Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. General Programming
  3. C#
  4. Array? Or how can i do this...

Array? Or how can i do this...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved C#
questiondata-structuressaleshelptutorial
22 Posts 10 Posters 2 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L Luc Pattyn

    Guffa wrote:

    Buckets are usually very stackable, at least when empty. Otherwise you can just put them in boxes and throw them in a heap.

    Aha, buckets can be boxed, hence they are value types, hence I don't need my string to link them together, I'll use it to bind the books instead as I already was going to; so all I need now is two boxes. In the end, in order to store two books, I need two boxes. Right. OO is simple after all, it just takes a while to get used to it. Now that we discovered all this, do we still need the second book? and the buckets? and the string? the boxes? And if we only need a single book, what is all this OO about?? :)

    Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles]


    This month's tips: - before you ask a question here, search CodeProject, then Google; - the quality and detail of your question reflects on the effectiveness of the help you are likely to get; - use PRE tags to preserve formatting when showing multi-line code snippets.


    G Offline
    G Offline
    Guffa
    wrote on last edited by
    #21

    Books are usually already bound when you buy them. If you use thread instead of string, and make a doubly linked list, it would be multi threaded. I hope that you don't have a single threaded apartment. If you have only one book, you could get some glue and make it static.

    Despite everything, the person most likely to be fooling you next is yourself.

    L 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • G Guffa

      Books are usually already bound when you buy them. If you use thread instead of string, and make a doubly linked list, it would be multi threaded. I hope that you don't have a single threaded apartment. If you have only one book, you could get some glue and make it static.

      Despite everything, the person most likely to be fooling you next is yourself.

      L Offline
      L Offline
      Luc Pattyn
      wrote on last edited by
      #22

      Guffa wrote:

      Books are usually already bound when you buy them

      Yes, of course, but I was given the advice of storing the books in buckets, and they fell apart; no one told me to buy empty buckets. And I wish I'd gotten the glue advice first. Yes mine is a typical singles apartment, how did you guess? :)

      Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles]


      This month's tips: - before you ask a question here, search CodeProject, then Google; - the quality and detail of your question reflects on the effectiveness of the help you are likely to get; - use PRE tags to preserve formatting when showing multi-line code snippets.


      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      Reply
      • Reply as topic
      Log in to reply
      • Oldest to Newest
      • Newest to Oldest
      • Most Votes


      • Login

      • Don't have an account? Register

      • Login or register to search.
      • First post
        Last post
      0
      • Categories
      • Recent
      • Tags
      • Popular
      • World
      • Users
      • Groups