doh:
I can imagine the sinking feeling one would have after ordering my book, only to find a laughably ridiculous theory with demented logic once the book arrives - Mark McCutcheon
-
I think it's a bloody miracle that the picture has been taken so seriously in the press. If you examine it somewhat critically, it's not hard at all to see that it's not a human-like figure, but a rock being half lit. Just wait and see. Soon there will be millions of videos floating around on the net, saying how NASA covered this one up, and that it really is an alien. (A rehash of the martian face, which really doesn't look like a face unless the lighting conditions are precisely right)
-- Kein Mitleid Für Die Mehrheit
Jörgen Sigvardsson wrote:
If you examine it somewhat critically
:laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
I can imagine the sinking feeling one would have after ordering my book, only to find a laughably ridiculous theory with demented logic once the book arrives - Mark McCutcheon
-
Well aware of that nitwit. That's become a figure of speech, as I used it there. As a general rule, it might be wise for you to never assume you know anything I don't. However, I must say, I am amazed that you were able to accurately regurgitate that fact from wherever you originally heard it. Shouldn't you be in school now?
Try code model generation tools at BoneSoft.com.
BoneSoft wrote:
Well aware of that nitwit.
Well, given the stupidity of some of your other posts it didn't seem too unlikely that you would actually think that.
BoneSoft wrote:
As a general rule, it might be wise for you to never assume you know anything I don't.
It's funny how you have such an exaggerated opinion of yourself. I think there's a word for that.[^]
-
Ravel H. Joyce wrote:
Last I checked, a cube doesn't have 4 of anything.
How about a cube has four diagonal axes, all of which cross at the center of the cube. :)
Chris Meech I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar] Donate to help Conquer Cancer[^]
Ah...touché...
"There's not a man in America who at one time or another hasn't had a secret desire to boot a child in the ass." - W. C. Fields -1 x -1 = +1 is Evil math, as +1 and -1 are antipodes equating a zero existence.
-
BoneSoft wrote:
Well aware of that nitwit.
Well, given the stupidity of some of your other posts it didn't seem too unlikely that you would actually think that.
BoneSoft wrote:
As a general rule, it might be wise for you to never assume you know anything I don't.
It's funny how you have such an exaggerated opinion of yourself. I think there's a word for that.[^]
DemonPossessed wrote:
Well, given the stupidity of some of your other posts it didn't seem too blah blah blah...
Show me one, and when you get tired of looking sit down and STFU.
DemonPossessed wrote:
It's funny how you have such an exaggerated blah blah blah
That's not from an exaggerated opinion of myself, it's from an extremely low opinion of you. I don't have a high opinion of my dog's intellect, and I'm confident she's much brighter that you too.
Try code model generation tools at BoneSoft.com.
-
DemonPossessed wrote:
Well, given the stupidity of some of your other posts it didn't seem too blah blah blah...
Show me one, and when you get tired of looking sit down and STFU.
DemonPossessed wrote:
It's funny how you have such an exaggerated blah blah blah
That's not from an exaggerated opinion of myself, it's from an extremely low opinion of you. I don't have a high opinion of my dog's intellect, and I'm confident she's much brighter that you too.
Try code model generation tools at BoneSoft.com.
BoneSoft wrote:
Show me one, and when you get tired of looking sit down and STFU.
I didn't have to look very far. A few posts you very confidently declare that the Bible doesn't say the earth is flat, when if you had read anything about the matter you might have run across the verse about Jesus appearing in the east from everywhere on the planet at once. :rolleyes:
BoneSoft wrote:
That's not from an exaggerated opinion of myself,
Yes it is, the only people on here who are dumber than you are captain see sharp and ilion.
BoneSoft wrote:
it's from an extremely low opinion of you.
And you think I care?
-
BoneSoft wrote:
Show me one, and when you get tired of looking sit down and STFU.
I didn't have to look very far. A few posts you very confidently declare that the Bible doesn't say the earth is flat, when if you had read anything about the matter you might have run across the verse about Jesus appearing in the east from everywhere on the planet at once. :rolleyes:
BoneSoft wrote:
That's not from an exaggerated opinion of myself,
Yes it is, the only people on here who are dumber than you are captain see sharp and ilion.
