Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
CODE PROJECT For Those Who Code
  • Home
  • Articles
  • FAQ
Community
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. Evolution works in mysterious ways

Evolution works in mysterious ways

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
htmlcomannouncement
286 Posts 22 Posters 27.7k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Matthew Faithfull

    So you'd prefer to listen to someone who doesn't actually believe anything and has no moral restraint against telling you a pack of lies than to someone who holds a consistent set of beliefs including a moral imperative to tell you the truth, interesting. Your choice of course.

    "The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage." Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)

    P Offline
    P Offline
    Paul Watson
    wrote on last edited by
    #109

    I am an aethist and I have moral restraint. Haven't bashed your brains in yet, have I? Stuck. Record.

    regards, Paul Watson Ireland & South Africa

    Fernando A. Gomez F. wrote:

    At least he achieved immortality for a few years.

    M 7 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • P Paul Watson

      What are you, 5? "Your mom" replies are for infants.

      regards, Paul Watson Ireland & South Africa

      Fernando A. Gomez F. wrote:

      At least he achieved immortality for a few years.

      C Offline
      C Offline
      CataclysmicQuantum
      wrote on last edited by
      #110

      Paul Watson wrote:

      What are you, 5?

      How can I be a number? Yes, I am the number 5. Brilliant!

      The Digital World. It is an amazing place in which we primitive humans interact. Our flesh made this synthetic machine. You see, we are so smart, we know a lot of stuff. We were grown from cells that came from the universe, which the matter and physics I'm typing in it is amazing how the universe is working. Human life is very amazing. How I experience this sh*t its like wow.

      P 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • O Oakman

        Matthew Faithfull wrote:

        why would that make the slightest difference

        Well the translations don't always agree with each other and maybe it's only the size of my non-neaderthal brain, but I have trouble understanding how all of them can be right. You aren't one of these guys who thinks that God spoke Elizabethan English, are you?

        Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

        M Offline
        M Offline
        Matthew Faithfull
        wrote on last edited by
        #111

        Oakman wrote:

        Well the translations don't always agree with each other

        Those who have never read the whole tend to massively exagerate the trivial differenes between translations for their own ends. It's seldom even worth arguing about. There are now unfortunately a number of highly corrupted modern 'translations' particularly coming out of the US, stick with an NIV or Good News or something with equivalent academic pedigree and you won't go far wrong.

        Oakman wrote:

        You aren't one of these guys who thinks that God spoke Elizabethan English, are you?

        I'm sure he did at the time, he's considerate like that. :)

        "The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage." Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)

        O 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M Matthew Faithfull

          Fisticuffs wrote:

          Wrong.

          I think you mean you disagree but can't think why. :)

          Fisticuffs wrote:

          Wrong - there are mutations that are neutral,

          And therefore don't confer selective advantage as I said.

          Fisticuffs wrote:

          What?!?!?! Deleterious phenotypes are outcompeted by definition. How can something that's deleterious outcompete something that's beneficial?

          Because randomness swamps fractional selective advantage, 500 bad chess players can beat one good one on average, especially if pieces don't always move as either side chooses.

          Fisticuffs wrote:

          That's not only the fundamental concept of evolution

          it's also false.

          "The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage." Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)

          L Offline
          L Offline
          Lost User
          wrote on last edited by
          #112

          Matthew Faithfull wrote:

          Because randomness swamps fractional selective advantage, 500 bad chess players can beat one good one on average, especially if pieces don't always move as either side chooses.

          This is a false analogy - because the number of players don't stay the same. If every "win" creates a new player, and B wins preferentially over A, then eventually there will be more B players than A players. Do the math. Presto! Evolution! The mutation rate and generation time are perfectly in line with what's been observed. Presto! Evolution!

          - F

          M 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M Matthew Faithfull

            Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

            Have any reason for saying so

            Yes but probably not one you'd accept. We've been around this debate before, I dismiss evolution as the pile of crap it is. Zepp and others loose their rag and post streams of unsubstantiated random abuse, I laugh, you post links to lots of evidence for de-evolution misdiagnosed as evidence for evolution, proving my point but not seeing it and everyone goes away none the wiser. I can only suggest that you look for yourself, you're more capable than me in math and shouldn't have any problem demoshing the paper thin arguments of idiots like Richard Dawkins. The more you look the less evolution and more de-evolution you will see.

            "The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage." Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)

            A Offline
            A Offline
            Al Beback
            wrote on last edited by
            #113

            Matthew Faithfull wrote:

            The more you look the less evolution and more de-evolution you will see.

            So this "de-evolution"... is it part of God's plan?

            - Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is impotent. - Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. - Is he both able and willing? Whence then is evil? - Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God? Epicurus

            M 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • P Paul Watson

              Just curious if that is your real name... Matthew Faithful. Never heard the surname Faithful before. It is like African tribesmen who select an English name and end up with kids named Precious, Beautiful, Innocent and Cocacola.

              regards, Paul Watson Ireland & South Africa

              Fernando A. Gomez F. wrote:

              At least he achieved immortality for a few years.

              M Offline
              M Offline
              Matthew Faithfull
              wrote on last edited by
              #114

              It's Faithfull, two ll's and yes it is real and pretty rare, only 3 or 4 families in the UK. In our case its an English transliteration of a corrupted Irish Gealic word which was originally a rude name given to Viking invaders who steal our daughters. At least according to my great Aunt Kay's research. Not as rare as Heher pronounced like 'hair', on my mother's side, only one family in the entire world, also Irish although most of them left during the great potato famine.

              "The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage." Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)

              P 7 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • C CataclysmicQuantum

                Paul Watson wrote:

                What are you, 5?

                How can I be a number? Yes, I am the number 5. Brilliant!

                The Digital World. It is an amazing place in which we primitive humans interact. Our flesh made this synthetic machine. You see, we are so smart, we know a lot of stuff. We were grown from cells that came from the universe, which the matter and physics I'm typing in it is amazing how the universe is working. Human life is very amazing. How I experience this sh*t its like wow.

                P Offline
                P Offline
                Paul Watson
                wrote on last edited by
                #115

                CataclysmicQuantum wrote:

                Yes, I am the number 5

                You're a robot from a movie controlled by a bunch of guys with RF transmitters? Explains a lot...

                regards, Paul Watson Ireland & South Africa

                Fernando A. Gomez F. wrote:

                At least he achieved immortality for a few years.

                C 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • P Paul Watson

                  I am an aethist and I have moral restraint. Haven't bashed your brains in yet, have I? Stuck. Record.

                  regards, Paul Watson Ireland & South Africa

                  Fernando A. Gomez F. wrote:

                  At least he achieved immortality for a few years.

                  M Offline
                  M Offline
                  Matthew Faithfull
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #116

                  That's what we call common grace but of course you're not allowed to believe in that :laugh:

                  "The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage." Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)

                  P I 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • P Paul Watson

                    CataclysmicQuantum wrote:

                    Yes, I am the number 5

                    You're a robot from a movie controlled by a bunch of guys with RF transmitters? Explains a lot...

                    regards, Paul Watson Ireland & South Africa

                    Fernando A. Gomez F. wrote:

                    At least he achieved immortality for a few years.

                    C Offline
                    C Offline
                    CataclysmicQuantum
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #117

                    A robot can't jack off to porn on the internet though, ahh the simple human pleasures.

                    The Digital World. It is an amazing place in which we primitive humans interact. Our flesh made this synthetic machine. You see, we are so smart, we know a lot of stuff. We were grown from cells that came from the universe, which the matter and physics I'm typing in it is amazing how the universe is working. Human life is very amazing. How I experience this sh*t its like wow.

                    P 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • C CataclysmicQuantum

                      A robot can't jack off to porn on the internet though, ahh the simple human pleasures.

                      The Digital World. It is an amazing place in which we primitive humans interact. Our flesh made this synthetic machine. You see, we are so smart, we know a lot of stuff. We were grown from cells that came from the universe, which the matter and physics I'm typing in it is amazing how the universe is working. Human life is very amazing. How I experience this sh*t its like wow.

                      P Offline
                      P Offline
                      Paul Watson
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #118

                      The five guys controlling you can though.

                      regards, Paul Watson Ireland & South Africa

                      Fernando A. Gomez F. wrote:

                      At least he achieved immortality for a few years.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • M Matthew Faithfull

                        That's what we call common grace but of course you're not allowed to believe in that :laugh:

                        "The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage." Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)

                        P Offline
                        P Offline
                        Paul Watson
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #119

                        I'm allowed to believe in whatever I want to believe, no book or person tells me otherwise. Can be tough and means frequent changes but it does make me responsible for all my actions, unable to do things in the name of someone else.

                        regards, Paul Watson Ireland & South Africa

                        Fernando A. Gomez F. wrote:

                        At least he achieved immortality for a few years.

                        M 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • L Lost User

                          Matthew Faithfull wrote:

                          Another, proof by blindness, double negative.

                          Science works on models. A model that explains observed phenomena is accepted as true until an observation that contradicts it is made. So, complete knowledge of all mutations is not necessary to hold theory of evolution as scientifically valid. For example: Newton's laws does not paint an accurate picture of all the forces involved in a given situation, but is a very good approximation for most real world situations. There is a certain expectation of evidence needed for a model to be discarded or modified. I am sure the evolution, natural selection models must have been modified many times. For instance, there is no dispute yet in the scientific community regarding the common origins of the animal kingdom; in case of microbes, there are disagreements (obviously not big enough to discredit the whole theory). I think that it is everyone's duty to aid the scientific process rather than doggedly standing your ground with no evidence. Maybe, one day a living human being may know everything that is to know. Evolution may be wrong; it may be discredited in the future; but please bear in mind that proving that the theory of evolution is wrong does not automatically prove the theory of creation. I get a distinct feeling of pride of your theory being vindicated when you discredit another.

                          M Offline
                          M Offline
                          Matthew Faithfull
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #120

                          Thomas George wrote:

                          but please bear in mind that proving that the theory of evolution is wrong does not automatically prove the theory of creation.

                          I have no desire or need to 'prove the theory of creation', firstly as for the reasons we agree it connot be proved and secondly becuase it is not a theory.

                          Thomas George wrote:

                          there is no dispute yet in the scientific community regarding the common origins of the animal kingdom;

                          Not so, there has always been dispute and probably always will be. Newton's laws and evolution are not readily comparable. Newton was stating fundamental universal laws describing reality. Evolutionists, despite recent denials here, are looking for an explanation of observable facts within the framework of the known laws. They have not yet found such an explanantion that does not contradict those laws, yes they will keep searching but to falsely claim success and to falsely claim the theory hasn't changed fundamentally over time and is not therfore a different theory ( This is implicit in calling it Darwinian evolution ) is wrong. Also to interpret all the evidence gathered accoring to the theory they are supposed to be falsifying before evaluating it is bad science. This doesn't just go on with evolution but is sadly a plague in modern science.

                          "The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage." Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)

                          L 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • C CataclysmicQuantum

                            Your mom? Do you like smelly raw fish?

                            The Digital World. It is an amazing place in which we primitive humans interact. Our flesh made this synthetic machine. You see, we are so smart, we know a lot of stuff. We were grown from cells that came from the universe, which the matter and physics I'm typing in it is amazing how the universe is working. Human life is very amazing. How I experience this sh*t its like wow.

                            L Offline
                            L Offline
                            Lost User
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #121

                            CataclysmicQuantum wrote:

                            Your mom?

                            No.

                            CataclysmicQuantum wrote:

                            Do you like smelly raw fish?

                            Yes.

                            Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription

                            C 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • M Matthew Faithfull

                              It's Faithfull, two ll's and yes it is real and pretty rare, only 3 or 4 families in the UK. In our case its an English transliteration of a corrupted Irish Gealic word which was originally a rude name given to Viking invaders who steal our daughters. At least according to my great Aunt Kay's research. Not as rare as Heher pronounced like 'hair', on my mother's side, only one family in the entire world, also Irish although most of them left during the great potato famine.

                              "The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage." Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)

                              P Offline
                              P Offline
                              Paul Watson
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #122

                              Matthew Faithfull wrote:

                              Irish Gealic word which was originally a rude name given to Viking invaders who steal our daughters

                              I live in Waterford, were the vikings landed in Ireland. The locals call the vikings grandad and grandma here ;)

                              Matthew Faithfull wrote:

                              only one family in the entire world

                              That is amazing. I wonder how many other "unique" surnames there are in the world. Mine is common enough. Though if I tried to pronounce Heher I'd probably insult your mother's side by referring to a young, female cow.

                              regards, Paul Watson Ireland & South Africa

                              Fernando A. Gomez F. wrote:

                              At least he achieved immortality for a few years.

                              V 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • L Lost User

                                CataclysmicQuantum wrote:

                                Your mom?

                                No.

                                CataclysmicQuantum wrote:

                                Do you like smelly raw fish?

                                Yes.

                                Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription

                                C Offline
                                C Offline
                                CataclysmicQuantum
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #123

                                fat_boy wrote:

                                Yes.

                                Do you like to lick it and drink its juices?

                                The Digital World. It is an amazing place in which we primitive humans interact. Our flesh made this synthetic machine. You see, we are so smart, we know a lot of stuff. We were grown from cells that came from the universe, which the matter and physics I'm typing in it is amazing how the universe is working. Human life is very amazing. How I experience this sh*t its like wow.

                                L 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • C CataclysmicQuantum

                                  fat_boy wrote:

                                  Yes.

                                  Do you like to lick it and drink its juices?

                                  The Digital World. It is an amazing place in which we primitive humans interact. Our flesh made this synthetic machine. You see, we are so smart, we know a lot of stuff. We were grown from cells that came from the universe, which the matter and physics I'm typing in it is amazing how the universe is working. Human life is very amazing. How I experience this sh*t its like wow.

                                  L Offline
                                  L Offline
                                  Lost User
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #124

                                  CataclysmicQuantum wrote:

                                  Do you like to lick it and drink its juices?

                                  After it is cooked, yes.

                                  Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription

                                  C B 2 Replies Last reply
                                  0
                                  • L Lost User

                                    Matthew Faithfull wrote:

                                    Because randomness swamps fractional selective advantage, 500 bad chess players can beat one good one on average, especially if pieces don't always move as either side chooses.

                                    This is a false analogy - because the number of players don't stay the same. If every "win" creates a new player, and B wins preferentially over A, then eventually there will be more B players than A players. Do the math. Presto! Evolution! The mutation rate and generation time are perfectly in line with what's been observed. Presto! Evolution!

                                    - F

                                    M Offline
                                    M Offline
                                    Matthew Faithfull
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #125

                                    B doesn't win 500 times more than A so once again your math is wrong. By the time B has gone on two generations it's indestinguishable in terms of superiority from A because of it's accumulated damage. You do the math, Presto extinction!

                                    "The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage." Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)

                                    L 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • A Al Beback

                                      Matthew Faithfull wrote:

                                      The more you look the less evolution and more de-evolution you will see.

                                      So this "de-evolution"... is it part of God's plan?

                                      - Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is impotent. - Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. - Is he both able and willing? Whence then is evil? - Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God? Epicurus

                                      M Offline
                                      M Offline
                                      Matthew Faithfull
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #126

                                      I'd have to say yes, just as everything else that happens in God's world is part of his plan and subject to his forknowledge. Can't say I understand that plan but then I'm not God. If you have a specific query you should ask him.

                                      "The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage." Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • L Lost User

                                        CataclysmicQuantum wrote:

                                        Do you like to lick it and drink its juices?

                                        After it is cooked, yes.

                                        Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription

                                        C Offline
                                        C Offline
                                        CataclysmicQuantum
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #127

                                        fat_boy wrote:

                                        After it is cooked, yes.

                                        Eww, so after you have fucked her and dumped in her you get down and lick and suck the juices?

                                        The Digital World. It is an amazing place in which we primitive humans interact. Our flesh made this synthetic machine. You see, we are so smart, we know a lot of stuff. We were grown from cells that came from the universe, which the matter and physics I'm typing in it is amazing how the universe is working. Human life is very amazing. How I experience this sh*t its like wow.

                                        L 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • M Matthew Faithfull

                                          Oakman wrote:

                                          Well the translations don't always agree with each other

                                          Those who have never read the whole tend to massively exagerate the trivial differenes between translations for their own ends. It's seldom even worth arguing about. There are now unfortunately a number of highly corrupted modern 'translations' particularly coming out of the US, stick with an NIV or Good News or something with equivalent academic pedigree and you won't go far wrong.

                                          Oakman wrote:

                                          You aren't one of these guys who thinks that God spoke Elizabethan English, are you?

                                          I'm sure he did at the time, he's considerate like that. :)

                                          "The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage." Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)

                                          O Offline
                                          O Offline
                                          Oakman
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #128

                                          Matthew Faithfull wrote:

                                          There are now unfortunately a number of highly corrupted modern 'translations' particularly coming out of the US, stick with an NIV or Good News or something with equivalent academic pedigree and you won't go far wrong.

                                          Interesting. You've never read the originals, but you know which translations are accurate. I wish I was that clever.

                                          Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                                          M 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups