Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
CODE PROJECT For Those Who Code
  • Home
  • Articles
  • FAQ
Community
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. Evolution works in mysterious ways

Evolution works in mysterious ways

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
htmlcomannouncement
286 Posts 22 Posters 27.7k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • P Paul Watson

    Matthew Faithfull wrote:

    How can there be any contradiction between the two as the Bible is the source for everything the non-believer can know about Jesus.

    Actually there are writings of Jesus outside of the Bible. Some suppressed by the Church, others part of the histories of other nations and peoples who came into contact with Jesus. The Romans obviously also wrote of him.

    Matthew Faithfull wrote:

    As far as I know modern day truth is exactly the same as it always been? Did someone rewire the universe while I was on lunch?

    Apologies, I wrote poorly. I meant that some people believe the Bible to be literally true but they claim it only pertains to the life and times in which the events happened. e.g. pork being an unclean food is patently untrue in this day and age but was true back in ancient times. Then you get people who think that everything written in the Bible holds as true today as when it was written. e.g. don't eat pork, ever.

    regards, Paul Watson Ireland & South Africa

    Fernando A. Gomez F. wrote:

    At least he achieved immortality for a few years.

    M Offline
    M Offline
    Matthew Faithfull
    wrote on last edited by
    #190

    Paul Watson wrote:

    Actually there are writings of Jesus outside of the Bible. Some suppressed by the Church

    There are no credible 1st century writings suppressed even by the church and certainly not by the Church. There are a couple of laughable modern day islamic forgeries and some incidental scribblings of the non Christian Ethiopian Gnostics dated before 500 AD. Neither has any bearing on the person or works of Christ. I'm not aware of any Roman writing referencing Jesus specifically but Josephus, a Jew working for the Romans around AD 70 may well have referred to him and certainly referred to the Christians. His works are non religous historical accounts generally taken to be accurate if a little biased towards his paymasters and apparently contain nothing in contradiction to the Bible. Clearly some people claim the Bible to be literally true but don't understand it. Jesus was clear that he had come to fulfill the Old Testament law, to complete its purpose and render it thereby obselete. Love the Lord your God with all your heart and love your neighbour as yourself. This contains the whole law, everything else is an expansion and application of it. The Old Testament law did not become wrong it is merely superceeded. Those whose understanding of this is so limited they cannot eat Pork with a clean concience should not eat it and those that can may do so except where it would cause distress or temptation to those who cannot.

    "The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage." Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • M Matthew Faithfull

      No, not a god but the one and only true and living God who is no fantasy. Isn't it fortunate for you that despite your unbelief he believes in you. After all you might have a problem with your continued existence otherwise :laugh:

      "The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage." Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)

      R Offline
      R Offline
      R Giskard Reventlov
      wrote on last edited by
      #191

      So you are delusional: quick lock him up: he's a godbot. I'm happy (in a strange, magnanimous kind of way) that you believe the voices in your head but, and trust me on this, there is no god, no afterlife, no nothing. You die, you're dead, that's it. Nice god, btw, that allowed 100,000 innocents to die in Burma. Bet that gives you a warm glow at night.

      me, me, me

      M 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • O Oakman

        Matthew Faithfull wrote:

        I did not. Quote away, but read first to avoid embarassment.

        Better yet, I'll quote in full: "Even you could pick the consistent from the inconsistent, or perhaps not. I have had the privellege of good teaching over the years from some of the best pastors in the UK. I'm told told my current pastor has written around 100 books, most of them probably way over my head. I'd love to learn ancient Hebrew and Greek and Aramaic but I'm afraid languages are not my thing. What you understand when you read enough scripture is that it's overall theme is the nature and character of God. Now remeber this is the same God that I know so it's like reading about a good friend. Not difficult to spot any glaring errors." (Emphasis added)

        Matthew Faithfull wrote:

        Most of it more than 3 times and although I don't

        I didn't count any of the mosts or maybes or somewhats or scripture readings for the day. If you didn't sit down and read it straight through, then you didn't read it. Sermons are a great way to be lead astray. I am surprised at how oftem the bible is quote out of context by folks who should know better.

        Matthew Faithfull wrote:

        you clearly know better.

