Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
CODE PROJECT For Those Who Code
  • Home
  • Articles
  • FAQ
Community
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. Evolution works in mysterious ways

Evolution works in mysterious ways

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
htmlcomannouncement
286 Posts 22 Posters 27.7k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Matthew Faithfull

    Oakman wrote:

    Back where I come from (said the Wizard to Dorothy) you had to be able to say ...in order to belong to the Church.

    No that was the church, getting into the Church is little more difficult.

    Oakman wrote:

    So Christ lied to Peter, eh?

    No

    Oakman wrote:

    They gladly took credit for anything that went right, but "Not me" was the one who did anything wrong.

    I suspect even your church taught individual responsibility before God.

    "The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage." Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)

    O Offline
    O Offline
    Oakman
    wrote on last edited by
    #194

    Matthew Faithfull wrote:

    No that was the church, getting into the Church is little more difficult.

    Problem is that everybody is in the Church - until some human comes along as says - oh no, he wasn't and she wasn't and they weren't either. God told me so. It always boils down to little men becoming big men by becoming God's mouthpiece.

    Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • R R Giskard Reventlov

      So you are delusional: quick lock him up: he's a godbot. I'm happy (in a strange, magnanimous kind of way) that you believe the voices in your head but, and trust me on this, there is no god, no afterlife, no nothing. You die, you're dead, that's it. Nice god, btw, that allowed 100,000 innocents to die in Burma. Bet that gives you a warm glow at night.

      me, me, me

      M Offline
      M Offline
      Matthew Faithfull
      wrote on last edited by
      #195

      I'm a deal happier that I don't believe the voices in your head, talk about delusions, just declare 100,000 people you don't know to be innocent why don't you. 'Judge of all the Earth' err no, that title belongs to Jesus Christ, who earned it. I highly recommend you check your omnipotence, immortality, omnicience and general perfection before you start an argument with the almighty himself. Relying on his enormous patience while your time runs out on a guess that your immortal soul can be switched off like a light, seems like a bad strategy to me.

      "The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage." Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Matthew Faithfull

        Oakman wrote:

        Not difficult to spot any glaring errors

        And as I've said I never spotted any. Quite sure I would have done if there were any though :)

        Oakman wrote:

        If you didn't sit down and read it straight through, then you didn't read it.

        Not strictly true.

        Oakman wrote:

        I find the concept of a god who

        You find your own small mean broken down concept of God distastefull. Well on that we can at least agree. God's concpet of God on the other hand well that will be stretching my mind to new horizons for eternity. :-D

        Oakman wrote:

        Something that is omnipotent and omniscient would not ...

        You see right at that point you fall flat on your face and spontaneously combust. You know less about what something omnipotent and omniscient would do than you do about canine dentistry in zero gravity, which is strange considering you've read all about exactly what someone omnipotent and omniscient has done and a great deal of why and how. Clearly you didn't get it which is truly, truly, sad. :((

        "The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage." Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)

        O Offline
        O Offline
        Oakman
        wrote on last edited by
        #196

        Matthew Faithfull wrote:

        And as I've said I never spotted any.

        But that's because you have only read one version, by your own admission. Try the Vulgate on for size.

        Matthew Faithfull wrote:

        God's concpet of God on the other hand well that will be stretching my mind to new horizons for eternity.

        I guess that's the problem. The more I understand about your concept of god, the more distasteful I find it. As for any assurance that it is God's concept, I am afraid i regard that as another case of a small man hoping to convince everyone that he's a great man because he speaks for god.

        Matthew Faithfull wrote:

        You know less about what something omnipotent and omniscient would do than you do about canine dentistry in zero gravity

        You forget that I am an official preacher. ;P Whatever else, you cannot suggest that I know nothing about what I speak of. You, on the other hand, are a rank amateur, holding up your guesses as if they were Holy Writ.

        Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

        M 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • O Oakman

          Matthew Faithfull wrote:

          No that was the church, getting into the Church is little more difficult.

          Problem is that everybody is in the Church - until some human comes along as says - oh no, he wasn't and she wasn't and they weren't either. God told me so. It always boils down to little men becoming big men by becoming God's mouthpiece.

          Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

          M Offline
          M Offline
          Matthew Faithfull
          wrote on last edited by
          #197

          Oakman wrote:

          Problem is that everybody is in the Church

          Not quite, everybody is generally presumed to be in the Church because it not up to us either to determine or to know who is and who isn't. That is the preserve of God who does not generally hand out lists of those who are and aren't to men small or large. Anyone claiming he has done so is highly suspect. The danger comes when this occurs in a weak church without enough discernment to understand what's going on. This is not the norm or the general case. I guess you've probably been through a church split or two and they're nearly always sad and traumatic. 'By their works you shall know them' and remember that He has promised to build his Church and the gates of Hell will not prevail against it. The Kingdom of heaven is forever and that forever can begin right now.

          "The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage." Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • P Paul Watson

            Matthew Faithfull wrote:

            Irish Gealic word which was originally a rude name given to Viking invaders who steal our daughters

            I live in Waterford, were the vikings landed in Ireland. The locals call the vikings grandad and grandma here ;)

            Matthew Faithfull wrote:

            only one family in the entire world

            That is amazing. I wonder how many other "unique" surnames there are in the world. Mine is common enough. Though if I tried to pronounce Heher I'd probably insult your mother's side by referring to a young, female cow.

            regards, Paul Watson Ireland & South Africa

            Fernando A. Gomez F. wrote:

            At least he achieved immortality for a few years.

            V Offline
            V Offline
            Vikram A Punathambekar
            wrote on last edited by
            #198

            Paul Watson wrote:

            I wonder how many other "unique" surnames there are in the world.

            Mine. Google it, and you will only ever come across two people - a distant uncle of mine, and, well, me. It's a corruption of a slightly more common name, Puntambekar. BTW, cows *are* female.

            Cheers, Vikram.


            The hands that help are holier than the lips that pray.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • O Oakman

              Matthew Faithfull wrote:

              And as I've said I never spotted any.

              But that's because you have only read one version, by your own admission. Try the Vulgate on for size.

              Matthew Faithfull wrote:

              God's concpet of God on the other hand well that will be stretching my mind to new horizons for eternity.

              I guess that's the problem. The more I understand about your concept of god, the more distasteful I find it. As for any assurance that it is God's concept, I am afraid i regard that as another case of a small man hoping to convince everyone that he's a great man because he speaks for god.

              Matthew Faithfull wrote:

              You know less about what something omnipotent and omniscient would do than you do about canine dentistry in zero gravity

              You forget that I am an official preacher. ;P Whatever else, you cannot suggest that I know nothing about what I speak of. You, on the other hand, are a rank amateur, holding up your guesses as if they were Holy Writ.

              Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

              M Offline
              M Offline
              Matthew Faithfull
              wrote on last edited by
              #199

              Oakman wrote:

              I guess that's the problem. The more I understand about your concept of god,

              Take no notice of my concept of God, it is inadequate, as am I, to begin to describe what the almighty is like.

              Oakman wrote:

              Whatever else, you cannot suggest that I know nothing about what I speak of

              Much the same was no doubt said by the Pharisees who knew their scriptures at least as well as you and understood them even less. Perhaps you can enlighten me from your store of knowledge. Who is it that the verses in John 1 1-18 are talking about. There is clearly John the Baptist and Moses gets a mention but who is this word he talks about?

              "The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage." Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)

              O 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • M Matthew Faithfull

                Thomas George wrote:

                True religious belief can only be personal, not organized.

                Agreed. I do not agree with intelligent desing being taught as science because it is not falsifiable. Being taught as fact simply because it is I have no problem with. As to the rest I ask you this, 'with what falsehood would you challenge the ultimate truth'? When you look at it like that you see that there is no such things as a viable threat to the Church, only to the stumbling unbelief of the wavering masses who do not really believe but like to pretend that they are the same as those who do.