BoneSoft wrote:
it's from an extremely low opinion of you.
And you think I care?
DemonPossessed wrote:
appearing in the east from everywhere
Which can be interpreted in any number of ways. Try again, or better yet don't and stop embarrassing yourself.
DemonPossessed wrote:
the only people on here who are dumber than you are captain see sharp and ilion
Says you, though not including yourself in that list proves you should be. Get back to me when you have something to back that up skippy. But rest assured I won't be holding my breathe.
Try code model generation tools at BoneSoft.com.
-
thomas_joyee wrote:
http://dreamslittle.blogspot.com/2008/01/lady-figure-in-mars-is-rock.html\[^\]
When they kick at your front door How you gonna come? With your hands on your head Or on the trigger of your gun?
Nice shot! How was your Mars trip? :)
Thomas
-
DemonPossessed wrote:
appearing in the east from everywhere
Which can be interpreted in any number of ways. Try again, or better yet don't and stop embarrassing yourself.
DemonPossessed wrote:
the only people on here who are dumber than you are captain see sharp and ilion
Says you, though not including yourself in that list proves you should be. Get back to me when you have something to back that up skippy. But rest assured I won't be holding my breathe.
Try code model generation tools at BoneSoft.com.
BoneSoft wrote:
Which can be interpreted in any number of ways. Try again, or better yet don't and stop embarrassing yourself.
For Jesus to appear in the east everywhere on earth at once, either the earth is flat or there is more than one Jesus.
BoneSoft wrote:
Says you, though not including yourself in that list proves you should be. Get back to me when you have something to back that up skippy.
Lines like this are precisely why I classify you with ilion and captain see sharp. Nothing you say shows the slightest sign of a sharp wit, you are just completely bland and boring to argue with. And what makes it even more ridiculous is how seriously you take these silly discussions.
-
BoneSoft wrote:
Which can be interpreted in any number of ways. Try again, or better yet don't and stop embarrassing yourself.
For Jesus to appear in the east everywhere on earth at once, either the earth is flat or there is more than one Jesus.
BoneSoft wrote:
Says you, though not including yourself in that list proves you should be. Get back to me when you have something to back that up skippy.
Lines like this are precisely why I classify you with ilion and captain see sharp. Nothing you say shows the slightest sign of a sharp wit, you are just completely bland and boring to argue with. And what makes it even more ridiculous is how seriously you take these silly discussions.
DemonPossessed wrote:
For Jesus to appear in the east everywhere on earth at once, either the earth is flat or there is more than one Jesus.
Umm, sure... That would also mean the world would have to be less that 100 miles accross since the horizon isn't the only thing that diminishes visibility. Or, oh I dunno, maybe if he had supernatural powers or something... Ooo ooo, or maybe help from God. I suppose the burning bush means that all plants contain gasoline too huh.
DemonPossessed wrote:
you are just completely bland and boring to argue with
Yet you still go out of your way to do so. I'm so sorry it's not fun for you skippy, it's been my goal all along for you to enjoy yourself. :rolleyes: I guess you'll just have to count on yourself for enjoyment. Because I'm betting there isn't a single soul on this board that cares if you're happy.
Try code model generation tools at BoneSoft.com.
-
DemonPossessed wrote:
For Jesus to appear in the east everywhere on earth at once, either the earth is flat or there is more than one Jesus.
Umm, sure... That would also mean the world would have to be less that 100 miles accross since the horizon isn't the only thing that diminishes visibility. Or, oh I dunno, maybe if he had supernatural powers or something... Ooo ooo, or maybe help from God. I suppose the burning bush means that all plants contain gasoline too huh.
DemonPossessed wrote:
you are just completely bland and boring to argue with
Yet you still go out of your way to do so. I'm so sorry it's not fun for you skippy, it's been my goal all along for you to enjoy yourself. :rolleyes: I guess you'll just have to count on yourself for enjoyment. Because I'm betting there isn't a single soul on this board that cares if you're happy.
Try code model generation tools at BoneSoft.com.
BoneSoft wrote:
Umm, sure... That would also mean the world would have to be less that 100 miles accross since the horizon isn't the only thing that diminishes visibility.
But do you think they knew that back when the bible was written?