        Exactly. I do. I find the concept of a god who interferes with his own creation; or needs the worship of his creations; or who has any interest in the petty little rules that each denomination promulgates (they all have a thing about donations though - they are remarkably consistent about that) to the point of enforcing them with everlasting torment to be ludicrous. Something that is omnipotent and omniscient would not be bothered. If, on the other hand, there is a god like the one you believe in, then I, like Shaw's Don Juan, consider Hell to be a far more convivial place to spend eternity.

        Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

        M Offline
        M Offline
        Matthew Faithfull
        wrote on last edited by
        #192

        Oakman wrote:

        Not difficult to spot any glaring errors

        And as I've said I never spotted any. Quite sure I would have done if there were any though :)

        Oakman wrote:

        If you didn't sit down and read it straight through, then you didn't read it.

        Not strictly true.

        Oakman wrote:

        I find the concept of a god who

        You find your own small mean broken down concept of God distastefull. Well on that we can at least agree. God's concpet of God on the other hand well that will be stretching my mind to new horizons for eternity. :-D

        Oakman wrote:

        Something that is omnipotent and omniscient would not ...

        You see right at that point you fall flat on your face and spontaneously combust. You know less about what something omnipotent and omniscient would do than you do about canine dentistry in zero gravity, which is strange considering you've read all about exactly what someone omnipotent and omniscient has done and a great deal of why and how. Clearly you didn't get it which is truly, truly, sad. :((

        "The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage." Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)

        O 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M Matthew Faithfull

          Ilíon wrote:

          you personally have the double constraint that you yourself tend to embrace un-reason and anti-reason.

          Something you have thrice failed to evidence. The time is coming when I will have to call you on that.

          "The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage." Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)

          I Offline
          I Offline
          Ilion
          wrote on last edited by
          #193

          Call all you want: I've *seen* your general posts and so I *know* that you're little different in general approach from the pseudo-atheists and half-baked "Darwinists" you're having a spat with at the moment. That in this thread on this subject you've been trying to argue by the "rules" of logic and reason, and doing a fair job, is great! I commend you ... in this limited context. Clearly, you *can* reason reasonably. When you do it consistently, then you can think about "calling me on that" ... though, of course, at that hoped-for time, there will be no need to do that.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M Matthew Faithfull

            Oakman wrote:

            Back where I come from (said the Wizard to Dorothy) you had to be able to say ...in order to belong to the Church.

            No that was the church, getting into the Church is little more difficult.

            Oakman wrote:

            So Christ lied to Peter, eh?

            No

            Oakman wrote:

            They gladly took credit for anything that went right, but "Not me" was the one who did anything wrong.

            I suspect even your church taught individual responsibility before God.

            "The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage." Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)

            O Offline
            O Offline
            Oakman
            wrote on last edited by
            #194

            Matthew Faithfull wrote:

            No that was the church, getting into the Church is little more difficult.

            Problem is that everybody is in the Church - until some human comes along as says - oh no, he wasn't and she wasn't and they weren't either. God told me so. It always boils down to little men becoming big men by becoming God's mouthpiece.

            Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

            M 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • R R Giskard Reventlov

              So you are delusional: quick lock him up: he's a godbot. I'm happy (in a strange, magnanimous kind of way) that you believe the voices in your head but, and trust me on this, there is no god, no afterlife, no nothing. You die, you're dead, that's it. Nice god, btw, that allowed 100,000 innocents to die in Burma. Bet that gives you a warm glow at night.

              me, me, me

              M Offline
              M Offline
              Matthew Faithfull
              wrote on last edited by
              #195

              I'm a deal happier that I don't believe the voices in your head, talk about delusions, just declare 100,000 people you don't know to be innocent why don't you. 'Judge of all the Earth' err no, that title belongs to Jesus Christ, who earned it. I highly recommend you check your omnipotence, immortality, omnicience and general perfection before you start an argument with the almighty himself. Relying on his enormous patience while your time runs out on a guess that your immortal soul can be switched off like a light, seems like a bad strategy to me.

              "The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage." Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • M Matthew Faithfull

                Oakman wrote:

                Not difficult to spot any glaring errors

                And as I've said I never spotted any. Quite sure I would have done if there were any though :)

                Oakman wrote:

                If you didn't sit down and read it straight through, then you didn't read it.