                "The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage." Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)

                L Offline
                L Offline
                Lost User
                wrote on last edited by
                #200

                Matthew Faithfull wrote:

                Being taught as fact simply because it is I have no problem with.

                Intelligent Design is fact? How so?

                M 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • L leckey 0

                  No, I prefer someone who is unbiased.

                  CP Offenders: Over 50 offenders and growing! Current rant: "Me thinks CP needs an application process!" http://craptasticnation.blogspot.com/[^]

                  L Offline
                  L Offline
                  Lost User
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #201

                  What has atheism got to do with bias?

                  L 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • M Matthew Faithfull

                    Like evolution but the other way around, species breaking up, loosing genetic information over time, becoming over adapted, over specialized to their environments, less flexible and more vulnerable to environmental change. Think of it as entroy applied to population genetics and you'll see that not only is it inevitable but it's obvious, accounts for all the genuine 'evidence' purported to demonstrate evolution, operates effectively over much shorter time scales and also absolutely rules out the evolution of higher organisms from lower ones.

                    "The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage." Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)

                    D Offline
                    D Offline
                    DemonPossessed
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #202

                    Matthew Faithfull wrote:

                    Like evolution but the other way around, species breaking up, loosing genetic information over time, becoming over adapted, over specialized to their environments, less flexible and more vulnerable to environmental change. Think of it as entroy applied to population genetics and you'll see that not only is it inevitable but it's obvious, accounts for all the genuine 'evidence' purported to demonstrate evolution, operates effectively over much shorter time scales and also absolutely rules out the evolution of higher organisms from lower ones.

                    If it is impossible for "higher" organisms to form from "lower" ones, then why is it that insects and bacteria can evolve resistance to pesticides and antibiotics in such a short time frame because of natural selection? Surely this added complexity could not arise through random mutations and natural selection. Is God sitting up in heaven magically using his Intelligent Design powers as we speak on bacteria and crop pests? If bacteria and insects can evolve changes that help them survive through mutations and natural selection in such a small timescale think what is possible over a timescale of hundreds of millions of years.

                    I'm a Christian: I *know* that I'm perverted. - Ilion

                    M 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • L Lost User

                      Matthew Faithfull wrote:

                      Being taught as fact simply because it is I have no problem with.

                      Intelligent Design is fact? How so?

                      M Offline
                      M Offline
                      Matthew Faithfull
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #203

                      The universe and everything in it is the creation of an intelligent God who designed it. The clear marks of his design are written all over it for any and every open eye to see, 'so that no one may have an excuse'. These are the facts of intelligent design, it is a basis for science not a product of it or a theory dervied by it. It is theology and philosophy and should be taught as such.

                      "The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage." Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)

                      L 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • D DemonPossessed

                        Matthew Faithfull wrote:

                        Like evolution but the other way around, species breaking up, loosing genetic information over time, becoming over adapted, over specialized to their environments, less flexible and more vulnerable to environmental change. Think of it as entroy applied to population genetics and you'll see that not only is it inevitable but it's obvious, accounts for all the genuine 'evidence' purported to demonstrate evolution, operates effectively over much shorter time scales and also absolutely rules out the evolution of higher organisms from lower ones.

                        If it is impossible for "higher" organisms to form from "lower" ones, then why is it that insects and bacteria can evolve resistance to pesticides and antibiotics in such a short time frame because of natural selection? Surely this added complexity could not arise through random mutations and natural selection. Is God sitting up in heaven magically using his Intelligent Design powers as we speak on bacteria and crop pests? If bacteria and insects can evolve changes that help them survive through mutations and natural selection in such a small timescale think what is possible over a timescale of hundreds of millions of years.