BoneSoft wrote:
Ooo ooo, or maybe help from God. I suppose the burning bush means that all plants contain gasoline too huh.
And all snakes have vocal cords.
BoneSoft wrote:
Yet you still go out of your way to do so. I'm so sorry it's not fun for you skippy, it's been my goal all along for you to enjoy yourself.
You can be a mildly entertaining distraction, but nothing more.
-
BoneSoft wrote:
Umm, sure... That would also mean the world would have to be less that 100 miles accross since the horizon isn't the only thing that diminishes visibility.
But do you think they knew that back when the bible was written?
BoneSoft wrote:
Ooo ooo, or maybe help from God. I suppose the burning bush means that all plants contain gasoline too huh.
And all snakes have vocal cords.
BoneSoft wrote:
Yet you still go out of your way to do so. I'm so sorry it's not fun for you skippy, it's been my goal all along for you to enjoy yourself.
You can be a mildly entertaining distraction, but nothing more.
DemonPossessed wrote:
But do you think they knew that back when the bible was written?
Does that matter dumbass? The world is flat or it isn't, visibility is what it is or it isn't. What the hell does perception have to do with it?!? Do I think they knew that back then? They had eyes didn't they? Moron.
DemonPossessed wrote:
And all snakes have vocal cords
So you're now coming to grips with your falacy? Happy I could help.
DemonPossessed wrote:
You can be a mildly entertaining distraction, but nothing more.
Good, the less interesting I am to you the better. Hopefully next time you'll keep your idiocy to yourself. Stay in school skippy, you really need it.
Try code model generation tools at BoneSoft.com.
-
DemonPossessed wrote:
But do you think they knew that back when the bible was written?
Does that matter dumbass? The world is flat or it isn't, visibility is what it is or it isn't. What the hell does perception have to do with it?!? Do I think they knew that back then? They had eyes didn't they? Moron.
DemonPossessed wrote:
And all snakes have vocal cords
So you're now coming to grips with your falacy? Happy I could help.
DemonPossessed wrote:
You can be a mildly entertaining distraction, but nothing more.
Good, the less interesting I am to you the better. Hopefully next time you'll keep your idiocy to yourself. Stay in school skippy, you really need it.
Try code model generation tools at BoneSoft.com.
BoneSoft wrote:
The world is flat or it isn't, visibility is what it is or it isn't. What the hell does perception have to do with it?!? Do I think they knew that back then? They had eyes didn't they? Moron.
So you think the fact that they had eyes back then means that they knew that the earth was round?
-
thomas_joyee wrote:
http://dreamslittle.blogspot.com/2008/01/lady-figure-in-mars-is-rock.html\[^\]
When they kick at your front door How you gonna come? With your hands on your head Or on the trigger of your gun?
-
dnh wrote:
Naked female dwarfs on mars
Now there's a B-movie worth watching.
Triple boobs on Mars didn't do it for you? (Total Recall - Schwarzenegger movie...)
-- Kein Mitleid Für Die Mehrheit
-
I think it's a bloody miracle that the picture has been taken so seriously in the press. If you examine it somewhat critically, it's not hard at all to see that it's not a human-like figure, but a rock being half lit. Just wait and see. Soon there will be millions of videos floating around on the net, saying how NASA covered this one up, and that it really is an alien. (A rehash of the martian face, which really doesn't look like a face unless the lighting conditions are precisely right)
-- Kein Mitleid Für Die Mehrheit
-
BoneSoft wrote:
The world is flat or it isn't, visibility is what it is or it isn't. What the hell does perception have to do with it?!? Do I think they knew that back then? They had eyes didn't they? Moron.
So you think the fact that they had eyes back then means that they knew that the earth was round?
No, idiot, that visibility diminishes with distance.
Try code model generation tools at BoneSoft.com.
-
No, idiot, that visibility diminishes with distance.
Try code model generation tools at BoneSoft.com.
BoneSoft wrote:
No, idiot, that visibility diminishes with distance.
But that's not how you worded it. And thanks, that post is going to make a good sig. :laugh:
The world is flat or it isn't, visibility is what it is or it isn't. What the hell does perception have to do with it?!? Do I think they knew that back then? They had eyes didn't they? Moron. - BoneSoft on whether or not the Bible says the earth is flat