                Not strictly true.

                Oakman wrote:

                I find the concept of a god who

                You find your own small mean broken down concept of God distastefull. Well on that we can at least agree. God's concpet of God on the other hand well that will be stretching my mind to new horizons for eternity. :-D

                Oakman wrote:

                Something that is omnipotent and omniscient would not ...

                You see right at that point you fall flat on your face and spontaneously combust. You know less about what something omnipotent and omniscient would do than you do about canine dentistry in zero gravity, which is strange considering you've read all about exactly what someone omnipotent and omniscient has done and a great deal of why and how. Clearly you didn't get it which is truly, truly, sad. :((

                "The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage." Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)

                O Offline
                O Offline
                Oakman
                wrote on last edited by
                #196

                Matthew Faithfull wrote:

                And as I've said I never spotted any.

                But that's because you have only read one version, by your own admission. Try the Vulgate on for size.

                Matthew Faithfull wrote:

                God's concpet of God on the other hand well that will be stretching my mind to new horizons for eternity.

                I guess that's the problem. The more I understand about your concept of god, the more distasteful I find it. As for any assurance that it is God's concept, I am afraid i regard that as another case of a small man hoping to convince everyone that he's a great man because he speaks for god.

                Matthew Faithfull wrote:

                You know less about what something omnipotent and omniscient would do than you do about canine dentistry in zero gravity

                You forget that I am an official preacher. ;P Whatever else, you cannot suggest that I know nothing about what I speak of. You, on the other hand, are a rank amateur, holding up your guesses as if they were Holy Writ.

                Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                M 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • O Oakman

                  Matthew Faithfull wrote:

                  No that was the church, getting into the Church is little more difficult.

                  Problem is that everybody is in the Church - until some human comes along as says - oh no, he wasn't and she wasn't and they weren't either. God told me so. It always boils down to little men becoming big men by becoming God's mouthpiece.

                  Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                  M Offline
                  M Offline
                  Matthew Faithfull
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #197

                  Oakman wrote:

                  Problem is that everybody is in the Church

                  Not quite, everybody is generally presumed to be in the Church because it not up to us either to determine or to know who is and who isn't. That is the preserve of God who does not generally hand out lists of those who are and aren't to men small or large. Anyone claiming he has done so is highly suspect. The danger comes when this occurs in a weak church without enough discernment to understand what's going on. This is not the norm or the general case. I guess you've probably been through a church split or two and they're nearly always sad and traumatic. 'By their works you shall know them' and remember that He has promised to build his Church and the gates of Hell will not prevail against it. The Kingdom of heaven is forever and that forever can begin right now.

                  "The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage." Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • P Paul Watson

                    Matthew Faithfull wrote:

                    Irish Gealic word which was originally a rude name given to Viking invaders who steal our daughters

                    I live in Waterford, were the vikings landed in Ireland. The locals call the vikings grandad and grandma here ;)

                    Matthew Faithfull wrote:

                    only one family in the entire world

                    That is amazing. I wonder how many other "unique" surnames there are in the world. Mine is common enough. Though if I tried to pronounce Heher I'd probably insult your mother's side by referring to a young, female cow.

                    regards, Paul Watson Ireland & South Africa

                    Fernando A. Gomez F. wrote:

                    At least he achieved immortality for a few years.

                    V Offline
                    V Offline
                    Vikram A Punathambekar
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #198

                    Paul Watson wrote:

                    I wonder how many other "unique" surnames there are in the world.

                    Mine. Google it, and you will only ever come across two people - a distant uncle of mine, and, well, me. It's a corruption of a slightly more common name, Puntambekar. BTW, cows *are* female.

                    Cheers, Vikram.


                    The hands that help are holier than the lips that pray.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • O Oakman

                      Matthew Faithfull wrote:

                      And as I've said I never spotted any.

                      But that's because you have only read one version, by your own admission. Try the Vulgate on for size.

                      Matthew Faithfull wrote:

                      God's concpet of God on the other hand well that will be stretching my mind to new horizons for eternity.

                      I guess that's the problem. The more I understand about your concept of god, the more distasteful I find it. As for any assurance that it is God's concept, I am afraid i regard that as another case of a small man hoping to convince everyone that he's a great man because he speaks for god.