                        I'm a Christian: I *know* that I'm perverted. - Ilion

                        M Offline
                        M Offline
                        Matthew Faithfull
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #204

                        DemonPossessed wrote:

                        why is it that insects and bacteria can evolve resistance to pesticides and antibiotics in such a short time frame

                        They cannot, no evolution is involed as discussed elsewhere in this thread. They must contain wihtin them the necessary information to enable the resistance beforehand, there is no opportuinity to evolve it by any mechanism ever propoed as evolutionary. They'd all take too long apart from just plain not working. If your code doesn't contain a DrawLine Function that can handle differing screen resolutions you're not going to get one by waving a magnet over your hard disk, not even if you wave it for a million years over a billion hard disks simultaneously, even if you do throw away a random selection of those that don't work every now and again. :)

                        "The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage." Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)

                        D 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • M Matthew Faithfull

                          Oakman wrote:

                          I guess that's the problem. The more I understand about your concept of god,

                          Take no notice of my concept of God, it is inadequate, as am I, to begin to describe what the almighty is like.

                          Oakman wrote:

                          Whatever else, you cannot suggest that I know nothing about what I speak of

                          Much the same was no doubt said by the Pharisees who knew their scriptures at least as well as you and understood them even less. Perhaps you can enlighten me from your store of knowledge. Who is it that the verses in John 1 1-18 are talking about. There is clearly John the Baptist and Moses gets a mention but who is this word he talks about?

                          "The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage." Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)

                          O Offline
                          O Offline
                          Oakman
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #205

                          Matthew Faithfull wrote:

                          Take no notice of my concept of God, it is inadequate, as am I, to begin to describe what the almighty is like.

                          'Twould be easier to ignore if you spent less bandwidth posting about it, end without end.

                          Matthew Faithfull wrote:

                          Much the same was no doubt said by the Pharisees who knew their scriptures at least as well as you

                          They had less to study.

                          Matthew Faithfull wrote:

                          understood them even less

                          You need to spend some time studying the history of Judea.

                          Matthew Faithfull wrote:

                          There is clearly John the Baptist and Moses gets a mention but who is this word he talks about?

                          We really should refer to "Logos" which doesn't exactly mean "word" (Could that be an error???) but is what the Greek author of John used. This is, of course, the section of the New Testament that was used to place Yeshua as an equal the Yaweh. Yaweh was also identified with Logos and so we had the start of the triple-headed god.

                          Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                          M 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • M Matthew Faithfull

                            DemonPossessed wrote:

                            why is it that insects and bacteria can evolve resistance to pesticides and antibiotics in such a short time frame

                            They cannot, no evolution is involed as discussed elsewhere in this thread. They must contain wihtin them the necessary information to enable the resistance beforehand, there is no opportuinity to evolve it by any mechanism ever propoed as evolutionary. They'd all take too long apart from just plain not working. If your code doesn't contain a DrawLine Function that can handle differing screen resolutions you're not going to get one by waving a magnet over your hard disk, not even if you wave it for a million years over a billion hard disks simultaneously, even if you do throw away a random selection of those that don't work every now and again. :)

                            "The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage." Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)

                            D Offline
                            D Offline
                            DemonPossessed
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #206

                            Matthew Faithfull wrote:

                            If your code doesn't contain a DrawLine Function that can handle differing screen resolutions you're not going to get one by waving a magnet over your hard disk, not even if you wave it for a million years over a billion hard disks simultaneously, even if you do throw away a random selection of those that don't work every now and again.

                            This is a typical creationist error. And one of the most ridiculous misunderstandings of evolution. Evolution does not deal with impossibly improbable single step changes. It deals with cumulative small changes over an extremely long time frame. Extremely small random changes in the offspring of each generation, such as the ones in bacteria that give them resistance to antibiotics allow natural selection to "select" the best suited ones to survive and produce the next generation of offspring. And over an extremely long time scale, this produces big changes, but in a small time scale, it produces small changes.

                            I'm a Christian: I *know* that I'm perverted. - Ilion

                            M 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • M Matthew Faithfull

                              The universe and everything in it is the creation of an intelligent God who designed it. The clear marks of his design are written all over it for any and every open eye to see, 'so that no one may have an excuse'. These are the facts of intelligent design, it is a basis for science not a product of it or a theory dervied by it. It is theology and philosophy and should be taught as such.

                              "The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage." Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)

                              L Offline
                              L Offline
                              Lost User
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #207

                              It is called belief, not fact. Different people believe different things. You accept on faith that God created everything; another person may not accept it.

                              Matthew Faithfull wrote:

                              The clear marks of his design are written all over it for any and every open eye to see, 'so that no one may have an excuse'.

                              Lots of people have a different opinion. All I have to say is this. You can believe in anything you want. You don't have the right to force it on anyone else. You force it on people, when you ask it to be taught as fact in schools. Teaching christian beliefs have an appropriate means -- Catechism, Sunday school, maybe a religious studies class in school. I hope you understand my point of view.

                              M 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • O Oakman

                                Matthew Faithfull wrote:

                                Take no notice of my concept of God, it is inadequate, as am I, to begin to describe what the almighty is like.

                                'Twould be easier to ignore if you spent less bandwidth posting about it, end without end.

                                Matthew Faithfull wrote:

                                Much the same was no doubt said by the Pharisees who knew their scriptures at least as well as you

                                They had less to study.

                                Matthew Faithfull wrote:

                                understood them even less

                                You need to spend some time studying the history of Judea.

                                Matthew Faithfull wrote:

                                There is clearly John the Baptist and Moses gets a mention but who is this word he talks about?

                                We really should refer to "Logos" which doesn't exactly mean "word" (Could that be an error???) but is what the Greek author of John used. This is, of course, the section of the New Testament that was used to place Yeshua as an equal the Yaweh. Yaweh was also identified with Logos and so we had the start of the triple-headed god.

                                Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                                M Offline
                                M Offline
                                Matthew Faithfull
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #208

                                So you agree that the Logos referred to is the Christ as verse 17 clearly implies. Now in order to then reject the divinity of Christ you must tear apart the entire new Testament, writing off all the bits you don't agree with, reattributing parts to different times and authors and coming up with complex justification for choosing far out interpretations in one place and orthodox ones in another where this choice seem entirely arbitrary. :sigh: Everyone form the Gnostics to the JW's to Steve Chalke has been there before. It all amounts to 'I don't like what the Bible says so I'll write my own'. Which in turn amounts to 'I know better than God', hardly original and its kind of obvious where that road leads. Just for fun why don't you tell me how you take apart ' I am the way, the truth and the life, no one comes to the father except by me' using 16 different translations, 3 language, 9.5 feet of rope and a fish hook to empty it of meaning and cast doubt on where the comma should go. I can't say I look forward to it fire away.

                                "The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage." Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • L Lost User

                                  What has atheism got to do with bias?

                                  L Offline
                                  L Offline
                                  leckey 0
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #209

                                  All arguments I have heard against evolution end up revolving in a higher being and religion. So if I can find someone who does not believe in a higher being and they can disprove evolution, then I would consider hearing the argument.

                                  I have a blog for those with a sense of humor. The codeword is "scuttlebutt." http://craptasticnation.blogspot.com/[^]

                                  I 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • P Paul Watson

                                    What are you, 5? "Your mom" replies are for infants.

                                    regards, Paul Watson Ireland & South Africa

                                    Fernando A. Gomez F. wrote:

                                    At least he achieved immortality for a few years.

                                    E Offline
                                    E Offline
                                    eggsovereasy
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #210

                                    Your mom is an infant...

                                    P 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • O Oakman

                                      Al Beback wrote:

                                      Adam and Eve's children having incest is neat. But people's ability to be coerced into believing in magic tops them all.

                                      Al, Adam and Eve didn't have any daughters. :)

                                      Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                                      A Offline
                                      A Offline
                                      Al Beback
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #211

                                      Oakman wrote:

                                      Al, Adam and Eve didn't have any daughters.

