Lesbians #2
-
Colin Davies wrote: Not you too Nish !! pas vous aussi Colin, vous la nouvelle terre de Z Colin
-
Encoder wrote: Colin Davies wrote: Not you too Nish !! pas vous aussi Colin, vous la nouvelle terre de Z Colin Translation: You are not Aussie Colin, you are kiwi Colin :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: A poor attempt at humor
Decoder wrote: Translation: You are not Aussie Colin, you are kiwi Colin Yes, I worked out a similar interpretation, but I can't see what its relevance is? :confused: :confused: Regardz Colin J Davies
Sonork ID 100.9197:Colin
More about me :-)
-
Decoder wrote: Translation: You are not Aussie Colin, you are kiwi Colin Yes, I worked out a similar interpretation, but I can't see what its relevance is? :confused: :confused: Regardz Colin J Davies
Sonork ID 100.9197:Colin
More about me :-)
-
In real life hetero guys don't dig lesbians, but they all love watchin lesbian movie flicks. Why? Nish
Author of the romantic comedy Summer Love and Some more Cricket [New Win] Review by Shog9 Click here for review[NW]
Nishant S wrote: In real life hetero guys don't dig lesbians, but they all love watchin lesbian movie flicks. Why? Maybe I'm the Lone Ranger here but watching a lesbian scene in a skin flick doesn't do a thing for me. Zero. Zilch. Nada. Oh well. :|
Mike Mullikin - People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of thought which they seldom use. Soren Kierkegaard
-
trivialist wrote: Since sex is mainly about penetration Says who?... trivialist wrote: In fact, lesbianism is a perversion of homo sexuality Eeh..., actually it IS homo sexuality. trivialist wrote: and is very unnatural in the context of homo sexuality. Why?... I am looking forward to your explanations, at the first glance i would consider your entire message complete nonsense but i could off course be missing some deep and insightfull knowledge hidden in your wordings. "It could have been worse, it could have been ME!"
jan larsen wrote: Says who?... Says mother nature... jan larsen wrote: Why?... Since sexaulity is about sex, since the natural thing about sex is penetration, since lesbianism does not involve penetration, and since homosexuals believe their way of sexual intercourse is the most natural, it follows that lesbianism is as unnatural.
-
jan larsen wrote: Says who?... Says mother nature... jan larsen wrote: Why?... Since sexaulity is about sex, since the natural thing about sex is penetration, since lesbianism does not involve penetration, and since homosexuals believe their way of sexual intercourse is the most natural, it follows that lesbianism is as unnatural.
trivialist wrote: Says mother nature... If your'e hearing voices, contact a psychiatrist. trivialist wrote: Since sexaulity is about sex, since the natural thing about sex is penetration, since lesbianism does not involve penetration, and since homosexuals believe their way of sexual intercourse is the most natural, it follows that lesbianism is as unnatural. That's not an explanation, that's repeating bullshit... "It could have been worse, it could have been ME!"
-
trivialist wrote: Says mother nature... If your'e hearing voices, contact a psychiatrist. trivialist wrote: Since sexaulity is about sex, since the natural thing about sex is penetration, since lesbianism does not involve penetration, and since homosexuals believe their way of sexual intercourse is the most natural, it follows that lesbianism is as unnatural. That's not an explanation, that's repeating bullshit... "It could have been worse, it could have been ME!"
jan larsen wrote: That's not an explanation, that's repeating bullshit... It's no greater bullshit than homo sexuals adopting babies and eventually turn them to homo sexuals. If they want to have babies, why dont' they give birth to them themselves? After all, their sexaulity is so natural!
-
jan larsen wrote: That's not an explanation, that's repeating bullshit... It's no greater bullshit than homo sexuals adopting babies and eventually turn them to homo sexuals. If they want to have babies, why dont' they give birth to them themselves? After all, their sexaulity is so natural!
trivialist wrote: It's no greater bullshit than homo sexuals adopting babies and eventually turn them to homo sexuals Jesus!, are you getting your science facts from "Watchtower"?. Homosexuality is NOT contageous. Furthermore, there is no analysis saying, and no reason to believe, that children raised by homosexuals are more likely to be homosexuals themselves. trivialist wrote: If they want to have babies, why dont' they give birth to them themselves? After all, their sexaulity is so natural! It is you who is using the word natural, and really, i don't think that a person that is able to make a statement as the one above is in any position to make that judgement. As i told another CPian: An increasing number of pregnancies in the western countries are helped through by medical attention, using e.g hormones and insemination. Do you consider this unnatural as well?. "It could have been worse, it could have been ME!"