                      Matthew Faithfull wrote:

                      You know less about what something omnipotent and omniscient would do than you do about canine dentistry in zero gravity

                      You forget that I am an official preacher. ;P Whatever else, you cannot suggest that I know nothing about what I speak of. You, on the other hand, are a rank amateur, holding up your guesses as if they were Holy Writ.

                      Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                      M Offline
                      M Offline
                      Matthew Faithfull
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #199

                      Oakman wrote:

                      I guess that's the problem. The more I understand about your concept of god,

                      Take no notice of my concept of God, it is inadequate, as am I, to begin to describe what the almighty is like.

                      Oakman wrote:

                      Whatever else, you cannot suggest that I know nothing about what I speak of

                      Much the same was no doubt said by the Pharisees who knew their scriptures at least as well as you and understood them even less. Perhaps you can enlighten me from your store of knowledge. Who is it that the verses in John 1 1-18 are talking about. There is clearly John the Baptist and Moses gets a mention but who is this word he talks about?

                      "The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage." Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)

                      O 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • M Matthew Faithfull

                        Thomas George wrote:

                        True religious belief can only be personal, not organized.

                        Agreed. I do not agree with intelligent desing being taught as science because it is not falsifiable. Being taught as fact simply because it is I have no problem with. As to the rest I ask you this, 'with what falsehood would you challenge the ultimate truth'? When you look at it like that you see that there is no such things as a viable threat to the Church, only to the stumbling unbelief of the wavering masses who do not really believe but like to pretend that they are the same as those who do.

                        "The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage." Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)

                        L Offline
                        L Offline
                        Lost User
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #200

                        Matthew Faithfull wrote:

                        Being taught as fact simply because it is I have no problem with.

                        Intelligent Design is fact? How so?

                        M 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • L leckey 0

                          No, I prefer someone who is unbiased.

                          CP Offenders: Over 50 offenders and growing! Current rant: "Me thinks CP needs an application process!" http://craptasticnation.blogspot.com/[^]

                          L Offline
                          L Offline
                          Lost User
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #201

                          What has atheism got to do with bias?

                          L 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • M Matthew Faithfull

                            Like evolution but the other way around, species breaking up, loosing genetic information over time, becoming over adapted, over specialized to their environments, less flexible and more vulnerable to environmental change. Think of it as entroy applied to population genetics and you'll see that not only is it inevitable but it's obvious, accounts for all the genuine 'evidence' purported to demonstrate evolution, operates effectively over much shorter time scales and also absolutely rules out the evolution of higher organisms from lower ones.

                            "The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage." Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)

                            D Offline
                            D Offline
                            DemonPossessed
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #202

                            Matthew Faithfull wrote:

                            Like evolution but the other way around, species breaking up, loosing genetic information over time, becoming over adapted, over specialized to their environments, less flexible and more vulnerable to environmental change. Think of it as entroy applied to population genetics and you'll see that not only is it inevitable but it's obvious, accounts for all the genuine 'evidence' purported to demonstrate evolution, operates effectively over much shorter time scales and also absolutely rules out the evolution of higher organisms from lower ones.

                            If it is impossible for "higher" organisms to form from "lower" ones, then why is it that insects and bacteria can evolve resistance to pesticides and antibiotics in such a short time frame because of natural selection? Surely this added complexity could not arise through random mutations and natural selection. Is God sitting up in heaven magically using his Intelligent Design powers as we speak on bacteria and crop pests? If bacteria and insects can evolve changes that help them survive through mutations and natural selection in such a small timescale think what is possible over a timescale of hundreds of millions of years.

                            I'm a Christian: I *know* that I'm perverted. - Ilion

                            M 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • L Lost User

                              Matthew Faithfull wrote:

                              Being taught as fact simply because it is I have no problem with.

                              Intelligent Design is fact? How so?

                              M Offline
                              M Offline
                              Matthew Faithfull
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #203

                              The universe and everything in it is the creation of an intelligent God who designed it. The clear marks of his design are written all over it for any and every open eye to see, 'so that no one may have an excuse'. These are the facts of intelligent design, it is a basis for science not a product of it or a theory dervied by it. It is theology and philosophy and should be taught as such.

                              "The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage." Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)

                              L 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • D DemonPossessed

                                Matthew Faithfull wrote:

                                Like evolution but the other way around, species breaking up, loosing genetic information over time, becoming over adapted, over specialized to their environments, less flexible and more vulnerable to environmental change. Think of it as entroy applied to population genetics and you'll see that not only is it inevitable but it's obvious, accounts for all the genuine 'evidence' purported to demonstrate evolution, operates effectively over much shorter time scales and also absolutely rules out the evolution of higher organisms from lower ones.

                                If it is impossible for "higher" organisms to form from "lower" ones, then why is it that insects and bacteria can evolve resistance to pesticides and antibiotics in such a short time frame because of natural selection? Surely this added complexity could not arise through random mutations and natural selection. Is God sitting up in heaven magically using his Intelligent Design powers as we speak on bacteria and crop pests? If bacteria and insects can evolve changes that help them survive through mutations and natural selection in such a small timescale think what is possible over a timescale of hundreds of millions of years.

                                I'm a Christian: I *know* that I'm perverted. - Ilion

                                M Offline
                                M Offline
                                Matthew Faithfull
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #204

                                DemonPossessed wrote:

                                why is it that insects and bacteria can evolve resistance to pesticides and antibiotics in such a short time frame

                                They cannot, no evolution is involed as discussed elsewhere in this thread. They must contain wihtin them the necessary information to enable the resistance beforehand, there is no opportuinity to evolve it by any mechanism ever propoed as evolutionary. They'd all take too long apart from just plain not working. If your code doesn't contain a DrawLine Function that can handle differing screen resolutions you're not going to get one by waving a magnet over your hard disk, not even if you wave it for a million years over a billion hard disks simultaneously, even if you do throw away a random selection of those that don't work every now and again. :)

                                "The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage." Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)

                                D 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • M Matthew Faithfull

                                  Oakman wrote:

                                  I guess that's the problem. The more I understand about your concept of god,

                                  Take no notice of my concept of God, it is inadequate, as am I, to begin to describe what the almighty is like.

                                  Oakman wrote:

                                  Whatever else, you cannot suggest that I know nothing about what I speak of

                                  Much the same was no doubt said by the Pharisees who knew their scriptures at least as well as you and understood them even less. Perhaps you can enlighten me from your store of knowledge. Who is it that the verses in John 1 1-18 are talking about. There is clearly John the Baptist and Moses gets a mention but who is this word he talks about?

                                  "The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage." Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)

                                  O Offline
                                  O Offline
                                  Oakman
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #205

                                  Matthew Faithfull wrote:

                                  Take no notice of my concept of God, it is inadequate, as am I, to begin to describe what the almighty is like.

                                  'Twould be easier to ignore if you spent less bandwidth posting about it, end without end.

                                  Matthew Faithfull wrote:

                                  Much the same was no doubt said by the Pharisees who knew their scriptures at least as well as you

                                  They had less to study.

                                  Matthew Faithfull wrote:

                                  understood them even less

                                  You need to spend some time studying the history of Judea.

                                  Matthew Faithfull wrote:

                                  There is clearly John the Baptist and Moses gets a mention but who is this word he talks about?

                                  We really should refer to "Logos" which doesn't exactly mean "word" (Could that be an error???) but is what the Greek author of John used. This is, of course, the section of the New Testament that was used to place Yeshua as an equal the Yaweh. Yaweh was also identified with Logos and so we had the start of the triple-headed god.

                                  Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                                  M 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • M Matthew Faithfull

                                    The universe and everything in it is the creation of an intelligent God who designed it. The clear marks of his design are written all over it for any and every open eye to see, 'so that no one may have an excuse'. These are the facts of intelligent design, it is a basis for science not a product of it or a theory dervied by it. It is theology and philosophy and should be taught as such.

                                    "The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage." Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)

                                    L Offline
                                    L Offline
                                    Lost User
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #206

                                    It is called belief, not fact. Different people believe different things. You accept on faith that God created everything; another person may not accept it.

                                    Matthew Faithfull wrote:

                                    The clear marks of his design are written all over it for any and every open eye to see, 'so that no one may have an excuse'.