                                      :omg: Does that mean Eve got busy with her own sons? (I don't care enough to look it up.)

                                      - Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is impotent. - Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. - Is he both able and willing? Whence then is evil? - Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God? Epicurus

                                      O 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • D DemonPossessed

                                        Matthew Faithfull wrote:

                                        If your code doesn't contain a DrawLine Function that can handle differing screen resolutions you're not going to get one by waving a magnet over your hard disk, not even if you wave it for a million years over a billion hard disks simultaneously, even if you do throw away a random selection of those that don't work every now and again.

                                        This is a typical creationist error. And one of the most ridiculous misunderstandings of evolution. Evolution does not deal with impossibly improbable single step changes. It deals with cumulative small changes over an extremely long time frame. Extremely small random changes in the offspring of each generation, such as the ones in bacteria that give them resistance to antibiotics allow natural selection to "select" the best suited ones to survive and produce the next generation of offspring. And over an extremely long time scale, this produces big changes, but in a small time scale, it produces small changes.

                                        I'm a Christian: I *know* that I'm perverted. - Ilion

                                        M Offline
                                        M Offline
                                        Matthew Faithfull
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #212

                                        That if I may say so is a typical pseduo scientific error. Firstly I am not a typical creationist, secondly I'm well aware of the how the theory of evolution is supposed to work i.e. not coming form a position of ignorance as you assume so no need to preach its tennets to me and thirdly as discussed elsewhere in this thread it's wrong. As in, does not work.

                                        "The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage." Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)

                                        D 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • M Matthew Faithfull

                                          Fisticuffs wrote:

                                          Point mutation - change of one nucleotide to another

                                          Can constitute information loss, has a high probability of disrupting any exisitng gene function.

                                          Fisticuffs wrote:

                                          Insertion - insertion of 1+ nucleotides

                                          Has a high probability of disrupting any exisiting gene function. This along with the above is the 'traditional' model of gene mutation driven evolution which has been shown to be inadequate to explain observation.

                                          Fisticuffs wrote:

                                          Deletion - removal of 1+ nucleotides

                                          Information loss, has a high probability of disrupting any exisitng gene function.

                                          Fisticuffs wrote:

                                          Translocation - a gene can be placed under the control of another promoter

                                          Information neutral. All necessary information gain must already have occured to form the potentially useful gene.

                                          Fisticuffs wrote:

                                          Inversion - can have weird and interesting effects, but does appear to occur regularly

                                          Information neutral over a population as nothing is added or removed, will be destructive or neutral in the majority of cases where a gene is functional.

                                          Fisticuffs wrote:

                                          Transformation/Conjugation

                                          Information neutral?

                                          Fisticuffs wrote:

                                          Infection/Transduction

                                          Do non destrcutive casses occur in nature? If so could they ever occur to any effect in a multi cellular organism. Not a lot of information increase there. Granted we probably have different concepts of information. None of the mechanisms you mention is capable of producing the observed species even given the unrealistic time frames usually quoted. You might also want to note that these are the ways we know of that a genome can change. Especially as you're going to need to find some new ones to hold on to your evolutionary delusion. :)

                                          "The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage." Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)

                                          P Offline
                                          P Offline
                                          Patrick Etc
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #213

                                          I don't understand why you don't just give up. You're the unarmed savage against a well-equipped, advanced Roman army. What is your professional training that might give you even the slightest bit of knowledge in the fields of chemistry and evolutionary biology? It's getting kind of pathetic watching this go on. You're talking about things you know absolutely nothing about, against someone who does this for a living and has extensive education on the subject. First year biology students know more about this subject than you are demonstrating. You believe all sorts of things about how genes behave, except all of them are demonstrably false by repeated proven experiment. Really, this is getting pathetic.


                                          It has become appallingly obvious that our technology has exceeded our humanity. - Albert Einstein

                                          M 7 2 Replies Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups