So, what to do with those pesky Muslems?

Haydn Chapman

I think you should pray your god goes to specsavers if he decides to make something else in his image. Some of his works seem to think for themselves, he can't have that. He may be omnipotent but he still needs all the prayers he can get, I imagine it can get pretty lonely :( being the most powerful being ever in existence, with nothing to do all day except to speak to gibbering fools.

Ilion

But you're still an ass. And intellectually dishonest (i.e. a liar).

Ilion

And I told you that your "original question" is beneath contempt. I don't answer contemptible questions.

Ro0ke

Why do you feel that question was contemptible?

Haydn Chapman

:laugh: :laugh: How can I be intellectually dishonet on a subject that is (to everyone's knowledge) unproveable? You gonna answer this time or ignore me and start another rant against someone else?

R Giskard Reventlov

You're wasting your time: he won't answer since he hasn't got an answer; he never has; his speciality is telling people how stupid they are or what liars they are or that they are poor deluded atheists and he brackets all the big words with asterisks so that you'll think he understands the words. But he doesn't: once challenged he is never to be heard of again. Watch and see how he responds to this: it is blazingly funny to watch someone with a pygmy intellect make a complete arse of themselves over and over again and he does keep coming back for more.

bin the spin home

CataclysmicQuantum · modified on Friday, March 28, 2008 11:11 AM

Did you ever boink her? Or at least get your dicks sucked?

The Digital World. It is an amazing place in which we primitive humans interact. Our flesh made this synthetic machine. You see, we are so smart, we know a lot of stuff. We were grown from cells that came from the universe, which the matter and physics I'm typing in it is amazing how the universe is working. Human life is very amazing. How I experience this sh*t its like wow.

Gary Kirkham

You know, I don't really mind you standing up for what you believe. Sometimes I do wish you would give it a rest and not make a point of stirring the pot with every post. I do occasionally stir things up, but it is usually in response to something someone else wrote. That said...I really wish that you would stop being abusive to people. It is decidedly un-Christian and totally unnecessary. I am not sure what your goal is, but if it is winning people to Christ, then you are failing miserably. If you are trying to be contentious and hurtful, then I have to say, "Good job!"

Gary Kirkham Forever Forgiven and Alive in the Spirit The fool has said in his heart, "There is no God" Me blog, You read

Ilion

I was not only naive at the time, but honorable towards women. I do not use women as recepticles. Also, while I'm sure that you won't believe this: getting your dick sucked is downright boring. "Boinking" is where it's at. But even "boinking" is eventually boring if that's all the significance it has. If sex is not the giving of yourself to another, you will end up hating it, and her.

Ilion

on all accusations.

Ilion

CataclysmicQuantum wrote:

Did you ever boink her? Or at least get your dicks sucked?

I've long gathered that you present yourself as being a virgin; I have no reason to doubt that. If you want your "boinking" to have you thinking "Man! *This* is what I was born to do!" then make sure that you're not just "boinking."

Ro0ke

I was just curious as to where he got that information, and to a lesser extent, why questioning his source of information was contemptible.

R Giskard Reventlov

Deflection: many people lose their temper or throw a fit or obfuscate or whatever to deflect. It's like asking a politician a question: they'll waffleon about everything else but never answer the question no matter how hard you press and they hope you'll get worn down and give up. Usually because they don't know the answer or telling the truth is worse than saying nothing or they can't accept that they may be wrong. It is quite amusing: he displays his abject ignorance in vivid technicolor with every post: try drawing him on anything meaningful and watch him squirm and wriggle away or simply repeat his bigoted mantra.

bin the spin home

Ilion

Ro0ke wrote:

I was just curious as to where he got that information, and to a lesser extent, why questioning his source of information was contemptible.

Ro0ke wrote:

Ilíon: You (Fat_Boy, personally, and great numbers, perhaps even a majority, of "Europeans") [emphasis yours] Ro0ke: That is a generalization.

[sarcasm] How fortunate am I that you were here to inform me that I had made a generalization. After all, it's not as though the very form and structure of what I'd written doesn't scream "This statement is a generalization and the author knows this!" [/sarcasm] Are you trying to imply that you weren't trying to use the contemptible tactic of fiat asserting that generalizations are "bad" and invalid, and therefore the statement one wishes to dispute can logically be waved away as of no account? (Do you even understand that such an assertion is itself a generalization? And, therefore, but its own asserted standard, invalid and of no account.) Also, do you not understand the use and meaning of the subjunctive mode of the English language?

Ro0ke

So as I understand it, you don't actually believe the majority of Europeans believe that there is absolutely nothing in this world worth dying for. Is this correct?

Ilion

Do you not understand the subjunctive?

Ro0ke wrote:

So as I understand it, you don't actually believe the majority of Europeans believe that there is absolutely nothing in this world worth dying for. Is this correct?

Also, do you not understand the insinuations contained in what you wrote first and here?

Ro0ke

There is no need to get defensive. I simply wanted to understand why you think the majority of Europeans believe there is nothing in the world worth dying for. As I understand it now, you don't actually believe that. There was no deeper meaning to what I wrote, you're over-analyzing it.

led mike

fat_boy wrote:

Somewhat in line with the proposed 'Oath of Britishness' I think we need an 'Oath of Europeaness', AKA, 'Oath of Westernisation'.

I think we could combine them all into the 'Oath of Non-BarbarismLameness'

led mike

Ilion

Ro0ke wrote:

There is no need to get defensive.

As you've surely been informed, I'm *offensive* (not defensive).

Ro0ke wrote:

As I understand it now, you don't actually believe that.

And I never said that I did, I took no position one way or another. ... Though, I *did* imply that I believed that such would not be a positive or desirable thing.

Ro0ke wrote:

... you're over-analyzing it.

Occupational (and social) hazard, I suppose. I'm a programmer: I analyze. I'm widely (even if shallowly) read; and I assume that other people generally do mean to write just what they write, same as I do. You say that I misinterpreted what you meant. I am willing to accept that I may well have done: so, I apologize for reacting as I did.

73Zeppelin

Gary Kirkham wrote:

That said...I really wish that you would stop being abusive to people. It is decidedly un-Christian and totally unnecessary. I am not sure what your goal is, but if it is winning people to Christ, then you are failing miserably. If you are trying to be contentious and hurtful, then I have to say, "Good job!"

Thank you for that Gary.

Only memories, fading memories, blending into dull tableaux. I want them back.