                                    Lots of people have a different opinion. All I have to say is this. You can believe in anything you want. You don't have the right to force it on anyone else. You force it on people, when you ask it to be taught as fact in schools. Teaching christian beliefs have an appropriate means -- Catechism, Sunday school, maybe a religious studies class in school. I hope you understand my point of view.

                                    M 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • M Matthew Faithfull

                                      DemonPossessed wrote:

                                      why is it that insects and bacteria can evolve resistance to pesticides and antibiotics in such a short time frame

                                      They cannot, no evolution is involed as discussed elsewhere in this thread. They must contain wihtin them the necessary information to enable the resistance beforehand, there is no opportuinity to evolve it by any mechanism ever propoed as evolutionary. They'd all take too long apart from just plain not working. If your code doesn't contain a DrawLine Function that can handle differing screen resolutions you're not going to get one by waving a magnet over your hard disk, not even if you wave it for a million years over a billion hard disks simultaneously, even if you do throw away a random selection of those that don't work every now and again. :)

                                      "The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage." Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)

                                      D Offline
                                      D Offline
                                      DemonPossessed
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #207

                                      Matthew Faithfull wrote:

                                      If your code doesn't contain a DrawLine Function that can handle differing screen resolutions you're not going to get one by waving a magnet over your hard disk, not even if you wave it for a million years over a billion hard disks simultaneously, even if you do throw away a random selection of those that don't work every now and again.

                                      This is a typical creationist error. And one of the most ridiculous misunderstandings of evolution. Evolution does not deal with impossibly improbable single step changes. It deals with cumulative small changes over an extremely long time frame. Extremely small random changes in the offspring of each generation, such as the ones in bacteria that give them resistance to antibiotics allow natural selection to "select" the best suited ones to survive and produce the next generation of offspring. And over an extremely long time scale, this produces big changes, but in a small time scale, it produces small changes.

                                      I'm a Christian: I *know* that I'm perverted. - Ilion

                                      M 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • O Oakman

                                        Matthew Faithfull wrote:

                                        Take no notice of my concept of God, it is inadequate, as am I, to begin to describe what the almighty is like.

                                        'Twould be easier to ignore if you spent less bandwidth posting about it, end without end.

                                        Matthew Faithfull wrote:

                                        Much the same was no doubt said by the Pharisees who knew their scriptures at least as well as you

                                        They had less to study.

                                        Matthew Faithfull wrote:

                                        understood them even less

                                        You need to spend some time studying the history of Judea.

                                        Matthew Faithfull wrote:

                                        There is clearly John the Baptist and Moses gets a mention but who is this word he talks about?

                                        We really should refer to "Logos" which doesn't exactly mean "word" (Could that be an error???) but is what the Greek author of John used. This is, of course, the section of the New Testament that was used to place Yeshua as an equal the Yaweh. Yaweh was also identified with Logos and so we had the start of the triple-headed god.

                                        Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                                        M Offline
                                        M Offline
                                        Matthew Faithfull
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #208

                                        So you agree that the Logos referred to is the Christ as verse 17 clearly implies. Now in order to then reject the divinity of Christ you must tear apart the entire new Testament, writing off all the bits you don't agree with, reattributing parts to different times and authors and coming up with complex justification for choosing far out interpretations in one place and orthodox ones in another where this choice seem entirely arbitrary. :sigh: Everyone form the Gnostics to the JW's to Steve Chalke has been there before. It all amounts to 'I don't like what the Bible says so I'll write my own'. Which in turn amounts to 'I know better than God', hardly original and its kind of obvious where that road leads. Just for fun why don't you tell me how you take apart ' I am the way, the truth and the life, no one comes to the father except by me' using 16 different translations, 3 language, 9.5 feet of rope and a fish hook to empty it of meaning and cast doubt on where the comma should go. I can't say I look forward to it fire away.

                                        "The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage." Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • L Lost User

                                          What has atheism got to do with bias?

                                          L Offline
                                          L Offline
                                          leckey 0
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #209

                                          All arguments I have heard against evolution end up revolving in a higher being and religion. So if I can find someone who does not believe in a higher being and they can disprove evolution, then I would consider hearing the argument.

                                          I have a blog for those with a sense of humor. The codeword is "scuttlebutt." http://craptasticnation.blogspot.com/[^]

                                          I 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups