Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. Yet another pointless thread

Yet another pointless thread

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
question
7 Posts 4 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    Shog9 0
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    What? You're actually reading this? Man, you *are* bored. Ok, so after my initial exposure to The Net, i soon picked up the habit of using asterisks around a word to denote emphasis. When i started posting at CP though, the ability to include italics and bold text initially caught my eye as a better way, and so i abandoned the previous technique. Soon however, my natural lazyness kicked in, and i tired of all that extra typing. As with my introduction to the cursive style of handwriting many years ago, this has now left my natural output mixed, sometimes using *one* way, other times the other. A broken man, here i stand. I ask you now: which way is clearer to you as a reader? Which one do you prefer as a writer? Do you percieve them / use them as though they meant the same, or do you see subtle differences in the way they reflect on the intent of the author? What is your *take*? :)

    - Shog9 -

    Aaah... It's time to relax. You know what that means: a glass of beer, your favorite ergo chair... And of course, The Code Project loaded on your Personal Computer System. So go on, and indulge yourself, put your feet up. Lean back and just enjoy the articles. After all, CP sooths even the savage :bob:

    C D 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • S Shog9 0

      What? You're actually reading this? Man, you *are* bored. Ok, so after my initial exposure to The Net, i soon picked up the habit of using asterisks around a word to denote emphasis. When i started posting at CP though, the ability to include italics and bold text initially caught my eye as a better way, and so i abandoned the previous technique. Soon however, my natural lazyness kicked in, and i tired of all that extra typing. As with my introduction to the cursive style of handwriting many years ago, this has now left my natural output mixed, sometimes using *one* way, other times the other. A broken man, here i stand. I ask you now: which way is clearer to you as a reader? Which one do you prefer as a writer? Do you percieve them / use them as though they meant the same, or do you see subtle differences in the way they reflect on the intent of the author? What is your *take*? :)

      - Shog9 -

      Aaah... It's time to relax. You know what that means: a glass of beer, your favorite ergo chair... And of course, The Code Project loaded on your Personal Computer System. So go on, and indulge yourself, put your feet up. Lean back and just enjoy the articles. After all, CP sooths even the savage :bob:

      C Offline
      C Offline
      ColinDavies
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      As long as you don't use Big pink fonts like *this* I don't really care. But it would be quite nice to have a keyboard that was set up to add HTML Tags as needed these days. Maybe Chris could get CP to convet { *this* to this } I don't think he has much else to do these days. Regardz Colin J Davies

      Sonork ID 100.9197:Colin

      More about me :-)

      S 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • C ColinDavies

        As long as you don't use Big pink fonts like *this* I don't really care. But it would be quite nice to have a keyboard that was set up to add HTML Tags as needed these days. Maybe Chris could get CP to convet { *this* to this } I don't think he has much else to do these days. Regardz Colin J Davies

        Sonork ID 100.9197:Colin

        More about me :-)

        S Offline
        S Offline
        Shog9 0
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Colin Davies wrote: As long as you don't use Big pink fonts like *this* I don't really care. OK Colin I'll be sure to avoid that in the future. :)

        - Shog9 -

        Aaah... It's time to relax. You know what that means: a glass of beer, your favorite ergo chair... And of course, The Code Project loaded on your Personal Computer System. So go on, and indulge yourself, put your feet up. Lean back and just enjoy the articles. After all, CP sooths even the savage :bob:

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • S Shog9 0

          What? You're actually reading this? Man, you *are* bored. Ok, so after my initial exposure to The Net, i soon picked up the habit of using asterisks around a word to denote emphasis. When i started posting at CP though, the ability to include italics and bold text initially caught my eye as a better way, and so i abandoned the previous technique. Soon however, my natural lazyness kicked in, and i tired of all that extra typing. As with my introduction to the cursive style of handwriting many years ago, this has now left my natural output mixed, sometimes using *one* way, other times the other. A broken man, here i stand. I ask you now: which way is clearer to you as a reader? Which one do you prefer as a writer? Do you percieve them / use them as though they meant the same, or do you see subtle differences in the way they reflect on the intent of the author? What is your *take*? :)

          - Shog9 -

          Aaah... It's time to relax. You know what that means: a glass of beer, your favorite ergo chair... And of course, The Code Project loaded on your Personal Computer System. So go on, and indulge yourself, put your feet up. Lean back and just enjoy the articles. After all, CP sooths even the savage :bob:

          D Offline
          D Offline
          Domenic Denicola
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Well, but it gets even more complicated once you remember you're really supposed to be using <em> and <strong> :-D

          -Domenic Denicola- [CPUA 0x1337] MadHamster Creations "I was born human. But this was an accident of fate - a condition merely of time and place. I believe it's something we have the power to change..."

          S P 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • D Domenic Denicola

            Well, but it gets even more complicated once you remember you're really supposed to be using <em> and <strong> :-D

            -Domenic Denicola- [CPUA 0x1337] MadHamster Creations "I was born human. But this was an accident of fate - a condition merely of time and place. I believe it's something we have the power to change..."

            S Offline
            S Offline
            Shog9 0
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Domenic [_Geek_n] wrote: it gets even more complicated once you remember you're really supposed to be using <em> and <strong> Hmmm, lets see... 8 keystrokes, or 3... yeah... good LUCK w3c! :rolleyes:

            - Shog9 -

            Aaah... It's time to relax. You know what that means: a glass of beer, your favorite ergo chair... And of course, The Code Project loaded on your Personal Computer System. So go on, and indulge yourself, put your feet up. Lean back and just enjoy the articles. After all, CP sooths even the savage :bob:

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • D Domenic Denicola

              Well, but it gets even more complicated once you remember you're really supposed to be using <em> and <strong> :-D

              -Domenic Denicola- [CPUA 0x1337] MadHamster Creations "I was born human. But this was an accident of fate - a condition merely of time and place. I believe it's something we have the power to change..."

              P Offline
              P Offline
              peterchen
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              neitehr the not the **let me see your "products" or your "portofolio" on your website :confused:


              To comply with a request by Mike Mullikin, the US will be given a break from all my statements for the duration of one week, up to and including July 17th, 2002, 19:05 MESZ
              [sighist]**

              D 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • P peterchen

                neitehr the not the **let me see your "products" or your "portofolio" on your website :confused:


                To comply with a request by Mike Mullikin, the US will be given a break from all my statements for the duration of one week, up to and including July 17th, 2002, 19:05 MESZ
                [sighist]**

                D Offline
                D Offline
                Domenic Denicola
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Sorry, that web site is hopelessly outdated. The only reason I kept it up is because it won me an internship when the company looked at the source code :-D Those sections are empty because I was planning on filling them out but never got around to it. My summer project is to redo the website, with an ASP.NET XML/XSLT content management system that outputs XHTML Strict, and a real domain name on a real host server -- instead of using CSS tricks to hide the banner ads on 50megs.com. However, I'm still open to critiques, etc. Nice to see that someone actually goes there ;)

                -Domenic Denicola- [CPUA 0x1337] MadHamster Creations "I was born human. But this was an accident of fate - a condition merely of time and place. I believe it's something we have the power to change..."

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                Reply
                • Reply as topic
                Log in to reply
                • Oldest to Newest
                • Newest to Oldest
                • Most Votes


                • Login

                • Don't have an account? Register

                • Login or register to search.
                • First post
                  Last post
                0
                • Categories
                • Recent
                • Tags
                • Popular
                • World
                • Users
                • Groups